|
Tournoi du 20-02-17
Lundi
1 56,67 A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
2 56,48 A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
3 55,93 A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
4 52,41 A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
5 51,48 A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
6 48,89 A.9 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph
7 46,11 A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
8 45,19 A.4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
9 43,52 A.6 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie
10 43,33 A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -DELHEZ Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,07 a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc
2 58,15 a.1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
3 54,44 a.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
4 53,89 a.5 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 50,37 a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 50,19 a.6 VAN DOOREN Michele -VAN AVERMAET Martine
7 46,67 a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
8 44,81 a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -WANDERPEPEN Janine
9 42,22 a.8 CAMUS Colette -WILLEMS Jacques
10 40,19 a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
PAIRE Nr : A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
a.1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,15 % 1 NS 3S S+3 490 15 83.33
2 NS 4KcS-2 -500 8 44.44
3 NS 1S N-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 59,07 % 4 NS Pass Passe 2 11.11
5 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
6 NS 2P E = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 44,81 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
8 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 4CcE-2 500 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 VAN DOOREN Michele -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,19 %10 NS 4C W-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 2T W+3 -150 8 44.44
12 NS 4K E-3 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,19 %13 NS 3S S-2 -200 11 61.11
14 NS 6S S+1 1020 18 100.00
15 NS 2P S-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.8 CAMUS Colette -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78
17 NS 5T W-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 4T N+1 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,37 %19 NS 2P N+2 170 6 33.33
20 NS 3S S+1 630 18 100.00
21 NS 4C W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 46,67 %22 NS 4PcW-3 800 18 100.00
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
24 NS 4C W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 54,44 %25 NS 5T S+1 420 10 55.56
26 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33
27 NS 5P S+1 480 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 11.11
29 NS 4CcE-1 200 18 100.00
30 NS 3S S = 400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 305,0 / 540 = 56,48 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 59,07 % 1 NS 3S N+3 490 15 83.33
2 NS 6C W = -980 3 16.67
3 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 44,81 % 4 NS 4P S+1 650 13 72.22
5 NS 1S W+1 -120 16 88.89
6 NS 4C N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,15 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
8 NS 4P S = 420 15 83.33
9 NS 3P N-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 46,67 %10 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
11 NS 3S W = -400 0 0.00
12 NS 1S E = -90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 54,44 %13 NS 4P N-2 -200 11 61.11
14 NS 4P N+2 480 0 0.00
15 NS 3C W = -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78
17 NS 5T E-2 100 18 100.00
18 NS 3T N+2 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.6 VAN DOOREN Michele -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,19 %19 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78
20 NS 3S N = 600 12 66.67
21 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,19 %22 NS 3C S = 140 13 72.22
23 NS 4P W = -620 15 83.33
24 NS 4C W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.8 CAMUS Colette -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %25 NS 5T S+1 420 10 55.56
26 NS 3C E-2 200 14 77.78
27 NS 6CcW-3 500 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,37 %28 NS 3P W+1 -170 10 55.56
29 NS 4K N = 130 14 77.78
30 NS 3C N = 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 306,0 / 540 = 56,67 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -DELHEZ Jacques
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 44,81 % 1 NS 3S S+3 490 15 83.33
2 NS 6C W = -980 3 16.67
3 NS 2S N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,15 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 8 44.44
5 NS 1K E+2 -110 18 100.00
6 NS 4C N+1 450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 59,07 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
8 NS 4P S-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 4P N-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.8 CAMUS Colette -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %10 NS 4C W-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 2K E+2 -130 16 88.89
12 NS 4K E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,37 %13 NS 4PcN-3 -800 0 0.00
14 NS 3S N+4 520 10 55.56
15 NS 2C E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 46,67 %16 NS 3P N = 140 13 72.22
17 NS 6T W-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 3T N+1 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 54,44 %19 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78
20 NS 3S N-1 -100 1 5.56
21 NS 3S W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %22 NS 1S E+2 -150 2 11.11
23 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
24 NS 5C W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 VAN DOOREN Michele -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,19 %25 NS 5T S+1 420 10 55.56
26 NS 5KcS-1 -200 3 16.67
27 NS 5C W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,19 %28 NS 4C N-2 -200 8 44.44
29 NS 3C W = -140 3 16.67
30 NS 4C N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 234,0 / 540 = 43,33 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,19 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 9 50.00
2 NS 6C W-1 50 17 94.44
3 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.6 VAN DOOREN Michele -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,19 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 8 44.44
5 NS 1S E+2 -150 7 38.89
6 NS 3C N+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
8 NS 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
9 NS 3P N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 54,44 %10 NS 4C E = -620 5 27.78
11 NS 2K E+3 -150 8 44.44
12 NS 4K E-3 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 46,67 %13 NS 4P N-2 -200 11 61.11
14 NS 3S N+4 520 10 55.56
15 NS 4C E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,37 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 27.78
17 NS 3S W = -400 5 27.78
18 NS 2C E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.8 CAMUS Colette -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %19 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78
20 NS 3S N = 600 12 66.67
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 59,07 %22 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
24 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 44,81 %25 NS 5T S+1 420 10 55.56
26 NS 5K S-2 -200 3 16.67
27 NS 5P S = 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,15 %28 NS 3CcN-2 -500 0 0.00
29 NS 3C W = -140 3 16.67
30 NS 3C N = 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 244,0 / 540 = 45,19 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
a.8 CAMUS Colette -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 % 1 NS 5K N = 400 0 0.00
2 NS 4P E+2 -480 11 61.11
3 NS 1S N+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,19 % 4 NS 4P N+2 680 16 88.89
5 NS 1S W+2 -150 7 38.89
6 NS 2P E = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.6 VAN DOOREN Michele -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,19 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
8 NS 4P S = 420 15 83.33
9 NS 3P N = 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,15 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 5.56
11 NS 1S W+2 -150 8 44.44
12 NS 3K E = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %13 NS 4PcN-2 -500 2 11.11
14 NS 3S N+4 520 10 55.56
15 NS 2C E+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 54,44 %16 NS 3P N = 140 13 72.22
17 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 3PcE = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 46,67 %19 NS 3P N = 140 2 11.11
20 NS 3K N+1 130 5 27.78
21 NS 4C W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,37 %22 NS 3P W-2 200 16 88.89
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
24 NS 2C W+1 -140 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 59,07 %25 NS 5T S+1 420 10 55.56
26 NS 5C E-4 400 18 100.00
27 NS 6P S = 980 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 44,81 %28 NS 4P W-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 2K N+2 130 14 77.78
30 NS 3C N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,37 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
2 NS 5P E+1 -480 11 61.11
3 NS 2T N = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.8 CAMUS Colette -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 % 4 NS 4P N = 620 8 44.44
5 NS 1S W+2 -150 7 38.89
6 NS 2P E-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,19 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
8 NS 3S N = 400 11 61.11
9 NS 4P N-3 -150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 44,81 %10 NS 4C W-2 200 18 100.00
11 NS 2C S-2 -100 18 100.00
12 NS 3P S-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,15 %13 NS 4P N-2 -200 11 61.11
14 NS 3S N+3 490 3 16.67
15 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.6 VAN DOOREN Michele -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,19 %16 NS 3P S = 140 13 72.22
17 NS 3S W+2 -460 2 11.11
18 NS 4T N+1 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %19 NS 3P N+1 170 6 33.33
20 NS 2C S+2 170 8 44.44
21 NS 4C W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 54,44 %22 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
24 NS 4C W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 46,67 %25 NS 5T N+1 420 10 55.56
26 NS 5KcS-2 -500 0 0.00
27 NS 5P N = 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 59,07 %28 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78
29 NS 4C W-1 100 7 38.89
30 NS 3PcW-2 300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 235,0 / 540 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 46,67 % 1 NS 3S N+3 490 15 83.33
2 NS 6C W = -980 3 16.67
3 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,37 % 4 NS 4P N+1 650 13 72.22
5 NS 2T W+2 -130 13 72.22
6 NS 4C N+1 450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.8 CAMUS Colette -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
8 NS 3S N = 400 11 61.11
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 59,07 %10 NS 4C W = -620 5 27.78
11 NS 3K E+2 -150 8 44.44
12 NS 3P S = 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 44,81 %13 NS 4P N-2 -200 11 61.11
14 NS 6P N = 980 16 88.89
15 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,15 %16 NS 4PcN-1 -100 0 0.00
17 NS 3S E+3 -490 0 0.00
18 NS 4T N+1 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,19 %19 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78
20 NS 4C N = 620 16 88.89
21 NS 4C W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.6 VAN DOOREN Michele -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,19 %22 NS 4K N-1 -50 10 55.56
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 6 33.33
24 NS 4C W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %25 NS 5T S+1 420 10 55.56
26 NS 4C E-2 200 14 77.78
27 NS 6CcW-2 300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 54,44 %28 NS 3S W = -400 5 27.78
29 NS 5K N-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
a.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 54,44 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 9 50.00
2 NS 4C W+1 -450 14 77.78
3 NS 1S N+2 150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 46,67 % 4 NS 4PcN = 790 18 100.00
5 NS 4T E = -130 13 72.22
6 NS 2S S = 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,37 % 7 NS 1S W = -90 18 100.00
8 NS 4P S-1 -50 6 33.33
9 NS 4P N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 %10 NS 4C W-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 3T W+2 -150 8 44.44
12 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 59,07 %13 NS 4P N-2 -200 11 61.11
14 NS 3S N+4 520 10 55.56
15 NS 2C E+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 44,81 %16 NS 3P N = 140 13 72.22
17 NS 3S W = -400 5 27.78
18 NS 3T N+2 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,15 %19 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00
20 NS 3S N = 600 12 66.67
21 NS 4C W-1 50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.8 CAMUS Colette -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %22 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00
23 NS 4P W = -620 15 83.33
24 NS 6C W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,19 %25 NS 5T S+1 420 10 55.56
26 NS 5K S-1 -100 8 44.44
27 NS 5P S = 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.6 VAN DOOREN Michele -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,19 %28 NS 3P W = -140 12 66.67
29 NS 4K N = 130 14 77.78
30 NS 2S S = 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
2 NS 6C E-1 50 17 94.44
3 NS 1S N+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 54,44 % 4 NS 3P N+1 170 4 22.22
5 NS 1S W+2 -150 7 38.89
6 NS 2C N+2 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 46,67 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
8 NS 5PcS-1 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 4TcW-2 500 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,19 %10 NS 4C W-1 100 13 72.22
11 NS 3K E+2 -150 8 44.44
12 NS 2P S+1 140 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.6 VAN DOOREN Michele -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,19 %13 NS 4P S-2 -200 11 61.11
14 NS 3S S+3 490 3 16.67
15 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 59,07 %16 NS 4P N-1 -50 5 27.78
17 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 3T N+2 150 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 44,81 %19 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78
20 NS 3S S-1 -100 1 5.56
21 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,15 %22 NS 3P W = -140 6 33.33
23 NS 4P W = -620 15 83.33
24 NS 2C W+2 -170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,37 %25 NS 4T S+2 170 0 0.00
26 NS 3CcE-1 200 14 77.78
27 NS 5P S-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.8 CAMUS Colette -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %28 NS 3S E-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 3K N = 110 10 55.56
30 NS 3S S+1 430 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse
a.6 VAN DOOREN Michele -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,19 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 4 22.22
2 NS 6C W = -980 3 16.67
3 NS 1S N+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.5 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,89 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00
5 NS 1S W+3 -180 2 11.11
6 NS 4C N = 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René : 54,44 % 7 NS 1S W+1 -120 8 44.44
8 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00
9 NS 4P N-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 50,37 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 5.56
11 NS 2K E+3 -150 8 44.44
12 NS 2C N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.8 CAMUS Colette -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,22 %13 NS 4P N-2 -200 11 61.11
14 NS 3S N+4 520 10 55.56
15 NS 3T W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard : 40,19 %16 NS 4CcW-1 200 18 100.00
17 NS 3S W-1 50 12 66.67
18 NS 5K S = 600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 59,07 %19 NS 2P N+2 170 6 33.33
20 NS 3K N+1 130 5 27.78
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 44,81 %22 NS 3C N = 140 13 72.22
23 NS 4P W = -620 15 83.33
24 NS 4C W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 58,15 %25 NS 5T S+1 420 10 55.56
26 NS 3C E-1 100 10 55.56
27 NS 6C W-3 150 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 46,67 %28 NS 5K W-3 150 18 100.00
29 NS 4C W-1 100 7 38.89
30 NS 3ScS = 550 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,48 % 1 EO 3S S+3 490 3 16.67
2 EO 4KcS-2 -500 10 55.56
3 EO 1S N-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,33 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 10 55.56
5 EO 1K E+2 -110 0 0.00
6 EO 4C N+1 450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,67 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
8 EO 4P S = 420 3 16.67
9 EO 3P N-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,11 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 17 94.44
11 EO 1S W+2 -150 10 55.56
12 EO 3K E = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.6 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,52 %13 EO 4P N-2 -200 7 38.89
14 EO 3S N+3 490 15 83.33
15 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %16 EO 4PcN-1 -100 18 100.00
17 EO 3S E+3 -490 18 100.00
18 EO 4T N+1 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 55,93 %19 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 100.00
20 EO 3S N = 600 6 33.33
21 EO 4C W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.9 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,89 %22 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67
23 EO 4P W = -620 3 16.67
24 EO 2C W+2 -170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,48 %25 EO 5T S+1 420 8 44.44
26 EO 3C E-1 100 8 44.44
27 EO 6C W-3 150 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 45,19 %28 EO 3CcN-2 -500 18 100.00
29 EO 3C W = -140 15 83.33
30 EO 3C N = 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 314,0 / 540 = 58,15 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -WANDERPEPEN Janine
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,33 % 1 EO 3S S+3 490 3 16.67
2 EO 6C W = -980 15 83.33
3 EO 2S N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,67 % 4 EO 4P S+1 650 5 27.78
5 EO 1S W+1 -120 2 11.11
6 EO 4C N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,48 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
8 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 4CcE-2 500 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,52 %10 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 2C S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 EO 3P S-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %13 EO 4P N-2 -200 7 38.89
14 EO 6P N = 980 2 11.11
15 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 55,93 %16 EO 3P N = 140 5 27.78
17 EO 3S W = -400 13 72.22
18 EO 3T N+2 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.9 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,89 %19 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22
20 EO 3S S-1 -100 17 94.44
21 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,48 %22 EO 3C N = 140 5 27.78
23 EO 4P W = -620 3 16.67
24 EO 4C W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 45,19 %25 EO 5T S+1 420 8 44.44
26 EO 5K S-2 -200 15 83.33
27 EO 5P S = 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,11 %28 EO 4P W-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 2K N+2 130 4 22.22
30 EO 3C N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 242,0 / 540 = 44,81 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,67 % 1 EO 3S N+3 490 3 16.67
2 EO 6C W = -980 15 83.33
3 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,48 % 4 EO Pass Passe 16 88.89
5 EO 3S W = -400 18 100.00
6 EO 2P E = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,33 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
8 EO 4P S-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 4P N-4 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %10 EO 4C W = -620 13 72.22
11 EO 3K E+2 -150 10 55.56
12 EO 3P S = 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 55,93 %13 EO 4P N-2 -200 7 38.89
14 EO 3S N+4 520 8 44.44
15 EO 2C E+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,89 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22
17 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 3T N+2 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,48 %19 EO 2P N+2 170 12 66.67
20 EO 3K N+1 130 13 72.22
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 45,19 %22 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
24 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,11 %25 EO 5T S+1 420 8 44.44
26 EO 5C E-4 400 0 0.00
27 EO 6P S = 980 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.6 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,52 %28 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22
29 EO 4C W-1 100 11 61.11
30 EO 3PcW-2 300 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 319,0 / 540 = 59,07 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 COLLIN Jean-Marie -LAENENS René
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 55,93 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 9 50.00
2 EO 4C W+1 -450 4 22.22
3 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,89 % 4 EO 3P N+1 170 14 77.78
5 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 61.11
6 EO 2C N+2 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,48 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
8 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
9 EO 4P N-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 45,19 %10 EO 4C E = -620 13 72.22
11 EO 2K E+3 -150 10 55.56
12 EO 4K E-3 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,67 %13 EO 4P N-2 -200 7 38.89
14 EO 4P N+2 480 18 100.00
15 EO 3C W = -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,11 %16 EO 3P N = 140 5 27.78
17 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 3PcE = -530 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,33 %19 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22
20 EO 3S N-1 -100 17 94.44
21 EO 3S W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.6 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,52 %22 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
24 EO 4C W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,48 %25 EO 5T S+1 420 8 44.44
26 EO 3P W = -140 12 66.67
27 EO 5P S+1 480 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %28 EO 3S W = -400 13 72.22
29 EO 5K N-2 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 294,0 / 540 = 54,44 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
A.9 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,89 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
2 EO 6C E-1 50 1 5.56
3 EO 1S N+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,48 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 18 100.00
5 EO 1S W+3 -180 16 88.89
6 EO 4C N = 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 45,19 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
8 EO 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
9 EO 3P N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 55,93 %10 EO 4C W-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 3T W+2 -150 10 55.56
12 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,11 %13 EO 4PcN-2 -500 16 88.89
14 EO 3S N+4 520 8 44.44
15 EO 2C E+2 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,67 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22
17 EO 5T E-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 3T N+2 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.6 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,52 %19 EO 3P N+1 170 12 66.67
20 EO 2C S+2 170 10 55.56
21 EO 4C W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,33 %22 EO 1S E+2 -150 16 88.89
23 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00
24 EO 5C W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %25 EO 5T S+1 420 8 44.44
26 EO 4C E-2 200 4 22.22
27 EO 6CcW-2 300 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,48 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 88.89
29 EO 4CcE-1 200 0 0.00
30 EO 3S S = 400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 VAN DOOREN Michele -VAN AVERMAET Martine
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,48 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
2 EO 6C W = -980 15 83.33
3 EO 1S N+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 45,19 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 10 55.56
5 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 61.11
6 EO 3C N+1 170 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,11 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
8 EO 4P S = 420 3 16.67
9 EO 3P N = 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,48 %10 EO 4C W-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 2T W+3 -150 10 55.56
12 EO 4K E-3 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,89 %13 EO 4P S-2 -200 7 38.89
14 EO 3S S+3 490 15 83.33
15 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.6 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,52 %16 EO 3P S = 140 5 27.78
17 EO 3S W+2 -460 16 88.89
18 EO 4T N+1 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,67 %19 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22
20 EO 3S N = 600 6 33.33
21 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %22 EO 4K N-1 -50 8 44.44
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
24 EO 4C W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,33 %25 EO 5T S+1 420 8 44.44
26 EO 5KcS-1 -200 15 83.33
27 EO 5C W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 55,93 %28 EO 3P W = -140 6 33.33
29 EO 4K N = 130 4 22.22
30 EO 2S S = 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 RAVET Brigitte -COLLET Edgard
A.4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 45,19 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 9 50.00
2 EO 6C W-1 50 1 5.56
3 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,11 % 4 EO 4P N+2 680 2 11.11
5 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 61.11
6 EO 2P E = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.6 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,52 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
8 EO 3S N = 400 7 38.89
9 EO 4P N-3 -150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.9 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,89 %10 EO 4C W-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 3K E+2 -150 10 55.56
12 EO 2P S+1 140 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,48 %13 EO 3S S-2 -200 7 38.89
14 EO 6S S+1 1020 0 0.00
15 EO 2P S-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,48 %16 EO 4CcW-1 200 0 0.00
17 EO 3S W-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 5K S = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %19 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22
20 EO 4C N = 620 2 11.11
21 EO 4C W-1 50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,67 %22 EO 3C S = 140 5 27.78
23 EO 4P W = -620 3 16.67
24 EO 4C W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 55,93 %25 EO 5T S+1 420 8 44.44
26 EO 5K S-1 -100 10 55.56
27 EO 5P S = 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,33 %28 EO 4C N-2 -200 10 55.56
29 EO 3C W = -140 15 83.33
30 EO 4C N-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
Total : 217,0 / 540 = 40,19 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 CAMUS Colette -WILLEMS Jacques
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,11 % 1 EO 5K N = 400 18 100.00
2 EO 4P E+2 -480 7 38.89
3 EO 1S N+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.6 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,52 % 4 EO 4P N = 620 10 55.56
5 EO 1S W+2 -150 11 61.11
6 EO 2P E-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
8 EO 3S N = 400 7 38.89
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,33 %10 EO 4C W-1 100 5 27.78
11 EO 2K E+2 -130 2 11.11
12 EO 4K E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,48 %13 EO 4P N-2 -200 7 38.89
14 EO 3S N+4 520 8 44.44
15 EO 3T W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,48 %16 EO 4P N-1 -50 13 72.22
17 EO 5T W-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 4T N+1 150 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 45,19 %19 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22
20 EO 3S N = 600 6 33.33
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 55,93 %22 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 100.00
23 EO 4P W = -620 3 16.67
24 EO 6C W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,67 %25 EO 5T S+1 420 8 44.44
26 EO 3C E-2 200 4 22.22
27 EO 6CcW-3 500 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.9 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,89 %28 EO 3S E-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 3K N = 110 8 44.44
30 EO 3S S+1 430 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 228,0 / 540 = 42,22 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A.6 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,52 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 14 77.78
2 EO 5P E+1 -480 7 38.89
3 EO 2T N = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 % 4 EO 4P N+1 650 5 27.78
5 EO 2T W+2 -130 5 27.78
6 EO 4C N+1 450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 55,93 % 7 EO 1S W = -90 0 0.00
8 EO 4P S-1 -50 12 66.67
9 EO 4P N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,48 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 17 94.44
11 EO 2K E+3 -150 10 55.56
12 EO 2C N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,33 %13 EO 4PcN-3 -800 18 100.00
14 EO 3S N+4 520 8 44.44
15 EO 2C E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 45,19 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 13 72.22
17 EO 3S W = -400 13 72.22
18 EO 2C E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,48 %19 EO 2P N+2 170 12 66.67
20 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
21 EO 4C W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,11 %22 EO 3P W-2 200 2 11.11
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
24 EO 2C W+1 -140 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.9 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,89 %25 EO 4T S+2 170 18 100.00
26 EO 3CcE-1 200 4 22.22
27 EO 5P S-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,67 %28 EO 3P W+1 -170 8 44.44
29 EO 4K N = 130 4 22.22
30 EO 3C N = 140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
A.7 NELIS Claude -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 % 1 EO 3S N+3 490 3 16.67
2 EO 6C W = -980 15 83.33
3 EO 1S N+2 150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 55,93 % 4 EO 4PcN = 790 0 0.00
5 EO 4T E = -130 5 27.78
6 EO 2S S = 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.9 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 48,89 % 7 EO 1S W+1 -120 10 55.56
8 EO 5PcS-1 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 4TcW-2 500 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 56,67 %10 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
11 EO 3S W = -400 18 100.00
12 EO 1S E = -90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 45,19 %13 EO 4P N-2 -200 7 38.89
14 EO 3S N+4 520 8 44.44
15 EO 4C E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.3 ERPICUM Patrice -DELHEZ Jacques : 43,33 %16 EO 3P N = 140 5 27.78
17 EO 6T W-1 50 6 33.33
18 EO 3T N+1 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.5 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 46,11 %19 EO 3P N = 140 16 88.89
20 EO 3K N+1 130 13 72.22
21 EO 4C W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.1 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 56,48 %22 EO 4PcW-3 800 0 0.00
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 12 66.67
24 EO 4C W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.6 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,52 %25 EO 5T N+1 420 8 44.44
26 EO 5KcS-2 -500 18 100.00
27 EO 5P N = 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A10 DAPHNE Chantal -WUYARD Alphonse : 51,48 %28 EO 5K W-3 150 0 0.00
29 EO 4C W-1 100 11 61.11
30 EO 3ScS = 550 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
|
|