|
Tournoi du 14-12-15
1 69,44 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 58,52 1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
3 57,04 8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges
4 55,37 9 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 53,15 10 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy
6 50,37 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
7 47,96 11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
8 45,74 5 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane
9 39,44 7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON
10 37,22 4 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
11 35,74 3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,48 16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
2 55,00 21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 54,63 20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
4 52,41 12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
~ 52,41 18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
6 50,37 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
7 49,63 14 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude
8 47,59 15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
9 45,37 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 44,44 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
11 36,67 22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
PAIRE Nr : 1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,41 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 10 55.56
2 NS 3TcN = 670 18 100.00
3 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,67 % 4 NS 3S E-2 200 14 77.78
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00
6 NS 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 % 7 NS 2S W-1 100 8 44.44
8 NS 2P S+1 140 8 44.44
9 NS 1S S+2 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,63 %10 NS 3K E-4 400 14 77.78
11 NS 3C S-1 -50 10 55.56
12 NS 4C E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,44 %13 NS 2S E = -120 9 50.00
14 NS 4C W-1 50 11 61.11
15 NS 5TcW-3 500 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 52,41 %16 NS 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 16.67
18 NS 2P E+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %19 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
20 NS 4C N+2 680 17 94.44
21 NS 4K S = 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,48 %22 NS 1S E-2 200 16 88.89
23 NS 3C E-1 100 10 55.56
24 NS 2C N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %25 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 16.67
26 NS 1K S+2 110 9 50.00
27 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 49,63 %28 NS 5T N = 600 18 100.00
29 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 44.44
30 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 316,0 / 540 = 58,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,37 % 4 NS 4K E-1 100 9 50.00
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00
6 NS 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,41 % 7 NS 4C E-2 200 15 83.33
8 NS 2P W-4 200 16 88.89
9 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,67 %10 NS 4C E-5 500 18 100.00
11 NS 3C S-1 -50 10 55.56
12 NS 3P E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %13 NS 2C N-1 -100 13 72.22
14 NS 4C W-1 50 11 61.11
15 NS 4C N = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,63 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 15 83.33
17 NS 3K W+2 -150 11 61.11
18 NS 4P E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,44 %19 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56
20 NS 4PcE-2 500 6 33.33
21 NS 4PcW-3 500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 52,41 %22 NS 2K E-4 400 18 100.00
23 NS 3CcE-1 200 15 83.33
24 NS 3K N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %25 NS 4C E-1 100 18 100.00
26 NS 3P S = 140 17 94.44
27 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,48 %28 NS 4T N+1 150 12 66.67
29 NS 3C N-1 -100 12 66.67
30 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %31 NS 2C N = 110 6 33.33
32 NS 2T N+2 130 18 100.00
33 NS 1S E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 375,0 / 540 = 69,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,48 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 10 55.56
2 NS 3T N = 110 10 55.56
3 NS 2C W = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
14 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 49,63 % 7 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
8 NS 3P N = 140 8 44.44
9 NS 2T S = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,37 %10 NS 3K E = -110 0 0.00
11 NS 2C N-2 -100 4 22.22
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,41 %13 NS 3CcN-3 -800 0 0.00
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 33.33
15 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,67 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 15 83.33
17 NS 4P E-1 50 17 94.44
18 NS 2P E+2 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %19 NS 1S N = 90 3 16.67
20 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 2C S-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,63 %22 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00
23 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 5.56
24 NS 4KcN-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 1,85 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,44 %25 NS 3PcS-2 -300 9 50.00
26 NS 2P S = 110 9 50.00
27 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 52,41 %28 NS 2S N+2 180 16 88.89
29 NS 2P E+3 -200 4 22.22
30 NS 2PcS-2 -300 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 10 55.56
32 NS 2K N = 90 10 55.56
33 NS 1K E+1 -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 193,0 / 540 = 35,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 52,41 % 1 NS 3S W+2 -460 0 0.00
2 NS 4K W-2 100 7 38.89
3 NS 3C E = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 % 4 NS 3S E-2 200 14 77.78
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00
6 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %10 NS 2K E = -90 2 11.11
11 NS 3P E-3 150 18 100.00
12 NS 1KcW+1 -240 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
14 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 49,63 %13 NS 2C N-1 -100 13 72.22
14 NS 3S E-1 50 11 61.11
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,37 %16 NS 1C S+1 110 4 22.22
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 16.67
18 NS 4P W = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,41 %19 NS 1S N = 90 3 16.67
20 NS 4P W-2 200 3 16.67
21 NS 3K S+1 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,67 %22 NS 2T W-1 100 6 33.33
23 NS 3S S-3 -300 1 5.56
24 NS 3K N+1 130 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %25 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 16.67
26 NS 1K S+2 110 9 50.00
27 NS 1S W = -90 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,63 %28 NS 4C S-2 -200 2 11.11
29 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 44.44
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,44 %31 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 2C W-1 100 14 77.78
33 NS 3K E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 201,0 / 540 = 37,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,63 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 10 55.56
2 NS 4T N-1 -100 0 0.00
3 NS 2C W-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,44 % 4 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33
5 NS 4PcS = 790 18 100.00
6 NS 5KcW-2 500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 52,41 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 8 44.44
8 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
9 NS 3T S = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,48 %13 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
14 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00
15 NS 4C N-2 -200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %16 NS 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 16.67
18 NS 4P E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 49,63 %19 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
20 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 4K S+1 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,37 %22 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56
23 NS 2S S-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 2P S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,41 %25 NS 4P S-3 -150 12 66.67
26 NS 1K S+3 130 14 77.78
27 NS 1S W = -90 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,67 %28 NS 3C S-1 -100 6 33.33
29 NS 4P E = -620 2 11.11
30 NS 4C W-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 3 16.67
32 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 5.56
33 NS 3T N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,67 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 10 55.56
2 NS 5K W-3 150 13 72.22
3 NS 2C E-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 % 4 NS 1S W+1 -120 2 11.11
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00
6 NS 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,63 % 7 NS 4P E = -620 3 16.67
8 NS 2P S+1 140 8 44.44
9 NS 3T S = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,44 %10 NS 4C E-2 200 7 38.89
11 NS 5TcE-1 100 15 83.33
12 NS 2T N-2 -200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %16 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 11.11
17 NS 2S W-1 50 17 94.44
18 NS 4P E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,48 %19 NS 1S N+2 150 17 94.44
20 NS 4C N-1 -100 0 0.00
21 NS 4K S+1 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %22 NS 2S N = 120 12 66.67
23 NS 4CcE-2 500 18 100.00
24 NS 1S E+2 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
14 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 49,63 %25 NS 3C E = -140 14 77.78
26 NS 1K S+1 90 4 22.22
27 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,37 %28 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56
29 NS 4P E-1 100 14 77.78
30 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,41 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 10 55.56
32 NS 2C E-1 100 14 77.78
33 NS 1K E = -70 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,37 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11
2 NS 3K W-1 50 3 16.67
3 NS 3C E-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,41 % 4 NS 3P S-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00
6 NS 3P S+1 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,67 % 7 NS 4P W-2 200 15 83.33
8 NS 2P S = 110 2 11.11
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %10 NS 4C E-4 400 14 77.78
11 NS 4KcN-2 -300 0 0.00
12 NS 2T N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,63 %13 NS 3S E-2 200 16 88.89
14 NS 3C W-3 150 18 100.00
15 NS 3C S+1 170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 52,41 %19 NS 2S N-1 -50 0 0.00
20 NS 4C N = 620 8 44.44
21 NS 5K S-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %22 NS 2C S+1 140 14 77.78
23 NS 3S S-2 -200 4 22.22
24 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,48 %25 NS 4PcS-2 -300 9 50.00
26 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 5.56
27 NS 1S W+2 -150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %28 NS 5T N-1 -100 6 33.33
29 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 44.44
30 NS 1S E = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
14 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 49,63 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 16 88.89
32 NS 2C W = -110 5 27.78
33 NS 1K E = -70 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 213,0 / 540 = 39,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 10 55.56
2 NS 3K W-2 100 7 38.89
3 NS 2TcN = 180 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
14 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 49,63 % 4 NS 3S E-3 300 18 100.00
5 NS 3P S = 140 16 88.89
6 NS 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,37 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 8 44.44
8 NS 4P N = 420 18 100.00
9 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,41 %10 NS 3C E-3 300 10 55.56
11 NS 4C N-2 -100 4 22.22
12 NS 2K W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,67 %13 NS 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00
14 NS 3S E-1 50 11 61.11
15 NS 4C N+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 15 83.33
17 NS 4K W = -130 14 77.78
18 NS 4P E = -420 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,44 %22 NS 2P W-1 100 6 33.33
23 NS 3TcE-1 200 15 83.33
24 NS 3K N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 52,41 %25 NS 4C E = -620 6 33.33
26 NS 3S N-2 -200 1 5.56
27 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %28 NS 3C S+1 170 14 77.78
29 NS 4P E-2 200 17 94.44
30 NS 3C E = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,48 %31 NS 4P N-1 -100 3 16.67
32 NS 2C E = -110 5 27.78
33 NS 1K E+2 -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 308,0 / 540 = 57,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 10 55.56
2 NS 3S W-3 150 13 72.22
3 NS 5S E-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,48 % 4 NS 3K E = -110 4 22.22
5 NS 5P S-2 -200 1 5.56
6 NS 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 % 7 NS 4P E-2 200 15 83.33
8 NS 3P S = 140 8 44.44
9 NS 3C E+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
14 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 49,63 %10 NS 3C E-2 200 7 38.89
11 NS 4C S-2 -100 4 22.22
12 NS 3K W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,37 %13 NS 2CcN = 670 18 100.00
14 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 11.11
15 NS 4C N+2 680 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,41 %16 NS 6S N-3 -150 0 0.00
17 NS 3K W+2 -150 11 61.11
18 NS 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,67 %19 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
20 NS 4C N+2 680 17 94.44
21 NS 5K S = 600 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,63 %25 NS 5C E+1 -680 0 0.00
26 NS 2P S+1 140 17 94.44
27 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,44 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 6 33.33
29 NS 3S W-2 200 17 94.44
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 52,41 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 16 88.89
32 NS 2C E-1 100 14 77.78
33 NS 1K E = -70 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 299,0 / 540 = 55,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,44 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 10 55.56
2 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89
3 NS 4K W-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 52,41 % 4 NS 4KcE-1 200 14 77.78
5 NS 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00
6 NS 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 % 7 NS 4P W-2 200 15 83.33
8 NS 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
9 NS 3T S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,48 %10 NS 4C E-4 400 14 77.78
11 NS 5TcW-1 100 15 83.33
12 NS 2TcN-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %13 NS 2CcN-2 -500 4 22.22
14 NS 2C W-2 100 16 88.89
15 NS 4C N = 620 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 49,63 %16 NS 4C S+1 450 15 83.33
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44
18 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,37 %19 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
20 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67
21 NS 3S N = 600 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 52,41 %22 NS 2P W-1 100 6 33.33
23 NS 2S N+1 150 12 66.67
24 NS 3C S-3 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %28 NS 6T N-3 -300 0 0.00
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 0 0.00
30 NS 4C E-1 50 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,63 %31 NS 2C N+2 170 10 55.56
32 NS 1S E = -90 8 44.44
33 NS 3T N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 287,0 / 540 = 53,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 % 1 NS 3S W-2 100 18 100.00
2 NS 4K W-1 50 3 16.67
3 NS 2C E+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 54,63 % 4 NS 4K E-1 100 9 50.00
5 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 5.56
6 NS 4P S = 420 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 44,44 % 7 NS 4P W = -620 3 16.67
8 NS 3P S+1 170 14 77.78
9 NS 3T S = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 52,41 %10 NS 2P W-1 100 4 22.22
11 NS 3C S-1 -50 10 55.56
12 NS 3K W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 45,37 %13 NS 3C N-3 -300 6 33.33
14 NS 3PcN-1 -100 4 22.22
15 NS 4P N+1 650 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,48 %16 NS 3C S+1 170 6 33.33
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 16.67
18 NS 2P E+3 -200 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,59 %19 NS 1S N+2 150 17 94.44
20 NS 4PcE-1 200 3 16.67
21 NS 3K S+2 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
14 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude : 49,63 %22 NS 2K S = 90 2 11.11
23 NS 2S S-1 -100 7 38.89
24 NS 2C S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,37 %25 NS 4P S-2 -100 16 88.89
26 NS 3K S = 110 9 50.00
27 NS 1S W+1 -120 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 36,67 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 16 88.89
32 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 5.56
33 NS 1S E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 58,52 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 8 44.44
2 EO 3TcN = 670 0 0.00
3 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 39,44 % 4 EO 3P S-2 -200 18 100.00
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00
6 EO 3P S+1 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,44 % 7 EO 4C E-2 200 3 16.67
8 EO 2P W-4 200 2 11.11
9 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,04 %10 EO 3C E-3 300 8 44.44
11 EO 4C N-2 -100 14 77.78
12 EO 2K W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %13 EO 3CcN-3 -800 18 100.00
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 12 66.67
15 EO 3S S-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,37 %16 EO 6S N-3 -150 18 100.00
17 EO 3K W+2 -150 7 38.89
18 EO 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
4 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 37,22 %19 EO 1S N = 90 15 83.33
20 EO 4P W-2 200 15 83.33
21 EO 3K S+1 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
10 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 53,15 %22 EO 2P W-1 100 12 66.67
23 EO 2S N+1 150 6 33.33
24 EO 3C S-3 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,74 %25 EO 4P S-3 -150 6 33.33
26 EO 1K S+3 130 4 22.22
27 EO 1S W = -90 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,37 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 8 44.44
32 EO 2C E-1 100 4 22.22
33 EO 1K E = -70 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 39,44 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89
2 EO 3K W-1 50 15 83.33
3 EO 3C E-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,44 % 4 EO 4K E-1 100 9 50.00
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00
6 EO 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,04 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 10 55.56
8 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00
9 EO 3S N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %10 EO 3K E = -110 18 100.00
11 EO 2C N-2 -100 14 77.78
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,37 %13 EO 2CcN = 670 0 0.00
14 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 88.89
15 EO 4C N+2 680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
4 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 37,22 %16 EO 1C S+1 110 14 77.78
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 15 83.33
18 EO 4P W = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
10 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 53,15 %19 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
20 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 3S N = 600 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,74 %22 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44
23 EO 2S S-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 2P S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %25 EO 4P S-2 -100 2 11.11
26 EO 3K S = 110 9 50.00
27 EO 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,37 %28 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44
29 EO 4P E-1 100 4 22.22
30 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 LENAERTS Pol -PIROTTE Claude
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,04 % 4 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
5 EO 3P S = 140 2 11.11
6 EO 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 % 7 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 100.00
8 EO 3P N = 140 10 55.56
9 EO 2T S = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,37 %10 EO 3C E-2 200 11 61.11
11 EO 4C S-2 -100 14 77.78
12 EO 3K W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
4 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 37,22 %13 EO 2C N-1 -100 5 27.78
14 EO 3S E-1 50 7 38.89
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 53,15 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 3 16.67
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56
18 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,74 %19 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
20 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 4K S+1 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %22 EO 2K S = 90 16 88.89
23 EO 2S S-1 -100 11 61.11
24 EO 2C S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,37 %25 EO 3C E = -140 4 22.22
26 EO 1K S+1 90 14 77.78
27 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 58,52 %28 EO 5T N = 600 0 0.00
29 EO 2P E+2 -170 10 55.56
30 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 39,44 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 2 11.11
32 EO 2C W = -110 13 72.22
33 EO 1K E = -70 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,04 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 8 44.44
2 EO 3K W-2 100 11 61.11
3 EO 2TcN = 180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,37 % 7 EO 4P E-2 200 3 16.67
8 EO 3P S = 140 10 55.56
9 EO 3C E+1 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 37,22 %10 EO 2K E = -90 16 88.89
11 EO 3P E-3 150 0 0.00
12 EO 1KcW+1 -240 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
10 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 53,15 %13 EO 2CcN-2 -500 14 77.78
14 EO 2C W-2 100 2 11.11
15 EO 4C N = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,74 %16 EO 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 15 83.33
18 EO 4P E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %19 EO 1S N+2 150 1 5.56
20 EO 4PcE-1 200 15 83.33
21 EO 3K S+2 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,37 %22 EO 2S N = 120 6 33.33
23 EO 4CcE-2 500 0 0.00
24 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 58,52 %25 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 83.33
26 EO 1K S+2 110 9 50.00
27 EO 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 39,44 %28 EO 5T N-1 -100 12 66.67
29 EO 2P E+2 -170 10 55.56
30 EO 1S E = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,44 %31 EO 2C N = 110 12 66.67
32 EO 2T N+2 130 0 0.00
33 EO 1S E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 8 44.44
2 EO 3T N = 110 8 44.44
3 EO 2C W = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,37 % 4 EO 3K E = -110 14 77.78
5 EO 5P S-2 -200 17 94.44
6 EO 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
10 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 53,15 %10 EO 4C E-4 400 4 22.22
11 EO 5TcW-1 100 3 16.67
12 EO 2TcN-3 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,74 %13 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
14 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00
15 EO 4C N-2 -200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %16 EO 3C S+1 170 12 66.67
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 15 83.33
18 EO 2P E+3 -200 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,37 %19 EO 1S N+2 150 1 5.56
20 EO 4C N-1 -100 18 100.00
21 EO 4K S+1 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 58,52 %22 EO 1S E-2 200 2 11.11
23 EO 3C E-1 100 8 44.44
24 EO 2C N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 39,44 %25 EO 4PcS-2 -300 9 50.00
26 EO 3S S-2 -200 17 94.44
27 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,44 %28 EO 4T N+1 150 6 33.33
29 EO 3C N-1 -100 6 33.33
30 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,04 %31 EO 4P N-1 -100 15 83.33
32 EO 2C E = -110 13 72.22
33 EO 1K E+2 -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 332,0 / 540 = 61,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
9 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,37 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 8 44.44
2 EO 3S W-3 150 5 27.78
3 EO 5S E-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
4 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 37,22 % 4 EO 3S E-2 200 4 22.22
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00
6 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
10 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 53,15 % 7 EO 4P W-2 200 3 16.67
8 EO 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
9 EO 3T S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %13 EO 3C N-3 -300 12 66.67
14 EO 3PcN-1 -100 14 77.78
15 EO 4P N+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,37 %16 EO 4C S-1 -50 16 88.89
17 EO 2S W-1 50 1 5.56
18 EO 4P E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 58,52 %19 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
20 EO 4C N+2 680 1 5.56
21 EO 4K S = 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 39,44 %22 EO 2C S+1 140 4 22.22
23 EO 3S S-2 -200 14 77.78
24 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,44 %25 EO 4C E-1 100 0 0.00
26 EO 3P S = 140 1 5.56
27 EO 1S W+2 -150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,04 %28 EO 3C S+1 170 4 22.22
29 EO 4P E-2 200 1 5.56
30 EO 3C E = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 8 44.44
32 EO 2K N = 90 8 44.44
33 EO 1K E+1 -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
4 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 37,22 % 1 EO 3S W+2 -460 18 100.00
2 EO 4K W-2 100 11 61.11
3 EO 3C E = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
10 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 53,15 % 4 EO 4KcE-1 200 4 22.22
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00
6 EO 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,74 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 10 55.56
8 EO 4P N-1 -50 18 100.00
9 EO 3T S = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %10 EO 2P W-1 100 14 77.78
11 EO 3C S-1 -50 8 44.44
12 EO 3K W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 58,52 %16 EO 3S N+1 430 9 50.00
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 15 83.33
18 EO 2P E+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 39,44 %19 EO 2S N-1 -50 18 100.00
20 EO 4C N = 620 10 55.56
21 EO 5K S-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,44 %22 EO 2K E-4 400 0 0.00
23 EO 3CcE-1 200 3 16.67
24 EO 3K N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,04 %25 EO 4C E = -620 12 66.67
26 EO 3S N-2 -200 17 94.44
27 EO 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %28 EO 2S N+2 180 2 11.11
29 EO 2P E+3 -200 14 77.78
30 EO 2PcS-2 -300 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,37 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 2 11.11
32 EO 2C E-1 100 4 22.22
33 EO 1K E = -70 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
10 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 53,15 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 8 44.44
2 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11
3 EO 4K W-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,74 % 4 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67
5 EO 4PcS = 790 0 0.00
6 EO 5KcW-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 % 7 EO 4P W = -620 15 83.33
8 EO 3P S+1 170 4 22.22
9 EO 3T S = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,37 %10 EO 4C E-2 200 11 61.11
11 EO 5TcE-1 100 3 16.67
12 EO 2T N-2 -200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 58,52 %13 EO 2S E = -120 9 50.00
14 EO 4C W-1 50 7 38.89
15 EO 5TcW-3 500 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,44 %19 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44
20 EO 4PcE-2 500 12 66.67
21 EO 4PcW-3 500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,04 %22 EO 2P W-1 100 12 66.67
23 EO 3TcE-1 200 3 16.67
24 EO 3K N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %25 EO 3PcS-2 -300 9 50.00
26 EO 2P S = 110 9 50.00
27 EO 1S W+3 -180 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,37 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 12 66.67
29 EO 3S W-2 200 1 5.56
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 37,22 %31 EO 4C N-2 -200 18 100.00
32 EO 2C W-1 100 4 22.22
33 EO 3K E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 240,0 / 540 = 44,44 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
5 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,74 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 8 44.44
2 EO 4T N-1 -100 18 100.00
3 EO 2C W-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 % 4 EO 4K E-1 100 9 50.00
5 EO 4P S-2 -200 17 94.44
6 EO 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,37 % 7 EO 4P E = -620 15 83.33
8 EO 2P S+1 140 10 55.56
9 EO 3T S = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 58,52 %10 EO 3K E-4 400 4 22.22
11 EO 3C S-1 -50 8 44.44
12 EO 4C E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 39,44 %13 EO 3S E-2 200 2 11.11
14 EO 3C W-3 150 0 0.00
15 EO 3C S+1 170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,44 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 3 16.67
17 EO 3K W+2 -150 7 38.89
18 EO 4P E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %22 EO 2P W = -110 18 100.00
23 EO 3S S-3 -300 17 94.44
24 EO 4KcN-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 98,15 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,37 %25 EO 5C E+1 -680 18 100.00
26 EO 2P S+1 140 1 5.56
27 EO 1S W+1 -120 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
4 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 37,22 %28 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 88.89
29 EO 2P E+2 -170 10 55.56
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
10 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 53,15 %31 EO 2C N+2 170 8 44.44
32 EO 1S E = -90 10 55.56
33 EO 3T N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 295,0 / 540 = 54,63 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 % 1 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00
2 EO 4K W-1 50 15 83.33
3 EO 2C E+2 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,37 % 4 EO 1S W+1 -120 16 88.89
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00
6 EO 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 58,52 % 7 EO 2S W-1 100 10 55.56
8 EO 2P S+1 140 10 55.56
9 EO 1S S+2 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 39,44 %10 EO 4C E-4 400 4 22.22
11 EO 4KcN-2 -300 18 100.00
12 EO 2T N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,44 %13 EO 2C N-1 -100 5 27.78
14 EO 4C W-1 50 7 38.89
15 EO 4C N = 620 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,04 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 3 16.67
17 EO 4K W = -130 4 22.22
18 EO 4P E = -420 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %19 EO 1S N = 90 15 83.33
20 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33
21 EO 2C S-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 37,22 %25 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 83.33
26 EO 1K S+2 110 9 50.00
27 EO 1S W = -90 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
10 de WASSEIGE Charlotte -CASSART Guy : 53,15 %28 EO 6T N-3 -300 18 100.00
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 18 100.00
30 EO 4C E-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,74 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 15 83.33
32 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 94.44
33 EO 3T N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,37 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 8 44.44
2 EO 5K W-3 150 5 27.78
3 EO 2C E-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 58,52 % 4 EO 3S E-2 200 4 22.22
5 EO 4P S-1 -100 9 50.00
6 EO 4P S = 420 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON : 39,44 % 7 EO 4P W-2 200 3 16.67
8 EO 2P S = 110 16 88.89
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 69,44 %10 EO 4C E-5 500 0 0.00
11 EO 3C S-1 -50 8 44.44
12 EO 3P E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
8 MATELART Marc -BABIKOW Georges : 57,04 %13 EO 1S E+1 -120 9 50.00
14 EO 3S E-1 50 7 38.89
15 EO 4C N+1 650 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
3 ARICKX Roger -COLLET Claudine : 35,74 %16 EO 4C S+1 450 3 16.67
17 EO 4P E-1 50 1 5.56
18 EO 2P E+2 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
9 WILLEMS Jacques -de NICOLAS Bernard : 55,37 %19 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
20 EO 4C N+2 680 1 5.56
21 EO 5K S = 600 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
4 LEBRUN Robert -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 37,22 %22 EO 2T W-1 100 12 66.67
23 EO 3S S-3 -300 17 94.44
24 EO 3K N+1 130 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,74 %28 EO 3C S-1 -100 12 66.67
29 EO 4P E = -620 16 88.89
30 EO 4C W-1 50 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 47,96 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 2 11.11
32 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 94.44
33 EO 1S E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 198,0 / 540 = 36,67 %
|
|