|
Tournoi du 23-01-17
Lundi
1 57,78 5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc
2 55,00 7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
3 54,26 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 52,22 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 51,48 4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
6 48,70 8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
7 48,33 10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
8 46,11 2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
9 43,15 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
10 42,96 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 61,48 13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
2 56,11 18 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYST Michele
3 52,78 20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
4 52,41 15 BRIOT Fernand -MOSSERAY Etienne
5 47,41 16 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
6 47,04 14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane
7 46,48 19 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
8 45,56 11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ERPICUM Patrice
~ 45,56 17 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
10 45,19 12 BERGER Jean Marie -MASSAUX Joel
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,56 % 1 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 2S W+1 -150 12 66.67
3 NS 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 61,48 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
6 NS 6T W = -1370 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 BERGER Jean Marie -MASSAUX Joel : 45,19 % 7 NS 3K W+2 -150 10 55.56
8 NS 3C S = 140 12 66.67
9 NS 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,41 %10 NS 5T S = 600 9 50.00
11 NS 2S S+2 180 18 100.00
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
17 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,56 %13 NS 6P N-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
18 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYST Michele : 56,11 %16 NS 3S W = -600 4 22.22
17 NS 3C S = 140 13 72.22
18 NS 2S S+1 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
19 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,48 %19 NS 4C E-4 400 18 100.00
20 NS 3T S+2 150 4 22.22
21 NS 3S S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,78 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 38.89
23 NS 2T S-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 3C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,04 %25 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
26 NS 2S E+1 -150 0 0.00
27 NS 4C W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 BRIOT Fernand -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %28 NS 1S E-3 150 4 22.22
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 61,48 % 1 NS 1S N+1 120 14 77.78
2 NS 2S W+2 -180 8 44.44
3 NS 4P S+1 450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
12 BERGER Jean Marie -MASSAUX Joel : 45,19 % 4 NS 3C W+2 -200 17 94.44
5 NS 2S E = -120 12 66.67
6 NS 6T W = -1370 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,56 % 7 NS 4K E+1 -150 10 55.56
8 NS 3C S-1 -50 6 33.33
9 NS 1S N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,78 %10 NS 5T S = 600 9 50.00
11 NS 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,04 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 3 16.67
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
15 BRIOT Fernand -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %16 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
17 NS 3C S = 140 13 72.22
18 NS 1S S = 90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
16 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,41 %19 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 10 55.56
21 NS 3P E = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
17 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,56 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 38.89
23 NS 2C S-1 -100 2 11.11
24 NS 2S W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYST Michele : 56,11 %25 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 11.11
26 NS 2P W-1 100 14 77.78
27 NS 1K E = -70 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
19 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,48 %28 NS 1S S+1 120 2 11.11
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 2P N+2 170 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 249,0 / 540 = 46,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
12 BERGER Jean Marie -MASSAUX Joel : 45,19 % 1 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 1S E+3 -180 8 44.44
3 NS 3S S+4 520 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,56 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
5 NS 2T E = -90 16 88.89
6 NS 5T W+1 -620 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 61,48 % 7 NS 6T E-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89
9 NS 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
18 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYST Michele : 56,11 %10 NS 6T S-1 -100 2 11.11
11 NS 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
12 NS 4P S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
19 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,48 %13 NS 4P N = 620 7 38.89
14 NS 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00
15 NS 4C W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,78 %16 NS 2S E+3 -210 8 44.44
17 NS 3C S = 140 13 72.22
18 NS 1S S = 90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,04 %19 NS 4T E = -130 6 33.33
20 NS 3P S+2 200 8 44.44
21 NS 2P E+2 -170 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 BRIOT Fernand -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 38.89
23 NS 2C E-3 300 17 94.44
24 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,41 %25 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 44.44
26 NS 2S E-3 300 18 100.00
27 NS 1S E = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
17 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,56 %28 NS 4C S+2 680 17 94.44
29 NS 4PcS-5 -1400 0 0.00
30 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 293,0 / 540 = 54,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
17 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,56 % 1 NS 2PcE-3 500 17 94.44
2 NS 3S W = -400 3 16.67
3 NS 4P S+1 450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
16 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,41 % 4 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
5 NS 2C E+2 -170 1 5.56
6 NS 6T E = -1370 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
15 BRIOT Fernand -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 % 7 NS 5T E+1 -620 2 11.11
8 NS 3C S-2 -100 2 11.11
9 NS 3P E-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,04 %10 NS 5T S = 600 9 50.00
11 NS 1S S+2 150 14 77.78
12 NS 4P S = 620 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,78 %13 NS 5S S = 660 15 83.33
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 55.56
15 NS 4P W+1 -450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,48 %16 NS 2K S+2 130 18 100.00
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22
18 NS 2S N-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
18 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYST Michele : 56,11 %19 NS 3P W-1 100 14 77.78
20 NS 3T S+1 130 1 5.56
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 61,48 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 38.89
23 NS 2C E-3 300 17 94.44
24 NS 2S W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
12 BERGER Jean Marie -MASSAUX Joel : 45,19 %25 NS 4C E-2 200 18 100.00
26 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
27 NS 1S S = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,56 %28 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 2P N+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 278,0 / 540 = 51,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc
18 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYST Michele : 56,11 % 1 NS 1S N = 90 11 61.11
2 NS 2S W+2 -180 8 44.44
3 NS 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
17 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,56 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
5 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 38.89
6 NS 6T W = -1370 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
16 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,41 % 7 NS 3T E+2 -150 10 55.56
8 NS 4C S-1 -50 6 33.33
9 NS 3P E-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,56 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 17 94.44
11 NS 1S S+2 150 14 77.78
12 NS 3P S+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
15 BRIOT Fernand -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %13 NS 5P N = 650 12 66.67
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 55.56
15 NS 4P W = -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,04 %16 NS 4T E = -130 12 66.67
17 NS 3C S = 140 13 72.22
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,78 %19 NS 2P W+2 -170 4 22.22
20 NS 3S S+3 690 18 100.00
21 NS 1S S+1 120 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
19 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,48 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 83.33
23 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33
24 NS 3C E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 61,48 %25 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 11.11
26 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22
27 NS 1K E = -70 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
12 BERGER Jean Marie -MASSAUX Joel : 45,19 %28 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67
29 NS 4C E = -620 16 88.89
30 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 312,0 / 540 = 57,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
19 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,48 % 1 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 3S W = -400 3 16.67
3 NS 4P S+1 450 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
18 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYST Michele : 56,11 % 4 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
5 NS 2C E+1 -140 7 38.89
6 NS 6T W = -1370 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
17 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,56 % 7 NS 6T E-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 2C S+1 140 12 66.67
9 NS 3P W-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
12 BERGER Jean Marie -MASSAUX Joel : 45,19 %10 NS 5T S+1 620 14 77.78
11 NS 3T W-2 100 3 16.67
12 NS 4P S = 620 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,56 %13 NS 3S N = 600 4 22.22
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 3 16.67
15 NS 5P W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
16 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,41 %16 NS 1S E = -90 14 77.78
17 NS 4C S = 420 18 100.00
18 NS 2S S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
15 BRIOT Fernand -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %19 NS 4KcS-3 -500 2 11.11
20 NS 2S S+2 180 6 33.33
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,04 %22 NS 3S E+3 -690 0 0.00
23 NS 2S E-2 200 14 77.78
24 NS 3C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,78 %25 NS 4C E = -620 6 33.33
26 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22
27 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 61,48 %28 NS 2C N+2 170 6 33.33
29 NS 4C E = -620 16 88.89
30 NS 4P N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,78 % 1 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
3 NS 3S S+3 490 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,48 % 4 NS 3P N-2 -200 17 94.44
5 NS 3T E-2 100 18 100.00
6 NS 5T W+1 -620 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
18 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYST Michele : 56,11 % 7 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
8 NS 3C S = 140 12 66.67
9 NS 3K N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 61,48 %10 NS 6TcS-1 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00
12 NS 4P S-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
12 BERGER Jean Marie -MASSAUX Joel : 45,19 %13 NS 6P N-1 -100 2 11.11
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 3 16.67
15 NS 4P W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,56 %16 NS 2S E+2 -180 10 55.56
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22
18 NS 1S S+2 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
17 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,56 %19 NS 4T E-1 100 14 77.78
20 NS 3S S+1 630 12 66.67
21 NS 3S S = 600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
16 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,41 %22 NS 3T E+2 -150 18 100.00
23 NS 1S N+1 120 11 61.11
24 NS 3C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
15 BRIOT Fernand -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %25 NS 3K N-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,04 %28 NS 4C S+1 650 12 66.67
29 NS 4C E = -620 16 88.89
30 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 297,0 / 540 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,04 % 1 NS 1S N = 90 11 61.11
2 NS 3S W-1 50 17 94.44
3 NS 4P S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,78 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
5 NS 2C W = -110 14 77.78
6 NS 6T W = -1370 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
19 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,48 % 7 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
8 NS 3C S-1 -50 6 33.33
9 NS 3K N-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
15 BRIOT Fernand -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 17 94.44
11 NS 2C W-2 100 3 16.67
12 NS 3P S+1 170 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 61,48 %13 NS 4P N = 620 7 38.89
14 NS 3S E+3 -490 3 16.67
15 NS 3S E = -400 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
12 BERGER Jean Marie -MASSAUX Joel : 45,19 %16 NS 2S E+4 -240 6 33.33
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,56 %19 NS 3P W-1 100 14 77.78
20 NS 3S S+2 660 16 88.89
21 NS 2S S-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
18 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYST Michele : 56,11 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 38.89
23 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33
24 NS 2C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
17 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,56 %25 NS 4C E-1 100 15 83.33
26 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22
27 NS 1S S = 90 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
16 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,41 %28 NS 2C N+3 200 8 44.44
29 NS 3S E+2 -660 2 11.11
30 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
Total : 263,0 / 540 = 48,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
15 BRIOT Fernand -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 % 1 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 27.78
2 NS 2K E+2 -130 14 77.78
3 NS 3S S+3 490 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,04 % 4 NS 4C W = -620 9 50.00
5 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 38.89
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,78 % 7 NS 5T E = -600 5 27.78
8 NS 4C S-3 -150 0 0.00
9 NS 3P W-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
17 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,56 %10 NS 5T S = 600 9 50.00
11 NS 1S S+2 150 14 77.78
12 NS 5CcE-3 500 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
16 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,41 %13 NS 3S N+2 660 15 83.33
14 NS 3S E+2 -460 10 55.56
15 NS 3S E+4 -520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 61,48 %16 NS 3S E+1 -630 2 11.11
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 22.22
18 NS 1S S = 90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
12 BERGER Jean Marie -MASSAUX Joel : 45,19 %19 NS 2K S = 90 10 55.56
20 NS 4C S+1 650 14 77.78
21 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,56 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 38.89
23 NS 1S N+1 120 11 61.11
24 NS 3C E-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
19 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,48 %25 NS 4C E-1 100 15 83.33
26 NS 3P W-1 100 14 77.78
27 NS 1S S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
18 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYST Michele : 56,11 %28 NS 4C S-1 -100 0 0.00
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 282,0 / 540 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
16 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,41 % 1 NS 4PcE-3 500 17 94.44
2 NS 2S E-1 50 17 94.44
3 NS 3S N+4 520 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
15 BRIOT Fernand -MOSSERAY Etienne : 52,41 % 4 NS 4C E = -620 9 50.00
5 NS 2P E+2 -170 1 5.56
6 NS 6T E = -1370 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,04 % 7 NS 5T E = -600 5 27.78
8 NS 3S N+2 460 18 100.00
9 NS 2K N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
19 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 46,48 %10 NS 4T N+1 150 4 22.22
11 NS 1S N+1 120 8 44.44
12 NS 4P N-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
18 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYST Michele : 56,11 %13 NS 4P N+2 680 18 100.00
14 NS 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33
15 NS 4P E = -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
17 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,56 %16 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 4 22.22
18 NS 1S N = 90 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 61,48 %19 NS 1P E+1 -110 8 44.44
20 NS 3T N+1 130 1 5.56
21 NS 1ScN-1 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
12 BERGER Jean Marie -MASSAUX Joel : 45,19 %22 NS 3S E+1 -630 15 83.33
23 NS 1S N = 90 6 33.33
24 NS Pass Passe 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,56 %25 NS 4C E+1 -650 2 11.11
26 NS 1S E-1 100 14 77.78
27 NS 2C E = -110 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 52,78 %28 NS 4C N+2 680 17 94.44
29 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 44.44
30 NS 4P N = 420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 261,0 / 540 = 48,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 CLERIN François-Xavier -ERPICUM Patrice
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 % 1 EO 3S N-2 -100 18 100.00
2 EO 2S W+1 -150 6 33.33
3 EO 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,26 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
5 EO 2T E = -90 2 11.11
6 EO 5T W+1 -620 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,11 % 7 EO 4K E+1 -150 8 44.44
8 EO 3C S-1 -50 12 66.67
9 EO 1S N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 57,78 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 1 5.56
11 EO 1S S+2 150 4 22.22
12 EO 3P S+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %13 EO 3S N = 600 14 77.78
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 15 83.33
15 EO 5P W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,00 %16 EO 2S E+2 -180 8 44.44
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78
18 EO 1S S+2 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,70 %19 EO 3P W-1 100 4 22.22
20 EO 3S S+2 660 2 11.11
21 EO 2S S-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,22 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 61.11
23 EO 1S N+1 120 7 38.89
24 EO 3C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,33 %25 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 88.89
26 EO 1S E-1 100 4 22.22
27 EO 2C E = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,48 %28 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 2P N+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 BERGER Jean Marie -MASSAUX Joel
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,26 % 1 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 1S E+3 -180 10 55.56
3 EO 3S S+4 520 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,11 % 4 EO 3C W+2 -200 1 5.56
5 EO 2S E = -120 6 33.33
6 EO 6T W = -1370 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 % 7 EO 3K W+2 -150 8 44.44
8 EO 3C S = 140 6 33.33
9 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %10 EO 5T S+1 620 4 22.22
11 EO 3T W-2 100 15 83.33
12 EO 4P S = 620 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,00 %13 EO 6P N-1 -100 16 88.89
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 15 83.33
15 EO 4P W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,70 %16 EO 2S E+4 -240 12 66.67
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,22 %19 EO 2K S = 90 8 44.44
20 EO 4C S+1 650 4 22.22
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,33 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 3 16.67
23 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67
24 EO Pass Passe 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,48 %25 EO 4C E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
27 EO 1S S = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 57,78 %28 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33
29 EO 4C E = -620 2 11.11
30 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 244,0 / 540 = 45,19 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,11 % 1 EO 1S N+1 120 4 22.22
2 EO 2S W+2 -180 10 55.56
3 EO 4P S+1 450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
6 EO 6T W = -1370 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,26 % 7 EO 6T E-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11
9 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,00 %10 EO 6TcS-1 -200 18 100.00
11 EO 2C E = -110 18 100.00
12 EO 4P S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 96,30 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,70 %13 EO 4P N = 620 11 61.11
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 15 83.33
15 EO 3S E = -400 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,22 %16 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78
18 EO 1S S = 90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,33 %19 EO 1P E+1 -110 10 55.56
20 EO 3T N+1 130 17 94.44
21 EO 1ScN-1 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,48 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 61.11
23 EO 2C E-3 300 1 5.56
24 EO 2S W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 57,78 %25 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 88.89
26 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78
27 EO 1K E = -70 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %28 EO 2C N+2 170 12 66.67
29 EO 4C E = -620 2 11.11
30 EO 4P N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 332,0 / 540 = 61,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 STEED Mercédès -de WASSEIGE Ariane
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,70 % 1 EO 1S N = 90 7 38.89
2 EO 3S W-1 50 1 5.56
3 EO 4P S = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,22 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
5 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 61.11
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,33 % 7 EO 5T E = -600 13 72.22
8 EO 3S N+2 460 0 0.00
9 EO 2K N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,48 %10 EO 5T S = 600 9 50.00
11 EO 1S S+2 150 4 22.22
12 EO 4P S = 620 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,11 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
14 EO 3S E+3 -490 15 83.33
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 57,78 %16 EO 4T E = -130 6 33.33
17 EO 3C S = 140 5 27.78
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,26 %19 EO 4T E = -130 12 66.67
20 EO 3P S+2 200 10 55.56
21 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %22 EO 3S E+3 -690 18 100.00
23 EO 2S E-2 200 4 22.22
24 EO 3C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %25 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
26 EO 2S E+1 -150 18 100.00
27 EO 4C W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,00 %28 EO 4C S+1 650 6 33.33
29 EO 4C E = -620 2 11.11
30 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 254,0 / 540 = 47,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 BRIOT Fernand -MOSSERAY Etienne
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,22 % 1 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 2K E+2 -130 4 22.22
3 EO 3S S+3 490 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,33 % 4 EO 4C E = -620 9 50.00
5 EO 2P E+2 -170 17 94.44
6 EO 6T E = -1370 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,48 % 7 EO 5T E+1 -620 16 88.89
8 EO 3C S-2 -100 16 88.89
9 EO 3P E-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,70 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 1 5.56
11 EO 2C W-2 100 15 83.33
12 EO 3P S+1 170 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 57,78 %13 EO 5P N = 650 6 33.33
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 8 44.44
15 EO 4P W = -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,11 %16 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
17 EO 3C S = 140 5 27.78
18 EO 1S S = 90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %19 EO 4KcS-3 -500 16 88.89
20 EO 2S S+2 180 12 66.67
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,26 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 61.11
23 EO 2C E-3 300 1 5.56
24 EO 3C E = -140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,00 %25 EO 3K N-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %28 EO 1S E-3 150 14 77.78
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,33 % 1 EO 4PcE-3 500 1 5.56
2 EO 2S E-1 50 1 5.56
3 EO 3S N+4 520 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,48 % 4 EO 3S E+1 -630 16 88.89
5 EO 2C E+2 -170 17 94.44
6 EO 6T E = -1370 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 57,78 % 7 EO 3T E+2 -150 8 44.44
8 EO 4C S-1 -50 12 66.67
9 EO 3P E-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %10 EO 5T S = 600 9 50.00
11 EO 2S S+2 180 0 0.00
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,22 %13 EO 3S N+2 660 3 16.67
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 8 44.44
15 EO 3S E+4 -520 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %16 EO 1S E = -90 4 22.22
17 EO 4C S = 420 0 0.00
18 EO 2S S-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,11 %19 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 8 44.44
21 EO 3P E = -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,00 %22 EO 3T E+2 -150 0 0.00
23 EO 1S N+1 120 7 38.89
24 EO 3C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,26 %25 EO 3C E+1 -170 10 55.56
26 EO 2S E-3 300 0 0.00
27 EO 1S E = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,70 %28 EO 2C N+3 200 10 55.56
29 EO 3S E+2 -660 16 88.89
30 EO 4P N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
Total : 256,0 / 540 = 47,41 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,48 % 1 EO 2PcE-3 500 1 5.56
2 EO 3S W = -400 15 83.33
3 EO 4P S+1 450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 57,78 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
5 EO 2C W+1 -140 11 61.11
6 EO 6T W = -1370 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 % 7 EO 6T E-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 2C S+1 140 6 33.33
9 EO 3P W-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,22 %10 EO 5T S = 600 9 50.00
11 EO 1S S+2 150 4 22.22
12 EO 5CcE-3 500 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %13 EO 6P N-2 -200 18 100.00
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,33 %16 EO 3S E+2 -660 18 100.00
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 14 77.78
18 EO 1S N = 90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,00 %19 EO 4T E-1 100 4 22.22
20 EO 3S S+1 630 6 33.33
21 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,11 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 61.11
23 EO 2C S-1 -100 16 88.89
24 EO 2S W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,70 %25 EO 4C E-1 100 3 16.67
26 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78
27 EO 1S S = 90 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,26 %28 EO 4C S+2 680 1 5.56
29 EO 4PcS-5 -1400 18 100.00
30 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 246,0 / 540 = 45,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYST Michele
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 57,78 % 1 EO 1S N = 90 7 38.89
2 EO 2S W+2 -180 10 55.56
3 EO 4P S+2 480 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 % 4 EO 3S E+3 -690 18 100.00
5 EO 2C E+1 -140 11 61.11
6 EO 6T W = -1370 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,00 % 7 EO 3S E+1 -630 18 100.00
8 EO 3C S = 140 6 33.33
9 EO 3K N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,26 %10 EO 6T S-1 -100 16 88.89
11 EO 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
12 EO 4P S-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,33 %13 EO 4P N+2 680 0 0.00
14 EO 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67
15 EO 4P E = -420 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %16 EO 3S W = -600 14 77.78
17 EO 3C S = 140 5 27.78
18 EO 2S S+1 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,48 %19 EO 3P W-1 100 4 22.22
20 EO 3T S+1 130 17 94.44
21 EO 2P E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,70 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 61.11
23 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67
24 EO 2C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,11 %25 EO 4C E+1 -650 16 88.89
26 EO 2P W-1 100 4 22.22
27 EO 1K E = -70 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,22 %28 EO 4C S-1 -100 18 100.00
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 303,0 / 540 = 56,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 % 1 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 3S W = -400 15 83.33
3 EO 4P S+1 450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,00 % 4 EO 3P N-2 -200 1 5.56
5 EO 3T E-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 5T W+1 -620 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 3,70 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,70 % 7 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
8 EO 3C S-1 -50 12 66.67
9 EO 3K N-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,33 %10 EO 4T N+1 150 14 77.78
11 EO 1S N+1 120 10 55.56
12 EO 4P N-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,26 %13 EO 4P N = 620 11 61.11
14 EO 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
15 EO 4C W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,48 %16 EO 2K S+2 130 0 0.00
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 14 77.78
18 EO 2S N-1 -100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %19 EO 4C E-4 400 0 0.00
20 EO 3T S+2 150 14 77.78
21 EO 3S S-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 57,78 %22 EO 3S E+1 -630 3 16.67
23 EO 1S N = 90 12 66.67
24 EO 3C E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,22 %25 EO 4C E-1 100 3 16.67
26 EO 3P W-1 100 4 22.22
27 EO 1S S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,11 %28 EO 1S S+1 120 16 88.89
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 2P N+2 170 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 251,0 / 540 = 46,48 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 55,00 % 1 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 72.22
2 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00
3 EO 3S S+3 490 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,70 % 4 EO 4C W = -620 9 50.00
5 EO 2C W = -110 4 22.22
6 EO 6T W = -1370 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
9 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 52,22 % 7 EO 5T E = -600 13 72.22
8 EO 4C S-3 -150 18 100.00
9 EO 3P W-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 46,11 %10 EO 5T S = 600 9 50.00
11 EO 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 51,48 %13 EO 5S S = 660 3 16.67
14 EO 3S E+2 -460 8 44.44
15 EO 4P W+1 -450 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 54,26 %16 EO 2S E+3 -210 10 55.56
17 EO 3C S = 140 5 27.78
18 EO 1S S = 90 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
5 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 57,78 %19 EO 2P W+2 -170 14 77.78
20 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
21 EO 1S S+1 120 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 43,15 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 11 61.11
23 EO 2T S-2 -200 18 100.00
24 EO 3C E-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,96 %25 EO 4C E = -620 12 66.67
26 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78
27 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 48,33 %28 EO 4C N+2 680 1 5.56
29 EO 4C E+1 -650 10 55.56
30 EO 4P N = 420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
|
|