|
Tournoi du 16-01-17
Lundi
1 58,70 A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 57,59 A.9 WILLEMS Jacques -COLLET Edgard
3 56,11 A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
4 50,74 A.2 HALLEUX Jean François -BRIOT Fernand
5 50,00 A.4 CASSART Guy -WANDERPEPEN Janine
6 48,89 A.7 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
~ 48,89 A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
8 48,33 A.1 COLOT Jacques -LEBRUN Robert
9 45,56 A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
10 43,52 A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
11 41,67 A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 69,07 a.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
2 57,96 a.1 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc
3 55,00 a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 50,37 a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
5 50,00 a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
~ 50,00 a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
7 47,78 a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
8 46,67 a.2 ARICKX Roger -PETERS Annik
9 46,30 a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule
10 45,19 a10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
11 31,67 a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
PAIRE Nr : A.1 COLOT Jacques -LEBRUN Robert
a.1 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 57,96 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 2 11.11
2 NS 2P W-4 200 8 44.44
3 NS 5K E = -600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 46,30 % 4 NS 3C S = 140 12 66.67
5 NS 3S S+2 660 16 88.89
6 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,19 % 7 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 55.56
8 NS 3T S-1 -50 5 27.78
9 NS 2S W+1 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %10 NS 3S E-3 300 15 83.33
11 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 NS 2C E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,78 %13 NS 2T E+1 -110 3 16.67
14 NS 5C S-2 -100 5 27.78
15 NS 3P E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 31,67 %16 NS 4PcN-3 -500 18 100.00
17 NS 4P W-3 150 18 100.00
18 NS 2S W-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 50,37 %19 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22
20 NS 4T S = 130 7 38.89
21 NS 4CcS = 790 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 69,07 %22 NS 2P N-1 -50 5 27.78
23 NS 3P E = -140 1 5.56
24 NS 2P S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %25 NS 1S N+3 180 4 22.22
26 NS 3S E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,00 %28 NS 4C N+3 710 10 55.56
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 16.67
30 NS 5P E = -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 HALLEUX Jean François -BRIOT Fernand
a.2 ARICKX Roger -PETERS Annik : 46,67 % 4 NS 3C S = 140 12 66.67
5 NS 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 NS 1S E+1 -120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.1 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 57,96 % 7 NS 3CcS-1 -200 2 11.11
8 NS 4T S-2 -100 0 0.00
9 NS 3P W+2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 46,30 %10 NS 2C E+2 -170 0 0.00
11 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 NS 3C E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,19 %13 NS 2T E-2 200 17 94.44
14 NS 5PcN-2 -300 0 0.00
15 NS 3P E = -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %16 NS 4C E+2 -680 8 44.44
17 NS 3S E-2 100 12 66.67
18 NS 3S W = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,78 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 10 55.56
20 NS 3T S+2 150 14 77.78
21 NS 3C S+2 200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 31,67 %22 NS 4P N-2 -100 1 5.56
23 NS 5T N = 600 18 100.00
24 NS 4C S = 420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 50,37 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 13 72.22
26 NS 6S E-4 400 18 100.00
27 NS 3S E+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 69,07 %28 NS 4C N+3 710 10 55.56
29 NS 4C E = -620 11 61.11
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %31 NS 3P E-4 200 18 100.00
32 NS 2P S-1 -50 9 50.00
33 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 274,0 / 540 = 50,74 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 69,07 % 1 NS 3K W-1 50 14 77.78
2 NS 4C N = 620 15 83.33
3 NS 3S E = -600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,00 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 10 55.56
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 5 27.78
9 NS 3T W+2 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.2 ARICKX Roger -PETERS Annik : 46,67 %10 NS 2T E-1 100 4 22.22
11 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 NS 3C E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.1 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 57,96 %13 NS 2T E-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22
15 NS 2P E = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 46,30 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 8 44.44
17 NS 2T E = -90 4 22.22
18 NS 4C E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,19 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89
20 NS 2C E-3 300 18 100.00
21 NS 3C S+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %22 NS 2P N+1 140 18 100.00
23 NS 2C S+1 140 9 50.00
24 NS 4P S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,78 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 13 72.22
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 31,67 %28 NS 4C N+3 710 10 55.56
29 NS 4C E-1 100 17 94.44
30 NS 5CcS-2 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 50,37 %31 NS 2P E-1 50 8 44.44
32 NS 5T S-1 -50 9 50.00
33 NS 3P N+2 200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 317,0 / 540 = 58,70 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 CASSART Guy -WANDERPEPEN Janine
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 31,67 % 1 NS 2K W = -90 9 50.00
2 NS 4C N = 620 15 83.33
3 NS 3P E-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 50,37 % 4 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 16.67
5 NS 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 NS 1S E+2 -150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %10 NS 5C W-3 300 15 83.33
11 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 NS 3C E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,00 %13 NS 2T E+1 -110 3 16.67
14 NS 5P N-2 -100 5 27.78
15 NS 2S W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.2 ARICKX Roger -PETERS Annik : 46,67 %16 NS 3S W = -600 16 88.89
17 NS 3P W-2 100 12 66.67
18 NS 2C E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.1 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 57,96 %19 NS 5K N = 400 4 22.22
20 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
21 NS 4C S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 46,30 %22 NS 2P N = 110 12 66.67
23 NS 2C S = 110 6 33.33
24 NS 2P S+2 170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,19 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 13 72.22
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 5.56
27 NS 3S W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %28 NS 4C N+3 710 10 55.56
29 NS 4C E = -620 11 61.11
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,78 %31 NS 4C N-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 5T S-2 -100 6 33.33
33 NS 2P N+3 200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 % 1 NS 3K W-1 50 14 77.78
2 NS 4C N = 620 15 83.33
3 NS 5K E = -600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,78 % 4 NS 2S N = 120 8 44.44
5 NS 2P N+3 200 0 0.00
6 NS 3K N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 31,67 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 10 55.56
8 NS 3C W-1 50 10 55.56
9 NS 2P W+3 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 69,07 %13 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
14 NS 4C S-2 -100 5 27.78
15 NS 3S E = -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %16 NS 4PcN-4 -800 0 0.00
17 NS 2P W-2 100 12 66.67
18 NS 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,00 %19 NS 3S N+1 430 10 55.56
20 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11
21 NS 3C S+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.2 ARICKX Roger -PETERS Annik : 46,67 %22 NS 3P N-1 -50 5 27.78
23 NS 4PcE-1 200 15 83.33
24 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.1 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 57,96 %25 NS 1S S+3 180 4 22.22
26 NS 3S W-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 46,30 %28 NS 4C N+3 710 10 55.56
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 16.67
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,19 %31 NS 2P E-1 50 8 44.44
32 NS 3CcE = -730 4 22.22
33 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 225,0 / 540 = 41,67 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 46,30 % 1 NS 2S N-2 -100 5 27.78
2 NS 4C N = 620 15 83.33
3 NS 5K E = -600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,19 % 4 NS 4C S-2 -200 3 16.67
5 NS 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 NS 2K N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 10 55.56
8 NS 2K S-1 -50 5 27.78
9 NS 3P W+2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,78 %10 NS 3S E-3 300 15 83.33
11 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 NS 4C E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 50,37 %16 NS 4C E+2 -680 8 44.44
17 NS 2S E-1 50 6 33.33
18 NS 4C E-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 69,07 %19 NS 3K N+2 150 0 0.00
20 NS 5TcS-2 -500 0 0.00
21 NS 4P E-3 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %22 NS 3PcN-1 -100 1 5.56
23 NS 3C S = 140 9 50.00
24 NS 2P S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,00 %25 NS 2S N+2 180 4 22.22
26 NS 3S W-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 ARICKX Roger -PETERS Annik : 46,67 %28 NS 2C N+5 260 0 0.00
29 NS 4C E = -620 11 61.11
30 NS 4P E = -420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.1 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 57,96 %31 NS 1P E = -80 3 16.67
32 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33
33 NS 2P N+3 200 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 235,0 / 540 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
a.2 ARICKX Roger -PETERS Annik : 46,67 % 1 NS 1S S-2 -100 5 27.78
2 NS 3C S+1 170 3 16.67
3 NS 3S W = -600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.1 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 57,96 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 18 100.00
5 NS 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 NS 2K N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 46,30 % 7 NS 2P W+1 -140 10 55.56
8 NS 1P S = 80 12 66.67
9 NS 3T W+1 -130 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,19 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
11 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 NS 4C E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %13 NS 2T E-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 4CcS-1 -100 5 27.78
15 NS 1P N-2 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 31,67 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 16 88.89
20 NS 3T S+1 130 7 38.89
21 NS 2P E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 50,37 %22 NS 2P N = 110 12 66.67
23 NS 3P E-1 100 4 22.22
24 NS 4P S = 420 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 69,07 %25 NS 2K S+2 130 0 0.00
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 1 5.56
27 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %28 NS 4C N+3 710 10 55.56
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 16.67
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,00 %31 NS 2P E-3 150 14 77.78
32 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33
33 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 % 1 NS 2K W = -90 9 50.00
2 NS 3C N+1 170 3 16.67
3 NS 3S W-2 200 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,00 % 4 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 16.67
5 NS 5P N = 650 8 44.44
6 NS 3K N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.2 ARICKX Roger -PETERS Annik : 46,67 % 7 NS 1PcW+2 -560 0 0.00
8 NS 2T S+1 110 17 94.44
9 NS 4T E+1 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.1 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 57,96 %10 NS 3S W-2 200 9 50.00
11 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 NS 3C E = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 46,30 %13 NS 1P E = -80 6 33.33
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22
15 NS 3P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,19 %16 NS 4C E+2 -680 8 44.44
17 NS 3P W-2 100 12 66.67
18 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,78 %22 NS 2P N = 110 12 66.67
23 NS 3P E = -140 1 5.56
24 NS 2P N+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 31,67 %25 NS 3S N+1 430 13 72.22
26 NS 3S E-1 100 13 72.22
27 NS 3S E = -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 50,37 %28 NS 4C N+2 680 2 11.11
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 3 16.67
30 NS 5CcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
a.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 69,07 %31 NS 2P E-1 50 8 44.44
32 NS 4CcE+1 -990 0 0.00
33 NS 4P N = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 WILLEMS Jacques -COLLET Edgard
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 50,37 % 1 NS 3K W-1 50 14 77.78
2 NS 3C S+1 170 3 16.67
3 NS 4P E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 69,07 % 4 NS 3C S = 140 12 66.67
5 NS 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 NS 3P E = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 10 55.56
8 NS 3T S-1 -50 5 27.78
9 NS 3T E+2 -150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,00 %10 NS 3S E-1 100 4 22.22
11 NS 2C N+2 170 9 50.00
12 NS 4C E-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.2 ARICKX Roger -PETERS Annik : 46,67 %13 NS 1S W-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22
15 NS 3P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.1 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 57,96 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 8 44.44
17 NS 3T E = -110 2 11.11
18 NS 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 46,30 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 10 55.56
20 NS 4P S-1 -100 4 22.22
21 NS 3C S+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %25 NS 3S S+1 430 13 72.22
26 NS 3S W+1 -630 6 33.33
27 NS 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,78 %28 NS 6C N+1 1460 18 100.00
29 NS 4C E = -620 11 61.11
30 NS 4P E = -420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 31,67 %31 NS 3P E-3 150 14 77.78
32 NS 1P S+1 110 15 83.33
33 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 311,0 / 540 = 57,59 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,78 % 1 NS 2S N-3 -150 0 0.00
2 NS 3C N+1 170 3 16.67
3 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 31,67 % 4 NS 3S N = 600 16 88.89
5 NS 4P N+1 650 8 44.44
6 NS 2K N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 50,37 % 7 NS 3P W = -140 10 55.56
8 NS 3C W-2 100 14 77.78
9 NS 3P W+2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 69,07 %10 NS 3S E-2 200 9 50.00
11 NS 2C N+2 170 9 50.00
12 NS 2C E = -110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %13 NS 1S W-1 100 11 61.11
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22
15 NS 4TcS-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,00 %16 NS 4C W+2 -680 8 44.44
17 NS 3P W-2 100 12 66.67
18 NS 3S W = -400 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.2 ARICKX Roger -PETERS Annik : 46,67 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 16 88.89
20 NS 4T S+1 150 14 77.78
21 NS 2C S+2 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.1 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc : 57,96 %22 NS 2P N = 110 12 66.67
23 NS 2C S+2 170 12 66.67
24 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,19 %28 NS 5C N+2 710 10 55.56
29 NS 4C E-1 100 17 94.44
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 %31 NS 1P E = -80 3 16.67
32 NS 4CcW = -790 2 11.11
33 NS 4P N+1 450 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 45,19 % 1 NS 2T S+1 110 18 100.00
2 NS 3S N = 600 10 55.56
3 NS 5K W = -600 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 50,00 % 4 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 16.67
5 NS 4P N+2 680 18 100.00
6 NS 2K N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 47,78 % 7 NS 3C N-1 -100 18 100.00
8 NS 2T S+1 110 17 94.44
9 NS 4T W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 98,15 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 31,67 %10 NS 3S E-3 300 15 83.33
11 NS 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 NS 4K S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 50,37 %13 NS 2S W-2 200 17 94.44
14 NS 5KcE-2 300 18 100.00
15 NS 3T N-2 -200 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 69,07 %16 NS 4C E+2 -680 8 44.44
17 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 55,00 %19 NS 3S N = 400 4 22.22
20 NS 4T S+1 150 14 77.78
21 NS 4P E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 50,00 %22 NS 2P N = 110 12 66.67
23 NS 4P E-2 200 15 83.33
24 NS 3CcW+1 -630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 ARICKX Roger -PETERS Annik : 46,67 %25 NS 3S S+1 430 13 72.22
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 6 33.33
27 NS 5S W = -460 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule : 46,30 %31 NS 3P E-3 150 14 77.78
32 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33
33 NS 4P N = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 de VIRON Baudouin -MATELART Marc
A.1 COLOT Jacques -LEBRUN Robert : 48,33 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 16 88.89
2 EO 2P W-4 200 10 55.56
3 EO 5K E = -600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.7 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,89 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 0 0.00
5 EO 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 EO 2K N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.2 HALLEUX Jean François -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 % 7 EO 3CcS-1 -200 16 88.89
8 EO 4T S-2 -100 18 100.00
9 EO 3P W+2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %10 EO 3S W-2 200 9 50.00
11 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 EO 3C E = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %13 EO 2T E-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78
15 EO 2P E = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.9 WILLEMS Jacques -COLLET Edgard : 57,59 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 10 55.56
17 EO 3T E = -110 16 88.89
18 EO 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 50,00 %19 EO 5K N = 400 14 77.78
20 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
21 EO 4C S-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,89 %22 EO 2P N = 110 6 33.33
23 EO 2C S+2 170 6 33.33
24 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 41,67 %25 EO 1S S+3 180 14 77.78
26 EO 3S W-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %31 EO 1P E = -80 15 83.33
32 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67
33 EO 2P N+3 200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 313,0 / 540 = 57,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 ARICKX Roger -PETERS Annik
A.7 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,89 % 1 EO 1S S-2 -100 13 72.22
2 EO 3C S+1 170 15 83.33
3 EO 3S W = -600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.2 HALLEUX Jean François -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 % 4 EO 3C S = 140 6 33.33
5 EO 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 % 7 EO 1PcW+2 -560 18 100.00
8 EO 2T S+1 110 1 5.56
9 EO 4T E+1 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %10 EO 2T E-1 100 14 77.78
11 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 EO 3C E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.9 WILLEMS Jacques -COLLET Edgard : 57,59 %13 EO 1S W-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78
15 EO 3P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 50,00 %16 EO 3S W = -600 2 11.11
17 EO 3P W-2 100 6 33.33
18 EO 2C E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,89 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11
20 EO 4T S+1 150 4 22.22
21 EO 2C S+2 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 41,67 %22 EO 3P N-1 -50 13 72.22
23 EO 4PcE-1 200 3 16.67
24 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,11 %25 EO 3S S+1 430 5 27.78
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 12 66.67
27 EO 5S W = -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %28 EO 2C N+5 260 18 100.00
29 EO 4C E = -620 7 38.89
30 EO 4P E = -420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 % 4 EO 3S N-2 -200 15 83.33
5 EO 5P N = 650 10 55.56
6 EO 3K N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 8 44.44
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 13 72.22
9 EO 3T W+2 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.9 WILLEMS Jacques -COLLET Edgard : 57,59 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
11 EO 2C N+2 170 9 50.00
12 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 50,00 %13 EO 2T E+1 -110 15 83.33
14 EO 5P N-2 -100 13 72.22
15 EO 2S W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,89 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 10 55.56
17 EO 3P W-2 100 6 33.33
18 EO 3S W = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 41,67 %19 EO 3S N+1 430 8 44.44
20 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89
21 EO 3C S+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,11 %22 EO 2P N = 110 6 33.33
23 EO 4P E-2 200 3 16.67
24 EO 3CcW+1 -630 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %25 EO 2S N+2 180 14 77.78
26 EO 3S W-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 COLOT Jacques -LEBRUN Robert : 48,33 %28 EO 4C N+3 710 8 44.44
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 83.33
30 EO 5P E = -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.7 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,89 %31 EO 2P E-3 150 4 22.22
32 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67
33 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 % 1 EO 2K W = -90 9 50.00
2 EO 3C N+1 170 15 83.33
3 EO 3S W-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.9 WILLEMS Jacques -COLLET Edgard : 57,59 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 8 44.44
8 EO 3T S-1 -50 13 72.22
9 EO 3T E+2 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 50,00 %10 EO 5C W-3 300 3 16.67
11 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 EO 3C E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,89 %13 EO 1S W-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78
15 EO 4TcS-3 -800 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 41,67 %16 EO 4PcN-4 -800 18 100.00
17 EO 2P W-2 100 6 33.33
18 EO 3S W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,11 %19 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78
20 EO 4T S+1 150 4 22.22
21 EO 4P E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %22 EO 3PcN-1 -100 17 94.44
23 EO 3C S = 140 9 50.00
24 EO 2P S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.1 COLOT Jacques -LEBRUN Robert : 48,33 %25 EO 1S N+3 180 14 77.78
26 EO 3S E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.7 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,89 %28 EO 4C N+3 710 8 44.44
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 83.33
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.2 HALLEUX Jean François -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %31 EO 3P E-4 200 0 0.00
32 EO 2P S-1 -50 9 50.00
33 EO 4P N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 % 1 EO 3K W-1 50 4 22.22
2 EO 4C N = 620 3 16.67
3 EO 3S E = -600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 WILLEMS Jacques -COLLET Edgard : 57,59 % 4 EO 3C S = 140 6 33.33
5 EO 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 EO 3P E = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,89 %10 EO 3S E-2 200 9 50.00
11 EO 2C N+2 170 9 50.00
12 EO 2C E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 41,67 %13 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 100.00
14 EO 4C S-2 -100 13 72.22
15 EO 3S E = -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,11 %16 EO 4C E+2 -680 10 55.56
17 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 100.00
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %19 EO 3K N+2 150 18 100.00
20 EO 5TcS-2 -500 18 100.00
21 EO 4P E-3 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
A.1 COLOT Jacques -LEBRUN Robert : 48,33 %22 EO 2P N-1 -50 13 72.22
23 EO 3P E = -140 17 94.44
24 EO 2P S = 110 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.7 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,89 %25 EO 2K S+2 130 18 100.00
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 17 94.44
27 EO 3S E+2 -460 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
A.2 HALLEUX Jean François -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %28 EO 4C N+3 710 8 44.44
29 EO 4C E = -620 7 38.89
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %31 EO 2P E-1 50 10 55.56
32 EO 4CcE+1 -990 18 100.00
33 EO 4P N = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 373,0 / 540 = 69,07 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
A.9 WILLEMS Jacques -COLLET Edgard : 57,59 % 1 EO 3K W-1 50 4 22.22
2 EO 3C S+1 170 15 83.33
3 EO 4P E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 50,00 % 4 EO 3S N-2 -200 15 83.33
5 EO 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 EO 1S E+2 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,89 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 8 44.44
8 EO 3C W-2 100 4 22.22
9 EO 3P W+2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,11 %13 EO 2S W-2 200 1 5.56
14 EO 5KcE-2 300 0 0.00
15 EO 3T N-2 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %16 EO 4C E+2 -680 10 55.56
17 EO 2S E-1 50 12 66.67
18 EO 4C E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.1 COLOT Jacques -LEBRUN Robert : 48,33 %19 EO 3S N = 400 14 77.78
20 EO 4T S = 130 11 61.11
21 EO 4CcS = 790 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.7 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,89 %22 EO 2P N = 110 6 33.33
23 EO 3P E-1 100 14 77.78
24 EO 4P S = 420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.2 HALLEUX Jean François -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 5 27.78
26 EO 6S E-4 400 0 0.00
27 EO 3S E+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %28 EO 4C N+2 680 16 88.89
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 83.33
30 EO 5CcS-3 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %31 EO 2P E-1 50 10 55.56
32 EO 5T S-1 -50 9 50.00
33 EO 3P N+2 200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
A.4 CASSART Guy -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 50,00 % 1 EO 2K W = -90 9 50.00
2 EO 4C N = 620 3 16.67
3 EO 3P E-2 200 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,89 % 4 EO 3S N = 600 2 11.11
5 EO 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 EO 2K N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 41,67 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 8 44.44
8 EO 3C W-1 50 8 44.44
9 EO 2P W+3 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,11 %10 EO 3S E-3 300 3 16.67
11 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 EO 4K S-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.1 COLOT Jacques -LEBRUN Robert : 48,33 %16 EO 4PcN-3 -500 0 0.00
17 EO 4P W-3 150 0 0.00
18 EO 2S W-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
A.7 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,89 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 2 11.11
20 EO 3T S+1 130 11 61.11
21 EO 2P E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.2 HALLEUX Jean François -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %22 EO 4P N-2 -100 17 94.44
23 EO 5T N = 600 0 0.00
24 EO 4C S = 420 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 5 27.78
26 EO 3S E-1 100 5 27.78
27 EO 3S E = -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %28 EO 4C N+3 710 8 44.44
29 EO 4C E-1 100 1 5.56
30 EO 5CcS-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.9 WILLEMS Jacques -COLLET Edgard : 57,59 %31 EO 3P E-3 150 4 22.22
32 EO 1P S+1 110 3 16.67
33 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 171,0 / 540 = 31,67 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,89 % 1 EO 2S N-3 -150 18 100.00
2 EO 3C N+1 170 15 83.33
3 EO 4P E = -620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 41,67 % 4 EO 2S N = 120 10 55.56
5 EO 2P N+3 200 18 100.00
6 EO 3K N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,11 % 7 EO 3C N-1 -100 0 0.00
8 EO 2T S+1 110 1 5.56
9 EO 4T W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 1,85 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 %10 EO 3S E-3 300 3 16.67
11 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 EO 4C E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 COLOT Jacques -LEBRUN Robert : 48,33 %13 EO 2T E+1 -110 15 83.33
14 EO 5C S-2 -100 13 72.22
15 EO 3P E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 HALLEUX Jean François -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 8 44.44
20 EO 3T S+2 150 4 22.22
21 EO 3C S+2 200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %22 EO 2P N = 110 6 33.33
23 EO 3P E = -140 17 94.44
24 EO 2P N+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 5 27.78
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.9 WILLEMS Jacques -COLLET Edgard : 57,59 %28 EO 6C N+1 1460 0 0.00
29 EO 4C E = -620 7 38.89
30 EO 4P E = -420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 50,00 %31 EO 4C N-2 -200 18 100.00
32 EO 5T S-2 -100 12 66.67
33 EO 2P N+3 200 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 258,0 / 540 = 47,78 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 41,67 % 1 EO 3K W-1 50 4 22.22
2 EO 4C N = 620 3 16.67
3 EO 5K E = -600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,11 % 4 EO 3S N-2 -200 15 83.33
5 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
6 EO 2K N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 % 7 EO 3P W = -140 8 44.44
8 EO 2K S-1 -50 13 72.22
9 EO 3P W+2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.1 COLOT Jacques -LEBRUN Robert : 48,33 %10 EO 3S E-3 300 3 16.67
11 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 EO 2C E = -110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.7 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,89 %13 EO 2T E-1 100 7 38.89
14 EO 4CcS-1 -100 13 72.22
15 EO 1P N-2 -200 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.2 HALLEUX Jean François -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %16 EO 4C E+2 -680 10 55.56
17 EO 3S E-2 100 6 33.33
18 EO 3S W = -400 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %22 EO 2P N+1 140 0 0.00
23 EO 2C S+1 140 9 50.00
24 EO 4P S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.9 WILLEMS Jacques -COLLET Edgard : 57,59 %25 EO 3S S+1 430 5 27.78
26 EO 3S W+1 -630 12 66.67
27 EO 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 50,00 %28 EO 4C N+3 710 8 44.44
29 EO 4C E = -620 7 38.89
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,89 %31 EO 1P E = -80 15 83.33
32 EO 4CcW = -790 16 88.89
33 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,11 % 1 EO 2T S+1 110 0 0.00
2 EO 3S N = 600 8 44.44
3 EO 5K W = -600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 % 4 EO 4C S-2 -200 15 83.33
5 EO 4P N+1 650 10 55.56
6 EO 2K N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.1 COLOT Jacques -LEBRUN Robert : 48,33 % 7 EO 2P E+1 -140 8 44.44
8 EO 3T S-1 -50 13 72.22
9 EO 2S W+1 -150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.7 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,89 %10 EO 3S E-1 100 14 77.78
11 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 EO 4C E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.2 HALLEUX Jean François -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %13 EO 2T E-2 200 1 5.56
14 EO 5PcN-2 -300 18 100.00
15 EO 3P E = -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %16 EO 4C E+2 -680 10 55.56
17 EO 3P W-2 100 6 33.33
18 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 2 11.11
20 EO 2C E-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 3C S+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 50,00 %25 EO 3S N+1 430 5 27.78
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 17 94.44
27 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 48,89 %28 EO 5C N+2 710 8 44.44
29 EO 4C E-1 100 1 5.56
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 41,67 %31 EO 2P E-1 50 10 55.56
32 EO 3CcE = -730 14 77.78
33 EO 4P N+1 450 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 244,0 / 540 = 45,19 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 VAN DOOREN Michele -THIRIFAY Marie-Paule
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 43,52 % 1 EO 2S N-2 -100 13 72.22
2 EO 4C N = 620 3 16.67
3 EO 5K E = -600 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 COLOT Jacques -LEBRUN Robert : 48,33 % 4 EO 3C S = 140 6 33.33
5 EO 3S S+2 660 2 11.11
6 EO 1S W+2 -150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.7 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 48,89 % 7 EO 2P W+1 -140 8 44.44
8 EO 1P S = 80 6 33.33
9 EO 3T W+1 -130 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.2 HALLEUX Jean François -BRIOT Fernand : 50,74 %10 EO 2C E+2 -170 18 100.00
11 EO 2C S+2 170 9 50.00
12 EO 3C E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 45,56 %13 EO 1P E = -80 12 66.67
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78
15 EO 3P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,70 %16 EO 4C W+2 -680 10 55.56
17 EO 2T E = -90 14 77.78
18 EO 4C E-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 WILLEMS Jacques -COLLET Edgard : 57,59 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 8 44.44
20 EO 4P S-1 -100 14 77.78
21 EO 3C S+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.4 CASSART Guy -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 50,00 %22 EO 2P N = 110 6 33.33
23 EO 2C S = 110 12 66.67
24 EO 2P S+2 170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 41,67 %28 EO 4C N+3 710 8 44.44
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 15 83.33
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A11 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 56,11 %31 EO 3P E-3 150 4 22.22
32 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67
33 EO 4P N = 420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
|
|