|
Tournoi du 26-09-16
Lundi
1 63,26 4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette
2 54,58 11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
3 53,58 9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard
4 53,27 13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
5 50,86 12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
6 49,56 7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
7 49,05 10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
8 48,80 6 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy
9 48,08 3 -GROSFILS Colette
10 47,08 5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
11 45,89 2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
12 44,85 8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
13 40,76 1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 59,95 18 DUMONT Catherine -de KERCHOVE Pauline
2 57,64 19 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
3 54,12 21 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele
4 51,79 14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
5 51,05 23 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
6 50,92 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
7 50,27 16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
8 49,27 26 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques
9 47,95 24 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
10 47,45 15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
11 45,29 22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger
12 42,17 25 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
13 41,85 17 -ERPICUM Patrice
PAIRE Nr : 1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,79 % 1 NS 3C S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 3S S+2 660 17 77.27
3 NS 1S W+2 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
24 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,95 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 7 31.82
5 NS 2T W = -90 8 36.36
6 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
23 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,05 % 7 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09
8 NS 4C W+2 -480 2 9.09
9 NS 3C E-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 45,29 %10 NS 3S W-2 200 21 95.45
11 NS 4P E+3 -510 12 54.55
12 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
21 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,12 %13 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 NS 2S N+1 150 11 50.00
15 NS 5KcE-2 300 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
26 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 49,27 %16 NS 4P W+3 -710 6 27.27
17 NS 6T E+1 -940 3 13.64
18 NS 4P N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,64 %19 NS 4P S-2 -100 2 9.09
20 NS 5T W+1 -620 16 72.73
21 NS 2S E = -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
18 DUMONT Catherine -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 59,95 %22 NS 2C N-1 -50 9 40.91
23 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
17 -ERPICUM Patrice : 41,85 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 NS 3KcE = -670 0.1 0.45
27 NS 4C S+1 450 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,27 %28 NS 2K S-1 -100 7.4 33.64
29 NS 6C N-1 -100 0.1 0.45
30 NS 6CcN-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 269,0 / 660 = 40,76 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,45 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 7 31.82
5 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 4.55
6 NS 2S E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,79 % 7 NS 3S N = 600 3 13.64
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 13 59.09
9 NS 4P W = -620 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
24 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,95 %10 NS 2T W+2 -130 7 31.82
11 NS 6S E-1 50 20 90.91
12 NS 4C W-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
23 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,05 %13 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 2T S+1 110 6 27.27
15 NS 4P S = 620 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 45,29 %16 NS 6P W+1 -1460 0 0.00
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 17 77.27
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
21 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,12 %19 NS 3C W-2 200 20 90.91
20 NS 5K W+2 -640 9 40.91
21 NS 2S E+1 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
25 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,17 %22 NS 1S S-1 -50 9 40.91
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 0 0.00
24 NS 1S S = 90 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,64 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 NS 3C S-2 -200 2.3 10.45
27 NS 2C S+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
18 DUMONT Catherine -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 59,95 %28 NS 2K S = 90 14.6 66.36
29 NS 4C N+3 710 20.8 94.55
30 NS 6CcS-1 -100 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 78,64 %
17 -ERPICUM Patrice : 41,85 %31 NS 4P N+2 680 15 68.18
32 NS 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45
33 NS 4P E-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 67,73 %
Total : 302,9 / 660 = 45,89 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 -GROSFILS Colette
18 DUMONT Catherine -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 59,95 % 1 NS 1S E-1 50 8 36.36
2 NS 3S N+2 660 17 77.27
3 NS 1S W+3 -180 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,27 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 13 59.09
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 13 59.09
9 NS 3P W = -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
25 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,17 %10 NS 2T E+2 -130 7 31.82
11 NS 6P E-1 50 20 90.91
12 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,79 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 18 81.82
14 NS 3T S-2 -100 1 4.55
15 NS 5P S = 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
24 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,95 %16 NS 4P W+2 -680 12 54.55
17 NS 6T E+1 -940 3 13.64
18 NS 2S N+1 150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
23 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,05 %19 NS 3C W-2 200 20 90.91
20 NS 6T W = -1370 1 4.55
21 NS 3S E = -400 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 45,29 %22 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09
23 NS 3S S+1 630 22 100.00
24 NS 2S N+2 180 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
26 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 49,27 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 NS 2K E+2 -130 5.5 25.00
27 NS 4C S = 420 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,92 %28 NS 2K S = 90 14.6 66.36
29 NS 4C N+1 650 5.5 25.00
30 NS 4P E+2 -480 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 40,45 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,64 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 5 22.73
32 NS 2C S-2 -100 4 18.18
33 NS 2P E = -110 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 23,64 %
Total : 317,3 / 660 = 48,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,92 % 1 NS 2K S+1 110 18 81.82
2 NS 3S N+1 630 6 27.27
3 NS 2P S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,64 % 4 NS 4CcS = 790 18 81.82
5 NS 3P W-1 50 13 59.09
6 NS 3S E-3 300 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
17 -ERPICUM Patrice : 41,85 %10 NS 2T E+1 -110 13 59.09
11 NS 6P E = -980 8 36.36
12 NS 2P N-1 -100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
26 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 49,27 %13 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 9.09
14 NS 3S N = 400 17 77.27
15 NS 4P S+1 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,45 %16 NS 6P W-1 100 22 100.00
17 NS 6P W-2 100 22 100.00
18 NS 3S N = 600 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 96,97 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,79 %19 NS 3C W-1 100 8 36.36
20 NS 5K W+1 -620 16 72.73
21 NS 2S E+1 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
24 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,95 %22 NS 1S S = 90 13 59.09
23 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
23 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,05 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 NS 3K E = -110 11 50.00
27 NS 3C S+1 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 45,29 %28 NS 2T N-2 -200 3.8 17.27
29 NS 4C N+2 680 13.2 60.00
30 NS 5P E+1 -480 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 35,76 %
25 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,17 %31 NS 4P N+2 680 15 68.18
32 NS 1S W-1 100 19 86.36
33 NS 5P E-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 81,36 %
Total : 417,5 / 660 = 63,26 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
26 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 49,27 % 1 NS 2C S = 110 18 81.82
2 NS 3S N+2 660 17 77.27
3 NS 1S W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
21 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,12 % 4 NS 3C S+2 200 0 0.00
5 NS 2P W = -110 4 18.18
6 NS 2S E = -120 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,92 % 7 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 13 59.09
9 NS 4P W = -620 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
18 DUMONT Catherine -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 59,95 %13 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 NS 2S S+1 150 11 50.00
15 NS 4P S+1 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
17 -ERPICUM Patrice : 41,85 %16 NS 4P W+2 -680 12 54.55
17 NS 3S E+3 -490 14 63.64
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
25 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,17 %19 NS 3K E-2 200 20 90.91
20 NS 5K W+2 -640 9 40.91
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,45 %22 NS 2T E-1 100 17 77.27
23 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,79 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 NS 3K E-1 100 17.5 79.55
27 NS 4C S-1 -50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
24 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,95 %28 NS 2K S+1 110 20.6 93.64
29 NS 4C N+1 650 5.5 25.00
30 NS 6CcS-2 -300 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 59,55 %
23 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,05 %31 NS 4P N+2 680 15 68.18
32 NS 2P E+1 -140 0 0.00
33 NS 2P E+2 -170 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 27,88 %
Total : 310,7 / 660 = 47,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy
24 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,95 % 1 NS 2C S = 110 18 81.82
2 NS 3S N+1 630 6 27.27
3 NS 2C N-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
23 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,05 % 4 NS 4C S+2 680 14 63.64
5 NS 2T W = -90 8 36.36
6 NS 2C E = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
25 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,17 % 7 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 13 59.09
9 NS 2P E+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
21 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,12 %10 NS 3T W = -110 13 59.09
11 NS 6P E = -980 8 36.36
12 NS 4CcE-1 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,64 %16 NS 4P W+1 -650 19 86.36
17 NS 6T E+1 -940 3 13.64
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
18 DUMONT Catherine -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 59,95 %19 NS 4P S-1 -50 5 22.73
20 NS 5K W+2 -640 9 40.91
21 NS 2S E+1 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
26 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 49,27 %22 NS 2T E = -90 4 18.18
23 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,27 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 NS 2P E = -110 11 50.00
27 NS 4C S-2 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 33,48 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,45 %28 NS 2K S = 90 14.6 66.36
29 NS 4C N+2 680 13.2 60.00
30 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,79 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,79 %31 NS 4P N+2 680 15 68.18
32 NS 2C N-1 -50 10 45.45
33 NS 4P E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 57,88 %
Total : 322,1 / 660 = 48,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,45 % 1 NS 2C S = 110 18 81.82
2 NS 3S S+2 660 17 77.27
3 NS 1S W-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,79 % 4 NS 4CcS = 790 18 81.82
5 NS 1ScS = 180 22 100.00
6 NS 2S E = -120 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
24 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,95 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 13 59.09
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 13 59.09
9 NS 1P W+2 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
26 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 49,27 %10 NS 2T E+1 -110 13 59.09
11 NS 6P W-1 50 20 90.91
12 NS 3S S-3 -300 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 45,29 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 18 81.82
14 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 18.18
15 NS 4K E-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,92 %19 NS 2P S+1 140 12 54.55
20 NS 5K W+2 -640 9 40.91
21 NS 2S E = -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,64 %22 NS 2T E-1 100 17 77.27
23 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
18 DUMONT Catherine -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 59,95 %25 NS 2C S+3 200 0.1 0.45
26 NS 3C S-1 -100 15.4 70.00
27 NS 3S S-1 -50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
25 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,17 %28 NS 4P S-2 -200 3.8 17.27
29 NS 3C N+2 200 2.3 10.45
30 NS 5CcS = 650 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,27 %31 NS 2P S+4 230 0 0.00
32 NS 2T S-1 -50 10 45.45
33 NS 4P E = -420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 15,30 %
Total : 327,1 / 660 = 49,56 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
17 -ERPICUM Patrice : 41,85 % 1 NS 3C S-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 3S N+2 660 17 77.27
3 NS 1S W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,27 % 4 NS 4CcS+1 990 22 100.00
5 NS 1S S = 90 18 81.82
6 NS 2S E = -120 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,45 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 3 13.64
8 NS 6C W-1 50 22 100.00
9 NS 3P W+2 -200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,79 %10 NS 3S E = -600 3 13.64
11 NS 6P E+1 -1010 2 9.09
12 NS 3C E = -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
24 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,95 %13 NS 3S S+1 630 18 81.82
14 NS 2T S-2 -100 1 4.55
15 NS 5P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
25 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,17 %16 NS 4P W+2 -680 12 54.55
17 NS 4S E+3 -520 10 45.45
18 NS 4C N-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
21 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,12 %22 NS 1S S+1 120 20 90.91
23 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 NS 3S N-1 -50 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,92 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 NS 2K E+1 -110 11 50.00
27 NS 4C S-1 -50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,64 %28 NS 6CcN-6 -1700 0.2 0.91
29 NS 4C N+2 680 13.2 60.00
30 NS 5PcE = -650 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 23,79 %
26 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 49,27 %31 NS 6P N = 1430 22 100.00
32 NS 2C W-1 100 19 86.36
33 NS 1C W = -80 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 75,45 %
Total : 296,0 / 660 = 44,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard
19 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,64 % 1 NS 2C S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 4P S = 620 2 9.09
3 NS 2P S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
25 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,17 % 4 NS 4CcS = 790 18 81.82
5 NS 1S S = 90 18 81.82
6 NS 3S W-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
17 -ERPICUM Patrice : 41,85 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 13 59.09
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 13 59.09
9 NS 2P W+2 -170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,27 %10 NS 3S E+1 -630 0 0.00
11 NS 4P W+1 -450 16 72.73
12 NS 4C E = -420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,45 %13 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 NS 3S N = 400 17 77.27
15 NS 4KcE-2 300 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,79 %16 NS 6P E = -1430 3 13.64
17 NS 4P W = -420 20 90.91
18 NS 3S S = 600 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
26 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 49,27 %19 NS 3P S = 140 12 54.55
20 NS 3S W+3 -690 4 18.18
21 NS 1K E = -70 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 45,29 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 NS 2C S = 110 20.8 94.55
27 NS 2S S-1 -50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,52 %
21 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,12 %28 NS 3C E-1 50 9.8 44.55
29 NS 4C N+2 680 13.2 60.00
30 NS 4P E+2 -480 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 44,85 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,92 %31 NS 4P N+2 680 15 68.18
32 NS 1S N = 90 16 72.73
33 NS 4P E-2 100 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 76,82 %
Total : 353,6 / 660 = 53,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
21 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,12 % 1 NS 1S E-2 100 11 50.00
2 NS 3S N = 600 0 0.00
3 NS 3T E+1 -130 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,92 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 7 31.82
5 NS 2T E = -90 8 36.36
6 NS 1S E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
26 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 49,27 % 7 NS 3PcE-4 1100 22 100.00
8 NS 4C E+1 -450 13 59.09
9 NS 3P E+1 -170 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 DUMONT Catherine -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 59,95 %10 NS 3S E = -600 3 13.64
11 NS 6P E = -980 8 36.36
12 NS 2C E+2 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
17 -ERPICUM Patrice : 41,85 %13 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
14 NS 3S N+1 430 22 100.00
15 NS 4P N+1 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,27 %16 NS 5P E+1 -680 12 54.55
17 NS 6T E+1 -940 3 13.64
18 NS 3S N = 600 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,45 %19 NS 3C E = -140 0 0.00
20 NS 6T E = -1370 1 4.55
21 NS 2S E+1 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 51,79 %22 NS 1S E = -90 4 18.18
23 NS 3S N = 600 11 50.00
24 NS 2C N+1 140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
23 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,05 %28 NS 2P N = 110 20.6 93.64
29 NS 4C N+3 710 20.8 94.55
30 NS 5PcE+1 -750 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 62,88 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 45,29 %31 NS 4P N+2 680 15 68.18
32 NS 1S N+1 120 22 100.00
33 NS 4P E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 76,06 %
Total : 323,7 / 660 = 49,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
23 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,05 % 1 NS 3TcW-1 100 11 50.00
2 NS 3S N+2 660 17 77.27
3 NS 2T W = -90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 45,29 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 7 31.82
5 NS 1S S = 90 18 81.82
6 NS 3S E-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
21 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,12 % 7 NS 3S S+1 630 13 59.09
8 NS 4C W+2 -480 2 9.09
9 NS 2P W+3 -200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,92 %10 NS 2T E+1 -110 13 59.09
11 NS 6P E+1 -1010 2 9.09
12 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
25 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,17 %13 NS 3S S+2 660 22 100.00
14 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
15 NS 5K E-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
18 DUMONT Catherine -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 59,95 %16 NS 6P W = -1430 3 13.64
17 NS 3S E+4 -520 10 45.45
18 NS 2S N+1 150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
17 -ERPICUM Patrice : 41,85 %19 NS 3T N+2 150 16 72.73
20 NS 5T W+1 -620 16 72.73
21 NS 2S W-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,27 %22 NS 3TcE-1 200 22 100.00
23 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 NS 3S S = 400 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,45 %25 NS 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 NS 3K E+1 -130 5.5 25.00
27 NS 4C S = 420 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
24 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,95 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 5 22.73
32 NS 1S S-1 -50 10 45.45
33 NS 4P E-1 50 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 42,73 %
Total : 360,2 / 660 = 54,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
25 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 42,17 % 1 NS 2C S = 110 18 81.82
2 NS 3S N+1 630 6 27.27
3 NS 1S W-3 300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
18 DUMONT Catherine -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 59,95 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 7 31.82
5 NS 2C E-1 50 13 59.09
6 NS 2S E = -120 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 45,29 % 7 NS 3S N+1 630 13 59.09
8 NS 4C W+2 -480 2 9.09
9 NS 3K S-1 -50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,45 %10 NS 2T E = -90 18 81.82
11 NS 6P E+1 -1010 2 9.09
12 NS 3C E+1 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,64 %13 NS 3K N+1 130 4 18.18
14 NS 2S N = 120 8 36.36
15 NS 4P S+1 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
23 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,05 %16 NS 4P W+2 -680 12 54.55
17 NS 3S E+2 -460 17 77.27
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,27 %19 NS 2P S-1 -50 5 22.73
20 NS 3K W+4 -190 20 90.91
21 NS 2S E = -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,92 %22 NS 2T E = -90 4 18.18
23 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 NS 1S S+1 120 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
17 -ERPICUM Patrice : 41,85 %28 NS 40%40% Ajust 8.8 40.00
29 NS 4C N+2 680 13.2 60.00
30 NS 5C S = 450 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
21 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,12 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 5 22.73
32 NS 1S N-1 -50 10 45.45
33 NS 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 335,7 / 660 = 50,86 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger : 45,29 % 1 NS 2C S-1 -50 4 18.18
2 NS 4P S+1 650 10 45.45
3 NS 1S W-1 100 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
26 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques : 49,27 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 7 31.82
5 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 4.55
6 NS 3S E-3 300 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
19 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 57,64 % 7 NS 4C N-3 -300 0 0.00
8 NS 4C W+1 -450 13 59.09
9 NS 2P W+1 -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
23 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 51,05 %10 NS 3S E-2 200 21 95.45
11 NS 3S E+2 -460 14 63.64
12 NS 3C E = -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,27 %13 NS 2S S+2 180 6 27.27
14 NS 3S S = 400 17 77.27
15 NS 4P S+1 650 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,92 %16 NS 4P W+1 -650 19 86.36
17 NS 3S E+4 -520 10 45.45
18 NS 4C S-1 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
24 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 47,95 %19 NS 3P S = 140 12 54.55
20 NS 3T W+3 -170 22 100.00
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
17 -ERPICUM Patrice : 41,85 %22 NS 2C N-2 -100 0 0.00
23 NS 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 NS 1S S+1 120 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
21 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,12 %25 NS 4C S+2 480 21.9 99.55
26 NS 2C S = 110 20.8 94.55
27 NS 4C S = 420 17.5 79.55 µ Tbl = 91,21 %
18 DUMONT Catherine -de KERCHOVE Pauline : 59,95 %31 NS 4P N+1 650 5 22.73
32 NS 2C W = -110 2 9.09
33 NS 2P E+2 -170 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 15,76 %
Total : 351,6 / 660 = 53,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 40,76 % 1 EO 3C S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 3S S+2 660 5 22.73
3 EO 1S W+2 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,56 % 4 EO 4CcS = 790 4 18.18
5 EO 1ScS = 180 0 0.00
6 EO 2S E = -120 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,89 % 7 EO 3S N = 600 19 86.36
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 40.91
9 EO 4P W = -620 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 44,85 %10 EO 3S E = -600 19 86.36
11 EO 6P E+1 -1010 20 90.91
12 EO 3C E = -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
3 -GROSFILS Colette : 48,08 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 4 18.18
14 EO 3T S-2 -100 21 95.45
15 EO 5P S = 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,58 %16 EO 6P E = -1430 19 86.36
17 EO 4P W = -420 2 9.09
18 EO 3S S = 600 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 63,26 %19 EO 3C W-1 100 14 63.64
20 EO 5K W+1 -620 6 27.27
21 EO 2S E+1 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,05 %22 EO 1S E = -90 18 81.82
23 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
24 EO 2C N+1 140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,08 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 EO 3K E-1 100 4.5 20.45
27 EO 4C S-1 -50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
6 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 48,80 %31 EO 4P N+2 680 7 31.82
32 EO 2C N-1 -50 12 54.55
33 EO 4P E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 42,12 %
Total : 341,8 / 660 = 51,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,56 % 1 EO 2C S = 110 4 18.18
2 EO 3S S+2 660 5 22.73
3 EO 1S W-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,89 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 15 68.18
5 EO 1S E+1 -120 21 95.45
6 EO 2S E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 44,85 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 19 86.36
8 EO 6C W-1 50 0 0.00
9 EO 3P W+2 -200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,86 %10 EO 2T E = -90 4 18.18
11 EO 6P E+1 -1010 20 90.91
12 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,58 %13 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 EO 3S N = 400 5 22.73
15 EO 4KcE-2 300 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 63,26 %16 EO 6P W-1 100 0 0.00
17 EO 6P W-2 100 0 0.00
18 EO 3S N = 600 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 3,03 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,05 %19 EO 3C E = -140 22 100.00
20 EO 6T E = -1370 21 95.45
21 EO 2S E+1 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,08 %22 EO 2T E-1 100 5 22.73
23 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,58 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 EO 3K E+1 -130 16.5 75.00
27 EO 4C S = 420 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
6 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 48,80 %28 EO 2K S = 90 7.4 33.64
29 EO 4C N+2 680 8.8 40.00
30 EO 4P E+1 -450 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,21 %
Total : 313,2 / 660 = 47,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 44,85 % 4 EO 4CcS+1 990 0 0.00
5 EO 1S S = 90 4 18.18
6 EO 2S E = -120 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
3 -GROSFILS Colette : 48,08 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 9 40.91
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 40.91
9 EO 3P W = -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,58 %10 EO 3S E+1 -630 22 100.00
11 EO 4P W+1 -450 6 27.27
12 EO 4C E = -420 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 53,27 %13 EO 2S S+2 180 16 72.73
14 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
15 EO 4P S+1 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,05 %16 EO 5P E+1 -680 10 45.45
17 EO 6T E+1 -940 19 86.36
18 EO 3S N = 600 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,86 %19 EO 2P S-1 -50 17 77.27
20 EO 3K W+4 -190 2 9.09
21 EO 2S E = -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,58 %22 EO 3TcE-1 200 0 0.00
23 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
6 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 48,80 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 EO 2P E = -110 11 50.00
27 EO 4C S-2 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 66,52 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 40,76 %28 EO 2K S-1 -100 14.6 66.36
29 EO 6C N-1 -100 21.9 99.55
30 EO 6CcN-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,56 %31 EO 2P S+4 230 22 100.00
32 EO 2T S-1 -50 12 54.55
33 EO 4P E = -420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 84,70 %
Total : 331,8 / 660 = 50,27 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 -ERPICUM Patrice
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 44,85 % 1 EO 3C S-2 -100 22 100.00
2 EO 3S N+2 660 5 22.73
3 EO 1S W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,58 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 9 40.91
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 40.91
9 EO 2P W+2 -170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 63,26 %10 EO 2T E+1 -110 9 40.91
11 EO 6P E = -980 14 63.64
12 EO 2P N-1 -100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,05 %13 EO 3S N = 600 11 50.00
14 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00
15 EO 4P N+1 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,08 %16 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 45.45
17 EO 3S E+3 -490 8 36.36
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,58 %19 EO 3T N+2 150 6 27.27
20 EO 5T W+1 -620 6 27.27
21 EO 2S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 53,27 %22 EO 2C N-2 -100 22 100.00
23 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 EO 1S S+1 120 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 40,76 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 EO 3KcE = -670 21.9 99.55
27 EO 4C S+1 450 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,86 %28 EO 40%40% Ajust 8.8 40.00
29 EO 4C N+2 680 8.8 40.00
30 EO 5C S = 450 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,15 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,89 %31 EO 4P N+2 680 7 31.82
32 EO 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55
33 EO 4P E-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 32,27 %
Total : 276,2 / 660 = 41,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 DUMONT Catherine -de KERCHOVE Pauline
3 -GROSFILS Colette : 48,08 % 1 EO 1S E-1 50 14 63.64
2 EO 3S N+2 660 5 22.73
3 EO 1S W+3 -180 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,86 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 15 68.18
5 EO 2C E-1 50 9 40.91
6 EO 2S E = -120 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,05 %10 EO 3S E = -600 19 86.36
11 EO 6P E = -980 14 63.64
12 EO 2C E+2 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,08 %13 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 EO 2S S+1 150 11 50.00
15 EO 4P S+1 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,58 %16 EO 6P W = -1430 19 86.36
17 EO 3S E+4 -520 12 54.55
18 EO 2S N+1 150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
6 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 48,80 %19 EO 4P S-1 -50 17 77.27
20 EO 5K W+2 -640 13 59.09
21 EO 2S E+1 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 40,76 %22 EO 2C N-1 -50 13 59.09
23 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,56 %25 EO 2C S+3 200 21.9 99.55
26 EO 3C S-1 -100 6.6 30.00
27 EO 3S S-1 -50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,89 %28 EO 2K S = 90 7.4 33.64
29 EO 4C N+3 710 1.2 5.45
30 EO 6CcS-1 -100 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 21,36 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 53,27 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 17 77.27
32 EO 2C W = -110 20 90.91
33 EO 2P E+2 -170 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 84,24 %
Total : 395,7 / 660 = 59,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,58 % 1 EO 2C S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 4P S = 620 20 90.91
3 EO 2P S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 63,26 % 4 EO 4CcS = 790 4 18.18
5 EO 3P W-1 50 9 40.91
6 EO 3S E-3 300 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 53,27 % 7 EO 4C N-3 -300 22 100.00
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 40.91
9 EO 2P W+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,86 %13 EO 3K N+1 130 18 81.82
14 EO 2S N = 120 14 63.64
15 EO 4P S+1 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
6 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 48,80 %16 EO 4P W+1 -650 3 13.64
17 EO 6T E+1 -940 19 86.36
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 40,76 %19 EO 4P S-2 -100 20 90.91
20 EO 5T W+1 -620 6 27.27
21 EO 2S E = -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,56 %22 EO 2T E-1 100 5 22.73
23 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,89 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 EO 3C S-2 -200 19.7 89.55
27 EO 2C S+1 140 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 44,85 %28 EO 6CcN-6 -1700 21.8 99.09
29 EO 4C N+2 680 8.8 40.00
30 EO 5PcE = -650 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 76,21 %
3 -GROSFILS Colette : 48,08 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 17 77.27
32 EO 2C S-2 -100 18 81.82
33 EO 2P E = -110 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 76,36 %
Total : 380,4 / 660 = 57,64 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 63,26 % 1 EO 2K S+1 110 4 18.18
2 EO 3S N+1 630 16 72.73
3 EO 2P S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,05 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 15 68.18
5 EO 2T E = -90 14 63.64
6 EO 1S E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,08 % 7 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 40.91
9 EO 4P W = -620 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,58 %10 EO 2T E+1 -110 9 40.91
11 EO 6P E+1 -1010 20 90.91
12 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 53,27 %16 EO 4P W+1 -650 3 13.64
17 EO 3S E+4 -520 12 54.55
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,56 %19 EO 2P S+1 140 10 45.45
20 EO 5K W+2 -640 13 59.09
21 EO 2S E = -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,86 %22 EO 2T E = -90 18 81.82
23 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 EO 1S S+1 120 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 44,85 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 EO 2K E+1 -110 11 50.00
27 EO 4C S-1 -50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 -GROSFILS Colette : 48,08 %28 EO 2K S = 90 7.4 33.64
29 EO 4C N+1 650 16.5 75.00
30 EO 4P E+2 -480 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 59,55 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,58 %31 EO 4P N+2 680 7 31.82
32 EO 1S N = 90 6 27.27
33 EO 4P E-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 23,18 %
Total : 336,1 / 660 = 50,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,05 % 1 EO 1S E-2 100 11 50.00
2 EO 3S N = 600 22 100.00
3 EO 3T E+1 -130 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,08 % 4 EO 3C S+2 200 22 100.00
5 EO 2P W = -110 18 81.82
6 EO 2S E = -120 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,58 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 9 40.91
8 EO 4C W+2 -480 20 90.91
9 EO 2P W+3 -200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
6 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 48,80 %10 EO 3T W = -110 9 40.91
11 EO 6P E = -980 14 63.64
12 EO 4CcE-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 40,76 %13 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
14 EO 2S N+1 150 11 50.00
15 EO 5KcE-2 300 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,89 %19 EO 3C W-2 200 2 9.09
20 EO 5K W+2 -640 13 59.09
21 EO 2S E+1 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 44,85 %22 EO 1S S+1 120 2 9.09
23 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 53,27 %25 EO 4C S+2 480 0.1 0.45
26 EO 2C S = 110 1.2 5.45
27 EO 4C S = 420 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 8,79 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,58 %28 EO 3C E-1 50 12.2 55.45
29 EO 4C N+2 680 8.8 40.00
30 EO 4P E+2 -480 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 55,15 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,86 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 17 77.27
32 EO 1S N-1 -50 12 54.55
33 EO 50%50% Ajust 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 357,2 / 660 = 54,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -ARICKX Roger
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 53,27 % 1 EO 2C S-1 -50 18 81.82
2 EO 4P S+1 650 12 54.55
3 EO 1S W-1 100 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,58 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 15 68.18
5 EO 1S S = 90 4 18.18
6 EO 3S E-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,86 % 7 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91
8 EO 4C W+2 -480 20 90.91
9 EO 3K S-1 -50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 40,76 %10 EO 3S W-2 200 1 4.55
11 EO 4P E+3 -510 10 45.45
12 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,56 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 4 18.18
14 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 81.82
15 EO 4K E-1 50 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,89 %16 EO 6P W+1 -1460 22 100.00
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 5 22.73
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
3 -GROSFILS Colette : 48,08 %22 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91
23 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
24 EO 2S N+2 180 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,58 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 EO 2C S = 110 1.2 5.45
27 EO 2S S-1 -50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,48 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 63,26 %28 EO 2T N-2 -200 18.2 82.73
29 EO 4C N+2 680 8.8 40.00
30 EO 5P E+1 -480 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 64,24 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,05 %31 EO 4P N+2 680 7 31.82
32 EO 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
33 EO 4P E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 23,94 %
Total : 298,9 / 660 = 45,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,58 % 1 EO 3TcW-1 100 11 50.00
2 EO 3S N+2 660 5 22.73
3 EO 2T W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
6 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 48,80 % 4 EO 4C S+2 680 8 36.36
5 EO 2T W = -90 14 63.64
6 EO 2C E = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 40,76 % 7 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91
8 EO 4C W+2 -480 20 90.91
9 EO 3C E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 53,27 %10 EO 3S E-2 200 1 4.55
11 EO 3S E+2 -460 8 36.36
12 EO 3C E = -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,89 %13 EO 4C S-2 -200 22 100.00
14 EO 2T S+1 110 16 72.73
15 EO 4P S = 620 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,86 %16 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 45.45
17 EO 3S E+2 -460 5 22.73
18 EO 4C S-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
3 -GROSFILS Colette : 48,08 %19 EO 3C W-2 200 2 9.09
20 EO 6T W = -1370 21 95.45
21 EO 3S E = -400 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 63,26 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 EO 3K E = -110 11 50.00
27 EO 3C S+1 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,05 %28 EO 2P N = 110 1.4 6.36
29 EO 4C N+3 710 1.2 5.45
30 EO 5PcE+1 -750 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 37,12 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,08 %31 EO 4P N+2 680 7 31.82
32 EO 2P E+1 -140 22 100.00
33 EO 2P E+2 -170 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 72,12 %
Total : 336,9 / 660 = 51,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
6 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 48,80 % 1 EO 2C S = 110 4 18.18
2 EO 3S N+1 630 16 72.73
3 EO 2C N-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 40,76 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 15 68.18
5 EO 2T W = -90 14 63.64
6 EO 2P E+1 -140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,56 % 7 EO 3S S+1 630 9 40.91
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 40.91
9 EO 1P W+2 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,89 %10 EO 2T W+2 -130 15 68.18
11 EO 6S E-1 50 2 9.09
12 EO 4C W-1 50 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 44,85 %13 EO 3S S+1 630 4 18.18
14 EO 2T S-2 -100 21 95.45
15 EO 5P S-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
3 -GROSFILS Colette : 48,08 %16 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 45.45
17 EO 6T E+1 -940 19 86.36
18 EO 2S N+1 150 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 53,27 %19 EO 3P S = 140 10 45.45
20 EO 3T W+3 -170 0 0.00
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 63,26 %22 EO 1S S = 90 9 40.91
23 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 EO 3S S = 400 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,08 %28 EO 2K S+1 110 1.4 6.36
29 EO 4C N+1 650 16.5 75.00
30 EO 6CcS-2 -300 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,45 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,58 %31 EO 4P N+1 650 17 77.27
32 EO 1S S-1 -50 12 54.55
33 EO 4P E-1 50 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,27 %
Total : 316,5 / 660 = 47,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,86 % 1 EO 2C S = 110 4 18.18
2 EO 3S N+1 630 16 72.73
3 EO 1S W-3 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,58 % 4 EO 4CcS = 790 4 18.18
5 EO 1S S = 90 4 18.18
6 EO 3S W-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
6 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 48,80 % 7 EO 3S N+1 630 9 40.91
8 EO 4C W+1 -450 9 40.91
9 EO 2P E+1 -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
3 -GROSFILS Colette : 48,08 %10 EO 2T E+2 -130 15 68.18
11 EO 6P E-1 50 2 9.09
12 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
11 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 54,58 %13 EO 3S S+2 660 0 0.00
14 EO 3S S = 400 5 22.73
15 EO 5K E-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 44,85 %16 EO 4P W+2 -680 10 45.45
17 EO 4S E+3 -520 12 54.55
18 EO 4C N-1 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,08 %19 EO 3K E-2 200 2 9.09
20 EO 5K W+2 -640 13 59.09
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,89 %22 EO 1S S-1 -50 13 59.09
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 22 100.00
24 EO 1S S = 90 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,56 %28 EO 4P S-2 -200 18.2 82.73
29 EO 3C N+2 200 19.7 89.55
30 EO 5CcS = 650 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 63,26 %31 EO 4P N+2 680 7 31.82
32 EO 1S W-1 100 3 13.64
33 EO 5P E-2 100 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 18,64 %
Total : 278,3 / 660 = 42,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 COURTOIS Patrick -DELHEZ Jacques
5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,08 % 1 EO 2C S = 110 4 18.18
2 EO 3S N+2 660 5 22.73
3 EO 1S W = -90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
13 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 53,27 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 15 68.18
5 EO 1S E+1 -120 21 95.45
6 EO 3S E-3 300 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 49,05 % 7 EO 3PcE-4 1100 0 0.00
8 EO 4C E+1 -450 9 40.91
9 EO 3P E+1 -170 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 49,56 %10 EO 2T E+1 -110 9 40.91
11 EO 6P W-1 50 2 9.09
12 EO 3S S-3 -300 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
4 BEYNE Anne -CAMUS Colette : 63,26 %13 EO 3S N-1 -100 20 90.91
14 EO 3S N = 400 5 22.73
15 EO 4P S+1 650 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
1 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 40,76 %16 EO 4P W+3 -710 16 72.73
17 EO 6T E+1 -940 19 86.36
18 EO 4P N-3 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
9 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 53,58 %19 EO 3P S = 140 10 45.45
20 EO 3S W+3 -690 18 81.82
21 EO 1K E = -70 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
6 NELIS Claude -CASSART Guy : 48,80 %22 EO 2T E = -90 18 81.82
23 EO 3S S = 600 11 50.00
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
3 -GROSFILS Colette : 48,08 %25 EO 4C S+1 450 11 50.00
26 EO 2K E+2 -130 16.5 75.00
27 EO 4C S = 420 4.5 20.45 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
8 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 44,85 %31 EO 6P N = 1430 0 0.00
32 EO 2C W-1 100 3 13.64
33 EO 1C W = -80 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 24,55 %
Total : 325,2 / 660 = 49,27 %
|
|