|
Tournoi du 28-11-16
Lundi
1 65,99 A11 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
2 60,95 A14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
3 55,92 A10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
4 54,78 A12 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
5 52,26 A.9 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès
6 51,62 A.8 LIBERT Laurent -NELIS Claude
7 48,77 A.5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
8 47,45 A.7 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne
9 46,73 A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
10 46,31 A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
11 45,96 A13 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
12 45,60 A.2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
13 42,88 A15 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
~ 42,88 A.6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
15 41,31 A.4 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 63,63 a.1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
2 60,69 a.8 de KERCHOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine
3 58,31 a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 57,40 a11 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
5 53,77 a.6 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne
6 53,64 a15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
7 52,05 a14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
8 51,69 a.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie
9 50,23 a12 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
10 48,03 a13 -PAQUET Anne
11 46,65 a10 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
12 45,10 a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik
13 37,44 a.4 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel
14 37,42 a.9 -PARMENTIER Richard
15 33,21 a.5 -
PAIRE Nr : A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 63,63 % 1 NS 1S E+2 -150 3.3 12.69
2 NS 2K S = 90 8.7 33.46
3 NS 1S S+1 120 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 34,87 %
a11 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,40 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 19 73.08
5 NS 4K S = 130 14 53.85
6 NS 4K S-3 -150 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 46,65 % 7 NS 5K N-3 -300 5 19.23
8 NS 4P S+2 480 18 69.23
9 NS 6S N-2 -100 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
a.9 -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,42 %10 NS 3S S+2 660 25 96.15
11 NS 6K N = 920 23 88.46
12 NS 5PcN+2 1250 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 89,74 %
a15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,64 %13 NS 3C N+1 170 15.2 58.46
14 NS 2C S+1 140 25 96.15
15 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,54 %
a13 -PAQUET Anne : 48,03 %16 NS 40%40% Ajust 10.4 40.00
17 NS 3C N-1 -50 4 15.38
18 NS 4P S+1 650 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 40,26 %
a.6 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,77 %19 NS 3K N+3 170 4 15.38
20 NS 4C W = -620 6 23.08
21 NS 4P N-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 20,51 %
a.5 - : 33,21 %22 NS 3T S = 110 16 61.54
23 NS 2P S-1 -100 10 38.46
24 NS 4P N = 420 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,44 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 14.1 54.23
26 NS 1S E+3 -180 17.3 66.54
27 NS 3P S-1 -50 9.8 37.69 µ Tbl = 52,82 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 45,10 %28 NS 3S E+3 -490 9.8 37.69
29 NS 2C N = 110 11.9 45.77
30 NS 4P S+1 450 9.8 37.69 µ Tbl = 40,38 %
Total : 364,5 / 780 = 46,73 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,31 % 4 NS 6C N-2 -200 0 0.00
5 NS 4K S = 130 14 53.85
6 NS 3K S-2 -100 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 63,63 % 7 NS 5KcN-3 -800 0 0.00
8 NS 4P S+1 450 8 30.77
9 NS 4P S+2 480 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
a11 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,40 %10 NS 3S N = 600 4 15.38
11 NS 3S N+3 490 14 53.85
12 NS 4P S+2 680 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 46,65 %13 NS 3C N = 140 11.9 45.77
14 NS 2P N = 110 22 84.62
15 NS 2C S = 110 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 49,87 %
a.9 -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,42 %16 NS 4T S+2 170 2.2 8.46
17 NS 1C W-3 150 23 88.46
18 NS 4P S = 620 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 41,28 %
a14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,05 %19 NS 3K N+3 170 4 15.38
20 NS 4C W-1 100 26 100.00
21 NS 4P N-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
a12 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,23 %22 NS 2T N = 90 9 34.62
23 NS 2T E-1 100 18 69.23
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
a.6 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,77 %25 NS 6S E-2 200 21.6 83.08
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.2 4.62
27 NS 3K E = -110 3.3 12.69 µ Tbl = 33,46 %
a.5 - : 33,21 %28 NS 5K E = -400 21.6 83.08
29 NS 1S S+2 150 23.8 91.54
30 NS 1PxS+4 1320 25.9 99.62 µ Tbl = 91,41 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,44 %31 NS 2K W+1 -110 8.7 33.46
32 NS 4PcS = 590 25.9 99.62
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 7.6 29.23 µ Tbl = 54,10 %
Total : 355,7 / 780 = 45,60 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
a.5 - : 33,21 % 1 NS 1P N-1 -50 15.2 58.46
2 NS 2S N+1 150 11.9 45.77
3 NS 2T N+2 130 21.6 83.08 µ Tbl = 62,44 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 45,10 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 17 65.38
8 NS 4P S+1 450 8 30.77
9 NS 4P S+1 450 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
a12 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,23 %10 NS 3S S = 600 4 15.38
11 NS 3S N+3 490 14 53.85
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 26,92 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 63,63 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.4 16.92
14 NS 1S E+2 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 3C N+1 170 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 32,56 %
a11 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,40 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 16.2 62.31
17 NS 3C S-1 -50 4 15.38
18 NS 4P S+1 650 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 47,69 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 46,65 %19 NS 5K N+2 440 21 80.77
20 NS 2C E+2 -170 16 61.54
21 NS 5K E-2 100 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
a15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,64 %22 NS 3T N-1 -50 2 7.69
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 10 38.46
24 NS 6P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 15,38 %
a13 -PAQUET Anne : 48,03 %25 NS 3S E = -600 8.7 33.46
26 NS 3S E-1 100 24.8 95.38
27 NS 3K E-2 100 21.6 83.08 µ Tbl = 70,64 %
a.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,69 %28 NS 3S E+2 -460 17.3 66.54
29 NS 1S N = 90 6.5 25.00
30 NS 6P S-1 -50 2.2 8.46 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,77 %31 NS 3S E-1 50 15.2 58.46
32 NS 3S W+1 -630 9.8 37.69
33 NS 6C E-1 50 24.8 95.38 µ Tbl = 63,85 %
Total : 361,2 / 780 = 46,31 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
a.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,69 % 1 NS 2S W-2 100 21.6 83.08
2 NS 3C N-1 -100 3.3 12.69
3 NS 2K S+1 110 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 43,08 %
a.6 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,77 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 19 73.08
5 NS 3K S+1 130 14 53.85
6 NS 4KcS-4 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,44 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 15 57.69
11 NS 3S N+3 490 14 53.85
12 NS 4P N+2 680 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
a13 -PAQUET Anne : 48,03 %13 NS 40%40% Ajust 10.4 40.00
14 NS 1S E = -90 9 34.62
15 NS 4C N-1 -100 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,31 %16 NS 3PcW-1 200 5.5 21.15
17 NS 5T E-2 100 11 42.31
18 NS 4P S = 620 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 30,13 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 63,63 %19 NS 5K N = 400 10 38.46
20 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00
21 NS 5KcE-2 300 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 38,46 %
a11 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,40 %22 NS 2C W-1 100 13 50.00
23 NS 1S S-1 -100 10 38.46
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 34,62 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 46,65 %25 NS 6PcE-1 200 21.6 83.08
26 NS 3S E = -600 14.1 54.23
27 NS 2S E-1 50 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
a14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,05 %28 NS 3S W+3 -490 9.8 37.69
29 NS 3C N-1 -100 2.2 8.46
30 NS 3K N = 110 4.4 16.92 µ Tbl = 21,03 %
a12 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,23 %31 NS 3K W = -110 8.7 33.46
32 NS 3S W+1 -630 9.8 37.69
33 NS 6C E-1 50 24.8 95.38 µ Tbl = 55,51 %
Total : 322,2 / 780 = 41,31 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
a13 -PAQUET Anne : 48,03 % 1 NS 2C S = 110 23.8 91.54
2 NS 1S N+2 150 11.9 45.77
3 NS 1S S+2 150 24.8 95.38 µ Tbl = 77,56 %
a.8 de KERCHOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 60,69 % 4 NS 4C S = 620 19 73.08
5 NS 3K S+1 130 14 53.85
6 NS 3CcE-1 200 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,69 % 7 NS 5K N-3 -300 5 19.23
8 NS 4P S+2 480 18 69.23
9 NS 4C S-2 -100 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
a.5 - : 33,21 %13 NS 4C N = 620 22.7 87.31
14 NS 1S W = -90 9 34.62
15 NS 3C S+1 170 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 67,56 %
a14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,05 %16 NS 3PcW-1 200 5.5 21.15
17 NS 4P E-3 150 23 88.46
18 NS 4P S+1 650 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a12 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,23 %19 NS 4K N+2 170 4 15.38
20 NS 4C W = -620 6 23.08
21 NS 4C S-1 -100 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,31 %22 NS 4P N = 420 26 100.00
23 NS 2C E = -110 3 11.54
24 NS 2C E-2 100 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 63,63 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 3.3 12.69
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 1.2 4.62
27 NS 3C W-1 50 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 27,95 %
a11 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,40 %28 NS 3S E+3 -490 9.8 37.69
29 NS 3C N-1 -100 2.2 8.46
30 NS 4P S+1 450 9.8 37.69 µ Tbl = 27,95 %
a15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,64 %31 NS 3S W-2 100 22.7 87.31
32 NS 3S E+1 -630 9.8 37.69
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 7.6 29.23 µ Tbl = 51,41 %
Total : 380,4 / 780 = 48,77 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
a11 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,40 % 1 NS 3C S-1 -50 15.2 58.46
2 NS 1P E-1 50 6.5 25.00
3 NS 1S S+1 120 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 47,31 %
a14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,05 % 4 NS 3S S+1 630 26 100.00
5 NS 3S S+1 630 26 100.00
6 NS 4P W = -620 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
a12 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,23 % 7 NS 3S S = 600 26 100.00
8 NS 4P N+2 480 18 69.23
9 NS 4P S+2 480 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 75,64 %
a.8 de KERCHOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 60,69 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 15 57.69
11 NS 3S S-2 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 6TcS-1 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 19,23 %
a.6 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,77 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 16.2 62.31
17 NS 3C S-1 -50 4 15.38
18 NS 4P S = 620 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 34,87 %
a15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,64 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 25 96.15
20 NS 4C W = -620 6 23.08
21 NS 4C S-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
a13 -PAQUET Anne : 48,03 %22 NS Pass Passe 6 23.08
23 NS 2P S-1 -100 10 38.46
24 NS 2S S+3 210 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 45,10 %25 NS 2PcS-4 -800 0.1 0.38
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8.7 33.46
27 NS 2P S-1 -50 9.8 37.69 µ Tbl = 23,85 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,31 %28 NS 4P S+1 650 25.9 99.62
29 NS 3P S-1 -100 2.2 8.46
30 NS 3S E+3 -490 0.1 0.38 µ Tbl = 36,15 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 63,63 %31 NS 3S E-1 50 15.2 58.46
32 NS 3S W+1 -630 9.8 37.69
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 7.6 29.23 µ Tbl = 41,79 %
Total : 334,5 / 780 = 42,88 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,31 % 1 NS 2C N-3 -150 3.3 12.69
2 NS 3T N-1 -100 3.3 12.69
3 NS 1S S+1 120 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 27,95 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 63,63 % 4 NS 5C N-1 -100 6 23.08
5 NS 5KcS-1 -200 2 7.69
6 NS 3S N-2 -100 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 24,36 %
a15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,64 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 17 65.38
8 NS 4P S+1 450 8 30.77
9 NS 4P N+2 480 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
a13 -PAQUET Anne : 48,03 %10 NS 3S S+2 660 25 96.15
11 NS 5K N+1 420 3 11.54
12 NS 6P S = 1430 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.9 -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,42 %13 NS 4C N = 620 22.7 87.31
14 NS 4P N-1 -50 17 65.38
15 NS 3C N+1 170 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 77,82 %
a.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,69 %19 NS 5K N+1 420 14 53.85
20 NS 4C W = -620 6 23.08
21 NS 4C S-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,77 %22 NS 1S W-1 100 13 50.00
23 NS 1S S+2 150 23 88.46
24 NS 4P N = 420 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
a14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,05 %25 NS 4P E = -620 6.5 25.00
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8.7 33.46
27 NS 3S E-1 50 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a12 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,23 %28 NS 3S E+3 -490 9.8 37.69
29 NS 2C N = 110 11.9 45.77
30 NS 4P S+1 450 9.8 37.69 µ Tbl = 40,38 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 45,10 %31 NS 2S E+1 -150 4.4 16.92
32 NS 3S W+1 -630 9.8 37.69
33 NS 4C W = -420 18.4 70.77 µ Tbl = 41,79 %
Total : 370,1 / 780 = 47,45 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 LIBERT Laurent -NELIS Claude
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,44 % 1 NS 3C N-1 -50 15.2 58.46
2 NS 3S N+1 630 24.8 95.38
3 NS 3S N-1 -50 2.2 8.46 µ Tbl = 54,10 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 45,10 % 4 NS 6S S-1 -100 6 23.08
5 NS 3K S+1 130 14 53.85
6 NS 4CcE-2 500 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,31 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 17 65.38
8 NS 4P S+2 480 18 69.23
9 NS 4P S+3 510 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 76,92 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 63,63 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 15 57.69
11 NS 4P S+1 450 8 30.77
12 NS 4P S+2 680 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
a14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,05 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.4 16.92
14 NS 1S E = -90 9 34.62
15 NS 1S S+1 120 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 27,44 %
a12 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,23 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 16.2 62.31
17 NS 2S W-2 100 11 42.31
18 NS 6S S-1 -100 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 36,15 %
a.8 de KERCHOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 60,69 %22 NS 3T S-1 -50 2 7.69
23 NS 1S S+2 150 23 88.46
24 NS 4P N = 420 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
a.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,69 %25 NS 4PcE-1 200 21.6 83.08
26 NS 3S E-1 100 24.8 95.38
27 NS 2P S = 110 24.8 95.38 µ Tbl = 91,28 %
a15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,64 %28 NS 3S E+3 -490 9.8 37.69
29 NS 2C N = 110 11.9 45.77
30 NS 3S N+3 490 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a13 -PAQUET Anne : 48,03 %31 NS 3S E = -400 1.2 4.62
32 NS 3S W+1 -630 9.8 37.69
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 7.6 29.23 µ Tbl = 23,85 %
Total : 402,6 / 780 = 51,62 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès
a14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,05 % 1 NS 3T E = -110 8.7 33.46
2 NS 2S N+2 180 17.3 66.54
3 NS 1S S+1 120 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 52,82 %
a12 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,23 % 4 NS 5C N-1 -100 6 23.08
5 NS 4K S = 130 14 53.85
6 NS 4CcE-2 500 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,44 % 7 NS 4C E-1 100 17 65.38
8 NS 4P S+2 480 18 69.23
9 NS 5P S+1 480 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 45,10 %10 NS 3S S+1 630 15 57.69
11 NS 3S N+3 490 14 53.85
12 NS 4P S+2 680 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,31 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.4 16.92
14 NS 1S E = -90 9 34.62
15 NS 3C S = 140 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 32,56 %
a15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,64 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 16.2 62.31
17 NS 5T E-2 100 11 42.31
18 NS 5P S+1 680 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 66,92 %
a13 -PAQUET Anne : 48,03 %19 NS 3S S+1 430 18 69.23
20 NS 4C W = -620 6 23.08
21 NS 4C S-1 -100 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,42 %25 NS 3K W-2 200 21.6 83.08
26 NS 2C W+2 -170 19.5 75.00
27 NS 3K E = -110 3.3 12.69 µ Tbl = 56,92 %
a.8 de KERCHOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 60,69 %28 NS 6S E = -990 2.2 8.46
29 NS 2C N+1 140 20.5 78.85
30 NS 4P S+1 450 9.8 37.69 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,69 %31 NS 3K W = -110 8.7 33.46
32 NS 5T W = -600 21.6 83.08
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 7.6 29.23 µ Tbl = 48,59 %
Total : 407,6 / 780 = 52,26 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
a.8 de KERCHOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 60,69 % 1 NS 1S E+2 -150 3.3 12.69
2 NS 3S N-2 -200 0.1 0.38
3 NS 2S S = 120 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 23,85 %
a15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,64 % 4 NS 3S S = 600 12 46.15
5 NS 3K S+1 130 14 53.85
6 NS 3C E-1 100 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
a13 -PAQUET Anne : 48,03 % 7 NS 5TcE-2 500 24 92.31
8 NS 6P S-1 -50 3 11.54
9 NS 4P N+2 480 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
a.5 - : 33,21 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 15 57.69
11 NS 3S N+3 490 14 53.85
12 NS 4P S+3 710 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,44 %13 NS 3C N = 140 11.9 45.77
14 NS 1S E-1 50 20 76.92
15 NS 2C N+2 170 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 67,82 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 45,10 %16 NS 4PcW-2 500 23.8 91.54
17 NS 2C S = 110 18 69.23
18 NS 4P S+1 650 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 75,38 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,31 %19 NS 4K N+2 170 4 15.38
20 NS 2C W+2 -170 16 61.54
21 NS 4P N-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,05 %22 NS 2S S = 120 19 73.08
23 NS 1S S+1 120 20 76.92
24 NS 4P N = 420 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 73,08 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 46,65 %28 NS 3S E+3 -490 9.8 37.69
29 NS 2C N = 110 11.9 45.77
30 NS 6P S = 980 21.6 83.08 µ Tbl = 55,51 %
a.9 -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,42 %31 NS 4K W-1 50 15.2 58.46
32 NS 3S W+1 -630 9.8 37.69
33 NS 3C E = -140 21.6 83.08 µ Tbl = 59,74 %
Total : 436,2 / 780 = 55,92 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 46,65 % 1 NS 3C N-1 -50 15.2 58.46
2 NS 3K E-4 200 21.6 83.08
3 NS 1S S+2 150 24.8 95.38 µ Tbl = 78,97 %
a.9 -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,42 % 4 NS 5C S-1 -100 6 23.08
5 NS 2K S+2 130 14 53.85
6 NS 4CcE-2 500 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
a.8 de KERCHOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 60,69 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 17 65.38
8 NS 6P S-1 -50 3 11.54
9 NS 4P N+2 480 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
a14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,05 %10 NS 6S N-4 -400 0 0.00
11 NS 6K N = 920 23 88.46
12 NS 5P N+1 680 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
a12 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,23 %13 NS 4C N = 620 22.7 87.31
14 NS 2P N+1 140 25 96.15
15 NS 3C S = 140 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 76,54 %
a.5 - : 33,21 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 16.2 62.31
17 NS 2C S = 110 18 69.23
18 NS 4P S+1 650 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 65,64 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,44 %19 NS 3S N+2 460 25 96.15
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 22 84.62
21 NS 5KcE-4 800 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,59 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 45,10 %22 NS 2S S+1 150 23 88.46
23 NS 2CcE-1 200 26 100.00
24 NS 4P N+1 450 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 96,15 %
a15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,64 %25 NS 4T W-2 200 21.6 83.08
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 8.7 33.46
27 NS 2P S-1 -50 9.8 37.69 µ Tbl = 51,41 %
a11 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,40 %31 NS 3S E-2 100 22.7 87.31
32 NS 3S W+1 -630 9.8 37.69
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 7.6 29.23 µ Tbl = 51,41 %
Total : 514,7 / 780 = 65,99 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
a12 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 50,23 % 1 NS 3C S-1 -50 15.2 58.46
2 NS 3S N+1 630 24.8 95.38
3 NS 2T N = 90 5.5 21.15 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a.5 - : 33,21 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 19 73.08
5 NS 4C N-4 -400 0 0.00
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 42,31 %
a.9 -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,42 % 7 NS 5K N-2 -200 9 34.62
8 NS 4P S+2 480 18 69.23
9 NS 5P S+1 480 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,31 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 15 57.69
11 NS 6K N = 920 23 88.46
12 NS 4P S+2 680 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 64,10 %
a.6 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,77 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.4 16.92
14 NS 2P N-1 -50 17 65.38
15 NS 2C S+2 170 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 54,36 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 46,65 %16 NS 4C S+2 480 16.2 62.31
17 NS 4P W-2 100 11 42.31
18 NS 4P S = 620 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 43,85 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 45,10 %19 NS 5K N+1 420 14 53.85
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 22 84.62
21 NS 4P N = 620 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 75,64 %
a.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,69 %22 NS 2S N+1 150 23 88.46
23 NS 2P N-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 4P N = 420 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,44 %28 NS 5K E+1 -420 19.5 75.00
29 NS 2C N+1 140 20.5 78.85
30 NS 6P S = 980 21.6 83.08 µ Tbl = 78,97 %
a.8 de KERCHOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 60,69 %31 NS 3S E = -400 1.2 4.62
32 NS 3S W+1 -630 9.8 37.69
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 7.6 29.23 µ Tbl = 23,85 %
Total : 427,3 / 780 = 54,78 %
PAIRE Nr : A13 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine
a.9 -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,42 % 1 NS 2C N+1 140 25.9 99.62
2 NS 2S N+2 180 17.3 66.54
3 NS 4C S-2 -100 0.1 0.38 µ Tbl = 55,51 %
a13 -PAQUET Anne : 48,03 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 19 73.08
5 NS 3P E-3 150 24 92.31
6 NS 5K S-3 -150 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
a.6 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,77 % 7 NS 3S W-1 100 17 65.38
8 NS 3S S+3 490 26 100.00
9 NS 4P S = 420 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 46,65 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 15 57.69
11 NS 3S N+1 430 6 23.08
12 NS 5T S-1 -100 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik : 45,10 %13 NS 4C N = 620 22.7 87.31
14 NS 1S E = -90 9 34.62
15 NS 2C S = 110 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 47,05 %
a.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,69 %16 NS 5K N-1 -50 0.1 0.38
17 NS 4PcW-2 300 26 100.00
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 34,74 %
a11 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,40 %19 NS 4K N+2 170 4 15.38
20 NS 2C W+2 -170 16 61.54
21 NS 4P N-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,44 %22 NS 2T N = 90 9 34.62
23 NS 1S N-1 -100 10 38.46
24 NS 4P N-1 -50 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
a.8 de KERCHOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 60,69 %25 NS 3S E+1 -630 3.3 12.69
26 NS 3S E = -600 14.1 54.23
27 NS 3K E+1 -130 0.1 0.38 µ Tbl = 22,44 %
a.5 - : 33,21 %31 NS 5K W-2 100 22.7 87.31
32 NS 3S W-1 100 23.8 91.54
33 NS 4C E = -420 18.4 70.77 µ Tbl = 83,21 %
Total : 358,5 / 780 = 45,96 %
PAIRE Nr : A14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
a.6 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,77 % 1 NS 2P N-3 -150 3.3 12.69
2 NS 2S S+2 180 17.3 66.54
3 NS 2T N = 90 5.5 21.15 µ Tbl = 33,46 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 46,65 % 4 NS 4C N = 620 19 73.08
5 NS 5K S-1 -100 4 15.38
6 NS 4PcW-1 200 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
a14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 52,05 % 7 NS 5KcN-2 -500 2 7.69
8 NS 4P S+2 480 18 69.23
9 NS 5P N+1 480 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
a.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,69 %10 NS 3S N+1 630 15 57.69
11 NS 6K N = 920 23 88.46
12 NS 6P S+1 1460 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 82,05 %
a11 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,40 %13 NS 3C N+2 200 17.3 66.54
14 NS 1S E+1 -120 2 7.69
15 NS 3C N+1 170 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
a.4 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel : 37,44 %16 NS 6T N+1 940 25.9 99.62
17 NS 2C S = 110 18 69.23
18 NS 4P S+1 650 17 65.38 µ Tbl = 78,08 %
a.8 de KERCHOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 60,69 %19 NS 5K N+1 420 14 53.85
20 NS 2C W+3 -200 12 46.15
21 NS 4P N = 620 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 63,63 %22 NS 3T N-1 -50 2 7.69
23 NS 1S S = 90 16 61.54
24 NS 4P N = 420 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
a.5 - : 33,21 %25 NS 3C N-2 -100 10.8 41.54
26 NS 2S E = -120 21.6 83.08
27 NS 2P S = 110 24.8 95.38 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
a.9 -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,42 %28 NS 2K E+4 -170 23.8 91.54
29 NS 3S S = 600 25.9 99.62
30 NS 4P S+2 480 15.2 58.46 µ Tbl = 83,21 %
Total : 475,4 / 780 = 60,95 %
PAIRE Nr : A15 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis
a.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 51,69 % 4 NS 4C N-1 -100 6 23.08
5 NS 3K S+1 130 14 53.85
6 NS 3S N-3 -150 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a11 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,40 % 7 NS 5K N-2 -200 9 34.62
8 NS 6P S-2 -100 0 0.00
9 NS 4P S+3 510 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
a15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 53,64 %10 NS 3S N = 600 4 15.38
11 NS 5K N+1 420 3 11.54
12 NS 4P S+2 680 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 24,36 %
a.8 de KERCHOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 60,69 %13 NS 4C N-1 -100 4.4 16.92
14 NS 1S E = -90 9 34.62
15 NS 3C N = 140 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 32,56 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile : 63,63 %16 NS 5T S+1 420 8.7 33.46
17 NS 4CcS-2 -300 0 0.00
18 NS 4P S+2 680 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 43,21 %
a.5 - : 33,21 %19 NS 5K N+2 440 21 80.77
20 NS 2C W+1 -140 22 84.62
21 NS 5C S-2 -200 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 62,82 %
a.9 -PARMENTIER Richard : 37,42 %22 NS 2S S = 120 19 73.08
23 NS 2C E = -110 3 11.54
24 NS 4P N = 420 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 51,28 %
a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 58,31 %25 NS 3S E-1 100 14.1 54.23
26 NS 4C E+1 -650 4.4 16.92
27 NS 3P S-1 -50 9.8 37.69 µ Tbl = 36,28 %
a.6 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne : 53,77 %28 NS 5PcS-5 -1400 0.1 0.38
29 NS 1S S+1 120 17.3 66.54
30 NS 6P S = 980 21.6 83.08 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin : 46,65 %31 NS 3S E-2 100 22.7 87.31
32 NS 3S W+1 -630 9.8 37.69
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 7.6 29.23 µ Tbl = 51,41 %
Total : 334,5 / 780 = 42,88 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 CASSART Guy -DELTOUR Emile
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,73 % 1 EO 1S E+2 -150 22.7 87.31
2 EO 2K S = 90 17.3 66.54
3 EO 1S S+1 120 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 65,13 %
A.7 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 47,45 % 4 EO 5C N-1 -100 20 76.92
5 EO 5KcS-1 -200 24 92.31
6 EO 3S N-2 -100 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 75,64 %
A.2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,60 % 7 EO 5KcN-3 -800 26 100.00
8 EO 4P S+1 450 18 69.23
9 EO 4P S+2 480 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -NELIS Claude : 51,62 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 11 42.31
11 EO 4P S+1 450 18 69.23
12 EO 4P S+2 680 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,31 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 21.6 83.08
14 EO 1S E+2 -150 26 100.00
15 EO 3C N+1 170 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 67,44 %
A15 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,88 %16 EO 5T S+1 420 17.3 66.54
17 EO 4CcS-2 -300 26 100.00
18 EO 4P S+2 680 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 56,79 %
A.4 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %19 EO 5K N = 400 16 61.54
20 EO 4C W+1 -650 26 100.00
21 EO 5KcE-2 300 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
A14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,95 %22 EO 3T N-1 -50 24 92.31
23 EO 1S S = 90 10 38.46
24 EO 4P N = 420 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
A.5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 48,77 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 22.7 87.31
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 24.8 95.38
27 EO 3C W-1 50 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 72,05 %
A.6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,88 %31 EO 3S E-1 50 10.8 41.54
32 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.2 62.31
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 18.4 70.77 µ Tbl = 58,21 %
Total : 496,3 / 780 = 63,63 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
A.7 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 47,45 % 1 EO 2C N-3 -150 22.7 87.31
2 EO 3T N-1 -100 22.7 87.31
3 EO 1S S+1 120 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 72,05 %
A.2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,60 % 4 EO 6C N-2 -200 26 100.00
5 EO 4K S = 130 12 46.15
6 EO 3K S-2 -100 15 57.69 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -NELIS Claude : 51,62 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 9 34.62
8 EO 4P S+2 480 8 30.77
9 EO 4P S+3 510 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 23,08 %
A12 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,78 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 11 42.31
11 EO 6K N = 920 3 11.54
12 EO 4P S+2 680 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
A.9 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 52,26 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 21.6 83.08
14 EO 1S E = -90 17 65.38
15 EO 3C S = 140 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 67,44 %
A.4 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %16 EO 3PcW-1 200 20.5 78.85
17 EO 5T E-2 100 15 57.69
18 EO 4P S = 620 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 69,87 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,92 %19 EO 4K N+2 170 22 84.62
20 EO 2C W+2 -170 10 38.46
21 EO 4P N-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 48,77 %22 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00
23 EO 2C E = -110 23 88.46
24 EO 2C E-2 100 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
A15 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,88 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 11.9 45.77
26 EO 4C E+1 -650 21.6 83.08
27 EO 3P S-1 -50 16.2 62.31 µ Tbl = 63,72 %
A.6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,88 %28 EO 4P S+1 650 0.1 0.38
29 EO 3P S-1 -100 23.8 91.54
30 EO 3S E+3 -490 25.9 99.62 µ Tbl = 63,85 %
Total : 454,8 / 780 = 58,31 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 LENAERTS Pol -PETERS Annik
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -NELIS Claude : 51,62 % 4 EO 6S S-1 -100 20 76.92
5 EO 3K S+1 130 12 46.15
6 EO 4CcE-2 500 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,31 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 9 34.62
8 EO 4P S+1 450 18 69.23
9 EO 4P S+1 450 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
A.9 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 52,26 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 11 42.31
11 EO 3S N+3 490 12 46.15
12 EO 4P S+2 680 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
A13 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,96 %13 EO 4C N = 620 3.3 12.69
14 EO 1S E = -90 17 65.38
15 EO 2C S = 110 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 52,95 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,92 %16 EO 4PcW-2 500 2.2 8.46
17 EO 2C S = 110 8 30.77
18 EO 4P S+1 650 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 24,62 %
A12 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,78 %19 EO 5K N+1 420 12 46.15
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 4 15.38
21 EO 4P N = 620 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 24,36 %
A11 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 65,99 %22 EO 2S S+1 150 3 11.54
23 EO 2CcE-1 200 0 0.00
24 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 3,85 %
A.6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,88 %25 EO 2PcS-4 -800 25.9 99.62
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 17.3 66.54
27 EO 2P S-1 -50 16.2 62.31 µ Tbl = 76,15 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,73 %28 EO 3S E+3 -490 16.2 62.31
29 EO 2C N = 110 14.1 54.23
30 EO 4P S+1 450 16.2 62.31 µ Tbl = 59,62 %
A.7 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 47,45 %31 EO 2S E+1 -150 21.6 83.08
32 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.2 62.31
33 EO 4C W = -420 7.6 29.23 µ Tbl = 58,21 %
Total : 351,8 / 780 = 45,10 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 LEBRUN Robert -MASSAUX Joel
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -NELIS Claude : 51,62 % 1 EO 3C N-1 -50 10.8 41.54
2 EO 3S N+1 630 1.2 4.62
3 EO 3S N-1 -50 23.8 91.54 µ Tbl = 45,90 %
A.9 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 52,26 % 7 EO 4C E-1 100 9 34.62
8 EO 4P S+2 480 8 30.77
9 EO 5P S+1 480 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 35,90 %
A.4 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 11 42.31
11 EO 3S N+3 490 12 46.15
12 EO 4P N+2 680 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,92 %13 EO 3C N = 140 14.1 54.23
14 EO 1S E-1 50 6 23.08
15 EO 2C N+2 170 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 32,18 %
A14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,95 %16 EO 6T N+1 940 0.1 0.38
17 EO 2C S = 110 8 30.77
18 EO 4P S+1 650 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 21,92 %
A11 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 65,99 %19 EO 3S N+2 460 1 3.85
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 4 15.38
21 EO 5KcE-4 800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,41 %
A13 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,96 %22 EO 2T N = 90 17 65.38
23 EO 1S N-1 -100 16 61.54
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 70,51 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,73 %25 EO 3S E-1 100 11.9 45.77
26 EO 1S E+3 -180 8.7 33.46
27 EO 3P S-1 -50 16.2 62.31 µ Tbl = 47,18 %
A12 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,78 %28 EO 5K E+1 -420 6.5 25.00
29 EO 2C N+1 140 5.5 21.15
30 EO 6P S = 980 4.4 16.92 µ Tbl = 21,03 %
A.2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,60 %31 EO 2K W+1 -110 17.3 66.54
32 EO 4PcS = 590 0.1 0.38
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 18.4 70.77 µ Tbl = 45,90 %
Total : 292,0 / 780 = 37,44 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 -
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,31 % 1 EO 1P N-1 -50 10.8 41.54
2 EO 2S N+1 150 14.1 54.23
3 EO 2T N+2 130 4.4 16.92 µ Tbl = 37,56 %
A12 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,78 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 7 26.92
5 EO 4C N-4 -400 26 100.00
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 12 46.15 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,92 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 11 42.31
11 EO 3S N+3 490 12 46.15
12 EO 4P S+3 710 6 23.08 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
A.5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 48,77 %13 EO 4C N = 620 3.3 12.69
14 EO 1S W = -90 17 65.38
15 EO 3C S+1 170 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 32,44 %
A11 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 65,99 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 9.8 37.69
17 EO 2C S = 110 8 30.77
18 EO 4P S+1 650 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 34,36 %
A15 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,88 %19 EO 5K N+2 440 5 19.23
20 EO 2C W+1 -140 4 15.38
21 EO 5C S-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,73 %22 EO 3T S = 110 10 38.46
23 EO 2P S-1 -100 16 61.54
24 EO 4P N = 420 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
A14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,95 %25 EO 3C N-2 -100 15.2 58.46
26 EO 2S E = -120 4.4 16.92
27 EO 2P S = 110 1.2 4.62 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
A.2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,60 %28 EO 5K E = -400 4.4 16.92
29 EO 1S S+2 150 2.2 8.46
30 EO 1PxS+4 1320 0.1 0.38 µ Tbl = 8,59 %
A13 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,96 %31 EO 5K W-2 100 3.3 12.69
32 EO 3S W-1 100 2.2 8.46
33 EO 4C E = -420 7.6 29.23 µ Tbl = 16,79 %
Total : 259,0 / 780 = 33,21 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 CLERIN François-Xavier -MOSSERAY Etienne
A14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,95 % 1 EO 2P N-3 -150 22.7 87.31
2 EO 2S S+2 180 8.7 33.46
3 EO 2T N = 90 20.5 78.85 µ Tbl = 66,54 %
A.4 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 7 26.92
5 EO 3K S+1 130 12 46.15
6 EO 4KcS-4 -800 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,69 %
A13 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,96 % 7 EO 3S W-1 100 9 34.62
8 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
9 EO 4P S = 420 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 39,74 %
A12 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,78 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 21.6 83.08
14 EO 2P N-1 -50 9 34.62
15 EO 2C S+2 170 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 45,64 %
A.6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,88 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 9.8 37.69
17 EO 3C S-1 -50 22 84.62
18 EO 4P S = 620 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 65,13 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,73 %19 EO 3K N+3 170 22 84.62
20 EO 4C W = -620 20 76.92
21 EO 4P N-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 79,49 %
A.7 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 47,45 %22 EO 1S W-1 100 13 50.00
23 EO 1S S+2 150 3 11.54
24 EO 4P N = 420 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
A.2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,60 %25 EO 6S E-2 200 4.4 16.92
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 24.8 95.38
27 EO 3K E = -110 22.7 87.31 µ Tbl = 66,54 %
A15 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,88 %28 EO 5PcS-5 -1400 25.9 99.62
29 EO 1S S+1 120 8.7 33.46
30 EO 6P S = 980 4.4 16.92 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,31 %31 EO 3S E-1 50 10.8 41.54
32 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.2 62.31
33 EO 6C E-1 50 1.2 4.62 µ Tbl = 36,15 %
Total : 419,4 / 780 = 53,77 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie
A.4 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 % 1 EO 2S W-2 100 4.4 16.92
2 EO 3C N-1 -100 22.7 87.31
3 EO 2K S+1 110 17.3 66.54 µ Tbl = 56,92 %
A15 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,88 % 4 EO 4C N-1 -100 20 76.92
5 EO 3K S+1 130 12 46.15
6 EO 3S N-3 -150 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 48,77 % 7 EO 5K N-3 -300 21 80.77
8 EO 4P S+2 480 8 30.77
9 EO 4C S-2 -100 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
A14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,95 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 11 42.31
11 EO 6K N = 920 3 11.54
12 EO 6P S+1 1460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 17,95 %
A13 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,96 %16 EO 5K N-1 -50 25.9 99.62
17 EO 4PcW-2 300 0 0.00
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 65,26 %
A.7 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 47,45 %19 EO 5K N+1 420 12 46.15
20 EO 4C W = -620 20 76.92
21 EO 4C S-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A12 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,78 %22 EO 2S N+1 150 3 11.54
23 EO 2P N-2 -200 26 100.00
24 EO 4P N = 420 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 47,44 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -NELIS Claude : 51,62 %25 EO 4PcE-1 200 4.4 16.92
26 EO 3S E-1 100 1.2 4.62
27 EO 2P S = 110 1.2 4.62 µ Tbl = 8,72 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,31 %28 EO 3S E+2 -460 8.7 33.46
29 EO 1S N = 90 19.5 75.00
30 EO 6P S-1 -50 23.8 91.54 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.9 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 52,26 %31 EO 3K W = -110 17.3 66.54
32 EO 5T W = -600 4.4 16.92
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 18.4 70.77 µ Tbl = 51,41 %
Total : 403,2 / 780 = 51,69 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 de KERCHOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine
A10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,92 % 1 EO 1S E+2 -150 22.7 87.31
2 EO 3S N-2 -200 25.9 99.62
3 EO 2S S = 120 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 76,15 %
A.5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 48,77 % 4 EO 4C S = 620 7 26.92
5 EO 3K S+1 130 12 46.15
6 EO 3CcE-1 200 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A11 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 65,99 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 9 34.62
8 EO 6P S-1 -50 23 88.46
9 EO 4P N+2 480 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
A.6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,88 %10 EO 3S S+1 630 11 42.31
11 EO 3S S-2 -100 26 100.00
12 EO 6TcS-1 -200 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,77 %
A15 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,88 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 21.6 83.08
14 EO 1S E = -90 17 65.38
15 EO 3C N = 140 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 67,44 %
A14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,95 %19 EO 5K N+1 420 12 46.15
20 EO 2C W+3 -200 14 53.85
21 EO 4P N = 620 3 11.54 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -NELIS Claude : 51,62 %22 EO 3T S-1 -50 24 92.31
23 EO 1S S+2 150 3 11.54
24 EO 4P N = 420 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 44,87 %
A13 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,96 %25 EO 3S E+1 -630 22.7 87.31
26 EO 3S E = -600 11.9 45.77
27 EO 3K E+1 -130 25.9 99.62 µ Tbl = 77,56 %
A.9 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 52,26 %28 EO 6S E = -990 23.8 91.54
29 EO 2C N+1 140 5.5 21.15
30 EO 4P S+1 450 16.2 62.31 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A12 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,78 %31 EO 3S E = -400 24.8 95.38
32 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.2 62.31
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 18.4 70.77 µ Tbl = 76,15 %
Total : 473,4 / 780 = 60,69 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 -PARMENTIER Richard
A13 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,96 % 1 EO 2C N+1 140 0.1 0.38
2 EO 2S N+2 180 8.7 33.46
3 EO 4C S-2 -100 25.9 99.62 µ Tbl = 44,49 %
A11 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 65,99 % 4 EO 5C S-1 -100 20 76.92
5 EO 2K S+2 130 12 46.15
6 EO 4CcE-2 500 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
A12 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,78 % 7 EO 5K N-2 -200 17 65.38
8 EO 4P S+2 480 8 30.77
9 EO 5P S+1 480 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,73 %10 EO 3S S+2 660 1 3.85
11 EO 6K N = 920 3 11.54
12 EO 5PcN+2 1250 4 15.38 µ Tbl = 10,26 %
A.7 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 47,45 %13 EO 4C N = 620 3.3 12.69
14 EO 4P N-1 -50 9 34.62
15 EO 3C N+1 170 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 22,18 %
A.2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,60 %16 EO 4T S+2 170 23.8 91.54
17 EO 1C W-3 150 3 11.54
18 EO 4P S = 620 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 58,72 %
A15 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,88 %22 EO 2S S = 120 7 26.92
23 EO 2C E = -110 23 88.46
24 EO 4P N = 420 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
A.9 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 52,26 %25 EO 3K W-2 200 4.4 16.92
26 EO 2C W+2 -170 6.5 25.00
27 EO 3K E = -110 22.7 87.31 µ Tbl = 43,08 %
A14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,95 %28 EO 2K E+4 -170 2.2 8.46
29 EO 3S S = 600 0.1 0.38
30 EO 4P S+2 480 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 16,79 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,92 %31 EO 4K W-1 50 10.8 41.54
32 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.2 62.31
33 EO 3C E = -140 4.4 16.92 µ Tbl = 40,26 %
Total : 291,9 / 780 = 37,42 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 HUBLET Carlo -de VIRON Baudouin
A11 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 65,99 % 1 EO 3C N-1 -50 10.8 41.54
2 EO 3K E-4 200 4.4 16.92
3 EO 1S S+2 150 1.2 4.62 µ Tbl = 21,03 %
A14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,95 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 7 26.92
5 EO 5K S-1 -100 22 84.62
6 EO 4PcW-1 200 7 26.92 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,73 % 7 EO 5K N-3 -300 21 80.77
8 EO 4P S+2 480 8 30.77
9 EO 6S N-2 -100 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
A13 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,96 %10 EO 3S N+1 630 11 42.31
11 EO 3S N+1 430 20 76.92
12 EO 5T S-1 -100 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 69,23 %
A.2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,60 %13 EO 3C N = 140 14.1 54.23
14 EO 2P N = 110 4 15.38
15 EO 2C S = 110 21 80.77 µ Tbl = 50,13 %
A12 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,78 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 9.8 37.69
17 EO 4P W-2 100 15 57.69
18 EO 4P S = 620 19 73.08 µ Tbl = 56,15 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,31 %19 EO 5K N+2 440 5 19.23
20 EO 2C E+2 -170 10 38.46
21 EO 5K E-2 100 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 29,49 %
A.4 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %25 EO 6PcE-1 200 4.4 16.92
26 EO 3S E = -600 11.9 45.77
27 EO 2S E-1 50 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 32,05 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,92 %28 EO 3S E+3 -490 16.2 62.31
29 EO 2C N = 110 14.1 54.23
30 EO 6P S = 980 4.4 16.92 µ Tbl = 44,49 %
A15 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,88 %31 EO 3S E-2 100 3.3 12.69
32 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.2 62.31
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 18.4 70.77 µ Tbl = 48,59 %
Total : 363,9 / 780 = 46,65 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
A.6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,88 % 1 EO 3C S-1 -50 10.8 41.54
2 EO 1P E-1 50 19.5 75.00
3 EO 1S S+1 120 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 52,69 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,73 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 7 26.92
5 EO 4K S = 130 12 46.15
6 EO 4K S-3 -150 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A15 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,88 % 7 EO 5K N-2 -200 17 65.38
8 EO 6P S-2 -100 26 100.00
9 EO 4P S+3 510 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 56,41 %
A.2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,60 %10 EO 3S N = 600 22 84.62
11 EO 3S N+3 490 12 46.15
12 EO 4P S+2 680 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 61,54 %
A14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,95 %13 EO 3C N+2 200 8.7 33.46
14 EO 1S E+1 -120 24 92.31
15 EO 3C N+1 170 5 19.23 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,31 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 9.8 37.69
17 EO 3C S-1 -50 22 84.62
18 EO 4P S+1 650 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 52,31 %
A13 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,96 %19 EO 4K N+2 170 22 84.62
20 EO 2C W+2 -170 10 38.46
21 EO 4P N-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.4 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %22 EO 2C W-1 100 13 50.00
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 61.54
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 65,38 %
A.5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 48,77 %28 EO 3S E+3 -490 16.2 62.31
29 EO 3C N-1 -100 23.8 91.54
30 EO 4P S+1 450 16.2 62.31 µ Tbl = 72,05 %
A11 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 65,99 %31 EO 3S E-2 100 3.3 12.69
32 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.2 62.31
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 18.4 70.77 µ Tbl = 48,59 %
Total : 447,7 / 780 = 57,40 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
A12 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 54,78 % 1 EO 3C S-1 -50 10.8 41.54
2 EO 3S N+1 630 1.2 4.62
3 EO 2T N = 90 20.5 78.85 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.9 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 52,26 % 4 EO 5C N-1 -100 20 76.92
5 EO 4K S = 130 12 46.15
6 EO 4CcE-2 500 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 43,59 %
A.6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,88 % 7 EO 3S S = 600 0 0.00
8 EO 4P N+2 480 8 30.77
9 EO 4P S+2 480 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 24,36 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,31 %10 EO 3S S = 600 22 84.62
11 EO 3S N+3 490 12 46.15
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 23 88.46 µ Tbl = 73,08 %
A11 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 65,99 %13 EO 4C N = 620 3.3 12.69
14 EO 2P N+1 140 1 3.85
15 EO 3C S = 140 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 23,46 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -NELIS Claude : 51,62 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 9.8 37.69
17 EO 2S W-2 100 15 57.69
18 EO 6S S-1 -100 25 96.15 µ Tbl = 63,85 %
A.5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 48,77 %19 EO 4K N+2 170 22 84.62
20 EO 4C W = -620 20 76.92
21 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 67,95 %
A.2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,60 %22 EO 2T N = 90 17 65.38
23 EO 2T E-1 100 8 30.77
24 EO 4P N-1 -50 22 84.62 µ Tbl = 60,26 %
A.7 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 47,45 %28 EO 3S E+3 -490 16.2 62.31
29 EO 2C N = 110 14.1 54.23
30 EO 4P S+1 450 16.2 62.31 µ Tbl = 59,62 %
A.4 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %31 EO 3K W = -110 17.3 66.54
32 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.2 62.31
33 EO 6C E-1 50 1.2 4.62 µ Tbl = 44,49 %
Total : 391,8 / 780 = 50,23 %
PAIRE Nr : a13 -PAQUET Anne
A.5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 48,77 % 1 EO 2C S = 110 2.2 8.46
2 EO 1S N+2 150 14.1 54.23
3 EO 1S S+2 150 1.2 4.62 µ Tbl = 22,44 %
A13 COLLET Edgard -COLLET Claudine : 45,96 % 4 EO 4C N = 620 7 26.92
5 EO 3P E-3 150 2 7.69
6 EO 5K S-3 -150 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 37,18 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,92 % 7 EO 5TcE-2 500 2 7.69
8 EO 6P S-1 -50 23 88.46
9 EO 4P N+2 480 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
A.7 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 47,45 %10 EO 3S S+2 660 1 3.85
11 EO 5K N+1 420 23 88.46
12 EO 6P S = 1430 2 7.69 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %13 EO 40%40% Ajust 10.4 40.00
14 EO 1S E = -90 17 65.38
15 EO 4C N-1 -100 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 65,90 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,73 %16 EO 40%40% Ajust 10.4 40.00
17 EO 3C N-1 -50 22 84.62
18 EO 4P S+1 650 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 53,08 %
A.9 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 52,26 %19 EO 3S S+1 430 8 30.77
20 EO 4C W = -620 20 76.92
21 EO 4C S-1 -100 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,88 %22 EO Pass Passe 20 76.92
23 EO 2P S-1 -100 16 61.54
24 EO 2S S+3 210 16 61.54 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,31 %25 EO 3S E = -600 17.3 66.54
26 EO 3S E-1 100 1.2 4.62
27 EO 3K E-2 100 4.4 16.92 µ Tbl = 29,36 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -NELIS Claude : 51,62 %31 EO 3S E = -400 24.8 95.38
32 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.2 62.31
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 18.4 70.77 µ Tbl = 76,15 %
Total : 374,6 / 780 = 48,03 %
PAIRE Nr : a14 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
A.9 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 52,26 % 1 EO 3T E = -110 17.3 66.54
2 EO 2S N+2 180 8.7 33.46
3 EO 1S S+1 120 10.8 41.54 µ Tbl = 47,18 %
A.6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,88 % 4 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
5 EO 3S S+1 630 0 0.00
6 EO 4P W = -620 24 92.31 µ Tbl = 30,77 %
A14 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 60,95 % 7 EO 5KcN-2 -500 24 92.31
8 EO 4P S+2 480 8 30.77
9 EO 5P N+1 480 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
A11 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 65,99 %10 EO 6S N-4 -400 26 100.00
11 EO 6K N = 920 3 11.54
12 EO 5P N+1 680 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 55,13 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -NELIS Claude : 51,62 %13 EO 4C N-1 -100 21.6 83.08
14 EO 1S E = -90 17 65.38
15 EO 1S S+1 120 18 69.23 µ Tbl = 72,56 %
A.5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 48,77 %16 EO 3PcW-1 200 20.5 78.85
17 EO 4P E-3 150 3 11.54
18 EO 4P S+1 650 9 34.62 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.2 EVRARD Armand -WUYARD Alphonse : 45,60 %19 EO 3K N+3 170 22 84.62
20 EO 4C W-1 100 0 0.00
21 EO 4P N-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 53,85 %
A10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,92 %22 EO 2S S = 120 7 26.92
23 EO 1S S+1 120 6 23.08
24 EO 4P N = 420 8 30.77 µ Tbl = 26,92 %
A.7 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 47,45 %25 EO 4P E = -620 19.5 75.00
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 17.3 66.54
27 EO 3S E-1 50 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.4 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 41,31 %28 EO 3S W+3 -490 16.2 62.31
29 EO 3C N-1 -100 23.8 91.54
30 EO 3K N = 110 21.6 83.08 µ Tbl = 78,97 %
Total : 406,0 / 780 = 52,05 %
PAIRE Nr : a15 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
A10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 55,92 % 4 EO 3S S = 600 14 53.85
5 EO 3K S+1 130 12 46.15
6 EO 3C E-1 100 10 38.46 µ Tbl = 46,15 %
A.7 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 47,45 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 9 34.62
8 EO 4P S+1 450 18 69.23
9 EO 4P N+2 480 11 42.31 µ Tbl = 48,72 %
A15 COURTOIS Patrick -ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis : 42,88 %10 EO 3S N = 600 22 84.62
11 EO 5K N+1 420 23 88.46
12 EO 4P S+2 680 14 53.85 µ Tbl = 75,64 %
A.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 46,73 %13 EO 3C N+1 170 10.8 41.54
14 EO 2C S+1 140 1 3.85
15 EO 1S E+1 -120 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,46 %
A.9 de WASSEIGE Ariane -STEED Mercédès : 52,26 %16 EO 4C S+2 480 9.8 37.69
17 EO 5T E-2 100 15 57.69
18 EO 5P S+1 680 1 3.85 µ Tbl = 33,08 %
A.6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 42,88 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 1 3.85
20 EO 4C W = -620 20 76.92
21 EO 4C S-2 -200 20 76.92 µ Tbl = 52,56 %
A.3 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 46,31 %22 EO 3T N-1 -50 24 92.31
23 EO 1S S-1 -100 16 61.54
24 EO 6P N-3 -150 26 100.00 µ Tbl = 84,62 %
A11 MATELART Marc -VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline : 65,99 %25 EO 4T W-2 200 4.4 16.92
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 17.3 66.54
27 EO 2P S-1 -50 16.2 62.31 µ Tbl = 48,59 %
A.8 LIBERT Laurent -NELIS Claude : 51,62 %28 EO 3S E+3 -490 16.2 62.31
29 EO 2C N = 110 14.1 54.23
30 EO 3S N+3 490 8.7 33.46 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.5 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 48,77 %31 EO 3S W-2 100 3.3 12.69
32 EO 3S E+1 -630 16.2 62.31
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 18.4 70.77 µ Tbl = 48,59 %
Total : 418,4 / 780 = 53,64 %
|
|