|
Tournoi du 28-12-15
1 58,65 14 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
2 58,29 8 MATELART Marc -MAHY Alain
3 57,24 3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
4 55,03 7 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand
5 53,53 4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
6 51,28 11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
7 51,18 5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 49,97 12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
9 48,85 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
10 48,58 6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
11 45,88 9 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
12 41,17 13 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina
13 40,79 10 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele
14 39,78 2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 64,69 21 CORCEOVEI Horia -VAN DOOREN André
2 62,06 28 BONMARIAGE François -LIBERT Laurent
3 56,92 20 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK GABRIEL
4 54,06 18 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
5 53,81 27 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
6 53,36 23 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
7 53,00 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 51,17 16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
9 47,94 25 MASSART Jean -de NICOLAS Bernard
10 44,11 17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
11 43,04 26 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
12 42,83 22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert
13 39,32 19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
14 33,49 24 DE MOOR Anne-Catherine -SALFI Huguette
PAIRE Nr : 1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,00 % 1 NS 4C N-2 -100 2 8.33
2 NS 3S W-3 150 23 95.83
3 NS 3S E-1 100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
25 MASSART Jean -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,94 % 4 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 41.67
5 NS 3C W-1 50 19 79.17
6 NS 4C N = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
24 DE MOOR Anne-Catherine -SALFI Huguette : 33,49 % 7 NS 1S E+2 -150 13 54.17
8 NS 2K N+2 130 19 79.17
9 NS 1S S = 90 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,36 %10 NS 1S N-1 -100 4 16.67
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 33.33
12 NS 6T E-2 100 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,83 %13 NS 2P W-1 100 13 54.17
14 NS 5KcW-3 500 22 91.67
15 NS 2P S-1 -100 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
27 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,81 %16 NS 2T N = 90 3 12.50
17 NS 2C N+2 170 11 45.83
18 NS 2T E-1 50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
20 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK GABRIEL : 56,92 %19 NS 2P E-1 100 20 83.33
20 NS 2S E+1 -150 2 8.33
21 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,32 %22 NS 1K S = 70 21 87.50
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 33.33
24 NS 2C W+2 -170 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,06 %25 NS 4C N-2 -100 3.3 13.75
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 7.7 32.08
27 NS 3C S+1 170 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 33,47 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 44,11 %28 NS 2T S+2 130 23.9 99.58
29 NS 3K N = 110 17.4 72.50
30 NS 3T S = 110 15.3 63.75 µ Tbl = 78,61 %
Total : 351,7 / 720 = 48,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,17 % 4 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 41.67
5 NS 3C W = -140 11 45.83
6 NS 3S N+3 490 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,00 % 7 NS 1S E+2 -150 13 54.17
8 NS 3K N = 110 12 50.00
9 NS 3P N-2 -100 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
25 MASSART Jean -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,94 %10 NS 1K S-1 -100 4 16.67
11 NS 3P S-3 -150 22 91.67
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
24 DE MOOR Anne-Catherine -SALFI Huguette : 33,49 %13 NS 4K N = 130 20 83.33
14 NS 5C S = 450 13 54.17
15 NS 3S S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,36 %16 NS 2S S-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 4C N+1 450 24 100.00
18 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
28 BONMARIAGE François -LIBERT Laurent : 62,06 %19 NS 2K W+2 -130 3 12.50
20 NS 3P E+1 -170 0 0.00
21 NS 5C N-1 -100 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
26 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %22 NS 1C E+2 -140 16 66.67
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 33.33
24 NS 1C E+2 -140 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
20 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK GABRIEL : 56,92 %25 NS 3C N-2 -100 3.3 13.75
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 7.7 32.08
27 NS 2C S+1 140 3.3 13.75 µ Tbl = 19,86 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,32 %28 NS 3T S = 110 21.8 90.83
29 NS 3K N = 110 17.4 72.50
30 NS 3T S+1 130 20.7 86.25 µ Tbl = 83,19 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,06 %31 NS 3S E+3 -490 9.8 40.83
32 NS 4P E-1 100 13.1 54.58
33 NS 1S W+2 -150 2.3 9.58 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
Total : 286,4 / 720 = 39,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,32 % 1 NS 2C N+2 170 22 91.67
2 NS 2K S = 90 14 58.33
3 NS 4S E-2 200 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 44,11 % 7 NS 1S E+3 -180 6 25.00
8 NS 3K N = 110 12 50.00
9 NS 2C W-1 100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
26 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %10 NS 1S S = 90 14 58.33
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 33.33
12 NS 3S W-3 150 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,00 %13 NS 2T N-1 -100 8 33.33
14 NS 3C S+1 170 1 4.17
15 NS 2P S = 110 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
25 MASSART Jean -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,94 %16 NS 1S N+2 150 19 79.17
17 NS 4C N = 420 20 83.33
18 NS 2C N-2 -200 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
24 DE MOOR Anne-Catherine -SALFI Huguette : 33,49 %19 NS 1CcW-2 500 24 100.00
20 NS 2C E-2 200 22 91.67
21 NS 4C S+1 650 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 95,83 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,36 %22 NS 2C E+2 -170 9 37.50
23 NS 3S S = 600 20 83.33
24 NS 3C W-2 100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
27 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,81 %25 NS 4PcS-2 -300 0.1 0.42
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 7.7 32.08
27 NS 1S N+3 180 19.6 81.67 µ Tbl = 38,06 %
21 CORCEOVEI Horia -VAN DOOREN André : 64,69 %28 NS 2C W = -110 8.8 36.67
29 NS 3K N = 110 17.4 72.50
30 NS 3T S = 110 15.3 63.75 µ Tbl = 57,64 %
20 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK GABRIEL : 56,92 %31 NS 6C W = -980 2.3 9.58
32 NS 3P E = -140 6.6 27.50
33 NS 1S E-1 50 15.3 63.75 µ Tbl = 33,61 %
Total : 412,1 / 720 = 57,24 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
21 CORCEOVEI Horia -VAN DOOREN André : 64,69 % 1 NS 4KcW-2 300 24 100.00
2 NS 3CcS-3 -800 0 0.00
3 NS 3S E-1 100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
20 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK GABRIEL : 56,92 % 4 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 41.67
5 NS 2C W+1 -140 11 45.83
6 NS 3S N+4 520 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,06 %10 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 16.67
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 33.33
12 NS 3S W-1 50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
27 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,81 %13 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00
14 NS 4C S+1 450 13 54.17
15 NS 2P S+1 140 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,17 %16 NS 1S N+1 120 12 50.00
17 NS 3C N-1 -50 5 20.83
18 NS 2T E-2 100 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,00 %19 NS 3T S-2 -100 14 58.33
20 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 20.83
21 NS 4C S = 620 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
25 MASSART Jean -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,94 %22 NS 1K S-1 -50 18 75.00
23 NS 1S S+1 120 14 58.33
24 NS 4C W-2 100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
24 DE MOOR Anne-Catherine -SALFI Huguette : 33,49 %25 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 50.00
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 19.6 81.67
27 NS 2CcS+2 670 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 77,08 %
28 BONMARIAGE François -LIBERT Laurent : 62,06 %28 NS 2C W+1 -140 4.4 18.33
29 NS 4KcN = 710 23.9 99.58
30 NS 3T S = 110 15.3 63.75 µ Tbl = 60,56 %
26 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 18.5 77.08
32 NS 3P E-1 100 13.1 54.58
33 NS 1S W = -90 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 54,58 %
Total : 385,4 / 720 = 53,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
27 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,81 % 1 NS 2C N+1 140 17 70.83
2 NS 3P E = -140 8 33.33
3 NS 3S E = -600 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,83 % 4 NS 3P E-1 100 20 83.33
5 NS 2C W+1 -140 11 45.83
6 NS 7S N = 1520 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
21 CORCEOVEI Horia -VAN DOOREN André : 64,69 % 7 NS 2TcS-3 -800 2 8.33
8 NS 3S N-2 -100 0 0.00
9 NS 1S N = 90 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,32 %13 NS 1S E = -90 10 41.67
14 NS 5KcW-3 500 22 91.67
15 NS 2P S+1 140 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 69,44 %
28 BONMARIAGE François -LIBERT Laurent : 62,06 %16 NS 2T N+1 110 7 29.17
17 NS 4C N-1 -50 5 20.83
18 NS 2T E-1 50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
26 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %19 NS 2P E-2 200 22 91.67
20 NS 4C E-3 300 24 100.00
21 NS 3S S = 600 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,17 %22 NS 4C E = -620 0 0.00
23 NS 3S S = 600 20 83.33
24 NS 1C W+1 -110 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,00 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 12 50.00
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 7.7 32.08
27 NS 4C S = 420 21.8 90.83 µ Tbl = 57,64 %
25 MASSART Jean -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,94 %28 NS 3K S-3 -300 1.2 5.00
29 NS 3C W-1 100 6.6 27.50
30 NS 3T S-1 -50 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 18,47 %
24 DE MOOR Anne-Catherine -SALFI Huguette : 33,49 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 18.5 77.08
32 NS 4PcE-2 500 23.9 99.58
33 NS 1S W-1 50 15.3 63.75 µ Tbl = 80,14 %
Total : 368,5 / 720 = 51,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
25 MASSART Jean -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,94 % 1 NS 3C N = 140 17 70.83
2 NS 3S W-2 100 18 75.00
3 NS 3S E-1 100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
28 BONMARIAGE François -LIBERT Laurent : 62,06 % 4 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 41.67
5 NS 2S W+1 -150 6 25.00
6 NS 6S N+1 1020 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
26 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 % 7 NS 2K W+1 -110 23 95.83
8 NS 3S S-1 -50 4 16.67
9 NS 1P N = 80 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,83 %10 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 16.67
11 NS 4K E+2 -170 20 83.33
12 NS 3S W-1 50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
20 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK GABRIEL : 56,92 %16 NS 2S N+1 150 19 79.17
17 NS 3S S-2 -100 1 4.17
18 NS 2S S-1 -100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,32 %19 NS 2K W+1 -110 9 37.50
20 NS 2S E-1 100 16 66.67
21 NS 6C N-1 -100 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
27 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,81 %22 NS 2K S-3 -150 14 58.33
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 33.33
24 NS 4C W-3 150 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 44,11 %25 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 50.00
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 7.7 32.08
27 NS 2C S+1 140 3.3 13.75 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,17 %28 NS 2C E = -110 8.8 36.67
29 NS 3C W-1 100 6.6 27.50
30 NS 3T S-1 -50 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 29,03 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,00 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 18.5 77.08
32 NS 4P E-1 100 13.1 54.58
33 NS 1S W-1 50 15.3 63.75 µ Tbl = 65,14 %
Total : 349,8 / 720 = 48,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,17 % 1 NS 2C N+1 140 17 70.83
2 NS 3K S-1 -100 12 50.00
3 NS 3S E-1 100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,00 % 4 NS 3P E = -140 10 41.67
5 NS 3C W = -140 11 45.83
6 NS 3S N+3 490 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
25 MASSART Jean -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,94 % 7 NS 1S E+2 -150 13 54.17
8 NS 2K N+2 130 19 79.17
9 NS 1S S+1 120 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
27 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,81 %10 NS 1S S = 90 14 58.33
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 33.33
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,36 %13 NS 2T N+1 110 16 66.67
14 NS 2C S+2 170 1 4.17
15 NS 2P S = 110 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
21 CORCEOVEI Horia -VAN DOOREN André : 64,69 %19 NS 3K W = -110 9 37.50
20 NS 3P E = -140 5 20.83
21 NS 4C S = 620 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
20 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK GABRIEL : 56,92 %22 NS 2C E+2 -170 9 37.50
23 NS 3S S = 600 20 83.33
24 NS 3S E-1 50 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
28 BONMARIAGE François -LIBERT Laurent : 62,06 %25 NS 2P S+1 140 23.9 99.58
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 19.6 81.67
27 NS 2C S+2 170 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 78,61 %
26 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %28 NS 3T S-1 -100 15.3 63.75
29 NS 3C W-1 100 6.6 27.50
30 NS 4T S+1 150 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 63,61 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 44,11 %31 NS 3S E+3 -490 9.8 40.83
32 NS 4P E-2 200 20.7 86.25
33 NS 3T W-1 50 15.3 63.75 µ Tbl = 63,61 %
Total : 396,2 / 720 = 55,03 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -MAHY Alain
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,06 % 1 NS 2C N+1 140 17 70.83
2 NS 2K S-2 -200 6 25.00
3 NS 3S E-1 100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 44,11 % 4 NS 4T S+1 150 22 91.67
5 NS 3C W-2 100 23 95.83
6 NS 6S N+1 1020 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,17 % 7 NS 2S E+1 -150 13 54.17
8 NS 2S S = 120 16 66.67
9 NS 3C E-1 100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,00 %10 NS 1S S = 90 14 58.33
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 33.33
12 NS 3S W = -400 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
28 BONMARIAGE François -LIBERT Laurent : 62,06 %13 NS 2K N+2 130 20 83.33
14 NS 4C S = 420 5 20.83
15 NS 3KcE-1 100 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
26 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %16 NS 3S N = 400 23 95.83
17 NS 2C N+2 170 11 45.83
18 NS 3C N-2 -200 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,83 %22 NS 1K S = 70 21 87.50
23 NS 3S S = 600 20 83.33
24 NS 4C W-2 100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 80,56 %
21 CORCEOVEI Horia -VAN DOOREN André : 64,69 %25 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 50.00
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 7.7 32.08
27 NS 2C S+2 170 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
20 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK GABRIEL : 56,92 %28 NS 3S N-3 -300 1.2 5.00
29 NS 3S S = 600 21.8 90.83
30 NS 3T S+1 130 20.7 86.25 µ Tbl = 60,69 %
27 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,81 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 18.5 77.08
32 NS 3P E+1 -170 4.4 18.33
33 NS 3S W-1 50 15.3 63.75 µ Tbl = 53,06 %
Total : 419,7 / 720 = 58,29 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy
28 BONMARIAGE François -LIBERT Laurent : 62,06 % 1 NS 4C N-2 -100 2 8.33
2 NS 3CcS-2 -500 2 8.33
3 NS 3S E = -600 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 8,33 %
26 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 % 4 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 41.67
5 NS 2C W+2 -170 3 12.50
6 NS 6K S+1 940 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,06 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 20 83.33
8 NS 2S S+1 150 22 91.67
9 NS 2C W-1 100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 81,94 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 44,11 %10 NS 1S S = 90 14 58.33
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 33.33
12 NS 3S W-1 50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,17 %13 NS 1CcN-2 -500 2 8.33
14 NS 4C N+1 450 13 54.17
15 NS 2P S+2 170 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,00 %16 NS 1S N+1 120 12 50.00
17 NS 3C N+1 170 11 45.83
18 NS 2TcE+1 -280 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
27 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,81 %19 NS 2P E = -110 9 37.50
20 NS 2C E-1 100 16 66.67
21 NS 4C N = 620 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,36 %25 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 50.00
26 NS 3S E+1 -630 23.9 99.58
27 NS 2C S+2 170 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,83 %28 NS 3T S-1 -100 15.3 63.75
29 NS 3C W-1 100 6.6 27.50
30 NS 2S S-1 -50 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 38,06 %
21 CORCEOVEI Horia -VAN DOOREN André : 64,69 %31 NS 6S E = -990 0.1 0.42
32 NS 4P E-2 200 20.7 86.25
33 NS 2CcN-2 -300 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 29,03 %
Total : 330,3 / 720 = 45,88 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,83 % 1 NS 2C N-1 -50 7 29.17
2 NS 2P E = -110 10 41.67
3 NS 3S E = -600 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
21 CORCEOVEI Horia -VAN DOOREN André : 64,69 % 4 NS 2P E+2 -170 0 0.00
5 NS 2C W+2 -170 3 12.50
6 NS 3S N+4 520 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 18,06 %
27 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,81 % 7 NS 3S E = -600 4 16.67
8 NS 3K N-1 -50 4 16.67
9 NS 1S N-1 -50 4 16.67 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,32 %10 NS 1S S+1 120 20 83.33
11 NS 3P S-1 -50 24 100.00
12 NS 4T E-1 50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 81,94 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,06 %13 NS 2K N+3 150 24 100.00
14 NS 4C S+1 450 13 54.17
15 NS 2P S = 110 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 44,11 %16 NS 2P S = 110 7 29.17
17 NS 4C N = 420 20 83.33
18 NS 2S S = 120 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,17 %19 NS 2K W = -90 16 66.67
20 NS 3K N-1 -100 8 33.33
21 NS 3S S = 600 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
28 BONMARIAGE François -LIBERT Laurent : 62,06 %22 NS 2KcS-2 -300 4 16.67
23 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 4.17
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 6,94 %
24 DE MOOR Anne-Catherine -SALFI Huguette : 33,49 %28 NS 2C E-1 50 19.6 81.67
29 NS 3C E-1 100 6.6 27.50
30 NS 3T S-1 -50 5.5 22.92 µ Tbl = 44,03 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,36 %31 NS 3S E+4 -520 5.5 22.92
32 NS 4P E-1 100 13.1 54.58
33 NS 1S W+1 -120 4.4 18.33 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
Total : 293,7 / 720 = 40,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques
24 DE MOOR Anne-Catherine -SALFI Huguette : 33,49 % 1 NS 4C N-2 -100 2 8.33
2 NS 3S W-3 150 23 95.83
3 NS 4K W-1 100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,36 % 4 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 41.67
5 NS 2P N-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 5K S+2 440 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,83 % 7 NS 1P W+1 -110 23 95.83
8 NS 2S N-1 -50 4 16.67
9 NS 2S E-1 100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
28 BONMARIAGE François -LIBERT Laurent : 62,06 %10 NS 1S S = 90 14 58.33
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 33.33
12 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
26 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 %13 NS 2K N+2 130 20 83.33
14 NS 5C S = 450 13 54.17
15 NS 2P W-3 150 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 76,39 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,32 %16 NS 2T N = 90 3 12.50
17 NS 4C N = 420 20 83.33
18 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,06 %19 NS 2K W+1 -110 9 37.50
20 NS 1S S = 90 10 41.67
21 NS 4C S = 620 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 44,11 %22 NS 2C E+2 -170 9 37.50
23 NS 3S S = 600 20 83.33
24 NS 4C W-3 150 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,17 %25 NS 2P S = 110 20.7 86.25
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 7.7 32.08
27 NS 2C S+1 140 3.3 13.75 µ Tbl = 44,03 %
25 MASSART Jean -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,94 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 18.5 77.08
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 1.2 5.00
33 NS 3S W-3 150 22.8 95.00 µ Tbl = 59,03 %
Total : 369,2 / 720 = 51,28 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
26 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard : 43,04 % 1 NS 3C N-1 -50 7 29.17
2 NS 2S W-2 100 18 75.00
3 NS 2C W-1 100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,32 % 4 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 41.67
5 NS 2P N-1 -100 16 66.67
6 NS 6K S+1 940 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,36 % 7 NS 1S E+2 -150 13 54.17
8 NS 3S N = 400 24 100.00
9 NS 1S S = 90 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 51,17 %10 NS 1S S+2 150 23 95.83
11 NS 4C W+2 -480 8 33.33
12 NS 3S W-1 50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
20 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK GABRIEL : 56,92 %13 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 25.00
14 NS 5C S = 450 13 54.17
15 NS 2P S+1 140 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
24 DE MOOR Anne-Catherine -SALFI Huguette : 33,49 %16 NS 3S S = 400 23 95.83
17 NS 3S N = 400 16 66.67
18 NS 2C N+1 140 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,50 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 44,11 %19 NS 2K W+3 -150 0 0.00
20 NS 2P W-1 100 16 66.67
21 NS 4C S-1 -100 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
21 CORCEOVEI Horia -VAN DOOREN André : 64,69 %22 NS 3S E = -600 2 8.33
23 NS 3S S-1 -100 8 33.33
24 NS 4C W = -420 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 18,06 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,06 %28 NS 2C E = -110 8.8 36.67
29 NS 3C W-1 100 6.6 27.50
30 NS 3S S-2 -100 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 21,53 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,83 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 18.5 77.08
32 NS 3P E-1 100 13.1 54.58
33 NS 1S W = -90 7.7 32.08 µ Tbl = 54,58 %
Total : 359,8 / 720 = 49,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina
23 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,36 % 1 NS 2P S = 110 11 45.83
2 NS 3K S-3 -300 4 16.67
3 NS 4S E-1 100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
27 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 53,81 % 4 NS 3T N+3 170 24 100.00
5 NS 4C W-2 100 23 95.83
6 NS 3S N+4 520 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
20 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK GABRIEL : 56,92 % 7 NS 1S E+2 -150 13 54.17
8 NS 2K N = 90 8 33.33
9 NS 2C E = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
24 DE MOOR Anne-Catherine -SALFI Huguette : 33,49 %10 NS 1S S-1 -100 4 16.67
11 NS 3C W+3 -230 18 75.00
12 NS 3S W-1 50 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 44,11 %13 NS 4P W-1 100 13 54.17
14 NS 4C S = 420 5 20.83
15 NS 2S S-1 -100 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
21 CORCEOVEI Horia -VAN DOOREN André : 64,69 %16 NS 2S N = 120 12 50.00
17 NS 4C N-2 -100 1 4.17
18 NS 2T E+1 -110 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 26,39 %
25 MASSART Jean -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,94 %19 NS 2K W+2 -130 3 12.50
20 NS 3C E-1 100 16 66.67
21 NS 4C S = 620 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,06 %22 NS 2C E+2 -170 9 37.50
23 NS 3S S-2 -200 1 4.17
24 NS 4C W = -420 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 18,06 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,83 %25 NS 2C N-1 -50 12 50.00
26 NS 3S E+2 -660 19.6 81.67
27 NS 2C S+1 140 3.3 13.75 µ Tbl = 48,47 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,32 %31 NS 3S E+4 -520 5.5 22.92
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 1.2 5.00
33 NS 3S W-3 150 22.8 95.00 µ Tbl = 40,97 %
Total : 296,4 / 720 = 41,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
20 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK GABRIEL : 56,92 % 1 NS 2C N = 110 11 45.83
2 NS 4P E-2 100 18 75.00
3 NS 3S E-1 100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
24 DE MOOR Anne-Catherine -SALFI Huguette : 33,49 % 4 NS 2P E+1 -140 10 41.67
5 NS 4C E-1 50 19 79.17
6 NS 7K N = 1440 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
28 BONMARIAGE François -LIBERT Laurent : 62,06 % 7 NS 2CcN-4 -1100 0 0.00
8 NS 2K N+1 110 12 50.00
9 NS 1S N+2 150 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 CORCEOVEI Horia -VAN DOOREN André : 64,69 %10 NS 1S N+2 150 23 95.83
11 NS 4C E+2 -480 8 33.33
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 12.50 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
25 MASSART Jean -de NICOLAS Bernard : 47,94 %13 NS 2S E+1 -150 4 16.67
14 NS 5KcE-3 500 22 91.67
15 NS 1S N = 90 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
18 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe : 54,06 %16 NS 2K N+2 130 16 66.67
17 NS 3C N+1 170 11 45.83
18 NS 1S E-2 100 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 42,83 %19 NS 3T N-1 -50 18 75.00
20 NS 2T E-1 100 16 66.67
21 NS 4C N+1 650 23 95.83 µ Tbl = 79,17 %
15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,00 %22 NS 3S E-1 100 24 100.00
23 NS 3S N-1 -100 8 33.33
24 NS 4C E-2 100 17 70.83 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 39,32 %25 NS 2P N = 110 20.7 86.25
26 NS 3S E+3 -690 7.7 32.08
27 NS 2C N+2 170 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 57,64 %
23 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,36 %28 NS 1S N-1 -100 15.3 63.75
29 NS 3C E-1 100 6.6 27.50
30 NS 2S E-1 50 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 45,56 %
Total : 422,3 / 720 = 58,65 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,85 % 1 EO 4C N-2 -100 22 91.67
2 EO 3S W-3 150 1 4.17
3 EO 3S E-1 100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,03 % 4 EO 3P E = -140 14 58.33
5 EO 3C W = -140 13 54.17
6 EO 3S N+3 490 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,78 % 7 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 45.83
8 EO 3K N = 110 12 50.00
9 EO 3P N-2 -100 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
8 MATELART Marc -MAHY Alain : 58,29 %10 EO 1S S = 90 10 41.67
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 16 66.67
12 EO 3S W = -400 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,24 %13 EO 2T N-1 -100 16 66.67
14 EO 3C S+1 170 23 95.83
15 EO 2P S = 110 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
9 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 45,88 %16 EO 1S N+1 120 12 50.00
17 EO 3C N+1 170 13 54.17
18 EO 2TcE+1 -280 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,53 %19 EO 3T S-2 -100 10 41.67
20 EO 2C E+1 -140 19 79.17
21 EO 4C S = 620 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
14 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,65 %22 EO 3S E-1 100 0 0.00
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 66.67
24 EO 4C E-2 100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,18 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 12 50.00
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 16.3 67.92
27 EO 4C S = 420 2.2 9.17 µ Tbl = 42,36 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,58 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 5.5 22.92
32 EO 4P E-1 100 10.9 45.42
33 EO 1S W-1 50 8.7 36.25 µ Tbl = 34,86 %
Total : 381,6 / 720 = 53,00 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,03 % 1 EO 2C N+1 140 7 29.17
2 EO 3K S-1 -100 12 50.00
3 EO 3S E-1 100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,78 % 4 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 58.33
5 EO 3C W = -140 13 54.17
6 EO 3S N+3 490 19 79.17 µ Tbl = 63,89 %
8 MATELART Marc -MAHY Alain : 58,29 % 7 EO 2S E+1 -150 11 45.83
8 EO 2S S = 120 8 33.33
9 EO 3C E-1 100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,97 %10 EO 1S S+2 150 1 4.17
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 16 66.67
12 EO 3S W-1 50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
9 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 45,88 %13 EO 1CcN-2 -500 22 91.67
14 EO 4C N+1 450 11 45.83
15 EO 2P S+2 170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,53 %16 EO 1S N+1 120 12 50.00
17 EO 3C N-1 -50 19 79.17
18 EO 2T E-2 100 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 40,79 %19 EO 2K W = -90 8 33.33
20 EO 3K N-1 -100 16 66.67
21 EO 3S S = 600 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,18 %22 EO 4C E = -620 24 100.00
23 EO 3S S = 600 4 16.67
24 EO 1C W+1 -110 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,28 %25 EO 2P S = 110 3.3 13.75
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 16.3 67.92
27 EO 2C S+1 140 20.7 86.25 µ Tbl = 55,97 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,58 %28 EO 2C E = -110 15.2 63.33
29 EO 3C W-1 100 17.4 72.50
30 EO 3T S-1 -50 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 70,97 %
Total : 368,4 / 720 = 51,17 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
8 MATELART Marc -MAHY Alain : 58,29 % 4 EO 4T S+1 150 2 8.33
5 EO 3C W-2 100 1 4.17
6 EO 6S N+1 1020 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,24 % 7 EO 1S E+3 -180 18 75.00
8 EO 3K N = 110 12 50.00
9 EO 2C W-1 100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
9 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 45,88 %10 EO 1S S = 90 10 41.67
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 16 66.67
12 EO 3S W-1 50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 41,17 %13 EO 4P W-1 100 11 45.83
14 EO 4C S = 420 19 79.17
15 EO 2S S-1 -100 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
10 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 40,79 %16 EO 2P S = 110 17 70.83
17 EO 4C N = 420 4 16.67
18 EO 2S S = 120 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,97 %19 EO 2K W+3 -150 24 100.00
20 EO 2P W-1 100 8 33.33
21 EO 4C S-1 -100 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,28 %22 EO 2C E+2 -170 15 62.50
23 EO 3S S = 600 4 16.67
24 EO 4C W-3 150 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,58 %25 EO 3C N-1 -50 12 50.00
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 16.3 67.92
27 EO 2C S+1 140 20.7 86.25 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,85 %28 EO 2T S+2 130 0.1 0.42
29 EO 3K N = 110 6.6 27.50
30 EO 3T S = 110 8.7 36.25 µ Tbl = 21,39 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,03 %31 EO 3S E+3 -490 14.2 59.17
32 EO 4P E-2 200 3.3 13.75
33 EO 3T W-1 50 8.7 36.25 µ Tbl = 36,39 %
Total : 317,6 / 720 = 44,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 HALLEUX Jean François -de TERWANGNE Philippe
8 MATELART Marc -MAHY Alain : 58,29 % 1 EO 2C N+1 140 7 29.17
2 EO 2K S-2 -200 18 75.00
3 EO 3S E-1 100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
9 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 45,88 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 4 16.67
8 EO 2S S+1 150 2 8.33
9 EO 2C W-1 100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 18,06 %
4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,53 %10 EO 1S S-1 -100 20 83.33
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 16 66.67
12 EO 3S W-1 50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
10 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 40,79 %13 EO 2K N+3 150 0 0.00
14 EO 4C S+1 450 11 45.83
15 EO 2P S = 110 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
14 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,65 %16 EO 2K N+2 130 8 33.33
17 EO 3C N+1 170 13 54.17
18 EO 1S E-2 100 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,28 %19 EO 2K W+1 -110 15 62.50
20 EO 1S S = 90 14 58.33
21 EO 4C S = 620 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 41,17 %22 EO 2C E+2 -170 15 62.50
23 EO 3S S-2 -200 23 95.83
24 EO 4C W = -420 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 81,94 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,85 %25 EO 4C N-2 -100 20.7 86.25
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 16.3 67.92
27 EO 3C S+1 170 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 66,53 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,97 %28 EO 2C E = -110 15.2 63.33
29 EO 3C W-1 100 17.4 72.50
30 EO 3S S-2 -100 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 78,47 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,78 %31 EO 3S E+3 -490 14.2 59.17
32 EO 4P E-1 100 10.9 45.42
33 EO 1S W+2 -150 21.7 90.42 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
Total : 389,2 / 720 = 54,06 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,24 % 1 EO 2C N+2 170 2 8.33
2 EO 2K S = 90 10 41.67
3 EO 4S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,97 % 4 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 58.33
5 EO 2P N-1 -100 8 33.33
6 EO 6K S+1 940 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
10 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 40,79 %10 EO 1S S+1 120 4 16.67
11 EO 3P S-1 -50 0 0.00
12 EO 4T E-1 50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 18,06 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,18 %13 EO 1S E = -90 14 58.33
14 EO 5KcW-3 500 2 8.33
15 EO 2P S+1 140 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 30,56 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,28 %16 EO 2T N = 90 21 87.50
17 EO 4C N = 420 4 16.67
18 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,58 %19 EO 2K W+1 -110 15 62.50
20 EO 2S E-1 100 8 33.33
21 EO 6C N-1 -100 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,85 %22 EO 1K S = 70 3 12.50
23 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 66.67
24 EO 2C W+2 -170 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
14 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,65 %25 EO 2P N = 110 3.3 13.75
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 16.3 67.92
27 EO 2C N+2 170 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 42,36 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,78 %28 EO 3T S = 110 2.2 9.17
29 EO 3K N = 110 6.6 27.50
30 EO 3T S+1 130 3.3 13.75 µ Tbl = 16,81 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 41,17 %31 EO 3S E+4 -520 18.5 77.08
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 22.8 95.00
33 EO 3S W-3 150 1.2 5.00 µ Tbl = 59,03 %
Total : 283,1 / 720 = 39,32 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 LEBLU Pascaline -BELSACK GABRIEL
14 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,65 % 1 EO 2C N = 110 13 54.17
2 EO 4P E-2 100 6 25.00
3 EO 3S E-1 100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 40,28 %
4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,53 % 4 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 58.33
5 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 54.17
6 EO 3S N+4 520 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 41,17 % 7 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 45.83
8 EO 2K N = 90 16 66.67
9 EO 2C E = -110 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,83 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,97 %13 EO 2P W+1 -140 18 75.00
14 EO 5C S = 450 11 45.83
15 EO 2P S+1 140 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,58 %16 EO 2S N+1 150 5 20.83
17 EO 3S S-2 -100 23 95.83
18 EO 2S S-1 -100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,85 %19 EO 2P E-1 100 4 16.67
20 EO 2S E+1 -150 22 91.67
21 EO 4C S-1 -100 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,03 %22 EO 2C E+2 -170 15 62.50
23 EO 3S S = 600 4 16.67
24 EO 3S E-1 50 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,78 %25 EO 3C N-2 -100 20.7 86.25
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 16.3 67.92
27 EO 2C S+1 140 20.7 86.25 µ Tbl = 80,14 %
8 MATELART Marc -MAHY Alain : 58,29 %28 EO 3S N-3 -300 22.8 95.00
29 EO 3S S = 600 2.2 9.17
30 EO 3T S+1 130 3.3 13.75 µ Tbl = 39,31 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,24 %31 EO 6C W = -980 21.7 90.42
32 EO 3P E = -140 17.4 72.50
33 EO 1S E-1 50 8.7 36.25 µ Tbl = 66,39 %
Total : 409,8 / 720 = 56,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 CORCEOVEI Horia -VAN DOOREN André
4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,53 % 1 EO 4KcW-2 300 0 0.00
2 EO 3CcS-3 -800 24 100.00
3 EO 3S E-1 100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
10 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 40,79 % 4 EO 2P E+2 -170 24 100.00
5 EO 2C W+2 -170 21 87.50
6 EO 3S N+4 520 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 81,94 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,18 % 7 EO 2TcS-3 -800 22 91.67
8 EO 3S N-2 -100 24 100.00
9 EO 1S N = 90 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
14 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,65 %10 EO 1S N+2 150 1 4.17
11 EO 4C E+2 -480 16 66.67
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 41,17 %16 EO 2S N = 120 12 50.00
17 EO 4C N-2 -100 23 95.83
18 EO 2T E+1 -110 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,03 %19 EO 3K W = -110 15 62.50
20 EO 3P E = -140 19 79.17
21 EO 4C S = 620 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,97 %22 EO 3S E = -600 22 91.67
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 66.67
24 EO 4C W = -420 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 81,94 %
8 MATELART Marc -MAHY Alain : 58,29 %25 EO 3C N-1 -50 12 50.00
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 16.3 67.92
27 EO 2C S+2 170 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,24 %28 EO 2C W = -110 15.2 63.33
29 EO 3K N = 110 6.6 27.50
30 EO 3T S = 110 8.7 36.25 µ Tbl = 42,36 %
9 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 45,88 %31 EO 6S E = -990 23.9 99.58
32 EO 4P E-2 200 3.3 13.75
33 EO 2CcN-2 -300 23.9 99.58 µ Tbl = 70,97 %
Total : 465,8 / 720 = 64,69 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert
10 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 40,79 % 1 EO 2C N-1 -50 17 70.83
2 EO 2P E = -110 14 58.33
3 EO 3S E = -600 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 73,61 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,18 % 4 EO 3P E-1 100 4 16.67
5 EO 2C W+1 -140 13 54.17
6 EO 7S N = 1520 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,28 % 7 EO 1P W+1 -110 1 4.17
8 EO 2S N-1 -50 20 83.33
9 EO 2S E-1 100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,58 %10 EO 1S S-1 -100 20 83.33
11 EO 4K E+2 -170 4 16.67
12 EO 3S W-1 50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,85 %13 EO 2P W-1 100 11 45.83
14 EO 5KcW-3 500 2 8.33
15 EO 2P S-1 -100 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 47,22 %
14 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,65 %19 EO 3T N-1 -50 6 25.00
20 EO 2T E-1 100 8 33.33
21 EO 4C N+1 650 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
8 MATELART Marc -MAHY Alain : 58,29 %22 EO 1K S = 70 3 12.50
23 EO 3S S = 600 4 16.67
24 EO 4C W-2 100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 19,44 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 41,17 %25 EO 2C N-1 -50 12 50.00
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 4.4 18.33
27 EO 2C S+1 140 20.7 86.25 µ Tbl = 51,53 %
9 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 45,88 %28 EO 3T S-1 -100 8.7 36.25
29 EO 3C W-1 100 17.4 72.50
30 EO 2S S-1 -50 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 61,94 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,97 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 5.5 22.92
32 EO 3P E-1 100 10.9 45.42
33 EO 1S W = -90 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 45,42 %
Total : 308,4 / 720 = 42,83 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 HUBLET Carlo -de WASSEIGE Ariane
13 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 41,17 % 1 EO 2P S = 110 13 54.17
2 EO 3K S-3 -300 20 83.33
3 EO 4S E-1 100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,28 % 4 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 58.33
5 EO 2P N-2 -200 24 100.00
6 EO 5K S+2 440 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,97 % 7 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 45.83
8 EO 3S N = 400 0 0.00
9 EO 1S S = 90 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 34,72 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,85 %10 EO 1S N-1 -100 20 83.33
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 16 66.67
12 EO 6T E-2 100 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,03 %13 EO 2T N+1 110 8 33.33
14 EO 2C S+2 170 23 95.83
15 EO 2P S = 110 12 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,78 %16 EO 2S S-1 -50 24 100.00
17 EO 4C N+1 450 0 0.00
18 EO 3C N-1 -100 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 52,78 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,24 %22 EO 2C E+2 -170 15 62.50
23 EO 3S S = 600 4 16.67
24 EO 3C W-2 100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
9 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 45,88 %25 EO 3C N-1 -50 12 50.00
26 EO 3S E+1 -630 0.1 0.42
27 EO 2C S+2 170 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
14 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,65 %28 EO 1S N-1 -100 8.7 36.25
29 EO 3C E-1 100 17.4 72.50
30 EO 2S E-1 50 13.1 54.58 µ Tbl = 54,44 %
10 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 40,79 %31 EO 3S E+4 -520 18.5 77.08
32 EO 4P E-1 100 10.9 45.42
33 EO 1S W+1 -120 19.6 81.67 µ Tbl = 68,06 %
Total : 384,2 / 720 = 53,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 DE MOOR Anne-Catherine -SALFI Huguette
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,28 % 1 EO 4C N-2 -100 22 91.67
2 EO 3S W-3 150 1 4.17
3 EO 4K W-1 100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
14 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,65 % 4 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 58.33
5 EO 4C E-1 50 5 20.83
6 EO 7K N = 1440 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 29,17 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,85 % 7 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 45.83
8 EO 2K N+2 130 5 20.83
9 EO 1S S = 90 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 41,17 %10 EO 1S S-1 -100 20 83.33
11 EO 3C W+3 -230 6 25.00
12 EO 3S W-1 50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,78 %13 EO 4K N = 130 4 16.67
14 EO 5C S = 450 11 45.83
15 EO 3S S-2 -200 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,97 %16 EO 3S S = 400 1 4.17
17 EO 3S N = 400 8 33.33
18 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,50 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,24 %19 EO 1CcW-2 500 0 0.00
20 EO 2C E-2 200 2 8.33
21 EO 4C S+1 650 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 4,17 %
4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,53 %25 EO 3C N-1 -50 12 50.00
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 4.4 18.33
27 EO 2CcS+2 670 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 22,92 %
10 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 40,79 %28 EO 2C E-1 50 4.4 18.33
29 EO 3C E-1 100 17.4 72.50
30 EO 3T S-1 -50 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 55,97 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,18 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 5.5 22.92
32 EO 4PcE-2 500 0.1 0.42
33 EO 1S W-1 50 8.7 36.25 µ Tbl = 19,86 %
Total : 241,1 / 720 = 33,49 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 MASSART Jean -de NICOLAS Bernard
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,58 % 1 EO 3C N = 140 7 29.17
2 EO 3S W-2 100 6 25.00
3 EO 3S E-1 100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,85 % 4 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 58.33
5 EO 3C W-1 50 5 20.83
6 EO 4C N = 420 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,03 % 7 EO 1S E+2 -150 11 45.83
8 EO 2K N+2 130 5 20.83
9 EO 1S S+1 120 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,78 %10 EO 1K S-1 -100 20 83.33
11 EO 3P S-3 -150 2 8.33
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
14 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,65 %13 EO 2S E+1 -150 20 83.33
14 EO 5KcE-3 500 2 8.33
15 EO 1S N = 90 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,24 %16 EO 1S N+2 150 5 20.83
17 EO 4C N = 420 4 16.67
18 EO 2C N-2 -200 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 41,17 %19 EO 2K W+2 -130 21 87.50
20 EO 3C E-1 100 8 33.33
21 EO 4C S = 620 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,53 %22 EO 1K S-1 -50 6 25.00
23 EO 1S S+1 120 10 41.67
24 EO 4C W-2 100 7 29.17 µ Tbl = 31,94 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,18 %28 EO 3K S-3 -300 22.8 95.00
29 EO 3C W-1 100 17.4 72.50
30 EO 3T S-1 -50 18.5 77.08 µ Tbl = 81,53 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,28 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 5.5 22.92
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 22.8 95.00
33 EO 3S W-3 150 1.2 5.00 µ Tbl = 40,97 %
Total : 345,2 / 720 = 47,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 COLLET Claudine -COLLET Edgard
12 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 49,97 % 1 EO 3C N-1 -50 17 70.83
2 EO 2S W-2 100 6 25.00
3 EO 2C W-1 100 10 41.67 µ Tbl = 45,83 %
9 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 45,88 % 4 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 58.33
5 EO 2C W+2 -170 21 87.50
6 EO 6K S+1 940 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,58 % 7 EO 2K W+1 -110 1 4.17
8 EO 3S S-1 -50 20 83.33
9 EO 1P N = 80 18 75.00 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,24 %10 EO 1S S = 90 10 41.67
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 16 66.67
12 EO 3S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,11 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,28 %13 EO 2K N+2 130 4 16.67
14 EO 5C S = 450 11 45.83
15 EO 2P W-3 150 2 8.33 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
8 MATELART Marc -MAHY Alain : 58,29 %16 EO 3S N = 400 1 4.17
17 EO 2C N+2 170 13 54.17
18 EO 3C N-2 -200 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 48,61 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,18 %19 EO 2P E-2 200 2 8.33
20 EO 4C E-3 300 0 0.00
21 EO 3S S = 600 15 62.50 µ Tbl = 23,61 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,78 %22 EO 1C E+2 -140 8 33.33
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 66.67
24 EO 1C E+2 -140 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,03 %28 EO 3T S-1 -100 8.7 36.25
29 EO 3C W-1 100 17.4 72.50
30 EO 4T S+1 150 0.1 0.42 µ Tbl = 36,39 %
4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,53 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 5.5 22.92
32 EO 3P E-1 100 10.9 45.42
33 EO 1S W = -90 16.3 67.92 µ Tbl = 45,42 %
Total : 309,9 / 720 = 43,04 %
PAIRE Nr : 27 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,18 % 1 EO 2C N+1 140 7 29.17
2 EO 3P E = -140 16 66.67
3 EO 3S E = -600 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
13 ARICKX Roger -DESSY Lina : 41,17 % 4 EO 3T N+3 170 0 0.00
5 EO 4C W-2 100 1 4.17
6 EO 3S N+4 520 14 58.33 µ Tbl = 20,83 %
10 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 40,79 % 7 EO 3S E = -600 20 83.33
8 EO 3K N-1 -50 20 83.33
9 EO 1S N-1 -50 20 83.33 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,03 %10 EO 1S S = 90 10 41.67
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 16 66.67
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,53 %13 EO 4P W = -620 24 100.00
14 EO 4C S+1 450 11 45.83
15 EO 2P S+1 140 6 25.00 µ Tbl = 56,94 %
1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 48,85 %16 EO 2T N = 90 21 87.50
17 EO 2C N+2 170 13 54.17
18 EO 2T E-1 50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 59,72 %
9 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 45,88 %19 EO 2P E = -110 15 62.50
20 EO 2C E-1 100 8 33.33
21 EO 4C N = 620 8 33.33 µ Tbl = 43,06 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,58 %22 EO 2K S-3 -150 10 41.67
23 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 66.67
24 EO 4C W-3 150 1 4.17 µ Tbl = 37,50 %
3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -VAGMAN David : 57,24 %25 EO 4PcS-2 -300 23.9 99.58
26 EO 3S E+3 -690 16.3 67.92
27 EO 1S N+3 180 4.4 18.33 µ Tbl = 61,94 %
8 MATELART Marc -MAHY Alain : 58,29 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 5.5 22.92
32 EO 3P E+1 -170 19.6 81.67
33 EO 3S W-1 50 8.7 36.25 µ Tbl = 46,94 %
Total : 387,4 / 720 = 53,81 %
PAIRE Nr : 28 BONMARIAGE François -LIBERT Laurent
9 DELTOUR Emile -CASSART Guy : 45,88 % 1 EO 4C N-2 -100 22 91.67
2 EO 3CcS-2 -500 22 91.67
3 EO 3S E = -600 22 91.67 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
6 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 48,58 % 4 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 58.33
5 EO 2S W+1 -150 18 75.00
6 EO 6S N+1 1020 5 20.83 µ Tbl = 51,39 %
14 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 58,65 % 7 EO 2CcN-4 -1100 24 100.00
8 EO 2K N+1 110 12 50.00
9 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 RAVET Brigitte -WILLEMS Jacques : 51,28 %10 EO 1S S = 90 10 41.67
11 EO 4C W+2 -480 16 66.67
12 EO 3S W+1 -430 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 65,28 %
8 MATELART Marc -MAHY Alain : 58,29 %13 EO 2K N+2 130 4 16.67
14 EO 4C S = 420 19 79.17
15 EO 3KcE-1 100 16 66.67 µ Tbl = 54,17 %
5 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 51,18 %16 EO 2T N+1 110 17 70.83
17 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 79.17
18 EO 2T E-1 50 9 37.50 µ Tbl = 62,50 %
2 MICHAUX Hélène -ROEGIERS Marga : 39,78 %19 EO 2K W+2 -130 21 87.50
20 EO 3P E+1 -170 24 100.00
21 EO 5C N-1 -100 21 87.50 µ Tbl = 91,67 %
10 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 40,79 %22 EO 2KcS-2 -300 20 83.33
23 EO 3S S-2 -200 23 95.83
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 24 100.00 µ Tbl = 93,06 %
7 CLERIN François-Xavier -BRIOT Fernand : 55,03 %25 EO 2P S+1 140 0.1 0.42
26 EO 3S E+2 -660 4.4 18.33
27 EO 2C S+2 170 10.9 45.42 µ Tbl = 21,39 %
4 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 53,53 %28 EO 2C W+1 -140 19.6 81.67
29 EO 4KcN = 710 0.1 0.42
30 EO 3T S = 110 8.7 36.25 µ Tbl = 39,44 %
Total : 446,8 / 720 = 62,06 %
|
|