|
Tournoi du 24-07-17
Lundi
1 60,00 A.7 GOBBE Amélie -CASSART Guy
2 55,93 A.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -JANSSENS Pierre
3 52,78 A10 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette
~ 52,78 A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
5 52,41 A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
6 49,63 A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
7 49,07 A.1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
8 46,30 A.6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
9 42,96 A.5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
10 38,15 A.3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,33 a.8 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
2 57,41 a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
3 50,19 a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 50,00 a.2 LEBRUN Robert -PIROTTE Claude
5 49,81 a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
6 49,44 a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 46,67 a.4 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice
8 46,30 a.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
9 45,37 a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 41,48 a.9 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele
PAIRE Nr : A.1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78
2 NS 2S N = 120 15 83.33
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 % 4 NS 3C N-2 -200 1 5.56
5 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00
6 NS 3S N = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
a.2 LEBRUN Robert -PIROTTE Claude : 50,00 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67
8 NS 4CcN-3 -500 0 0.00
9 NS 1S N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 46,30 %10 NS 4P N = 620 15 83.33
11 NS 4C N = 420 12 66.67
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %13 NS 2K S+2 130 12 66.67
14 NS 3K E-1 50 2 11.11
15 NS 3P W-1 50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.8 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,33 %16 NS 4K S-1 -50 10 55.56
17 NS 2KcE-3 500 18 100.00
18 NS 1S W = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,48 %19 NS 3T N-1 -50 7 38.89
20 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,37 %22 NS 2P E-2 200 17 94.44
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 2 11.11
24 NS 4C E-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.4 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 46,67 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 61.11
26 NS 1S W-1 100 18 100.00
27 NS 1S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 57,41 %28 NS 4C N-3 -300 0 0.00
29 NS 2T E = -90 13 72.22
30 NS 4PcW-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 265,0 / 540 = 49,07 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 % 1 NS 4P W = -420 2 11.11
2 NS 1S N+1 120 15 83.33
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 LEBRUN Robert -PIROTTE Claude : 50,00 % 4 NS 2P S-1 -100 6 33.33
5 NS 4CcE-2 300 18 100.00
6 NS 3S N+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 4 22.22
8 NS 3P W = -140 11 61.11
9 NS 2T N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,37 %10 NS 2P N+1 140 10 55.56
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 1 5.56
12 NS 2S E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 46,67 %13 NS 3S N-2 -200 3 16.67
14 NS 2P N+1 140 14 77.78
15 NS 2T W+1 -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 57,41 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 15 83.33
17 NS 4C S-1 -50 2 11.11
18 NS 1S W = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 46,30 %19 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 38.89
20 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %22 NS 3T E-1 100 9 50.00
23 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 5K N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.8 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,33 %25 NS 4C S = 420 3 16.67
26 NS 1S W+2 -150 0 0.00
27 NS 1S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,48 %28 NS 1K N-1 -100 13 72.22
29 NS 1S E = -90 13 72.22
30 NS 5TcS+1 650 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 268,0 / 540 = 49,63 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
a.2 LEBRUN Robert -PIROTTE Claude : 50,00 % 1 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
2 NS 2S N = 120 15 83.33
3 NS 4P E+3 -710 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 % 4 NS 2P S-1 -100 6 33.33
5 NS Pass Passe 6 33.33
6 NS 3S N+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 % 7 NS 6C N-2 -200 0 0.00
8 NS 4P W-1 50 18 100.00
9 NS 2K E = -90 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.8 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,33 %10 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 1S N+2 150 4 22.22
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,48 %13 NS 3K S+1 130 12 66.67
14 NS 2S W-2 100 8 44.44
15 NS 1S N-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,37 %16 NS 4K S-1 -50 10 55.56
17 NS 2P N+1 140 11 61.11
18 NS 2S W-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.4 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 46,67 %19 NS 2S N-1 -50 7 38.89
20 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 57,41 %22 NS 2K N = 90 6 33.33
23 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33
24 NS 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 46,30 %25 NS 4C S = 420 3 16.67
26 NS 2P S-1 -100 12 66.67
27 NS 1S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %28 NS 3C N-2 -200 5 27.78
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
30 NS 6TcS-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 206,0 / 540 = 38,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -JANSSENS Pierre
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 % 1 NS 3S E-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 2S N-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 46,30 % 4 NS 2P S = 110 12 66.67
5 NS 4C E-2 100 14 77.78
6 NS 3S N+1 430 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 57,41 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67
8 NS 3C N-3 -150 8 44.44
9 NS 2C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 46,67 %10 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89
12 NS 3T W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,37 %13 NS 4K S = 130 12 66.67
14 NS 2P N = 110 12 66.67
15 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,48 %16 NS 4CcE-1 200 18 100.00
17 NS 3P N-2 -100 0 0.00
18 NS 2C W-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.8 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,33 %19 NS 2S N = 120 16 88.89
20 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %22 NS 2K N+1 110 13 72.22
23 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33
24 NS 4C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.2 LEBRUN Robert -PIROTTE Claude : 50,00 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 61.11
26 NS 2K E = -90 15 83.33
27 NS 1S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %28 NS 2S N-1 -100 13 72.22
29 NS Pass Passe 18 100.00
30 NS 5T S+1 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
a.8 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,33 % 1 NS 3S E = -400 5 27.78
2 NS 2S N-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 4P E+2 -680 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 % 4 NS 1S S+2 150 16 88.89
5 NS 3P N-1 -100 4 22.22
6 NS 3S N = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 46,30 % 7 NS 4C S+2 680 17 94.44
8 NS 2P W+1 -140 11 61.11
9 NS 3T N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %10 NS 3P S-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 1 5.56
12 NS 1S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 57,41 %13 NS 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
14 NS 2S W-1 50 2 11.11
15 NS 1S N-2 -200 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.4 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 46,67 %16 NS 3C E = -140 4 22.22
17 NS 2P N = 110 8 44.44
18 NS 2C W-3 150 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,37 %19 NS 3T N-2 -100 0 0.00
20 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 NS 4C W-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,48 %22 NS 2P W-1 100 9 50.00
23 NS 4P W-2 200 17 94.44
24 NS 5C E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %25 NS 2C S+3 200 0 0.00
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
27 NS 2T W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.2 LEBRUN Robert -PIROTTE Claude : 50,00 %28 NS 3C N-1 -100 13 72.22
29 NS 3T E = -110 6 33.33
30 NS 5P W-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,48 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 1S N = 90 10 55.56
3 NS 4P E+2 -680 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.8 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,33 % 4 NS 2P S = 110 12 66.67
5 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11
6 NS 3S N = 400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 % 7 NS 3S N+1 630 8 44.44
8 NS 3P W+3 -230 6 33.33
9 NS 1S N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.2 LEBRUN Robert -PIROTTE Claude : 50,00 %10 NS 4P S = 620 15 83.33
11 NS 4C N+1 450 18 100.00
12 NS 2C S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %13 NS 3S N-3 -300 0 0.00
14 NS 3K E-2 100 8 44.44
15 NS 2P W = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 46,30 %16 NS 4C E-1 100 15 83.33
17 NS 2K E-2 100 5 27.78
18 NS 1S W-1 50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 57,41 %19 NS 2S N-1 -50 7 38.89
20 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 NS 2S E+2 -180 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.4 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 46,67 %22 NS 2C S-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 2P W = -110 6 33.33
24 NS 4P E-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,37 %25 NS 4C S+2 480 18 100.00
26 NS 2K E+1 -110 8 44.44
27 NS 2K E = -90 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %28 NS 2S N = 120 18 100.00
29 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
30 NS 5P W-3 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 GOBBE Amélie -CASSART Guy
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,37 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 2S N-2 -200 0 0.00
3 NS 4P E+3 -710 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,48 % 4 NS 2S N+2 180 18 100.00
5 NS 3C E-1 50 9 50.00
6 NS 3S N+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.8 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,33 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 4 22.22
8 NS 2CcN-1 -100 15 83.33
9 NS 2T N = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %10 NS 4P N = 620 15 83.33
11 NS 4C N = 420 12 66.67
12 NS 2PcS+2 1070 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.2 LEBRUN Robert -PIROTTE Claude : 50,00 %13 NS 5KcS-1 -200 3 16.67
14 NS 3K E-4 200 17 94.44
15 NS 2C W = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %16 NS 3C E = -140 4 22.22
17 NS 2C S+2 170 16 88.89
18 NS 3KcE-1 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %19 NS 2S N = 120 16 88.89
20 NS 2C E-1 100 18 100.00
21 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 46,30 %22 NS 2C S = 110 13 72.22
23 NS 3P W-1 100 11 61.11
24 NS 4C W-2 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 57,41 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 61.11
26 NS 2K E+1 -110 8 44.44
27 NS 1S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 46,67 %28 NS 3C N-2 -200 5 27.78
29 NS 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44
30 NS 5T S = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 324,0 / 540 = 60,00 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
a.4 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 46,67 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 3P E+2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,37 % 4 NS 3P S-1 -100 6 33.33
5 NS 3C E-1 50 9 50.00
6 NS 3S N+4 520 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,48 % 7 NS 4C N = 620 4 22.22
8 NS 3C N-2 -100 15 83.33
9 NS 2C S+1 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 57,41 %10 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 3S N = 400 7 38.89
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %13 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00
14 NS 2C E-4 200 17 94.44
15 NS 2P W+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.2 LEBRUN Robert -PIROTTE Claude : 50,00 %16 NS 5K S-1 -50 10 55.56
17 NS 2K E-3 150 14 77.78
18 NS 2K E+1 -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %19 NS 3S S-1 -50 7 38.89
20 NS 2K N-1 -100 0 0.00
21 NS 3S E-2 100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.8 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,33 %22 NS 3C S-1 -50 3 16.67
23 NS 5TcS-3 -800 0 0.00
24 NS 5K N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 61.11
26 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
27 NS 1S N+1 120 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 46,30 %28 NS 3C N-1 -100 13 72.22
29 NS 2T E = -90 13 72.22
30 NS 5T S = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 57,41 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 1S N+1 120 15 83.33
3 NS 4P W+2 -680 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.4 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 46,67 % 4 NS 2P N = 110 12 66.67
5 NS 4C E-2 100 14 77.78
6 NS 3S N+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,37 % 7 NS 4C N+2 680 17 94.44
8 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67
9 NS 3S E-2 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %10 NS 4P N = 620 15 83.33
11 NS 3S N+1 430 16 88.89
12 NS 1S E+1 -120 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 46,30 %13 NS 2K N+3 150 16 88.89
14 NS 2K E-1 50 2 11.11
15 NS 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %16 NS 3C E+1 -170 0 0.00
17 NS 2K E-2 100 5 27.78
18 NS 2K E-2 100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.2 LEBRUN Robert -PIROTTE Claude : 50,00 %19 NS 3S N-1 -50 7 38.89
20 NS 1S W = -90 9 50.00
21 NS 3S E = -400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %22 NS 3K N-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 4T S = 130 14 77.78
24 NS 5T N-1 -50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,48 %25 NS 5C S = 450 11 61.11
26 NS 2K E+1 -110 8 44.44
27 NS 1S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.8 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,33 %28 NS 3C N-2 -200 5 27.78
29 NS 1S W+1 -120 3 16.67
30 NS 5TcS = 550 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 283,0 / 540 = 52,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette
a.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 46,30 % 1 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
2 NS 3S N-1 -100 5 27.78
3 NS 4P E+1 -650 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 57,41 % 4 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 5.56
5 NS 4C E-2 100 14 77.78
6 NS 3S N+2 460 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice : 46,67 % 7 NS 4C N+1 650 12 66.67
8 NS 4P W = -420 3 16.67
9 NS 2C S+1 140 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.9 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 41,48 %10 NS 4P N-1 -100 4 22.22
11 NS 4C N = 420 12 66.67
12 NS 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.8 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 63,33 %13 NS 2K S+1 110 6 33.33
14 NS 2KcE-1 100 8 44.44
15 NS 2P W+2 -170 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,44 %16 NS 3C E = -140 4 22.22
17 NS 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
18 NS 1S W = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,19 %19 NS 2S N = 120 16 88.89
20 NS 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 NS 4C W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.2 LEBRUN Robert -PIROTTE Claude : 50,00 %22 NS 2P W-2 200 17 94.44
23 NS 3P W-1 100 11 61.11
24 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger : 49,81 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 61.11
26 NS 1S W = -90 15 83.33
27 NS 1S N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,37 %28 NS 3S N-2 -200 5 27.78
29 NS 2T E = -90 13 72.22
30 NS 5T S+1 420 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 285,0 / 540 = 52,78 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 CLERIN François-Xavier -ARICKX Roger
A.1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,07 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22
2 EO 2S N = 120 3 16.67
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 38,15 % 4 EO 2P S-1 -100 12 66.67
5 EO Pass Passe 12 66.67
6 EO 3S N+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,63 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 14 77.78
8 EO 3P W = -140 7 38.89
9 EO 2T N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %10 EO 3P S-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 17 94.44
12 EO 1S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,30 %13 EO 3S N-3 -300 18 100.00
14 EO 3K E-2 100 10 55.56
15 EO 2P W = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 GOBBE Amélie -CASSART Guy : 60,00 %16 EO 3C E = -140 14 77.78
17 EO 2C S+2 170 2 11.11
18 EO 3KcE-1 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 52,78 %19 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 61.11
20 EO 2K N-1 -100 18 100.00
21 EO 3S E-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %22 EO 3K N-2 -100 18 100.00
23 EO 4T S = 130 4 22.22
24 EO 5T N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,78 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 7 38.89
26 EO 1S W = -90 3 16.67
27 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,93 %28 EO 2S N-1 -100 5 27.78
29 EO Pass Passe 0 0.00
30 EO 5T S+1 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 269,0 / 540 = 49,81 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 LEBRUN Robert -PIROTTE Claude
A.3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 38,15 % 1 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00
2 EO 2S N = 120 3 16.67
3 EO 4P E+3 -710 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,63 % 4 EO 2P S-1 -100 12 66.67
5 EO 4CcE-2 300 0 0.00
6 EO 3S N+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,07 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33
8 EO 4CcN-3 -500 18 100.00
9 EO 1S N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,30 %10 EO 4P S = 620 3 16.67
11 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00
12 EO 2C S-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.7 GOBBE Amélie -CASSART Guy : 60,00 %13 EO 5KcS-1 -200 15 83.33
14 EO 3K E-4 200 1 5.56
15 EO 2C W = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 52,78 %16 EO 5K S-1 -50 8 44.44
17 EO 2K E-3 150 4 22.22
18 EO 2K E+1 -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %19 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 61.11
20 EO 1S W = -90 9 50.00
21 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,78 %22 EO 2P W-2 200 1 5.56
23 EO 3P W-1 100 7 38.89
24 EO 4C W+1 -450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,93 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 7 38.89
26 EO 2K E = -90 3 16.67
27 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %28 EO 3C N-1 -100 5 27.78
29 EO 3T E = -110 12 66.67
30 EO 5P W-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 270,0 / 540 = 50,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,63 % 1 EO 4P W = -420 16 88.89
2 EO 1S N+1 120 3 16.67
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,07 % 4 EO 3C N-2 -200 17 94.44
5 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 100.00
6 EO 3S N = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
A.3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 38,15 % 7 EO 6C N-2 -200 18 100.00
8 EO 4P W-1 50 0 0.00
9 EO 2K E = -90 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.7 GOBBE Amélie -CASSART Guy : 60,00 %10 EO 4P N = 620 3 16.67
11 EO 4C N = 420 6 33.33
12 EO 2PcS+2 1070 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 52,78 %13 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00
14 EO 2C E-4 200 1 5.56
15 EO 2P W+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %16 EO 3C E+1 -170 18 100.00
17 EO 2K E-2 100 13 72.22
18 EO 2K E-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,78 %19 EO 2S N = 120 2 11.11
20 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 EO 4C W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,93 %22 EO 2K N+1 110 5 27.78
23 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67
24 EO 4C E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %25 EO 2C S+3 200 18 100.00
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
27 EO 2T W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,30 %28 EO 2S N = 120 0 0.00
29 EO 1S E+2 -150 18 100.00
30 EO 5P W-3 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 271,0 / 540 = 50,19 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 AUBRY Vincent -ERPICUM Patrice
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 52,78 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 3P E+2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 % 4 EO 2P N = 110 6 33.33
5 EO 4C E-2 100 4 22.22
6 EO 3S N+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,78 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33
8 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33
9 EO 2C S+1 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,93 %10 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11
12 EO 3T W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,63 %13 EO 3S N-2 -200 15 83.33
14 EO 2P N+1 140 4 22.22
15 EO 2T W+1 -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %16 EO 3C E = -140 14 77.78
17 EO 2P N = 110 10 55.56
18 EO 2C W-3 150 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 38,15 %19 EO 2S N-1 -50 11 61.11
20 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,30 %22 EO 2C S-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67
24 EO 4P E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,07 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 7 38.89
26 EO 1S W-1 100 0 0.00
27 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.7 GOBBE Amélie -CASSART Guy : 60,00 %28 EO 3C N-2 -200 13 72.22
29 EO 2P N-1 -100 10 55.56
30 EO 5T S = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 252,0 / 540 = 46,67 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 1S N+1 120 3 16.67
3 EO 4P W+2 -680 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,78 % 4 EO 3S S-2 -200 17 94.44
5 EO 4C E-2 100 4 22.22
6 EO 3S N+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,93 % 7 EO 4C N+1 650 6 33.33
8 EO 3C N-3 -150 10 55.56
9 EO 2C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 52,78 %10 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 3S N = 400 11 61.11
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %13 EO 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
14 EO 2S W-1 50 16 88.89
15 EO 1S N-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,63 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 3 16.67
17 EO 4C S-1 -50 16 88.89
18 EO 1S W = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,30 %19 EO 2S N-1 -50 11 61.11
20 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 EO 2S E+2 -180 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 38,15 %22 EO 2K N = 90 12 66.67
23 EO 2P W = -110 12 66.67
24 EO 4C W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.7 GOBBE Amélie -CASSART Guy : 60,00 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 7 38.89
26 EO 2K E+1 -110 10 55.56
27 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,07 %28 EO 4C N-3 -300 18 100.00
29 EO 2T E = -90 5 27.78
30 EO 4PcW-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 310,0 / 540 = 57,41 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
A10 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,78 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 3S N-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,93 % 4 EO 2P S = 110 6 33.33
5 EO 4C E-2 100 4 22.22
6 EO 3S N+1 430 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 % 7 EO 4C S+2 680 1 5.56
8 EO 2P W+1 -140 7 38.89
9 EO 3T N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,07 %10 EO 4P N = 620 3 16.67
11 EO 4C N = 420 6 33.33
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %13 EO 2K N+3 150 2 11.11
14 EO 2K E-1 50 16 88.89
15 EO 2C E+1 -140 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,30 %16 EO 4C E-1 100 3 16.67
17 EO 2K E-2 100 13 72.22
18 EO 1S W-1 50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,63 %19 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 61.11
20 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.7 GOBBE Amélie -CASSART Guy : 60,00 %22 EO 2C S = 110 5 27.78
23 EO 3P W-1 100 7 38.89
24 EO 4C W-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 38,15 %25 EO 4C S = 420 15 83.33
26 EO 2P S-1 -100 6 33.33
27 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 52,78 %28 EO 3C N-1 -100 5 27.78
29 EO 2T E = -90 5 27.78
30 EO 5T S = 400 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 250,0 / 540 = 46,30 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
A.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,93 % 1 EO 3S E-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 2S N-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 % 4 EO 1S S+2 150 2 11.11
5 EO 3P N-1 -100 14 77.78
6 EO 3S N = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,30 % 7 EO 3S N+1 630 10 55.56
8 EO 3P W+3 -230 12 66.67
9 EO 1S N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %10 EO 4P N = 620 3 16.67
11 EO 3S N+1 430 2 11.11
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,07 %13 EO 2K S+2 130 6 33.33
14 EO 3K E-1 50 16 88.89
15 EO 3P W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,78 %16 EO 3C E = -140 14 77.78
17 EO 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
18 EO 1S W = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.7 GOBBE Amélie -CASSART Guy : 60,00 %19 EO 2S N = 120 2 11.11
20 EO 2C E-1 100 0 0.00
21 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,63 %22 EO 3T E-1 100 9 50.00
23 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 5K N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 52,78 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 7 38.89
26 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
27 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 38,15 %28 EO 3C N-2 -200 13 72.22
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
30 EO 6TcS-1 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 267,0 / 540 = 49,44 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
A.5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 % 1 EO 3S E = -400 13 72.22
2 EO 2S N-1 -100 13 72.22
3 EO 4P E+2 -680 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,30 % 4 EO 2P S = 110 6 33.33
5 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89
6 EO 3S N = 400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.7 GOBBE Amélie -CASSART Guy : 60,00 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 14 77.78
8 EO 2CcN-1 -100 3 16.67
9 EO 2T N = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 38,15 %10 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 1S N+2 150 14 77.78
12 EO 1S E+1 -120 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,78 %13 EO 2K S+1 110 12 66.67
14 EO 2KcE-1 100 10 55.56
15 EO 2P W+2 -170 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,07 %16 EO 4K S-1 -50 8 44.44
17 EO 2KcE-3 500 0 0.00
18 EO 1S W = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,93 %19 EO 2S N = 120 2 11.11
20 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 52,78 %22 EO 3C S-1 -50 15 83.33
23 EO 5TcS-3 -800 18 100.00
24 EO 5K N-1 -50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,63 %25 EO 4C S = 420 15 83.33
26 EO 1S W+2 -150 18 100.00
27 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %28 EO 3C N-2 -200 13 72.22
29 EO 1S W+1 -120 15 83.33
30 EO 5TcS = 550 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 342,0 / 540 = 63,33 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele
A.6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,30 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 1S N = 90 8 44.44
3 EO 4P E+2 -680 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.7 GOBBE Amélie -CASSART Guy : 60,00 % 4 EO 2S N+2 180 0 0.00
5 EO 3C E-1 50 9 50.00
6 EO 3S N+2 460 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 52,78 % 7 EO 4C N = 620 14 77.78
8 EO 3C N-2 -100 3 16.67
9 EO 2C S+1 140 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,78 %10 EO 4P N-1 -100 14 77.78
11 EO 4C N = 420 6 33.33
12 EO 2P N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 38,15 %13 EO 3K S+1 130 6 33.33
14 EO 2S W-2 100 10 55.56
15 EO 1S N-2 -200 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,93 %16 EO 4CcE-1 200 0 0.00
17 EO 3P N-2 -100 18 100.00
18 EO 2C W-2 100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,07 %19 EO 3T N-1 -50 11 61.11
20 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 EO 3S E = -400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %22 EO 2P W-1 100 9 50.00
23 EO 4P W-2 200 1 5.56
24 EO 5C E-2 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 %25 EO 5C S = 450 7 38.89
26 EO 2K E+1 -110 10 55.56
27 EO 1S N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,63 %28 EO 1K N-1 -100 5 27.78
29 EO 1S E = -90 5 27.78
30 EO 5TcS+1 650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
Total : 224,0 / 540 = 41,48 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A.7 GOBBE Amélie -CASSART Guy : 60,00 % 1 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
2 EO 2S N-2 -200 18 100.00
3 EO 4P E+3 -710 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.8 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 52,78 % 4 EO 3P S-1 -100 12 66.67
5 EO 3C E-1 50 9 50.00
6 EO 3S N+4 520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,41 % 7 EO 4C N+2 680 1 5.56
8 EO 4P W = -420 15 83.33
9 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 49,63 %10 EO 2P N+1 140 8 44.44
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 17 94.44
12 EO 2S E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -JANSSENS Pierre : 55,93 %13 EO 4K S = 130 6 33.33
14 EO 2P N = 110 6 33.33
15 EO 3S E = -400 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.3 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 38,15 %16 EO 4K S-1 -50 8 44.44
17 EO 2P N+1 140 7 38.89
18 EO 2S W-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.5 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 42,96 %19 EO 3T N-2 -100 18 100.00
20 EO 1S E = -90 9 50.00
21 EO 4C W-2 100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.1 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 49,07 %22 EO 2P E-2 200 1 5.56
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 88.89
24 EO 4C E-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.6 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 46,30 %25 EO 4C S+2 480 0 0.00
26 EO 2K E+1 -110 10 55.56
27 EO 2K E = -90 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A10 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 52,78 %28 EO 3S N-2 -200 13 72.22
29 EO 2T E = -90 5 27.78
30 EO 5T S+1 420 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 245,0 / 540 = 45,37 %
|
|