|
Tournoi du 15-05-17
Lundi
1 62,22 A11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
2 58,15 A.4 CASSART Guy -BERGER Jean Marie
3 57,41 A.6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
4 55,19 A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
5 53,33 A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
6 49,26 A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
7 47,22 A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
8 46,30 A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
9 42,78 A.5 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette
10 40,37 A.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -PAQUET Anne
11 37,78 A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,96 a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc
2 60,56 a.2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 57,41 a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
4 52,22 a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
5 48,52 a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
6 48,33 a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
7 47,96 a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
8 45,93 a10 DOUETTE André -VAN DOOREN Michele
9 45,00 a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle
10 42,04 a.9 LAENENS René -COLLIN Jean-Marie
11 39,07 a.6 AUBRY Jean -ERPICUM Patrice
PAIRE Nr : A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,22 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78
2 NS 4C W = -420 6 33.33
3 NS 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,96 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
5 NS 3P S-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 1S S+1 120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a10 DOUETTE André -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,93 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 10 55.56
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 38.89
9 NS 3S S+1 430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.9 LAENENS René -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,04 %10 NS 2P E-1 100 12 66.67
11 NS 5K S+1 420 14 77.78
12 NS 3T S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 45,00 %13 NS 3S E-1 100 12 66.67
14 NS 3S E-2 100 17 94.44
15 NS 1S S+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,41 %16 NS 4C E+2 -680 0 0.00
17 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 2P S+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.6 AUBRY Jean -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,07 %19 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00
20 NS 4C S+1 650 14 77.78
21 NS 1C W+4 -200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 48,33 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11
23 NS 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
24 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 62,96 %25 NS 3T W = -110 8 44.44
26 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 33.33
27 NS 6S W+1 -1020 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %28 NS 6K W = -920 5 27.78
29 NS 3S N = 600 7 38.89
30 NS 2S E = -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 298,0 / 540 = 55,19 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,56 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
5 NS 4T E = -130 2 11.11
6 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,22 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 15 83.33
8 NS 5K E+1 -420 16 88.89
9 NS 3S S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,96 %10 NS 2S S-1 -100 5 27.78
11 NS 5KcS = 550 17 94.44
12 NS 3K N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a10 DOUETTE André -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,93 %13 NS 3P E-3 300 16 88.89
14 NS 3S E-1 50 11 61.11
15 NS 1S S+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.9 LAENENS René -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,04 %16 NS 3S W = -600 13 72.22
17 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 5P S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 45,00 %19 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33
20 NS 3S N = 600 3 16.67
21 NS 4P W+1 -450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,41 %22 NS 4C E-2 200 16 88.89
23 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00
24 NS 2C W = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.6 AUBRY Jean -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,07 %25 NS 3T W+1 -130 5 27.78
26 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
27 NS 6S W = -990 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 48,33 %28 NS 5K E = -400 14 77.78
29 NS 3S N = 600 7 38.89
30 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 62,96 %31 NS 3P N-2 -200 1 5.56
32 NS 3ScN-3 -500 2 11.11
33 NS 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 48,33 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 14 77.78
2 NS 4C E+1 -450 0 0.00
3 NS 4C N-3 -150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 15 83.33
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 38.89
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,56 %10 NS 2P E-1 100 12 66.67
11 NS 5KcS-1 -100 4 22.22
12 NS 3P E-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,22 %13 NS 1S W+1 -120 6 33.33
14 NS 4C W = -420 3 16.67
15 NS 1S S+1 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,96 %16 NS 3S W+1 -630 7 38.89
17 NS 4P E = -420 4 22.22
18 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 DOUETTE André -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,93 %19 NS Pass Passe 16 88.89
20 NS 4C S+1 650 14 77.78
21 NS 4C W = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.9 LAENENS René -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,04 %22 NS 4C E-2 200 16 88.89
23 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
24 NS 2C W = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 45,00 %25 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
27 NS 6S E+1 -1020 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,41 %28 NS 6K E-1 50 16 88.89
29 NS 4C S = 620 12 66.67
30 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.6 AUBRY Jean -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,07 %31 NS 3T W+1 -130 11 61.11
32 NS 2C E+2 -170 4 22.22
33 NS 4PcS-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 CASSART Guy -BERGER Jean Marie
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,41 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 14 77.78
2 NS 4C W = -420 6 33.33
3 NS 4C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.6 AUBRY Jean -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,07 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
5 NS 3T E-1 50 14 77.78
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 62,96 %10 NS 3T N-1 -100 5 27.78
11 NS 3C E-1 50 8 44.44
12 NS 3K N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %13 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
14 NS 4C E-1 50 11 61.11
15 NS 1S S+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,56 %16 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 16.67
17 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,22 %19 NS 2S W+1 -150 6 33.33
20 NS 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
21 NS 3C W+1 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,96 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11
23 NS 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
24 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a10 DOUETTE André -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,93 %25 NS 3K N+1 130 15 83.33
26 NS 4P E = -620 2 11.11
27 NS 3S E+4 -520 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.9 LAENENS René -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,04 %28 NS 3S W+2 -460 12 66.67
29 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
30 NS 3S W-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 45,00 %31 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89
32 NS 3K S+1 130 13 72.22
33 NS 3P S = 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 314,0 / 540 = 58,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette
a.9 LAENENS René -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,04 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 5 27.78
2 NS 4C E-2 100 18 100.00
3 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 45,00 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
5 NS 3T E = -110 4 22.22
6 NS 1S S = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,41 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 4 22.22
8 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 48,33 %13 NS 2S W = -120 6 33.33
14 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33
15 NS 1S S+2 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 62,96 %16 NS 3P E+2 -200 17 94.44
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 5.56
18 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %19 NS 1S W+2 -150 6 33.33
20 NS 4C S = 620 6 33.33
21 NS 4P E+1 -450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,56 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 2 11.11
23 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
24 NS 3T E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,22 %25 NS 3T W+2 -150 2 11.11
26 NS 4P E-1 100 16 88.89
27 NS 6S W+1 -1020 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,96 %28 NS 4S W+3 -520 10 55.56
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 11.11
30 NS 3S W-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 DOUETTE André -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,93 %31 NS 4T W+1 -150 6 33.33
32 NS 3T W-1 100 8 44.44
33 NS 4PcS-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 231,0 / 540 = 42,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,96 % 1 NS 4C E = -420 9 50.00
2 NS 4C W-1 50 15 83.33
3 NS 4C S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a10 DOUETTE André -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,93 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
5 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 38.89
6 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.9 LAENENS René -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,04 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 15 83.33
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 38.89
9 NS 4P N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 45,00 %10 NS 2P E-1 100 12 66.67
11 NS 4K N+2 170 12 66.67
12 NS 4C N = 620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.6 AUBRY Jean -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,07 %16 NS 3S W+1 -630 7 38.89
17 NS 4P E-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 48,33 %19 NS 1S E = -90 14 77.78
20 NS 4C N+1 650 14 77.78
21 NS 2P W+3 -200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 62,96 %22 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44
23 NS 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
24 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %25 NS 3K N+1 130 15 83.33
26 NS 4P E-1 100 16 88.89
27 NS 6T W+1 -940 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a.2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,56 %28 NS 6K W+1 -940 0 0.00
29 NS 3S N = 600 7 38.89
30 NS 3S W = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,22 %31 NS 4T W+1 -150 6 33.33
32 NS 4K S = 130 13 72.22
33 NS 4C W = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
a.2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,56 % 1 NS 6S W-3 150 18 100.00
2 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33
3 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,22 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
5 NS 3T E-1 50 14 77.78
6 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,96 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 4 22.22
8 NS 4P W+2 -480 2 11.11
9 NS 4P N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a10 DOUETTE André -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,93 %10 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
11 NS 5KcS = 550 17 94.44
12 NS 2K N+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.9 LAENENS René -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,04 %13 NS 3S W-3 300 16 88.89
14 NS 3S E-1 50 11 61.11
15 NS 2K W-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,41 %19 NS 1S E+2 -150 6 33.33
20 NS 3S N = 600 3 16.67
21 NS 4C W = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.6 AUBRY Jean -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,07 %22 NS 1P S = 80 12 66.67
23 NS 3S E = -600 4 22.22
24 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 48,33 %25 NS 4K S = 130 15 83.33
26 NS 3P E = -140 11 61.11
27 NS 6S E+1 -1020 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 62,96 %28 NS 6K E = -920 5 27.78
29 NS 3S N = 600 7 38.89
30 NS 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %31 NS 3PcN = 730 18 100.00
32 NS 3K S+1 130 13 72.22
33 NS 5T E = -400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 288,0 / 540 = 53,33 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 62,96 % 1 NS 4C W+1 -450 2 11.11
2 NS 4C E = -420 6 33.33
3 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
5 NS 3K E-1 50 14 77.78
6 NS 1S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,56 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 4 22.22
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 72.22
9 NS 3S S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,22 %10 NS 1S S+2 150 18 100.00
11 NS 3C E = -140 2 11.11
12 NS 2K N = 90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,96 %13 NS 2C W = -110 10 55.56
14 NS 4C W-1 50 11 61.11
15 NS 3S N-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a10 DOUETTE André -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,93 %16 NS 3S W = -600 13 72.22
17 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 45,00 %22 NS 3C E-2 200 16 88.89
23 NS 4P E-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 3C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,41 %25 NS 4T W = -130 5 27.78
26 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 33.33
27 NS 6S E+1 -1020 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 AUBRY Jean -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,07 %28 NS 3T E-4 200 18 100.00
29 NS 3S N+2 660 17 94.44
30 NS 3S E-2 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 48,33 %31 NS 5PcN-1 -200 1 5.56
32 NS 2CcE+2 -1070 0 0.00
33 NS 5C W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 255,0 / 540 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -PAQUET Anne
a.6 AUBRY Jean -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,07 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 14 77.78
2 NS 3C W+1 -170 12 66.67
3 NS 3P E+1 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 48,33 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 17 94.44
5 NS 2T E = -90 10 55.56
6 NS 1S N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 62,96 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 4 22.22
8 NS 4P W+1 -450 13 72.22
9 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %10 NS 2S S = 120 16 88.89
11 NS 5K N-1 -50 6 33.33
12 NS 2P E-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,56 %13 NS 2S W = -120 6 33.33
14 NS 2CcN-5 -1100 0 0.00
15 NS 1S S+1 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,22 %16 NS 4C E = -620 10 55.56
17 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,96 %19 NS 1S E+3 -180 0 0.00
20 NS 4C N+1 650 14 77.78
21 NS 4C W = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.9 LAENENS René -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,04 %25 NS 4T W-1 100 10 55.56
26 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 33.33
27 NS 7S E = -1520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 45,00 %28 NS 6K E = -920 5 27.78
29 NS 3S N+1 630 14 77.78
30 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,41 %31 NS 3T W+1 -130 11 61.11
32 NS 3K S+1 130 13 72.22
33 NS 5T E = -400 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 218,0 / 540 = 40,37 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 45,00 % 1 NS 3S W+3 -490 0 0.00
2 NS 4C E-1 50 15 83.33
3 NS 4C N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,41 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 17 94.44
5 NS 4P N-3 -300 0 0.00
6 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.6 AUBRY Jean -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,07 % 7 NS 4P N = 620 4 22.22
8 NS 5K E-1 50 18 100.00
9 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 48,33 %10 NS 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00
11 NS 5C E-2 100 10 55.56
12 NS 3P E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 62,96 %13 NS 2C W+1 -140 2 11.11
14 NS 4C E = -420 3 16.67
15 NS 1S S+1 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %16 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 16.67
17 NS 4P E-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 4P S = 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,56 %19 NS 1S W+2 -150 6 33.33
20 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 4P W = -420 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,22 %22 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44
23 NS 4P W-1 100 11 61.11
24 NS 2P S = 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a10 DOUETTE André -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,93 %28 NS 6K E = -920 5 27.78
29 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 3S W+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
a.9 LAENENS René -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,04 %31 NS 3S W-1 50 14 77.78
32 NS 4K S-1 -50 6 33.33
33 NS 4PcS-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 204,0 / 540 = 37,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
a10 DOUETTE André -VAN DOOREN Michele : 45,93 % 1 NS 4C E = -420 9 50.00
2 NS 4C W = -420 6 33.33
3 NS 4C N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 LAENENS René -COLLIN Jean-Marie : 42,04 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89
5 NS 5TcE-2 300 18 100.00
6 NS 3P W = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle : 45,00 % 7 NS 4P N+1 650 15 83.33
8 NS 3S E+2 -460 7 38.89
9 NS 3S S+1 430 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 57,41 %10 NS 2P E = -110 2 11.11
11 NS 4C E = -420 0 0.00
12 NS 2K N+2 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.6 AUBRY Jean -ERPICUM Patrice : 39,07 %13 NS 3S W-3 300 16 88.89
14 NS 4C W-2 100 17 94.44
15 NS 1S S+1 120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 48,33 %16 NS 2P E+3 -200 17 94.44
17 NS 4P E-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc : 62,96 %19 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67
20 NS 4C N+1 650 14 77.78
21 NS 2P W+3 -200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 48,52 %22 NS 2C E = -110 8 44.44
23 NS 2C E-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 3P N = 140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,56 %25 NS 3K N+1 130 15 83.33
26 NS 3P E-1 100 16 88.89
27 NS 6S E+1 -1020 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,96 %31 NS 3T W+2 -150 6 33.33
32 NS 4CcE-2 500 18 100.00
33 NS 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 336,0 / 540 = 62,22 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,19 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22
2 EO 4C W = -420 12 66.67
3 EO 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,33 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
5 EO 3T E-1 50 4 22.22
6 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,26 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 3 16.67
8 EO 5K E+1 -420 2 11.11
9 EO 3S S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %10 EO 1S S+2 150 0 0.00
11 EO 3C E = -140 16 88.89
12 EO 2K N = 90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,30 %13 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 66.67
14 EO 4C W = -420 15 83.33
15 EO 1S S+1 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -PAQUET Anne : 40,37 %16 EO 4C E = -620 8 44.44
17 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -BERGER Jean Marie : 58,15 %19 EO 2S W+1 -150 12 66.67
20 EO 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
21 EO 3C W+1 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,78 %22 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56
23 EO 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
24 EO 2P S = 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.5 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %25 EO 3T W+2 -150 16 88.89
26 EO 4P E-1 100 2 11.11
27 EO 6S W+1 -1020 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,41 %31 EO 4T W+1 -150 12 66.67
32 EO 4K S = 130 5 27.78
33 EO 4C W = -420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 282,0 / 540 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,33 % 1 EO 6S W-3 150 0 0.00
2 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67
3 EO 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,26 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
5 EO 4T E = -130 16 88.89
6 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 14 77.78
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 5 27.78
9 EO 3S S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,30 %10 EO 2P E-1 100 6 33.33
11 EO 5KcS-1 -100 14 77.78
12 EO 3P E-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -PAQUET Anne : 40,37 %13 EO 2S W = -120 12 66.67
14 EO 2CcN-5 -1100 18 100.00
15 EO 1S S+1 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -BERGER Jean Marie : 58,15 %16 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 83.33
17 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,78 %19 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 66.67
20 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
21 EO 4P W = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.5 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89
23 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
24 EO 3T E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 62,22 %25 EO 3K N+1 130 3 16.67
26 EO 3P E-1 100 2 11.11
27 EO 6S E+1 -1020 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,41 %28 EO 6K W+1 -940 18 100.00
29 EO 3S N = 600 11 61.11
30 EO 3S W = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 327,0 / 540 = 60,56 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
5 EO 3K E-1 50 4 22.22
6 EO 1S N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,30 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 3 16.67
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 61.11
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -PAQUET Anne : 40,37 %10 EO 2S S = 120 2 11.11
11 EO 5K N-1 -50 12 66.67
12 EO 2P E-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -BERGER Jean Marie : 58,15 %13 EO 4C W = -620 18 100.00
14 EO 4C E-1 50 7 38.89
15 EO 1S S+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,78 %16 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 83.33
17 EO 4P E-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.5 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %19 EO 1S W+2 -150 12 66.67
20 EO 4C S = 620 12 66.67
21 EO 4P E+1 -450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 62,22 %22 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56
23 EO 2C E-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 3P N = 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,41 %25 EO 3K N+1 130 3 16.67
26 EO 4P E-1 100 2 11.11
27 EO 6T W+1 -940 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,19 %28 EO 6K W = -920 13 72.22
29 EO 3S N = 600 11 61.11
30 EO 2S E = -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,33 %31 EO 3PcN = 730 0 0.00
32 EO 3K S+1 130 5 27.78
33 EO 5T E = -400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 262,0 / 540 = 48,52 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -MATELART Marc
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 % 1 EO 4C W+1 -450 16 88.89
2 EO 4C E = -420 12 66.67
3 EO 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -PAQUET Anne : 40,37 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 14 77.78
8 EO 4P W+1 -450 5 27.78
9 EO 3S S-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -BERGER Jean Marie : 58,15 %10 EO 3T N-1 -100 13 72.22
11 EO 3C E-1 50 10 55.56
12 EO 3K N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,78 %13 EO 2C W+1 -140 16 88.89
14 EO 4C E = -420 15 83.33
15 EO 1S S+1 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.5 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %16 EO 3P E+2 -200 1 5.56
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 94.44
18 EO 4P N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 62,22 %19 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33
20 EO 4C N+1 650 4 22.22
21 EO 2P W+3 -200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,41 %22 EO 2C E = -110 10 55.56
23 EO 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
24 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,19 %25 EO 3T W = -110 10 55.56
26 EO 3P E+1 -170 12 66.67
27 EO 6S W+1 -1020 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,33 %28 EO 6K E = -920 13 72.22
29 EO 3S N = 600 11 61.11
30 EO 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,26 %31 EO 3P N-2 -200 17 94.44
32 EO 3ScN-3 -500 16 88.89
33 EO 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 340,0 / 540 = 62,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,30 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 4 22.22
2 EO 4C E+1 -450 18 100.00
3 EO 4C N-3 -150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -PAQUET Anne : 40,37 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 1 5.56
5 EO 2T E = -90 8 44.44
6 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,78 %10 EO 2P E+2 -170 18 100.00
11 EO 5C E-2 100 8 44.44
12 EO 3P E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.5 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %13 EO 2S W = -120 12 66.67
14 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67
15 EO 1S S+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 62,22 %16 EO 2P E+3 -200 1 5.56
17 EO 4P E-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,41 %19 EO 1S E = -90 4 22.22
20 EO 4C N+1 650 4 22.22
21 EO 2P W+3 -200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,19 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89
23 EO 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
24 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,33 %25 EO 4K S = 130 3 16.67
26 EO 3P E = -140 7 38.89
27 EO 6S E+1 -1020 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,26 %28 EO 5K E = -400 4 22.22
29 EO 3S N = 600 11 61.11
30 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %31 EO 5PcN-1 -200 17 94.44
32 EO 2CcE+2 -1070 18 100.00
33 EO 5C W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 AUBRY Jean -ERPICUM Patrice
A.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -PAQUET Anne : 40,37 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 4 22.22
2 EO 3C W+1 -170 6 33.33
3 EO 3P E+1 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -BERGER Jean Marie : 58,15 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
5 EO 3T E-1 50 4 22.22
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,78 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 14 77.78
8 EO 5K E-1 50 0 0.00
9 EO 4P N-2 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 62,22 %13 EO 3S W-3 300 2 11.11
14 EO 4C W-2 100 1 5.56
15 EO 1S S+1 120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,41 %16 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 61.11
17 EO 4P E-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,19 %19 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
20 EO 4C S+1 650 4 22.22
21 EO 1C W+4 -200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,33 %22 EO 1P S = 80 6 33.33
23 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
24 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,26 %25 EO 3T W+1 -130 13 72.22
26 EO 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
27 EO 6S W = -990 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %28 EO 3T E-4 200 0 0.00
29 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
30 EO 3S E-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,30 %31 EO 3T W+1 -130 7 38.89
32 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 77.78
33 EO 4PcS-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 211,0 / 540 = 39,07 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
A.4 CASSART Guy -BERGER Jean Marie : 58,15 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 4 22.22
2 EO 4C W = -420 12 66.67
3 EO 4C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,78 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 1 5.56
5 EO 4P N-3 -300 18 100.00
6 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.5 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 14 77.78
8 EO 3S E+3 -490 18 100.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 62,22 %10 EO 2P E = -110 16 88.89
11 EO 4C E = -420 18 100.00
12 EO 2K N+2 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,19 %16 EO 4C E+2 -680 18 100.00
17 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 2P S+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,33 %19 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67
20 EO 3S N = 600 15 83.33
21 EO 4C W = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,26 %22 EO 4C E-2 200 2 11.11
23 EO 4P W = -620 18 100.00
24 EO 2C W = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %25 EO 4T W = -130 13 72.22
26 EO 3P E+1 -170 12 66.67
27 EO 6S E+1 -1020 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,30 %28 EO 6K E-1 50 2 11.11
29 EO 4C S = 620 6 33.33
30 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -PAQUET Anne : 40,37 %31 EO 3T W+1 -130 7 38.89
32 EO 3K S+1 130 5 27.78
33 EO 5T E = -400 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 PIETQUIN Joseph -VUYTS Michèle
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,78 % 1 EO 3S W+3 -490 18 100.00
2 EO 4C E-1 50 3 16.67
3 EO 4C N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.5 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
5 EO 3T E = -110 14 77.78
6 EO 1S S = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 62,22 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 3 16.67
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 61.11
9 EO 3S S+1 430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,41 %10 EO 2P E-1 100 6 33.33
11 EO 4K N+2 170 6 33.33
12 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,19 %13 EO 3S E-1 100 6 33.33
14 EO 3S E-2 100 1 5.56
15 EO 1S S+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,26 %19 EO 1S E+2 -150 12 66.67
20 EO 3S N = 600 15 83.33
21 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %22 EO 3C E-2 200 2 11.11
23 EO 4P E-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 3C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,30 %25 EO 1S E+3 -180 18 100.00
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
27 EO 6S E+1 -1020 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
A.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -PAQUET Anne : 40,37 %28 EO 6K E = -920 13 72.22
29 EO 3S N+1 630 4 22.22
30 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -BERGER Jean Marie : 58,15 %31 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11
32 EO 3K S+1 130 5 27.78
33 EO 3P S = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 LAENENS René -COLLIN Jean-Marie
A.5 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 13 72.22
2 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00
3 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 62,22 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
5 EO 5TcE-2 300 0 0.00
6 EO 3P W = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,41 % 7 EO 4P N+1 650 3 16.67
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 61.11
9 EO 4P N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,19 %10 EO 2P E-1 100 6 33.33
11 EO 5K S+1 420 4 22.22
12 EO 3T S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,33 %13 EO 3S W-3 300 2 11.11
14 EO 3S E-1 50 7 38.89
15 EO 2K W-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,26 %16 EO 3S W = -600 5 27.78
17 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 5P S-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,30 %22 EO 4C E-2 200 2 11.11
23 EO 3S E = -600 14 77.78
24 EO 2C W = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -PAQUET Anne : 40,37 %25 EO 4T W-1 100 8 44.44
26 EO 3P E+1 -170 12 66.67
27 EO 7S E = -1520 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -BERGER Jean Marie : 58,15 %28 EO 3S W+2 -460 6 33.33
29 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.56
30 EO 3S W-2 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,78 %31 EO 3S W-1 50 4 22.22
32 EO 4K S-1 -50 12 66.67
33 EO 4PcS-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 227,0 / 540 = 42,04 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 DOUETTE André -VAN DOOREN Michele
A11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 62,22 % 1 EO 4C E = -420 9 50.00
2 EO 4C W = -420 12 66.67
3 EO 4C N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,41 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
5 EO 4P N-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 1S N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,19 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 8 44.44
8 EO 3S E+2 -460 11 61.11
9 EO 3S S+1 430 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,33 %10 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
11 EO 5KcS = 550 1 5.56
12 EO 2K N+1 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,26 %13 EO 3P E-3 300 2 11.11
14 EO 3S E-1 50 7 38.89
15 EO 1S S+2 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %16 EO 3S W = -600 5 27.78
17 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,30 %19 EO Pass Passe 2 11.11
20 EO 4C S+1 650 4 22.22
21 EO 4C W = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -BERGER Jean Marie : 58,15 %25 EO 3K N+1 130 3 16.67
26 EO 4P E = -620 16 88.89
27 EO 3S E+4 -520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 37,78 %28 EO 6K E = -920 13 72.22
29 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 3S W+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
A.5 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %31 EO 4T W+1 -150 12 66.67
32 EO 3T W-1 100 10 55.56
33 EO 4PcS-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 248,0 / 540 = 45,93 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A.6 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,41 % 1 EO 4C E = -420 9 50.00
2 EO 4C W-1 50 3 16.67
3 EO 4C S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 55,19 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11
5 EO 3P S-1 -100 11 61.11
6 EO 1S S+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 53,33 % 7 EO 4P N = 620 14 77.78
8 EO 4P W+2 -480 16 88.89
9 EO 4P N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 49,26 %10 EO 2S S-1 -100 13 72.22
11 EO 5KcS = 550 1 5.56
12 EO 3K N = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 47,22 %13 EO 2C W = -110 8 44.44
14 EO 4C W-1 50 7 38.89
15 EO 3S N-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.3 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,30 %16 EO 3S W+1 -630 11 61.11
17 EO 4P E = -420 14 77.78
18 EO 4P S = 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -PAQUET Anne : 40,37 %19 EO 1S E+3 -180 18 100.00
20 EO 4C N+1 650 4 22.22
21 EO 4C W = -420 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -BERGER Jean Marie : 58,15 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 16 88.89
23 EO 4P W-1 100 7 38.89
24 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.5 POWIS Vinciane -GROSFILS Colette : 42,78 %28 EO 4S W+3 -520 8 44.44
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 88.89
30 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 62,22 %31 EO 3T W+2 -150 12 66.67
32 EO 4CcE-2 500 0 0.00
33 EO 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 259,0 / 540 = 47,96 %
|
|