|
Tournoi du 24-04-17
Lundi
1 57,93 12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard
2 57,46 5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN
3 56,99 9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
4 55,71 4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
5 53,85 13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie
6 52,33 6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette
7 51,86 10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph
8 50,23 3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose
9 46,39 8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 45,57 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
11 45,10 11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
12 43,36 14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick
~ 43,36 7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie
14 39,86 2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger
15 0,00 15 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 72,05 24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
2 58,72 20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
3 55,00 25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice
4 53,97 30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc
5 53,33 23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 52,69 17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON
7 49,53 28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
8 48,14 19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
9 47,56 22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane
10 47,31 16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert
11 45,77 21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie
12 44,49 18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent
13 44,29 29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
14 42,07 27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
15 36,67 26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert : 47,31 % 1 NS 4C W-2 100 17 65.38
2 NS 3S N = 600 17 65.38
3 NS 2S N = 120 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,67 % 4 NS 6S E-1 100 25 96.15
5 NS 3T W+1 -130 7 26.92
6 NS 3S W = -600 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 55,00 % 7 NS 4KcN-3 -800 2 7.69
8 NS Pass Passe 11 42.31
9 NS 4K N+2 170 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 72,05 %10 NS 1S W-2 200 26 100.00
11 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 11.54
12 NS 3P N-2 -200 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 53,97 %13 NS 1S W-1 100 21 80.77
14 NS 6S W-1 50 16 61.54
15 NS 3TcN-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 49,53 %16 NS 3P E = -140 5 19.23
17 NS 4P N+2 480 4 15.38
18 NS 2S S-2 -200 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 45,77 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 24 92.31
20 NS 2C S+1 140 9 34.62
21 NS 1S N-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 58,72 %22 NS 4PcS-2 -300 0 0.00
23 NS 3P E+2 -200 24 92.31
24 NS 4C N = 420 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,14 %25 NS 4P E = -620 18 69.23
26 NS 3C W+2 -200 14 53.85
27 NS 3C E+2 -200 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 44,49 %28 NS 4P S-2 -200 11 42.31
29 NS 1S S-3 -300 1 3.85
30 NS 2S W+1 -150 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,29 %31 NS . 15 57.69
32 NS . 13 50.00
33 NS . 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
Total : 391,0 / 858 = 45,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger
30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 53,97 % 1 NS . 12 46.15
2 NS . 10 38.46
3 NS . 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON : 52,69 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 14 53.85
5 NS 2T W+2 -130 7 26.92
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert : 47,31 % 7 NS 4KcN-3 -800 2 7.69
8 NS Pass Passe 11 42.31
9 NS 3K N = 110 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 26,92 %
26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,67 %10 NS 2T E = -90 15 57.69
11 NS 2P E = -110 18 69.23
12 NS 2S S-1 -100 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 55,00 %13 NS 3P S-3 -300 0 0.00
14 NS 6C E-1 50 16 61.54
15 NS 3T N-3 -300 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 25,64 %
24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 72,05 %16 NS 3P E = -140 5 19.23
17 NS 4P N+2 480 4 15.38
18 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,54 %
29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,29 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 21 80.77
20 NS 3C N+1 170 14 53.85
21 NS 1S N-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,07 %22 NS 2P S = 110 20 76.92
23 NS 3P W+3 -230 22 84.62
24 NS 4C N+1 450 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 45,77 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 26.92
26 NS 4C W = -620 8 30.77
27 NS 4P N-4 -200 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 58,72 %28 NS 3S S-3 -300 3 11.54
29 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 23.08
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,14 %31 NS 5K E+1 -420 6 23.08
32 NS 3K N+1 130 21 80.77
33 NS 1S E = -90 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
Total : 342,0 / 858 = 39,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 58,72 % 1 NS 4T W = -130 0 0.00
2 NS 3S S-1 -100 4 15.38
3 NS 2S N-1 -50 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 12,82 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,14 % 4 NS . 22 84.62
5 NS . 26 100.00
6 NS . 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 92,31 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 44,49 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 16 61.54
8 NS 2P S+2 170 26 100.00
9 NS 4C S+3 510 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 84,62 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,07 %10 NS 1S S-1 -100 8 30.77
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 42.31
12 NS 3P S = 140 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert : 47,31 %13 NS 2K E+1 -110 5 19.23
14 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 7.69
15 NS 2S E+3 -210 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,67 %16 NS 3C N = 140 19 73.08
17 NS 4C S+3 510 11 42.31
18 NS 3T S = 110 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 55,00 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 13 50.00
20 NS 4C S+1 650 24 92.31
21 NS 1S N-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 53,97 %22 NS 4P S-2 -100 3 11.54
23 NS 4P W+3 -710 0 0.00
24 NS 4C N+1 450 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 21,79 %
28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 49,53 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 26.92
26 NS 4C W-1 100 25 96.15
27 NS 4CcE+2 -790 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,56 %28 NS 3S S-3 -300 3 11.54
29 NS 2C S+1 140 24 92.31
30 NS 2S E = -120 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 45,77 %31 NS 4C N = 620 26 100.00
32 NS 3C W+1 -170 2 7.69
33 NS 1S E-1 50 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
Total : 431,0 / 858 = 50,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,56 % 1 NS 3P N = 140 22 84.62
2 NS 3S N = 600 17 65.38
3 NS 2S N = 120 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 73,08 %
21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 45,77 % 4 NS 4P W = -620 14 53.85
5 NS 2T W+1 -110 18 69.23
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 58,72 % 7 NS . 24 92.31
8 NS . 16 61.54
9 NS . 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,14 %10 NS 1S W = -90 15 57.69
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 42.31
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 49,53 %13 NS 3K E-1 100 21 80.77
14 NS 6C E-1 50 16 61.54
15 NS 3TcN-2 -500 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON : 52,69 %16 NS 3P E = -140 5 19.23
17 NS 4P N+2 480 4 15.38
18 NS 1S S-1 -100 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 21,79 %
16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert : 47,31 %19 NS 4C S+1 450 17 65.38
20 NS 2C S+3 200 17 65.38
21 NS 2C W-4 200 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,92 %
26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,67 %22 NS 4P S = 420 24 92.31
23 NS 4P E+1 -650 10 38.46
24 NS 4C N+1 450 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 55,00 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 26.92
26 NS 4C W+1 -650 1 3.85
27 NS 3P N-2 -100 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,29 %28 NS 3K E-2 100 24 92.31
29 NS 2C N+1 140 24 92.31
30 NS 3T W = -110 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 84,62 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,07 %31 NS 4T E-2 100 21 80.77
32 NS 3C W = -140 4 15.38
33 NS 2P N-1 -50 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
Total : 478,0 / 858 = 55,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN
28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 49,53 % 1 NS 4PcN-1 -100 5 19.23
2 NS 3S N = 600 17 65.38
3 NS 1S N = 90 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,33 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 8 30.77
5 NS 3T W = -110 18 69.23
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,56 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 30.77
8 NS 2P S+1 140 23 88.46
9 NS 4C S+2 480 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 45,77 %10 NS . 22 84.62
11 NS . 22 84.62
12 NS . 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 58,72 %13 NS 2T N-2 -200 2 7.69
14 NS 6S W-1 50 16 61.54
15 NS 2C E+1 -140 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,29 %16 NS 3C N = 140 19 73.08
17 NS 6P N+1 1010 21 80.77
18 NS 2C S+1 140 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 74,36 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,07 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 13 50.00
20 NS 4C S+1 650 24 92.31
21 NS 1S N-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON : 52,69 %22 NS 4C E-2 200 22 84.62
23 NS 5P E = -650 10 38.46
24 NS 4C N+1 450 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert : 47,31 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 26.92
26 NS 3C W+1 -170 16 61.54
27 NS 3P N-1 -50 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,67 %28 NS 3P S-1 -100 17 65.38
29 NS 1S S-1 -100 11 42.31
30 NS 3S W = -400 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 53,97 %31 NS 4P W-2 100 21 80.77
32 NS 3T N = 110 16 61.54
33 NS 1S E = -90 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
Total : 493,0 / 858 = 57,46 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette
26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,67 % 1 NS 2C W = -110 2 7.69
2 NS 3S N = 600 17 65.38
3 NS 2S N = 120 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,29 % 4 NS 4P E = -620 14 53.85
5 NS 3C N-1 -100 24 92.31
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,07 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 30.77
8 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 7.69
9 NS 4C S+1 450 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,33 %10 NS 1S W = -90 15 57.69
11 NS 2P E-1 50 25 96.15
12 NS 3P N = 140 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 75,64 %
22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,56 %13 NS . 14 53.85
14 NS . 6 23.08
15 NS . 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 45,77 %16 NS 3P W = -140 5 19.23
17 NS 4P N+3 510 11 42.31
18 NS 3S N = 600 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 53,97 %19 NS 2S S+3 210 10 38.46
20 NS 4P W-2 200 17 65.38
21 NS 1S N+1 120 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 49,53 %22 NS 5CcE-2 500 26 100.00
23 NS 5P W = -650 10 38.46
24 NS 4C N+1 450 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 44,49 %25 NS 6P E-2 200 26 100.00
26 NS 4C W = -620 8 30.77
27 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON : 52,69 %28 NS 3S S-3 -300 3 11.54
29 NS 1S S-3 -300 1 3.85
30 NS 3S E-1 50 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert : 47,31 %31 NS 5K E+2 -440 0 0.00
32 NS 4T N = 130 21 80.77
33 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
Total : 449,0 / 858 = 52,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie
17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON : 52,69 % 1 NS 4C W-2 100 17 65.38
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 15.38
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert : 47,31 % 4 NS 4P E = -620 14 53.85
5 NS 3T W = -110 18 69.23
6 NS 3S W = -600 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 53,97 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 16 61.54
8 NS Pass Passe 11 42.31
9 NS 4C S-2 -100 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 49,53 %10 NS 2T E+1 -110 6 23.08
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 42.31
12 NS 4P N = 620 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 72,05 %13 NS 2S E-1 100 21 80.77
14 NS 6S W = -990 0 0.00
15 NS 2S E+2 -180 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,33 %16 NS . 14 53.85
17 NS . 0 0.00
18 NS . 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,56 %19 NS 6S S-1 -50 3 11.54
20 NS 2C S+1 140 9 34.62
21 NS 1S N-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 23,08 %
21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 45,77 %22 NS 4P S-1 -50 11 42.31
23 NS 4P E = -620 20 76.92
24 NS 4C N+1 450 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,29 %25 NS 4P E = -620 18 69.23
26 NS 4C W+1 -650 1 3.85
27 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,07 %28 NS 4P S-2 -200 11 42.31
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 11 42.31
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 44,49 %31 NS 5K E+1 -420 6 23.08
32 NS 3T N+1 130 21 80.77
33 NS 1S E = -90 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
Total : 372,0 / 858 = 43,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,14 % 1 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 34.62
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 15.38
3 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 44,49 % 4 NS 4P W-1 100 25 96.15
5 NS 3S E = -400 1 3.85
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON : 52,69 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 16 61.54
8 NS 3C W-1 50 18 69.23
9 NS 4C S+1 450 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert : 47,31 %10 NS 2S W-1 100 24 92.31
11 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 11.54
12 NS 5TcW-3 500 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,29 %13 NS 4KcE-1 200 26 100.00
14 NS 6C E-2 100 26 100.00
15 NS 2T N-2 -200 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 78,21 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,07 %16 NS 3P E = -140 5 19.23
17 NS 6P N+1 1010 21 80.77
18 NS 4C S-2 -200 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 72,05 %19 NS . 7 26.92
20 NS . 2 7.69
21 NS . 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,33 %22 NS 3P S-1 -50 11 42.31
23 NS 4P E+1 -650 10 38.46
24 NS 5CcN = 650 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,56 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 26.92
26 NS 4C W = -620 8 30.77
27 NS 3C W+2 -200 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 53,97 %28 NS 4P S-1 -100 17 65.38
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 11 42.31
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 49,53 %31 NS 5K E+1 -420 6 23.08
32 NS 5T N-1 -50 8 30.77
33 NS 1S E = -90 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
Total : 398,0 / 858 = 46,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,29 % 1 NS 4PcN-1 -100 5 19.23
2 NS 3S N = 600 17 65.38
3 NS 3S N = 400 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,07 % 4 NS 3P E+1 -170 20 76.92
5 NS 2T W+1 -110 18 69.23
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,14 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 16 61.54
8 NS 3P S = 140 23 88.46
9 NS 5KcN+1 650 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 44,49 %10 NS 1S W = -90 15 57.69
11 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 11.54
12 NS 4TcW-1 100 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON : 52,69 %13 NS 1S N = 90 16 61.54
14 NS 6C W-1 50 16 61.54
15 NS 2S W+2 -180 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 53,97 %16 NS 4P W-2 200 25 96.15
17 NS 6P N+1 1010 21 80.77
18 NS 3S N+1 630 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,31 %
28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 49,53 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 21 80.77
20 NS 3P W-1 100 4 15.38
21 NS 1S N = 90 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 55,00 %22 NS . 18 69.23
23 NS . 26 100.00
24 NS . 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 72,05 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 26.92
26 NS 4C W = -620 8 30.77
27 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,33 %28 NS 4P S-2 -200 11 42.31
29 NS 2C N-1 -100 11 42.31
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,56 %31 NS 3K E+3 -170 12 46.15
32 NS 3S S+2 460 26 100.00
33 NS 1S E = -90 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
Total : 489,0 / 858 = 56,99 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,33 % 1 NS 3P N+1 170 25 96.15
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 15.38
3 NS 3S N = 400 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 53,97 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 15.38
5 NS 4T W = -130 7 26.92
6 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,10 %
28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 49,53 % 7 NS 6C E-2 200 26 100.00
8 NS Pass Passe 11 42.31
9 NS 4C S = 420 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 58,72 %10 NS 2S W = -120 4 15.38
11 NS 2P E = -110 18 69.23
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,14 %13 NS 3P S-1 -100 8 30.77
14 NS 6S W-1 50 16 61.54
15 NS 2S E+1 -150 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 44,49 %16 NS 3P E-2 200 25 96.15
17 NS 6P N+1 1010 21 80.77
18 NS 3S S-2 -200 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON : 52,69 %19 NS 4C S+1 450 17 65.38
20 NS 2C S+1 140 9 34.62
21 NS 3S N-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,29 %22 NS 4P S-1 -50 11 42.31
23 NS 5P E = -650 10 38.46
24 NS 4C N+1 450 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,07 %25 NS . 23 88.46
26 NS . 21 80.77
27 NS . 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 88,46 %
25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 55,00 %28 NS 2P N+2 170 26 100.00
29 NS 2C N+1 140 24 92.31
30 NS 3S E = -400 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 73,08 %
24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 72,05 %31 NS 5K E+1 -420 6 23.08
32 NS 4T S-1 -50 8 30.77
33 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 20,51 %
Total : 445,0 / 858 = 51,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 55,00 % 1 NS 3P N-1 -50 9 34.62
2 NS 3S N = 600 17 65.38
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 72,05 % 4 NS 3CcS-4 -1100 0 0.00
5 NS 3T W+1 -130 7 26.92
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 20,51 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,33 % 7 NS 3KcS-3 -800 2 7.69
8 NS 1S S-1 -50 6 23.08
9 NS 5K N+1 420 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,29 %10 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 7.69
11 NS 2P E = -110 18 69.23
12 NS 2S S = 120 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,07 %13 NS 2K E = -90 11 42.31
14 NS 6C E-1 50 16 61.54
15 NS 2S E+2 -180 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 58,72 %16 NS 3C N = 140 19 73.08
17 NS 4P N+3 510 11 42.31
18 NS 3S N = 600 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,14 %19 NS 6P N-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 5T N-2 -200 0 0.00
21 NS 3K S-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 7,69 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 44,49 %22 NS 4P S-2 -100 3 11.54
23 NS 4P W+1 -650 10 38.46
24 NS 4C N+1 450 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 53,97 %25 NS 5P E = -650 7 26.92
26 NS 4C W-1 100 25 96.15
27 NS 4PcN-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 49,53 %28 NS . 21 80.77
29 NS . 17 65.38
30 NS . 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 75,64 %
26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,67 %31 NS 5K E-1 50 18 69.23
32 NS 4T S = 130 21 80.77
33 NS 1S E-1 50 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
Total : 387,0 / 858 = 45,10 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard
27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 42,07 % 1 NS 4C W-2 100 17 65.38
2 NS 3S N+1 630 24 92.31
3 NS 3S N = 400 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 58,72 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 15.38
5 NS 3T W = -110 18 69.23
6 NS 3S W = -600 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 72,05 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 16 61.54
8 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00
9 NS 5K N+1 420 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON : 52,69 %10 NS 1S W = -90 15 57.69
11 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 11.54
12 NS 3P S+1 170 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 45,77 %13 NS 3K W = -110 5 19.23
14 NS 4T W = -130 4 15.38
15 NS 2T N-2 -200 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 23,08 %
25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 55,00 %16 NS 3C N = 140 19 73.08
17 NS 6C S+1 1010 21 80.77
18 NS 2C N = 110 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 44,49 %19 NS 6P N = 980 26 100.00
20 NS 4PcW-2 500 20 76.92
21 NS 1S N = 90 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 80,77 %
22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,56 %22 NS 4P S-1 -50 11 42.31
23 NS 4P E+1 -650 10 38.46
24 NS 4C N+1 450 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,67 %25 NS . 23 88.46
26 NS . 21 80.77
27 NS . 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 88,46 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,14 %28 NS 4P S-2 -200 11 42.31
29 NS 2C N = 110 20 76.92
30 NS 3S E-1 50 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,33 %31 NS 5K E+1 -420 6 23.08
32 NS 5T N-1 -50 8 30.77
33 NS 1S E = -90 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
Total : 497,0 / 858 = 57,93 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie
24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 72,05 % 1 NS 4C W-2 100 17 65.38
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 4 15.38
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 49,53 % 4 NS 4P E = -620 14 53.85
5 NS 3S E = -400 1 3.85
6 NS 3S W-1 100 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 45,77 % 7 NS 3C E = -140 22 84.62
8 NS 2P S = 110 20 76.92
9 NS 4C S-1 -50 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 55,00 %10 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
11 NS 2P E-1 50 25 96.15
12 NS 4P N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 44,49 %13 NS 3K E-1 100 21 80.77
14 NS 6S W-1 50 16 61.54
15 NS 2S E = -120 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 75,64 %
22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,56 %16 NS 4C N-2 -100 12 46.15
17 NS 6P N+1 1010 21 80.77
18 NS 2C S = 110 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,67 %19 NS 6S N-1 -50 7 26.92
20 NS 4C S+1 650 24 92.31
21 NS 1S N+1 120 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,14 %22 NS 3P S-1 -50 11 42.31
23 NS 4P E+1 -650 10 38.46
24 NS 5C N = 450 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,33 %25 NS 4P E = -620 18 69.23
26 NS 3T E = -110 18 69.23
27 NS 4C E+1 -450 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert : 47,31 %28 NS . 21 80.77
29 NS . 17 65.38
30 NS . 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 75,64 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 58,72 %31 NS 5TcE-2 300 24 92.31
32 NS 4P S-4 -200 0 0.00
33 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 462,0 / 858 = 53,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick
21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 45,77 % 1 NS 3P N+1 170 25 96.15
2 NS 3S N+2 660 26 100.00
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 73,08 %
25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 55,00 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 4 15.38
5 NS 1S E+1 -120 12 46.15
6 NS 3S W+1 -630 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 44,29 % 7 NS 4C E+1 -650 8 30.77
8 NS 2C E = -110 4 15.38
9 NS 4C S-2 -100 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,56 %10 NS 1S W = -90 15 57.69
11 NS 2P E+1 -140 11 42.31
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,67 %13 NS 2K E = -90 11 42.31
14 NS 6C E-1 50 16 61.54
15 NS 2T N-1 -100 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 48,14 %16 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 19.23
17 NS 4P N+3 510 11 42.31
18 NS 3S N = 600 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,33 %19 NS 4P N-1 -50 3 11.54
20 NS 3C S = 140 9 34.62
21 NS 2C W-2 100 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert : 47,31 %22 NS 4P S-1 -50 11 42.31
23 NS 4P E+1 -650 10 38.46
24 NS 4C N+1 450 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 58,72 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7 26.92
26 NS 4C W = -620 8 30.77
27 NS 4P N-4 -200 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 72,05 %28 NS 4C N-3 -300 3 11.54
29 NS 4C N-2 -200 4 15.38
30 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 11,54 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON : 52,69 %31 NS . 15 57.69
32 NS . 13 50.00
33 NS . 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
Total : 372,0 / 858 = 43,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 -
18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 44,49 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 47,56 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert : 36,67 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 53,97 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,33 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert : 47,31 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 58,72 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 72,05 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON : 52,69 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie : 45,77 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 55,00 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 858 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VAN DOOREN Michele -LEBRUN Robert
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,57 % 1 EO 4C W-2 100 9 34.62
2 EO 3S N = 600 9 34.62
3 EO 2S N = 120 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,36 % 4 EO 4P E = -620 12 46.15
5 EO 3T W = -110 8 30.77
6 EO 3S W = -600 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger : 39,86 % 7 EO 4KcN-3 -800 24 92.31
8 EO Pass Passe 15 57.69
9 EO 3K N = 110 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 73,08 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,39 %10 EO 2S W-1 100 2 7.69
11 EO 2P E+2 -170 23 88.46
12 EO 5TcW-3 500 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 50,23 %13 EO 2K E+1 -110 21 80.77
14 EO 4C E+1 -450 24 92.31
15 EO 2S E+3 -210 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
15 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 55,71 %19 EO 4C S+1 450 9 34.62
20 EO 2C S+3 200 9 34.62
21 EO 2C W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,08 %
14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,36 %22 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 57.69
23 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 61.54
24 EO 4C N+1 450 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN : 57,46 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 73.08
26 EO 3C W+1 -170 10 38.46
27 EO 3P N-1 -50 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie : 53,85 %28 EO . 5 19.23
29 EO . 9 34.62
30 EO . 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 24,36 %
6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette : 52,33 %31 EO 5K E+2 -440 26 100.00
32 EO 4T N = 130 5 19.23
33 EO 1S E+1 -120 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
Total : 369,0 / 780 = 47,31 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 HUBLET Carlo -DE BIRON
7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,36 % 1 EO 4C W-2 100 9 34.62
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 84.62
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger : 39,86 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 12 46.15
5 EO 2T W+2 -130 19 73.08
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,39 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 10 38.46
8 EO 3C W-1 50 8 30.77
9 EO 4C S+1 450 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,93 %10 EO 1S W = -90 11 42.31
11 EO 2P E+2 -170 23 88.46
12 EO 3P S+1 170 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,99 %13 EO 1S N = 90 10 38.46
14 EO 6C W-1 50 10 38.46
15 EO 2S W+2 -180 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 55,71 %16 EO 3P E = -140 21 80.77
17 EO 4P N+2 480 22 84.62
18 EO 1S S-1 -100 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 78,21 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 51,86 %19 EO 4C S+1 450 9 34.62
20 EO 2C S+1 140 17 65.38
21 EO 3S N-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN : 57,46 %22 EO 4C E-2 200 4 15.38
23 EO 5P E = -650 16 61.54
24 EO 4C N+1 450 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
15 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette : 52,33 %28 EO 3S S-3 -300 23 88.46
29 EO 1S S-3 -300 25 96.15
30 EO 3S E-1 50 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,36 %31 EO . 11 42.31
32 EO . 13 50.00
33 EO . 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
Total : 411,0 / 780 = 52,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent
15 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,39 % 4 EO 4P W-1 100 1 3.85
5 EO 3S E = -400 25 96.15
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 50,23 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 10 38.46
8 EO 2P S+2 170 0 0.00
9 EO 4C S+3 510 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 15,38 %
9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,99 %10 EO 1S W = -90 11 42.31
11 EO 2P E+2 -170 23 88.46
12 EO 4TcW-1 100 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie : 53,85 %13 EO 3K E-1 100 5 19.23
14 EO 6S W-1 50 10 38.46
15 EO 2S E = -120 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 24,36 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 51,86 %16 EO 3P E-2 200 1 3.85
17 EO 6P N+1 1010 5 19.23
18 EO 3S S-2 -200 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,93 %19 EO 6P N = 980 0 0.00
20 EO 4PcW-2 500 6 23.08
21 EO 1S N = 90 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 19,23 %
11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,10 %22 EO 4P S-2 -100 23 88.46
23 EO 4P W+1 -650 16 61.54
24 EO 4C N+1 450 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette : 52,33 %25 EO 6P E-2 200 0 0.00
26 EO 4C W = -620 18 69.23
27 EO 4C E+1 -450 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,57 %28 EO 4P S-2 -200 15 57.69
29 EO 1S S-3 -300 25 96.15
30 EO 2S W+1 -150 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,36 %31 EO 5K E+1 -420 20 76.92
32 EO 3T N+1 130 5 19.23
33 EO 1S E = -90 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
Total : 347,0 / 780 = 44,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,39 % 1 EO 4P N-1 -50 17 65.38
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 84.62
3 EO 3S N-2 -100 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 50,23 % 4 EO . 4 15.38
5 EO . 0 0.00
6 EO . 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 7,69 %
9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,99 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 10 38.46
8 EO 3P S = 140 3 11.54
9 EO 5KcN+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 55,71 %10 EO 1S W = -90 11 42.31
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 57.69
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 51,86 %13 EO 3P S-1 -100 18 69.23
14 EO 6S W-1 50 10 38.46
15 EO 2S E+1 -150 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,36 %16 EO 2P E+1 -140 21 80.77
17 EO 4P N+3 510 15 57.69
18 EO 3S N = 600 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,10 %19 EO 6P N-2 -100 26 100.00
20 EO 5T N-2 -200 26 100.00
21 EO 3K S-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 92,31 %
13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie : 53,85 %22 EO 3P S-1 -50 15 57.69
23 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 61.54
24 EO 5C N = 450 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,57 %25 EO 4P E = -620 8 30.77
26 EO 3C W+2 -200 12 46.15
27 EO 3C E+2 -200 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,93 %28 EO 4P S-2 -200 15 57.69
29 EO 2C N = 110 6 23.08
30 EO 3S E-1 50 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger : 39,86 %31 EO 5K E+1 -420 20 76.92
32 EO 3K N+1 130 5 19.23
33 EO 1S E = -90 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
Total : 413,0 / 858 = 48,14 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 50,23 % 1 EO 4T W = -130 26 100.00
2 EO 3S S-1 -100 22 84.62
3 EO 2S N-1 -50 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 87,18 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,93 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 22 84.62
5 EO 3T W = -110 8 30.77
6 EO 3S W = -600 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 55,71 % 7 EO . 2 7.69
8 EO . 10 38.46
9 EO . 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 51,86 %10 EO 2S W = -120 22 84.62
11 EO 2P E = -110 8 30.77
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN : 57,46 %13 EO 2T N-2 -200 24 92.31
14 EO 6S W-1 50 10 38.46
15 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,10 %16 EO 3C N = 140 7 26.92
17 EO 4P N+3 510 15 57.69
18 EO 3S N = 600 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,57 %22 EO 4PcS-2 -300 26 100.00
23 EO 3P E+2 -200 2 7.69
24 EO 4C N = 420 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,36 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 73.08
26 EO 4C W = -620 18 69.23
27 EO 4P N-4 -200 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger : 39,86 %28 EO 3S S-3 -300 23 88.46
29 EO 2P W+2 -170 20 76.92
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie : 53,85 %31 EO 5TcE-2 300 2 7.69
32 EO 4P S-4 -200 26 100.00
33 EO 1S E+1 -120 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 458,0 / 780 = 58,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 ALLARD Jean-Marie -JAUMOTTE Jean-Marie
14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,36 % 1 EO 3P N+1 170 1 3.85
2 EO 3S N+2 660 0 0.00
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 26,92 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 55,71 % 4 EO 4P W = -620 12 46.15
5 EO 2T W+1 -110 8 30.77
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie : 53,85 % 7 EO 3C E = -140 4 15.38
8 EO 2P S = 110 6 23.08
9 EO 4C S-1 -50 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN : 57,46 %10 EO . 4 15.38
11 EO . 4 15.38
12 EO . 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,93 %13 EO 3K W = -110 21 80.77
14 EO 4T W = -130 22 84.62
15 EO 2T N-2 -200 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 76,92 %
6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette : 52,33 %16 EO 3P W = -140 21 80.77
17 EO 4P N+3 510 15 57.69
18 EO 3S N = 600 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,57 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 2 7.69
20 EO 2C S+1 140 17 65.38
21 EO 1S N-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,36 %22 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 57.69
23 EO 4P E = -620 6 23.08
24 EO 4C N+1 450 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger : 39,86 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 73.08
26 EO 4C W = -620 18 69.23
27 EO 4P N-4 -200 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
15 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 50,23 %31 EO 4C N = 620 0 0.00
32 EO 3C W+1 -170 24 92.31
33 EO 1S E-1 50 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
Total : 357,0 / 780 = 45,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 MASSAUX Joel -de WASSEIGE Ariane
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 55,71 % 1 EO 3P N = 140 4 15.38
2 EO 3S N = 600 9 34.62
3 EO 2S N = 120 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 26,92 %
15 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN : 57,46 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 18 69.23
8 EO 2P S+1 140 3 11.54
9 EO 4C S+2 480 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,36 %10 EO 1S W = -90 11 42.31
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 57.69
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette : 52,33 %13 EO . 12 46.15
14 EO . 20 76.92
15 EO . 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie : 53,85 %16 EO 4C N-2 -100 14 53.85
17 EO 6P N+1 1010 5 19.23
18 EO 2C S = 110 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,36 %19 EO 6S S-1 -50 23 88.46
20 EO 2C S+1 140 17 65.38
21 EO 1S N-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 76,92 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,93 %22 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 57.69
23 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 61.54
24 EO 4C N+1 450 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,39 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 73.08
26 EO 4C W = -620 18 69.23
27 EO 3C W+2 -200 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 50,23 %28 EO 3S S-3 -300 23 88.46
29 EO 2C S+1 140 2 7.69
30 EO 2S E = -120 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,99 %31 EO 3K E+3 -170 14 53.85
32 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
33 EO 1S E = -90 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
Total : 371,0 / 780 = 47,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 51,86 % 1 EO 3P N+1 170 1 3.85
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 84.62
3 EO 3S N = 400 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN : 57,46 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 18 69.23
5 EO 3T W = -110 8 30.77
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,10 % 7 EO 3KcS-3 -800 24 92.31
8 EO 1S S-1 -50 20 76.92
9 EO 5K N+1 420 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette : 52,33 %10 EO 1S W = -90 11 42.31
11 EO 2P E-1 50 1 3.85
12 EO 3P N = 140 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 24,36 %
15 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,36 %16 EO . 12 46.15
17 EO . 26 100.00
18 EO . 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,36 %19 EO 4P N-1 -50 23 88.46
20 EO 3C S = 140 17 65.38
21 EO 2C W-2 100 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,39 %22 EO 3P S-1 -50 15 57.69
23 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 61.54
24 EO 5CcN = 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie : 53,85 %25 EO 4P E = -620 8 30.77
26 EO 3T E = -110 8 30.77
27 EO 4C E+1 -450 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,99 %28 EO 4P S-2 -200 15 57.69
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 15 57.69
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,93 %31 EO 5K E+1 -420 20 76.92
32 EO 5T N-1 -50 18 69.23
33 EO 1S E = -90 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
Total : 416,0 / 780 = 53,33 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie : 53,85 % 1 EO 4C W-2 100 9 34.62
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 22 84.62
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,10 % 4 EO 3CcS-4 -1100 26 100.00
5 EO 3T W+1 -130 19 73.08
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 79,49 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,93 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 10 38.46
8 EO 3C W = -140 26 100.00
9 EO 5K N+1 420 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,57 %10 EO 1S W-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 2P E+2 -170 23 88.46
12 EO 3P N-2 -200 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,36 %13 EO 2S E-1 100 5 19.23
14 EO 6S W = -990 26 100.00
15 EO 2S E+2 -180 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger : 39,86 %16 EO 3P E = -140 21 80.77
17 EO 4P N+2 480 22 84.62
18 EO 3S N-3 -300 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,46 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,39 %19 EO . 19 73.08
20 EO . 24 92.31
21 EO . 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
15 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,99 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 73.08
26 EO 4C W = -620 18 69.23
27 EO 4C E+1 -450 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 71,79 %
14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,36 %28 EO 4C N-3 -300 23 88.46
29 EO 4C N-2 -200 22 84.62
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 88,46 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 51,86 %31 EO 5K E+1 -420 20 76.92
32 EO 4T S-1 -50 18 69.23
33 EO 1S E+1 -120 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 79,49 %
Total : 562,0 / 780 = 72,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice
11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,10 % 1 EO 3P N-1 -50 17 65.38
2 EO 3S N = 600 9 34.62
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,36 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 22 84.62
5 EO 1S E+1 -120 14 53.85
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,57 % 7 EO 4KcN-3 -800 24 92.31
8 EO Pass Passe 15 57.69
9 EO 4K N+2 170 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie : 53,85 %10 EO 1S E+2 -150 26 100.00
11 EO 2P E-1 50 1 3.85
12 EO 4P N-3 -300 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger : 39,86 %13 EO 3P S-3 -300 26 100.00
14 EO 6C E-1 50 10 38.46
15 EO 3T N-3 -300 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 74,36 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,93 %16 EO 3C N = 140 7 26.92
17 EO 6C S+1 1010 5 19.23
18 EO 2C N = 110 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 50,23 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 13 50.00
20 EO 4C S+1 650 2 7.69
21 EO 1S N-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,99 %22 EO . 8 30.77
23 EO . 0 0.00
24 EO . 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 55,71 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 73.08
26 EO 4C W+1 -650 25 96.15
27 EO 3P N-2 -100 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 51,86 %28 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00
29 EO 2C N+1 140 2 7.69
30 EO 3S E = -400 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 26,92 %
15 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 429,0 / 780 = 55,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 PAQUET Anne -POULAERT Gilbert
6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette : 52,33 % 1 EO 2C W = -110 24 92.31
2 EO 3S N = 600 9 34.62
3 EO 2S N = 120 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,57 % 4 EO 6S E-1 100 1 3.85
5 EO 3T W+1 -130 19 73.08
6 EO 3S W = -600 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
15 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger : 39,86 %10 EO 2T E = -90 11 42.31
11 EO 2P E = -110 8 30.77
12 EO 2S S-1 -100 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,36 %13 EO 2K E = -90 15 57.69
14 EO 6C E-1 50 10 38.46
15 EO 2T N-1 -100 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 50,23 %16 EO 3C N = 140 7 26.92
17 EO 4C S+3 510 15 57.69
18 EO 3T S = 110 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie : 53,85 %19 EO 6S N-1 -50 19 73.08
20 EO 4C S+1 650 2 7.69
21 EO 1S N+1 120 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 55,71 %22 EO 4P S = 420 2 7.69
23 EO 4P E+1 -650 16 61.54
24 EO 4C N+1 450 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,93 %25 EO . 3 11.54
26 EO . 5 19.23
27 EO . 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 11,54 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN : 57,46 %28 EO 3P S-1 -100 9 34.62
29 EO 1S S-1 -100 15 57.69
30 EO 3S W = -400 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,10 %31 EO 5K E-1 50 8 30.77
32 EO 4T S = 130 5 19.23
33 EO 1S E-1 50 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
Total : 286,0 / 780 = 36,67 %
PAIRE Nr : 27 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
12 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 57,93 % 1 EO 4C W-2 100 9 34.62
2 EO 3S N+1 630 2 7.69
3 EO 3S N = 400 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,99 % 4 EO 3P E+1 -170 6 23.08
5 EO 2T W+1 -110 8 30.77
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette : 52,33 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 18 69.23
8 EO 1S E+1 -120 24 92.31
9 EO 4C S+1 450 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 50,23 %10 EO 1S S-1 -100 18 69.23
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 57.69
12 EO 3P S = 140 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,10 %13 EO 2K E = -90 15 57.69
14 EO 6C E-1 50 10 38.46
15 EO 2S E+2 -180 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,39 %16 EO 3P E = -140 21 80.77
17 EO 6P N+1 1010 5 19.23
18 EO 4C S-2 -200 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN : 57,46 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 13 50.00
20 EO 4C S+1 650 2 7.69
21 EO 1S N-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger : 39,86 %22 EO 2P S = 110 6 23.08
23 EO 3P W+3 -230 4 15.38
24 EO 4C N+1 450 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 28,21 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 51,86 %25 EO . 3 11.54
26 EO . 5 19.23
27 EO . 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 11,54 %
7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,36 %28 EO 4P S-2 -200 15 57.69
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 15 57.69
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 55,71 %31 EO 4T E-2 100 5 19.23
32 EO 3C W = -140 22 84.62
33 EO 2P N-1 -50 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
Total : 361,0 / 858 = 42,07 %
PAIRE Nr : 28 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN : 57,46 % 1 EO 4PcN-1 -100 21 80.77
2 EO 3S N = 600 9 34.62
3 EO 1S N = 90 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
13 SAMBREE Arlette -GAUTHIER Anne-Marie : 53,85 % 4 EO 4P E = -620 12 46.15
5 EO 3S E = -400 25 96.15
6 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 51,86 % 7 EO 6C E-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO Pass Passe 15 57.69
9 EO 4C S = 420 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,36 %10 EO 2T E+1 -110 20 76.92
11 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 57.69
12 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 55,71 %13 EO 3K E-1 100 5 19.23
14 EO 6C E-1 50 10 38.46
15 EO 3TcN-2 -500 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,57 %16 EO 3P E = -140 21 80.77
17 EO 4P N+2 480 22 84.62
18 EO 2S S-2 -200 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,99 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 5 19.23
20 EO 3P W-1 100 22 84.62
21 EO 1S N = 90 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette : 52,33 %22 EO 5CcE-2 500 0 0.00
23 EO 5P W = -650 16 61.54
24 EO 4C N+1 450 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 50,23 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 19 73.08
26 EO 4C W-1 100 1 3.85
27 EO 4CcE+2 -790 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,10 %28 EO . 5 19.23
29 EO . 9 34.62
30 EO . 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 24,36 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,39 %31 EO 5K E+1 -420 20 76.92
32 EO 5T N-1 -50 18 69.23
33 EO 1S E = -90 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
Total : 425,0 / 858 = 49,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 29 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,99 % 1 EO 4PcN-1 -100 21 80.77
2 EO 3S N = 600 9 34.62
3 EO 3S N = 400 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 41,03 %
6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette : 52,33 % 4 EO 4P E = -620 12 46.15
5 EO 3C N-1 -100 2 7.69
6 EO 3S W+1 -630 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
14 DELHEZ Jacques -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,36 % 7 EO 4C E+1 -650 18 69.23
8 EO 2C E = -110 22 84.62
9 EO 4C S-2 -100 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,10 %10 EO 2P E+1 -140 24 92.31
11 EO 2P E = -110 8 30.77
12 EO 2S S = 120 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,39 %13 EO 4KcE-1 200 0 0.00
14 EO 6C E-2 100 0 0.00
15 EO 2T N-2 -200 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 21,79 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN : 57,46 %16 EO 3C N = 140 7 26.92
17 EO 6P N+1 1010 5 19.23
18 EO 2C S+1 140 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 25,64 %
2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger : 39,86 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 5 19.23
20 EO 3C N+1 170 12 46.15
21 EO 1S N-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 51,86 %22 EO 4P S-1 -50 15 57.69
23 EO 5P E = -650 16 61.54
24 EO 4C N+1 450 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,36 %25 EO 4P E = -620 8 30.77
26 EO 4C W+1 -650 25 96.15
27 EO 4C E+1 -450 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
4 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 55,71 %28 EO 3K E-2 100 2 7.69
29 EO 2C N+1 140 2 7.69
30 EO 3T W = -110 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 15,38 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,57 %31 EO . 11 42.31
32 EO . 13 50.00
33 EO . 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
Total : 380,0 / 858 = 44,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 30 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc
2 VAN PETEGHEM PAUL -ARICKX Roger : 39,86 % 1 EO . 14 53.85
2 EO . 16 61.54
3 EO . 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
10 PARMENTIER Richard -COOLEN Joseph : 51,86 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 22 84.62
5 EO 4T W = -130 19 73.08
6 EO 3S W+2 -660 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,90 %
7 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,36 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 10 38.46
8 EO Pass Passe 15 57.69
9 EO 4C S-2 -100 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
15 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 45,57 %13 EO 1S W-1 100 5 19.23
14 EO 6S W-1 50 10 38.46
15 EO 3TcN-3 -800 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
9 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,99 %16 EO 4P W-2 200 1 3.85
17 EO 6P N+1 1010 5 19.23
18 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,69 %
6 LECERF Marcel -BEBUISSON Colette : 52,33 %19 EO 2S S+3 210 16 61.54
20 EO 4P W-2 200 9 34.62
21 EO 1S N+1 120 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
3 DEVIGNE Alain -FOUBERT Marie-Rose : 50,23 %22 EO 4P S-2 -100 23 88.46
23 EO 4P W+3 -710 26 100.00
24 EO 4C N+1 450 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 78,21 %
11 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 45,10 %25 EO 5P E = -650 19 73.08
26 EO 4C W-1 100 1 3.85
27 EO 4PcN-4 -800 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 58,97 %
8 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 46,39 %28 EO 4P S-1 -100 9 34.62
29 EO 2C N-1 -100 15 57.69
30 EO 3S E+1 -430 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
5 GROSFILS Colette -VANDERPEPEN : 57,46 %31 EO 4P W-2 100 5 19.23
32 EO 3T N = 110 10 38.46
33 EO 1S E = -90 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
Total : 421,0 / 780 = 53,97 %
|
|