|
Tournoi du 18-01-16
1 62,60 A.4 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
2 59,50 A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
3 57,42 A.7 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy
4 57,17 A12 MOSSERAY Etienne -BAILLY Jacques
5 56,67 A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
6 50,32 A.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 46,63 A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David
8 46,15 A.6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
9 45,20 A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
10 41,28 A.8 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse
11 40,82 A11 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik
12 36,25 A.3 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
13 0,00 A13 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,96 a11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
2 59,83 a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
3 57,69 a.5 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie
4 56,11 a.8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
5 55,83 a12 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
6 49,31 a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
7 48,18 a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 47,85 a10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
9 47,80 a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
10 46,70 a.1 ARICKX Roger -PIROTTE Claude
11 44,91 a13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
12 38,11 a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
13 34,63 a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
PAIRE Nr : A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.1 ARICKX Roger -PIROTTE Claude : 46,70 % 1 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 30.00
2 NS 4P W-1 50 8 40.00
3 NS 1S S+3 180 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
a11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,96 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 10.00
5 NS 2C W = -110 8 40.00
6 NS 4C N = 420 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,85 % 7 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 35.00
8 NS 3S S+2 460 15 75.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,83 %10 NS 3S N = 600 13 65.00
11 NS 1S N+1 120 6 30.00
12 NS 6T N-1 -100 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 56,11 %13 NS 3S N+2 660 18 90.00
14 NS 2C N = 110 10 50.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
a13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,91 %16 NS 2C N = 110 7 35.00
17 NS 4T N-2 -100 14 70.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,63 %19 NS 4P S+1 450 11 55.00
20 NS 4P S-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.5 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 57,69 %22 NS 2P E = -110 4 20.00
23 NS 1S E+2 -150 9 45.00
24 NS 4T S = 130 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 38,11 %25 NS 3S W-2 200 16.6 83.00
26 NS 2P E-1 100 15.5 77.50
27 NS 3K N = 110 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 72,00 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,80 %28 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 40.00
29 NS 2C N = 110 0 0.00
30 NS 1S S+1 120 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
Total : 271,2 / 600 = 45,20 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,18 % 4 NS 2PcN-1 -200 15 75.00
5 NS 1S E = -90 12 60.00
6 NS 3S S+2 460 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -PIROTTE Claude : 46,70 % 7 NS 3P E+2 -200 20 100.00
8 NS 3S S+2 460 15 75.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
a11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,96 %10 NS 4C S = 620 16 80.00
11 NS 2P S+2 170 17 85.00
12 NS 6T N-1 -100 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,85 %13 NS 4C S-1 -100 2 10.00
14 NS 1S S+1 120 12 60.00
15 NS 2C S-2 -200 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,83 %16 NS 2C S = 110 7 35.00
17 NS 3P E-1 50 19 95.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 56,11 %19 NS 4P S+1 450 11 55.00
20 NS 4P S+2 680 19 95.00
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a12 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,83 %22 NS 2C N-2 -100 10 50.00
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 13 65.00
24 NS 4P S = 420 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,63 %25 NS 4P E-1 100 10 50.00
26 NS 3PcE-3 800 19.9 99.50
27 NS 3K N = 110 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
a.5 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 57,69 %28 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 5.00
29 NS 3S S = 600 8 40.00
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 38,11 %31 NS 4C N+1 650 12 60.00
32 NS 3KcW-2 500 18 90.00
33 NS 5CcE = -650 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 340,0 / 600 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
a.5 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 57,69 % 1 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 30.00
2 NS 2P W+2 -170 3 15.00
3 NS 2K N+1 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,80 % 7 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 35.00
8 NS 3S N = 400 4 20.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a12 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,83 %10 NS 2P W-2 200 8 40.00
11 NS 2C E-2 100 1 5.00
12 NS 5K N+1 620 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -PIROTTE Claude : 46,70 %13 NS 4P S = 620 7 35.00
14 NS 2T W+1 -110 0 0.00
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,67 %
a11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,96 %16 NS 1ScE+1 -380 0 0.00
17 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 30.00
18 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 10,00 %
a10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,85 %19 NS 4P S+1 450 11 55.00
20 NS 3C S-1 -100 4 20.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,83 %22 NS 2P E = -110 4 20.00
23 NS 3S E = -600 5 25.00
24 NS 4C E-2 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 18,33 %
a13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,91 %25 NS 3S W-2 200 16.6 83.00
26 NS 2T S-3 -300 0.1 0.50
27 NS 3K N+1 130 18.8 94.00 µ Tbl = 59,17 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,31 %28 NS 2K E+1 -110 15 75.00
29 NS 3P S = 140 4 20.00
30 NS 1S W-3 150 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,63 %31 NS 4C S+1 650 12 60.00
32 NS 4P N = 420 14 70.00
33 NS 5PcN-2 -300 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 217,5 / 600 = 36,25 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,31 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 15 75.00
2 NS 3P W+1 -170 3 15.00
3 NS 2S S+2 180 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,63 % 4 NS 5T E-1 100 20 100.00
5 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 20.00
6 NS 5C N = 450 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 38,11 %10 NS 3S N+2 660 19 95.00
11 NS 4C E-4 200 20 100.00
12 NS 4P S+2 680 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 98,33 %
a13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,91 %13 NS 3S E+2 660 18 90.00
14 NS 2C N+1 140 16 80.00
15 NS 3S E-2 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,18 %16 NS 2P S = 110 7 35.00
17 NS 3P W = -140 6 30.00
18 NS 3K S-1 -100 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -PIROTTE Claude : 46,70 %19 NS 4P S+1 450 11 55.00
20 NS 4P S+2 680 19 95.00
21 NS 3S N+2 660 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,96 %22 NS 2K S-1 -50 13 65.00
23 NS 4C W = -620 2 10.00
24 NS 4T S = 130 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,85 %25 NS 2C N-1 -50 6.7 33.50
26 NS 3K S-1 -100 7.8 39.00
27 NS 2K N+1 110 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,83 %28 NS 2S W = -120 8 40.00
29 NS 3S S+1 630 16 80.00
30 NS 1S S+1 120 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a12 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,83 %31 NS 4C S+2 680 20 100.00
32 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 25.00
33 NS 5CcE = -650 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
Total : 375,6 / 600 = 62,60 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David
a13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,91 % 1 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 30.00
2 NS 5T W-2 100 11 55.00
3 NS 2S N+1 150 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a.8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 56,11 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 10.00
5 NS 2S E+1 -150 0 0.00
6 NS 4C N = 420 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,31 % 7 NS 4P E = -620 17 85.00
8 NS 3S S+2 460 15 75.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.5 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 57,69 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 12 60.00
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 25.00
15 NS 3S W-1 50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 38,11 %16 NS 2C S+1 140 16 80.00
17 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 30.00
18 NS 3K S-1 -100 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a12 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,83 %19 NS 4P S+1 450 11 55.00
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 20.00
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,18 %22 NS 2P E = -110 4 20.00
23 NS 2C E = -110 17 85.00
24 NS 4T S = 130 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -PIROTTE Claude : 46,70 %25 NS 3T W = -110 2.3 11.50
26 NS 2C W-3 300 17.7 88.50
27 NS 2K N+2 130 18.8 94.00 µ Tbl = 64,67 %
a11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,96 %28 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 40.00
29 NS 2S S = 120 2 10.00
30 NS 1S S+1 120 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,85 %31 NS 4C S+1 650 12 60.00
32 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 25.00
33 NS 5C E = -450 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 279,8 / 600 = 46,63 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques
a11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,96 % 1 NS 4C E+1 -450 6 30.00
2 NS 5TcW-2 300 18 90.00
3 NS 2S S+1 150 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
a10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,85 % 4 NS 3P N-2 -200 15 75.00
5 NS 1S E-1 50 16 80.00
6 NS 4P N = 420 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
a12 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,83 % 7 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 35.00
8 NS 3S S = 400 4 20.00
9 NS 2S S-1 -50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
a.8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 56,11 %10 NS 3K S = 110 2 10.00
11 NS 2C E-2 100 1 5.00
12 NS 2P S+1 140 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,63 %16 NS 2C S+1 140 16 80.00
17 NS 3C E = -140 6 30.00
18 NS 4K N-1 -100 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a.5 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 57,69 %19 NS 4P S+1 450 11 55.00
20 NS 4P S+1 650 16 80.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
a13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,91 %22 NS 2P E = -110 4 20.00
23 NS 2S W+1 -150 9 45.00
24 NS 3C E-2 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,80 %25 NS 2C N-2 -100 4.5 22.50
26 NS 1P S = 80 13.3 66.50
27 NS 2K N+1 110 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 48,17 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,18 %28 NS 1S W+2 -150 1 5.00
29 NS 3S S+1 630 16 80.00
30 NS 1S S+1 120 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -PIROTTE Claude : 46,70 %31 NS 4C S = 620 4 20.00
32 NS 4P N = 420 14 70.00
33 NS 4P N+1 450 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 276,9 / 600 = 46,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,18 % 1 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 30.00
2 NS 5TcE-2 300 18 90.00
3 NS 1S S+3 180 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -PIROTTE Claude : 46,70 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 10.00
5 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 20.00
6 NS 4C N = 420 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
a11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,96 % 7 NS 5P W = -650 7 35.00
8 NS 3S S = 400 4 20.00
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
a13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,91 %10 NS 3S S+2 660 19 95.00
11 NS 3P S+1 170 17 85.00
12 NS 5T N+2 640 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,83 %13 NS 4C S = 620 7 35.00
14 NS 2C N+1 140 16 80.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,31 %19 NS 5P S = 450 11 55.00
20 NS 6P S-1 -100 4 20.00
21 NS 3S N+1 630 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,63 %22 NS 1S S+2 150 18 90.00
23 NS 2S W-1 100 20 100.00
24 NS 4P S = 420 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 95,00 %
a.5 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 57,69 %25 NS 6P W-2 200 16.6 83.00
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 7.8 39.00
27 NS 3K N = 110 11.1 55.50 µ Tbl = 59,17 %
a12 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,83 %28 NS 1S W = -90 20 100.00
29 NS 3S S+1 630 16 80.00
30 NS 1S S = 90 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,80 %31 NS 4C S+1 650 12 60.00
32 NS 4P N = 420 14 70.00
33 NS 5CcE = -650 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 344,5 / 600 = 57,42 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 38,11 % 1 NS 4C W = -420 18 90.00
2 NS 4T E-3 150 14 70.00
3 NS 1S S+2 150 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,80 % 4 NS 3P N-2 -200 15 75.00
5 NS 1S E = -90 12 60.00
6 NS 3S N = 400 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,18 % 7 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 35.00
8 NS 3S S+1 430 8 40.00
9 NS 1S S+2 150 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -PIROTTE Claude : 46,70 %10 NS 3S S = 600 13 65.00
11 NS 3P S = 140 8 40.00
12 NS 2T N+2 130 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,96 %13 NS 4P N+1 650 14 70.00
14 NS 1S S-1 -50 5 25.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,83 %16 NS 1C N+2 140 16 80.00
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 30.00
18 NS 3S E = -400 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
a.8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 56,11 %22 NS 2P E = -110 4 20.00
23 NS 3S W = -600 5 25.00
24 NS 3T S+1 130 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,31 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 0.1 0.50
26 NS 2C W = -110 2.3 11.50
27 NS 2K N = 90 2.3 11.50 µ Tbl = 7,83 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,63 %28 NS 2C E = -110 15 75.00
29 NS 3S S = 600 8 40.00
30 NS 1S S-1 -50 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,91 %31 NS 4C S+1 650 12 60.00
32 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 25.00
33 NS 5C E = -450 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
Total : 247,7 / 600 = 41,28 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,63 % 1 NS 3S W = -400 20 100.00
2 NS 5K E-2 100 11 55.00
3 NS 2S S+1 150 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
a12 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,83 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 8 40.00
5 NS 1S E = -90 12 60.00
6 NS 4C S = 420 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 38,11 % 7 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 35.00
8 NS 3S S+2 460 15 75.00
9 NS 3S S = 400 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,80 %10 NS 1S S+1 120 4 20.00
11 NS 3C E-3 150 12 60.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,18 %13 NS 4P N = 620 7 35.00
14 NS 2C N-1 -50 5 25.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -PIROTTE Claude : 46,70 %16 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 10.00
17 NS 4C E-1 50 19 95.00
18 NS 4C W-3 150 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
a13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,91 %19 NS 4P S+1 450 11 55.00
20 NS 4P S = 620 13 65.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,83 %25 NS 5T E-1 100 10 50.00
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 7.8 39.00
27 NS 1S S-1 -50 0.1 0.50 µ Tbl = 29,83 %
a.8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 56,11 %28 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 40.00
29 NS 3S S = 600 8 40.00
30 NS 1S S+1 120 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,31 %31 NS 6C S-1 -100 0 0.00
32 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 25.00
33 NS 4P N-1 -50 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
Total : 301,9 / 600 = 50,32 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
a.8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 56,11 % 1 NS 3S E+1 -430 15 75.00
2 NS 4PcW-2 300 18 90.00
3 NS 1S S+3 180 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,31 % 4 NS 3P N-2 -200 15 75.00
5 NS 2S W-2 100 19 95.00
6 NS 6S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,91 % 7 NS 4P W = -620 17 85.00
8 NS 3S S+2 460 15 75.00
9 NS 2S S+1 150 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.5 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 57,69 %10 NS 3K S+1 130 6 30.00
11 NS 3C E-3 150 12 60.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 38,11 %13 NS 6PcN-2 -500 0 0.00
14 NS 3C N = 140 16 80.00
15 NS 3S E = -400 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,80 %16 NS 2C S+1 140 16 80.00
17 NS 3T N-1 -50 16 80.00
18 NS 4T E-1 50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,18 %19 NS 4P S+1 450 11 55.00
20 NS 4P S = 620 13 65.00
21 NS 3S N = 600 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -PIROTTE Claude : 46,70 %22 NS 4P E-3 300 20 100.00
23 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
24 NS 3C E-2 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,85 %28 NS 2P N-1 -100 18 90.00
29 NS 3S S+1 630 16 80.00
30 NS 1S S+1 120 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,83 %31 NS 4C S+1 650 12 60.00
32 NS 3P N = 140 10 50.00
33 NS 5C E = -450 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
Total : 357,0 / 600 = 59,50 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik
a10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,85 % 1 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 30.00
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 30.00
3 NS 2S S+2 180 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,83 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 8 40.00
5 NS 1S E+1 -120 4 20.00
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
a.8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 56,11 % 7 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 35.00
8 NS 2S S = 120 0 0.00
9 NS 2S S+1 150 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,31 %10 NS 3C N-1 -100 0 0.00
11 NS 2P S = 110 4 20.00
12 NS 3S N+2 660 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a12 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,83 %13 NS 4P N = 620 7 35.00
14 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 25.00
15 NS 3S E-2 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.5 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 57,69 %16 NS 2C N = 110 7 35.00
17 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 30.00
18 NS 1S E+4 -210 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 38,11 %19 NS 6P S-1 -50 0 0.00
20 NS 2P S+2 170 10 50.00
21 NS 3S N+1 630 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,80 %22 NS 4K S-1 -50 13 65.00
23 NS 2C E+1 -140 13 65.00
24 NS 3CcE-2 300 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,18 %25 NS 3S W-2 200 16.6 83.00
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 7.8 39.00
27 NS 2P E-2 100 4.5 22.50 µ Tbl = 48,17 %
a11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,96 %31 NS 4P E-1 50 2 10.00
32 NS 3PcN-1 -100 0 0.00
33 NS 6CcE-1 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 244,9 / 600 = 40,82 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 MOSSERAY Etienne -BAILLY Jacques
a12 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,83 % 1 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 30.00
2 NS 3CcS-2 -500 0 0.00
3 NS 1S S+3 180 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
a.5 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 57,69 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 8 40.00
5 NS 2T E-2 100 19 95.00
6 NS 2S N+1 150 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,83 % 7 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 35.00
8 NS 3S S+2 460 15 75.00
9 NS 3S S-1 -50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,18 %10 NS 2P W-3 300 10 50.00
11 NS 1S N+2 150 12 60.00
12 NS 5KcE-3 500 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,63 %13 NS 3S N+2 660 18 90.00
14 NS 2C N+2 170 20 100.00
15 NS 3S E-2 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 93,33 %
a10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,85 %16 NS 2C S+1 140 16 80.00
17 NS 2P E+1 -140 6 30.00
18 NS 2S W+1 -150 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,80 %19 NS 4P S+1 450 11 55.00
20 NS 2S N = 120 8 40.00
21 NS 3S N-1 -100 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,31 %22 NS 2P E-1 100 16 80.00
23 NS 2C W = -110 17 85.00
24 NS 3T S+1 130 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 38,11 %28 NS 1S E+1 -120 8 40.00
29 NS 3S S+1 630 16 80.00
30 NS 1S S+2 150 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
a.8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 56,11 %31 NS 5C S = 650 12 60.00
32 NS 5TcW-4 1100 20 100.00
33 NS 5C E = -450 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
Total : 343,0 / 600 = 57,17 %
PAIRE Nr : A13 -
a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 59,83 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 44,91 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 34,63 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,85 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,80 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 49,31 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 62,96 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 38,11 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 56,11 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 57,69 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 660 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 ARICKX Roger -PIROTTE Claude
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,20 % 1 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 70.00
2 EO 4P W-1 50 12 60.00
3 EO 1S S+3 180 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
A.7 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 57,42 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 90.00
5 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 80.00
6 EO 4C N = 420 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 % 7 EO 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00
8 EO 3S S+2 460 5 25.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
A.8 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,28 %10 EO 3S S = 600 7 35.00
11 EO 3P S = 140 12 60.00
12 EO 2T N+2 130 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.3 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,25 %13 EO 4P S = 620 13 65.00
14 EO 2T W+1 -110 20 100.00
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,33 %
A.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,32 %16 EO 4C S-1 -50 18 90.00
17 EO 4C E-1 50 1 5.00
18 EO 4C W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
A.4 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,60 %19 EO 4P S+1 450 9 45.00
20 EO 4P S+2 680 1 5.00
21 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,50 %22 EO 4P E-3 300 0 0.00
23 EO 3S W+1 -630 20 100.00
24 EO 3C E-2 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 46,63 %25 EO 3T W = -110 17.7 88.50
26 EO 2C W-3 300 2.3 11.50
27 EO 2K N+2 130 1.2 6.00 µ Tbl = 35,33 %
A.6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,15 %31 EO 4C S = 620 16 80.00
32 EO 4P N = 420 6 30.00
33 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 280,2 / 600 = 46,70 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
A.7 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 57,42 % 1 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 70.00
2 EO 5TcE-2 300 2 10.00
3 EO 1S S+3 180 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 % 4 EO 2PcN-1 -200 5 25.00
5 EO 1S E = -90 8 40.00
6 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
A.8 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,28 % 7 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 65.00
8 EO 3S S+1 430 12 60.00
9 EO 1S S+2 150 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
A12 MOSSERAY Etienne -BAILLY Jacques : 57,17 %10 EO 2P W-3 300 10 50.00
11 EO 1S N+2 150 8 40.00
12 EO 5KcE-3 500 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,32 %13 EO 4P N = 620 13 65.00
14 EO 2C N-1 -50 15 75.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
A.4 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,60 %16 EO 2P S = 110 13 65.00
17 EO 3P W = -140 14 70.00
18 EO 3K S-1 -100 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,50 %19 EO 4P S+1 450 9 45.00
20 EO 4P S = 620 7 35.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 46,63 %22 EO 2P E = -110 16 80.00
23 EO 2C E = -110 3 15.00
24 EO 4T S = 130 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
A11 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 40,82 %25 EO 3S W-2 200 3.4 17.00
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 12.2 61.00
27 EO 2P E-2 100 15.5 77.50 µ Tbl = 51,83 %
A.6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,15 %28 EO 1S W+2 -150 19 95.00
29 EO 3S S+1 630 4 20.00
30 EO 1S S+1 120 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 289,1 / 600 = 48,18 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
A.8 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,28 % 4 EO 3P N-2 -200 5 25.00
5 EO 1S E = -90 8 40.00
6 EO 3S N = 400 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.3 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,25 % 7 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 65.00
8 EO 3S N = 400 16 80.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,32 %10 EO 1S S+1 120 16 80.00
11 EO 3C E-3 150 8 40.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A13 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,50 %16 EO 2C S+1 140 4 20.00
17 EO 3T N-1 -50 4 20.00
18 EO 4T E-1 50 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A12 MOSSERAY Etienne -BAILLY Jacques : 57,17 %19 EO 4P S+1 450 9 45.00
20 EO 2S N = 120 12 60.00
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A11 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 40,82 %22 EO 4K S-1 -50 7 35.00
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 35.00
24 EO 3CcE-2 300 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,15 %25 EO 2C N-2 -100 15.5 77.50
26 EO 1P S = 80 6.7 33.50
27 EO 2K N+1 110 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 51,83 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,20 %28 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 60.00
29 EO 2C N = 110 20 100.00
30 EO 1S S+1 120 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
A.7 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 57,42 %31 EO 4C S+1 650 8 40.00
32 EO 4P N = 420 6 30.00
33 EO 5CcE = -650 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 258,1 / 540 = 47,80 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
A.8 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,28 % 1 EO 4C W = -420 2 10.00
2 EO 4T E-3 150 6 30.00
3 EO 1S S+2 150 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
A.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,32 % 7 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 65.00
8 EO 3S S+2 460 5 25.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
A.4 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,60 %10 EO 3S N+2 660 1 5.00
11 EO 4C E-4 200 0 0.00
12 EO 4P S+2 680 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 1,67 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,50 %13 EO 6PcN-2 -500 20 100.00
14 EO 3C N = 140 4 20.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 46,63 %16 EO 2C S+1 140 4 20.00
17 EO 2C E+1 -140 14 70.00
18 EO 3K S-1 -100 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A11 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 40,82 %19 EO 6P S-1 -50 20 100.00
20 EO 2P S+2 170 10 50.00
21 EO 3S N+1 630 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A13 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,20 %25 EO 3S W-2 200 3.4 17.00
26 EO 2P E-1 100 4.5 22.50
27 EO 3K N = 110 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 28,00 %
A12 MOSSERAY Etienne -BAILLY Jacques : 57,17 %28 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 60.00
29 EO 3S S+1 630 4 20.00
30 EO 1S S+2 150 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %31 EO 4C N+1 650 8 40.00
32 EO 3KcW-2 500 2 10.00
33 EO 5CcE = -650 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 205,8 / 540 = 38,11 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie
A.3 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,25 % 1 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 70.00
2 EO 2P W+2 -170 17 85.00
3 EO 2K N+1 110 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
A12 MOSSERAY Etienne -BAILLY Jacques : 57,17 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 12 60.00
5 EO 2T E-2 100 1 5.00
6 EO 2S N+1 150 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,50 %10 EO 3K S+1 130 14 70.00
11 EO 3C E-3 150 8 40.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 46,63 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 8 40.00
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 75.00
15 EO 3S W-1 50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A11 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 40,82 %16 EO 2C N = 110 13 65.00
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 70.00
18 EO 1S E+4 -210 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,15 %19 EO 4P S+1 450 9 45.00
20 EO 4P S+1 650 4 20.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,20 %22 EO 2P E = -110 16 80.00
23 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 55.00
24 EO 4T S = 130 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
A.7 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 57,42 %25 EO 6P W-2 200 3.4 17.00
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 12.2 61.00
27 EO 3K N = 110 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 40,83 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %28 EO 1S W+2 -150 19 95.00
29 EO 3S S = 600 12 60.00
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A13 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 311,5 / 540 = 57,69 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,32 % 1 EO 3S W = -400 0 0.00
2 EO 5K E-2 100 9 45.00
3 EO 2S S+1 150 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.4 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,60 % 4 EO 5T E-1 100 0 0.00
5 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 80.00
6 EO 5C N = 450 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A13 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A12 MOSSERAY Etienne -BAILLY Jacques : 57,17 %13 EO 3S N+2 660 2 10.00
14 EO 2C N+2 170 0 0.00
15 EO 3S E-2 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 6,67 %
A.6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,15 %16 EO 2C S+1 140 4 20.00
17 EO 3C E = -140 14 70.00
18 EO 4K N-1 -100 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,20 %19 EO 4P S+1 450 9 45.00
20 EO 4P S-2 -200 20 100.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.7 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 57,42 %22 EO 1S S+2 150 2 10.00
23 EO 2S W-1 100 0 0.00
24 EO 4P S = 420 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 5,00 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %25 EO 4P E-1 100 10 50.00
26 EO 3PcE-3 800 0.1 0.50
27 EO 3K N = 110 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
A.8 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,28 %28 EO 2C E = -110 5 25.00
29 EO 3S S = 600 12 60.00
30 EO 1S S-1 -50 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.3 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,25 %31 EO 4C S+1 650 8 40.00
32 EO 4P N = 420 6 30.00
33 EO 5PcN-2 -300 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 187,0 / 540 = 34,63 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
A.4 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,60 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 5 25.00
2 EO 3P W+1 -170 17 85.00
3 EO 2S S+2 180 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,50 % 4 EO 3P N-2 -200 5 25.00
5 EO 2S W-2 100 1 5.00
6 EO 6S N-2 -100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 46,63 % 7 EO 4P E = -620 3 15.00
8 EO 3S S+2 460 5 25.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A11 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 40,82 %10 EO 3C N-1 -100 20 100.00
11 EO 2P S = 110 16 80.00
12 EO 3S N+2 660 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A13 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.7 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 57,42 %19 EO 5P S = 450 9 45.00
20 EO 6P S-1 -100 16 80.00
21 EO 3S N+1 630 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A12 MOSSERAY Etienne -BAILLY Jacques : 57,17 %22 EO 2P E-1 100 4 20.00
23 EO 2C W = -110 3 15.00
24 EO 3T S+1 130 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
A.8 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,28 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 19.9 99.50
26 EO 2C W = -110 17.7 88.50
27 EO 2K N = 90 17.7 88.50 µ Tbl = 92,17 %
A.3 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,25 %28 EO 2K E+1 -110 5 25.00
29 EO 3P S = 140 16 80.00
30 EO 1S W-3 150 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
A.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,32 %31 EO 6C S-1 -100 20 100.00
32 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 75.00
33 EO 4P N-1 -50 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
Total : 266,3 / 540 = 49,31 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,50 % 1 EO 3S E+1 -430 5 25.00
2 EO 4PcW-2 300 2 10.00
3 EO 1S S+3 180 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 46,63 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 90.00
5 EO 2S E+1 -150 20 100.00
6 EO 4C N = 420 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
A11 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 40,82 % 7 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 65.00
8 EO 2S S = 120 20 100.00
9 EO 2S S+1 150 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,15 %10 EO 3K S = 110 18 90.00
11 EO 2C E-2 100 19 95.00
12 EO 2P S+1 140 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,20 %13 EO 3S N+2 660 2 10.00
14 EO 2C N = 110 10 50.00
15 EO 3S E = -400 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %19 EO 4P S+1 450 9 45.00
20 EO 4P S+2 680 1 5.00
21 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
A.8 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,28 %22 EO 2P E = -110 16 80.00
23 EO 3S W = -600 15 75.00
24 EO 3T S+1 130 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
A13 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,32 %28 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 60.00
29 EO 3S S = 600 12 60.00
30 EO 1S S+1 120 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A12 MOSSERAY Etienne -BAILLY Jacques : 57,17 %31 EO 5C S = 650 8 40.00
32 EO 5TcW-4 1100 0 0.00
33 EO 5C E = -450 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
A13 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 40,82 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 12 60.00
5 EO 1S E+1 -120 16 80.00
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
A12 MOSSERAY Etienne -BAILLY Jacques : 57,17 % 7 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 65.00
8 EO 3S S+2 460 5 25.00
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,20 %10 EO 3S N = 600 7 35.00
11 EO 1S N+1 120 14 70.00
12 EO 6T N-1 -100 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 57,42 %13 EO 4C S = 620 13 65.00
14 EO 2C N+1 140 4 20.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %16 EO 2C S = 110 13 65.00
17 EO 3P E-1 50 1 5.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,25 %22 EO 2P E = -110 16 80.00
23 EO 3S E = -600 15 75.00
24 EO 4C E-2 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 81,67 %
A.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,32 %25 EO 5T E-1 100 10 50.00
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 12.2 61.00
27 EO 1S S-1 -50 19.9 99.50 µ Tbl = 70,17 %
A.4 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,60 %28 EO 2S W = -120 12 60.00
29 EO 3S S+1 630 4 20.00
30 EO 1S S+1 120 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,50 %31 EO 4C S+1 650 8 40.00
32 EO 3P N = 140 10 50.00
33 EO 5C E = -450 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
Total : 323,1 / 540 = 59,83 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
A11 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 40,82 % 1 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 70.00
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 70.00
3 EO 2S S+2 180 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
A.6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,15 % 4 EO 3P N-2 -200 5 25.00
5 EO 1S E-1 50 4 20.00
6 EO 4P N = 420 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,20 % 7 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 65.00
8 EO 3S S+2 460 5 25.00
9 EO 3S S = 400 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
A13 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %13 EO 4C S-1 -100 18 90.00
14 EO 1S S+1 120 8 40.00
15 EO 2C S-2 -200 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A12 MOSSERAY Etienne -BAILLY Jacques : 57,17 %16 EO 2C S+1 140 4 20.00
17 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 70.00
18 EO 2S W+1 -150 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.3 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,25 %19 EO 4P S+1 450 9 45.00
20 EO 3C S-1 -100 16 80.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.4 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,60 %25 EO 2C N-1 -50 13.3 66.50
26 EO 3K S-1 -100 12.2 61.00
27 EO 2K N+1 110 8.9 44.50 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,50 %28 EO 2P N-1 -100 2 10.00
29 EO 3S S+1 630 4 20.00
30 EO 1S S+1 120 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 46,63 %31 EO 4C S+1 650 8 40.00
32 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 75.00
33 EO 5C E = -450 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 258,4 / 540 = 47,85 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
A.6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,15 % 1 EO 4C E+1 -450 14 70.00
2 EO 5TcW-2 300 2 10.00
3 EO 2S S+1 150 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,20 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 18 90.00
5 EO 2C W = -110 12 60.00
6 EO 4C N = 420 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.7 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 57,42 % 7 EO 5P W = -650 13 65.00
8 EO 3S S = 400 16 80.00
9 EO 3S S-1 -50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %10 EO 4C S = 620 4 20.00
11 EO 2P S+2 170 3 15.00
12 EO 6T N-1 -100 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A.8 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,28 %13 EO 4P N+1 650 6 30.00
14 EO 1S S-1 -50 15 75.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,25 %16 EO 1ScE+1 -380 20 100.00
17 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 70.00
18 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,00 %
A13 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,60 %22 EO 2K S-1 -50 7 35.00
23 EO 4C W = -620 18 90.00
24 EO 4T S = 130 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 46,63 %28 EO 1S W+1 -120 12 60.00
29 EO 2S S = 120 18 90.00
30 EO 1S S+1 120 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A11 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 40,82 %31 EO 4P E-1 50 18 90.00
32 EO 3PcN-1 -100 20 100.00
33 EO 6CcE-1 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 340,0 / 540 = 62,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
A12 MOSSERAY Etienne -BAILLY Jacques : 57,17 % 1 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 70.00
2 EO 3CcS-2 -500 20 100.00
3 EO 1S S+3 180 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
A.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,32 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 12 60.00
5 EO 1S E = -90 8 40.00
6 EO 4C S = 420 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
A.6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,15 % 7 EO 4P E+1 -650 13 65.00
8 EO 3S S = 400 16 80.00
9 EO 2S S-1 -50 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
A.3 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,25 %10 EO 2P W-2 200 12 60.00
11 EO 2C E-2 100 19 95.00
12 EO 5K N+1 620 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
A11 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 40,82 %13 EO 4P N = 620 13 65.00
14 EO 4C N-1 -50 15 75.00
15 EO 3S E-2 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,28 %16 EO 1C N+2 140 4 20.00
17 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 70.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 46,63 %19 EO 4P S+1 450 9 45.00
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 80.00
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,67 %22 EO 2C N-2 -100 10 50.00
23 EO 2C E+1 -140 7 35.00
24 EO 4P S = 420 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
A.7 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 57,42 %28 EO 1S W = -90 0 0.00
29 EO 3S S+1 630 4 20.00
30 EO 1S S = 90 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,60 %31 EO 4C S+2 680 0 0.00
32 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 75.00
33 EO 5CcE = -650 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
Total : 335,0 / 600 = 55,83 %
PAIRE Nr : a13 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
A.5 CHANTRAINE René -VAGMAN David : 46,63 % 1 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 70.00
2 EO 5T W-2 100 9 45.00
3 EO 2S N+1 150 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A13 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 59,50 % 7 EO 4P W = -620 3 15.00
8 EO 3S S+2 460 5 25.00
9 EO 2S S+1 150 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.7 de VIRON Baudouin -CASSART Guy : 57,42 %10 EO 3S S+2 660 1 5.00
11 EO 3P S+1 170 3 15.00
12 EO 5T N+2 640 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 20,00 %
A.4 BRUYR Pascal -BRIOT Fernand : 62,60 %13 EO 3S E+2 660 2 10.00
14 EO 2C N+1 140 4 20.00
15 EO 3S E-2 100 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,20 %16 EO 2C N = 110 13 65.00
17 EO 4T N-2 -100 6 30.00
18 EO 3S E = -400 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.9 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,32 %19 EO 4P S+1 450 9 45.00
20 EO 4P S = 620 7 35.00
21 EO 3S N = 600 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
A.6 BEYNE Anne -WILLEMS Jacques : 46,15 %22 EO 2P E = -110 16 80.00
23 EO 2S W+1 -150 11 55.00
24 EO 3C E-2 100 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
A.3 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 36,25 %25 EO 3S W-2 200 3.4 17.00
26 EO 2T S-3 -300 19.9 99.50
27 EO 3K N+1 130 1.2 6.00 µ Tbl = 40,83 %
A.8 ERPICUM Patrice -WUYARD Alphonse : 41,28 %31 EO 4C S+1 650 8 40.00
32 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 75.00
33 EO 5C E = -450 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
Total : 242,5 / 540 = 44,91 %
|
|