|
Tournoi du 29-01-18
Lundi
1 64,81 A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
2 56,48 A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
3 54,44 A.7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
4 52,22 A.2 MOLS Bruno -CLUYTENS
5 51,30 A10 COOLEN Joseph -PETITJEAN Christian
6 50,93 A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
7 48,15 A.5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
8 47,59 A.4 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo
9 43,52 A11 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne
10 41,48 A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie
11 39,07 A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
12 0,00 A12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,08 a10 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie
2 55,35 a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc
3 53,70 a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
~ 53,70 a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent
5 52,06 a.3 VRANKEN Louis -KOSCIELNIAK JEAN
6 51,85 a.1 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques
7 51,03 a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
8 45,06 a.5 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice
9 45,00 a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 44,86 a.2 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
11 44,03 a12 BERGER Jean Marie -PIERRET Jean-François
12 43,62 a.9 le HARDY de BEAULIEU Ghis-POULAERT Gilbert
PAIRE Nr : A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
a.1 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 % 1 NS 2C E+1 -140 0 0.00
2 NS 2C S+2 170 10 55.56
3 NS 3S N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 % 4 NS 3P E+1 -170 8 44.44
5 NS 5T E+1 -420 4 22.22
6 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a10 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,08 % 7 NS 1S N-1 -100 0 0.00
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67
9 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
a.9 le HARDY de BEAULIEU Ghis-POULAERT Gilbert : 43,62 %10 NS 2C S = 110 10 55.56
11 NS 3S N+3 490 15 83.33
12 NS 3S S+2 660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
14 NS 2T E = -90 6 33.33
15 NS 4P N-2 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,03 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 11 61.11
17 NS 4T E-1 50 4 22.22
18 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,35 %19 NS 4PcW-2 500 11 61.11
20 NS 3K N-1 -100 2 11.11
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.5 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,06 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 27.78
23 NS 4C W = -620 5 27.78
24 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 53,70 %25 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
26 NS 2C W-1 100 10 55.56
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.3 VRANKEN Louis -KOSCIELNIAK JEAN : 52,06 %28 NS 3S W = -400 9 50.00
29 NS 2C W = -110 17 94.44
30 NS 4T S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 211,0 / 540 = 39,07 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 MOLS Bruno -CLUYTENS
a.2 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 44,86 % 4 NS 6P E-2 200 14 77.78
5 NS 4T W+1 -150 16 88.89
6 NS 3T W+3 -170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.1 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 % 7 NS 2S N+1 150 10 55.56
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67
9 NS 3S E+3 -690 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %10 NS 2S N-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 3S N+3 490 15 83.33
12 NS 3S S+2 660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a10 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,08 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67
14 NS 2T E = -90 6 33.33
15 NS 3S S-2 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.9 le HARDY de BEAULIEU Ghis-POULAERT Gilbert : 43,62 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 11 61.11
17 NS 4C E-1 50 4 22.22
18 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %19 NS 4C S+1 450 4 22.22
20 NS 2T E-1 100 8 44.44
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a12 BERGER Jean Marie -PIERRET Jean-François : 44,03 %22 NS 2P S+1 140 18 100.00
23 NS 3C W+1 -170 10 55.56
24 NS 4K N-5 -250 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,35 %25 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
26 NS 2C W-1 100 10 55.56
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.5 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,06 %28 NS 3S E-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 1C W+1 -110 17 94.44
30 NS 2S S+1 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 53,70 %31 NS 3P S+2 200 14 77.78
32 NS 6P E-1 100 17 94.44
33 NS 4PcN-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 282,0 / 540 = 52,22 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
a.5 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,06 % 1 NS 2T W = -90 11 61.11
2 NS 2C N+2 170 10 55.56
3 NS 3T S+1 130 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 VRANKEN Louis -KOSCIELNIAK JEAN : 52,06 % 7 NS 1S N+1 120 5 27.78
8 NS 2P W = -110 10 55.56
9 NS 5K W+2 -640 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a12 BERGER Jean Marie -PIERRET Jean-François : 44,03 %10 NS 3C S = 140 15 83.33
11 NS 3S N+3 490 15 83.33
12 NS 3S S+3 690 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a.1 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 16.67
14 NS 2T E-1 50 15 83.33
15 NS 4P N-2 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 11 61.11
17 NS 2P S+1 140 9 50.00
18 NS 1S N+2 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a10 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,08 %19 NS 4PcW-2 500 11 61.11
20 NS 2P S+1 140 15 83.33
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.9 le HARDY de BEAULIEU Ghis-POULAERT Gilbert : 43,62 %22 NS 3K N = 110 15 83.33
23 NS 4C W-1 100 15 83.33
24 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %25 NS 1S S = 90 8 44.44
26 NS 2P W = -110 1 5.56
27 NS 3K N+1 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,03 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67
29 NS 1S S-3 -300 4 22.22
30 NS 1S E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,35 %31 NS 4P S = 620 17 94.44
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22
33 NS 4K N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
Total : 305,0 / 540 = 56,48 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,03 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 6 33.33
2 NS 2C N+2 170 10 55.56
3 NS 2T N+1 110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,35 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 2 11.11
5 NS 4T E+1 -150 16 88.89
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 53,70 %10 NS 3C S-1 -100 5 27.78
11 NS 3S N+2 460 2 11.11
12 NS 3S S = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
a.3 VRANKEN Louis -KOSCIELNIAK JEAN : 52,06 %13 NS 3S W+1 -630 10 55.56
14 NS 2T E = -90 6 33.33
15 NS 4P N = 620 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.2 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 44,86 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 11 61.11
17 NS 4P E-1 50 4 22.22
18 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.1 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %19 NS 4C N+3 510 14 77.78
20 NS 2P S+1 140 15 83.33
21 NS 3C W+2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %22 NS 3C E = -140 5 27.78
23 NS 2C W+2 -170 10 55.56
24 NS 3P E-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a10 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,08 %25 NS 2P W = -110 1 5.56
26 NS 2S S-1 -100 4 22.22
27 NS 2S N = 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.9 le HARDY de BEAULIEU Ghis-POULAERT Gilbert : 43,62 %28 NS 3S E-1 50 15 83.33
29 NS 1C W+4 -200 6 33.33
30 NS 2C N-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a12 BERGER Jean Marie -PIERRET Jean-François : 44,03 %31 NS 2P S+2 170 9 50.00
32 NS 4P E = -620 9 50.00
33 NS 4P N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 257,0 / 540 = 47,59 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
a.9 le HARDY de BEAULIEU Ghis-POULAERT Gilbert : 43,62 % 1 NS 1S S-1 -50 14 77.78
2 NS 2K N+2 130 1 5.56
3 NS 2S S+1 150 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 % 4 NS 6P E-2 200 14 77.78
5 NS 3S E+1 -430 1 5.56
6 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,03 % 7 NS 1S N = 90 2 11.11
8 NS 4P E-1 50 15 83.33
9 NS 6S E-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.5 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,06 %13 NS 3S W = -600 14 77.78
14 NS 3T E-1 50 15 83.33
15 NS 3S S-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 53,70 %16 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
17 NS 3P S+1 170 13 72.22
18 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a12 BERGER Jean Marie -PIERRET Jean-François : 44,03 %19 NS 5K N+2 440 1 5.56
20 NS 3P S-1 -100 2 11.11
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.2 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 44,86 %22 NS 3C E+1 -170 0 0.00
23 NS 2C W+2 -170 10 55.56
24 NS 2K S-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.1 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %25 NS 2C E-1 100 14 77.78
26 NS 4C W-3 300 16 88.89
27 NS 2K N+1 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %28 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
29 NS 3C W+1 -170 8 44.44
30 NS 3K W = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a10 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,08 %31 NS 4P S = 620 17 94.44
32 NS 4C W-1 100 17 94.44
33 NS 2P N = 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 260,0 / 540 = 48,15 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 % 1 NS 3T W-1 50 16 88.89
2 NS 2C N+2 170 10 55.56
3 NS 3S S+1 430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a10 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,08 % 4 NS 6T W+1 -1390 0 0.00
5 NS 5T E = -400 8 44.44
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a12 BERGER Jean Marie -PIERRET Jean-François : 44,03 % 7 NS 1S N+3 180 16 88.89
8 NS 2P E = -110 10 55.56
9 NS 3S W+2 -660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %10 NS 2C S+1 140 15 83.33
11 NS 4P S+2 480 8 44.44
12 NS 3S S+3 690 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,35 %16 NS 3P S+2 200 4 22.22
17 NS 3PcS+1 630 16 88.89
18 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.5 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,06 %19 NS 6C S+1 1010 18 100.00
20 NS 3P N = 140 15 83.33
21 NS 2P S = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 53,70 %22 NS 4C E-1 100 12 66.67
23 NS 4C W-2 200 18 100.00
24 NS 2C W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.3 VRANKEN Louis -KOSCIELNIAK JEAN : 52,06 %25 NS 2P W = -110 1 5.56
26 NS 3CcW-2 500 18 100.00
27 NS 3K N+1 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.2 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 44,86 %28 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
29 NS 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
30 NS 1S W = -90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.1 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22
33 NS 3P N = 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
Total : 350,0 / 540 = 64,81 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
a.2 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 44,86 % 1 NS 2T W = -90 11 61.11
2 NS 2C N+2 170 10 55.56
3 NS 5T N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.1 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 % 4 NS 4P E = -620 4 22.22
5 NS 4T E+1 -150 16 88.89
6 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 % 7 NS 3K E-3 300 18 100.00
8 NS 3C N = 140 18 100.00
9 NS 5K E+2 -640 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 92,59 %
a10 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,08 %10 NS 2C S+1 140 15 83.33
11 NS 3S N+3 490 15 83.33
12 NS 3S N+1 630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.9 le HARDY de BEAULIEU Ghis-POULAERT Gilbert : 43,62 %13 NS 1S W+2 -150 16 88.89
14 NS 2T E = -90 6 33.33
15 NS 3S N-2 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,03 %19 NS 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
20 NS 3P S = 140 15 83.33
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,35 %22 NS 3C E = -140 5 27.78
23 NS 4C W = -620 5 27.78
24 NS 2P E+1 -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.5 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,06 %25 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 22.22
26 NS 1S E-1 100 10 55.56
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a12 BERGER Jean Marie -PIERRET Jean-François : 44,03 %28 NS 3S E-2 100 18 100.00
29 NS 1C W+2 -140 12 66.67
30 NS 2T S+1 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.3 VRANKEN Louis -KOSCIELNIAK JEAN : 52,06 %31 NS 4P S-1 -100 3 16.67
32 NS 4T S-1 -50 14 77.78
33 NS 3P S = 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 294,0 / 540 = 54,44 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 53,70 % 1 NS 3S W-4 200 18 100.00
2 NS 2C S+2 170 10 55.56
3 NS 3S S+1 430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.3 VRANKEN Louis -KOSCIELNIAK JEAN : 52,06 % 4 NS 6PcE-2 500 18 100.00
5 NS 3S W+1 -430 1 5.56
6 NS 4P W+2 -680 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.2 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 44,86 % 7 NS 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
8 NS 4P E-1 50 15 83.33
9 NS 3S E+3 -690 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.1 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %10 NS 2S N-1 -100 5 27.78
11 NS 3S N+2 460 2 11.11
12 NS 5T S+1 620 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %13 NS 6K E-1 100 18 100.00
14 NS 2T E-1 50 15 83.33
15 NS 3S S-2 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a12 BERGER Jean Marie -PIERRET Jean-François : 44,03 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 11 61.11
17 NS 1P S+2 140 9 50.00
18 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %22 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 1 5.56
24 NS 2C W-3 150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,03 %25 NS 2P W-1 100 14 77.78
26 NS 2C W-1 100 10 55.56
27 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,35 %28 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00
29 NS 1C W+2 -140 12 66.67
30 NS 2T S = 90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.5 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,06 %31 NS 5P S-1 -100 3 16.67
32 NS 4P E+1 -650 4 22.22
33 NS 4CcS-1 -100 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,35 % 1 NS 3T W+1 -130 2 11.11
2 NS 2C N+2 170 10 55.56
3 NS 3S N+1 430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a12 BERGER Jean Marie -PIERRET Jean-François : 44,03 % 4 NS 6S W-1 100 10 55.56
5 NS 3T E+3 -170 12 66.67
6 NS 3S W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 53,70 % 7 NS 1S S+1 120 5 27.78
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67
9 NS 6K E = -1370 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.3 VRANKEN Louis -KOSCIELNIAK JEAN : 52,06 %10 NS 4C S-1 -100 5 27.78
11 NS 3S N+2 460 2 11.11
12 NS 3S S+2 660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.2 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 44,86 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 10 55.56
14 NS 2T E = -90 6 33.33
15 NS 5TcW-2 300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.1 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %16 NS 4P S+1 450 11 61.11
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 3S N-1 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %19 NS 5K N+2 440 1 5.56
20 NS 2T E-1 100 8 44.44
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.9 le HARDY de BEAULIEU Ghis-POULAERT Gilbert : 43,62 %25 NS 1ScS = 180 18 100.00
26 NS 2C W-1 100 10 55.56
27 NS 3S N+1 430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %28 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 16.67
29 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00
30 NS 2P S-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,03 %31 NS 2C S-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 3C W = -140 12 66.67
33 NS 4C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 224,0 / 540 = 41,48 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 COOLEN Joseph -PETITJEAN Christian
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 6 33.33
2 NS 2CcN+2 1070 18 100.00
3 NS 3S N+1 430 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,03 % 4 NS 6P E-2 200 14 77.78
5 NS 5T E = -400 8 44.44
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,35 % 7 NS 2C S+2 170 14 77.78
8 NS 2P E = -110 10 55.56
9 NS 6K E+1 -1390 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.5 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,06 %10 NS 3C S-1 -100 5 27.78
11 NS 4P S+2 480 8 44.44
12 NS 3S S+2 660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 53,70 %13 NS 3S W+2 -660 3 16.67
14 NS 2T E-1 50 15 83.33
15 NS 4P N-2 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.3 VRANKEN Louis -KOSCIELNIAK JEAN : 52,06 %16 NS 3P S+1 170 2 11.11
17 NS 3P S+1 170 13 72.22
18 NS 3S N-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.2 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 44,86 %19 NS 5PcW-3 800 16 88.89
20 NS 3T E-1 100 8 44.44
21 NS 4C W = -420 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.1 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques : 51,85 %22 NS 3P S-1 -50 10 55.56
23 NS 4C W-1 100 15 83.33
24 NS 3S S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a10 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,08 %28 NS 3S E = -400 9 50.00
29 NS 3S E = -600 2 11.11
30 NS 3T S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.9 le HARDY de BEAULIEU Ghis-POULAERT Gilbert : 43,62 %31 NS 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 NS 4PcE = -790 0 0.00
33 NS 2K N+1 110 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 277,0 / 540 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne
a10 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,08 % 1 NS 3T W = -110 6 33.33
2 NS 2K N+2 130 1 5.56
3 NS 5T N-1 -50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.9 le HARDY de BEAULIEU Ghis-POULAERT Gilbert : 43,62 % 4 NS 2P E+3 -200 6 33.33
5 NS 5T E = -400 8 44.44
6 NS 3S E+1 -630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 % 7 NS 1S N+2 150 10 55.56
8 NS 2P E+1 -140 3 16.67
9 NS 5K E+2 -640 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,03 %10 NS 3C S = 140 15 83.33
11 NS 4P S+2 480 8 44.44
12 NS 3S S+2 660 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a12 BERGER Jean Marie -PIERRET Jean-François : 44,03 %13 NS 3S E+2 -660 3 16.67
14 NS 2S E = -120 0 0.00
15 NS 4P N-2 -200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.5 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,06 %16 NS 4PcS+1 690 18 100.00
17 NS 4PcS+1 690 18 100.00
18 NS 1S N+1 120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 53,70 %19 NS 4C S+2 480 7 38.89
20 NS 1S N-1 -100 2 11.11
21 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
a.3 VRANKEN Louis -KOSCIELNIAK JEAN : 52,06 %22 NS 2C E+1 -140 5 27.78
23 NS 4C W+1 -650 1 5.56
24 NS 2P E = -110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.2 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 44,86 %25 NS 2P W-1 100 14 77.78
26 NS 2C W = -110 1 5.56
27 NS 3K N+1 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 45,00 %31 NS 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
32 NS 4P W = -620 9 50.00
33 NS 4K N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 235,0 / 540 = 43,52 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 -
a12 BERGER Jean Marie -PIERRET Jean-François : 44,03 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 45,06 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 le HARDY de BEAULIEU Ghis-POULAERT Gilbert : 43,62 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 44,86 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc : 55,35 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie : 60,08 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 VRANKEN Louis -KOSCIELNIAK JEAN : 52,06 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 51,03 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent : 53,70 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 53,70 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 COLLIN Jean-Marie -DELHEZ Jacques
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 39,07 % 1 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 100.00
2 EO 2C S+2 170 8 44.44
3 EO 3S N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 54,44 % 4 EO 4P E = -620 14 77.78
5 EO 4T E+1 -150 2 11.11
6 EO 3S E+3 -690 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.2 MOLS Bruno -CLUYTENS : 52,22 % 7 EO 2S N+1 150 8 44.44
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33
9 EO 3S E+3 -690 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,93 %10 EO 2S N-1 -100 13 72.22
11 EO 3S N+2 460 16 88.89
12 EO 5T S+1 620 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,48 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 83.33
14 EO 2T E-1 50 3 16.67
15 EO 4P N-2 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 41,48 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 7 38.89
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 100.00
18 EO 3S N-1 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.4 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 47,59 %19 EO 4C N+3 510 4 22.22
20 EO 2P S+1 140 3 16.67
21 EO 3C W+2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PETITJEAN Christian : 51,30 %22 EO 3P S-1 -50 8 44.44
23 EO 4C W-1 100 3 16.67
24 EO 3S S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,15 %25 EO 2C E-1 100 4 22.22
26 EO 4C W-3 300 2 11.11
27 EO 2K N+1 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,81 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78
33 EO 3P N = 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
Total : 280,0 / 540 = 51,85 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
A.7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 54,44 % 1 EO 2T W = -90 7 38.89
2 EO 2C N+2 170 8 44.44
3 EO 5T N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.2 MOLS Bruno -CLUYTENS : 52,22 % 4 EO 6P E-2 200 4 22.22
5 EO 4T W+1 -150 2 11.11
6 EO 3T W+3 -170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,93 % 7 EO 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
8 EO 4P E-1 50 3 16.67
9 EO 3S E+3 -690 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 41,48 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
14 EO 2T E = -90 12 66.67
15 EO 5TcW-2 300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.4 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 47,59 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 7 38.89
17 EO 4P E-1 50 14 77.78
18 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PETITJEAN Christian : 51,30 %19 EO 5PcW-3 800 2 11.11
20 EO 3T E-1 100 10 55.56
21 EO 4C W = -420 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,15 %22 EO 3C E+1 -170 18 100.00
23 EO 2C W+2 -170 8 44.44
24 EO 2K S-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 43,52 %25 EO 2P W-1 100 4 22.22
26 EO 2C W = -110 17 94.44
27 EO 3K N+1 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,81 %28 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
29 EO 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
30 EO 1S W = -90 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 218,0 / 486 = 44,86 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 VRANKEN Louis -KOSCIELNIAK JEAN
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,93 % 4 EO 6PcE-2 500 0 0.00
5 EO 3S W+1 -430 17 94.44
6 EO 4P W+2 -680 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,48 % 7 EO 1S N+1 120 13 72.22
8 EO 2P W = -110 8 44.44
9 EO 5K W+2 -640 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 41,48 %10 EO 4C S-1 -100 13 72.22
11 EO 3S N+2 460 16 88.89
12 EO 3S S+2 660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.4 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 47,59 %13 EO 3S W+1 -630 8 44.44
14 EO 2T E = -90 12 66.67
15 EO 4P N = 620 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PETITJEAN Christian : 51,30 %16 EO 3P S+1 170 16 88.89
17 EO 3P S+1 170 5 27.78
18 EO 3S N-2 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 43,52 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 72.22
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 17 94.44
24 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,81 %25 EO 2P W = -110 17 94.44
26 EO 3CcW-2 500 0 0.00
27 EO 3K N+1 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 39,07 %28 EO 3S W = -400 9 50.00
29 EO 2C W = -110 1 5.56
30 EO 4T S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 54,44 %31 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 83.33
32 EO 4T S-1 -50 4 22.22
33 EO 3P S = 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 253,0 / 486 = 52,06 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 JANSSENS Pierre -LIBERT Laurent
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,93 % 1 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00
2 EO 2C S+2 170 8 44.44
3 EO 3S S+1 430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 41,48 % 7 EO 1S S+1 120 13 72.22
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33
9 EO 6K E = -1370 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.4 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 47,59 %10 EO 3C S-1 -100 13 72.22
11 EO 3S N+2 460 16 88.89
12 EO 3S S = 600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PETITJEAN Christian : 51,30 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33
14 EO 2T E-1 50 3 16.67
15 EO 4P N-2 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,15 %16 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 100.00
17 EO 3P S+1 170 5 27.78
18 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 43,52 %19 EO 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
20 EO 1S N-1 -100 16 88.89
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,81 %22 EO 4C E-1 100 6 33.33
23 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
24 EO 2C W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 39,07 %25 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
26 EO 2C W-1 100 8 44.44
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 MOLS Bruno -CLUYTENS : 52,22 %31 EO 3P S+2 200 4 22.22
32 EO 6P E-1 100 1 5.56
33 EO 4PcN-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 261,0 / 486 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,48 % 1 EO 2T W = -90 7 38.89
2 EO 2C N+2 170 8 44.44
3 EO 3T S+1 130 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PETITJEAN Christian : 51,30 %10 EO 3C S-1 -100 13 72.22
11 EO 4P S+2 480 10 55.56
12 EO 3S S+2 660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,15 %13 EO 3S W = -600 4 22.22
14 EO 3T E-1 50 3 16.67
15 EO 3S S-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 43,52 %16 EO 4PcS+1 690 0 0.00
17 EO 4PcS+1 690 0 0.00
18 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,81 %19 EO 6C S+1 1010 0 0.00
20 EO 3P N = 140 3 16.67
21 EO 2P S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 5,56 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 39,07 %22 EO 2C E+1 -140 13 72.22
23 EO 4C W = -620 13 72.22
24 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 54,44 %25 EO 1S S-1 -50 14 77.78
26 EO 1S E-1 100 8 44.44
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.2 MOLS Bruno -CLUYTENS : 52,22 %28 EO 3S E-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 1C W+1 -110 1 5.56
30 EO 2S S+1 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,93 %31 EO 5P S-1 -100 15 83.33
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78
33 EO 4CcS-1 -100 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
Total : 219,0 / 486 = 45,06 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -MATELART Marc
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 41,48 % 1 EO 3T W+1 -130 16 88.89
2 EO 2C N+2 170 8 44.44
3 EO 3S N+1 430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 47,59 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 16 88.89
5 EO 4T E+1 -150 2 11.11
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PETITJEAN Christian : 51,30 % 7 EO 2C S+2 170 4 22.22
8 EO 2P E = -110 8 44.44
9 EO 6K E+1 -1390 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,81 %16 EO 3P S+2 200 14 77.78
17 EO 3PcS+1 630 2 11.11
18 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 39,07 %19 EO 4PcW-2 500 7 38.89
20 EO 3K N-1 -100 16 88.89
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 54,44 %22 EO 3C E = -140 13 72.22
23 EO 4C W = -620 13 72.22
24 EO 2P E+1 -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.2 MOLS Bruno -CLUYTENS : 52,22 %25 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
26 EO 2C W-1 100 8 44.44
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,93 %28 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 100.00
29 EO 1C W+2 -140 6 33.33
30 EO 2T S = 90 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,48 %31 EO 4P S = 620 1 5.56
32 EO 4P E+1 -650 14 77.78
33 EO 4K N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
Total : 269,0 / 486 = 55,35 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
A.4 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 47,59 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 12 66.67
2 EO 2C N+2 170 8 44.44
3 EO 2T N+1 110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PETITJEAN Christian : 51,30 % 4 EO 6P E-2 200 4 22.22
5 EO 5T E = -400 10 55.56
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,15 % 7 EO 1S N = 90 16 88.89
8 EO 4P E-1 50 3 16.67
9 EO 6S E-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 43,52 %10 EO 3C S = 140 3 16.67
11 EO 4P S+2 480 10 55.56
12 EO 3S S+2 660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 39,07 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 7 38.89
17 EO 4T E-1 50 14 77.78
18 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 54,44 %19 EO 4C S+2 480 11 61.11
20 EO 3P S = 140 3 16.67
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,93 %25 EO 2P W-1 100 4 22.22
26 EO 2C W-1 100 8 44.44
27 EO 3S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,48 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33
29 EO 1S S-3 -300 14 77.78
30 EO 1S E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 41,48 %31 EO 2C S-2 -200 18 100.00
32 EO 3C W = -140 6 33.33
33 EO 4C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 248,0 / 486 = 51,03 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PETITJEAN Christian : 51,30 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 12 66.67
2 EO 2CcN+2 1070 0 0.00
3 EO 3S N+1 430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,15 % 4 EO 6P E-2 200 4 22.22
5 EO 3S E+1 -430 17 94.44
6 EO 3S E+3 -690 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 43,52 % 7 EO 1S N+2 150 8 44.44
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33
9 EO 5K E+2 -640 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,81 %10 EO 2C S+1 140 3 16.67
11 EO 4P S+2 480 10 55.56
12 EO 3S S+3 690 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 39,07 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 8 44.44
14 EO 2T E = -90 12 66.67
15 EO 4P N-2 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.2 MOLS Bruno -CLUYTENS : 52,22 %19 EO 4C S+1 450 14 77.78
20 EO 2T E-1 100 10 55.56
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,93 %22 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67
23 EO 4C W+1 -650 17 94.44
24 EO 2C W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,48 %25 EO 1S S = 90 10 55.56
26 EO 2P W = -110 17 94.44
27 EO 3K N+1 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 41,48 %28 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 83.33
29 EO 4P E = -620 18 100.00
30 EO 2P S-3 -150 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
A12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 261,0 / 486 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 le HARDY de BEAULIEU Ghis-POULAERT Gilbert
A.5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,15 % 1 EO 1S S-1 -50 4 22.22
2 EO 2K N+2 130 17 94.44
3 EO 2S S+1 150 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 43,52 % 4 EO 2P E+3 -200 12 66.67
5 EO 5T E = -400 10 55.56
6 EO 3S E+1 -630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 39,07 %10 EO 2C S = 110 8 44.44
11 EO 3S N+3 490 3 16.67
12 EO 3S S+2 660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 54,44 %13 EO 1S W+2 -150 2 11.11
14 EO 2T E = -90 12 66.67
15 EO 3S N-2 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.2 MOLS Bruno -CLUYTENS : 52,22 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 7 38.89
17 EO 4C E-1 50 14 77.78
18 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,48 %22 EO 3K N = 110 3 16.67
23 EO 4C W-1 100 3 16.67
24 EO 2P E = -110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 41,48 %25 EO 1ScS = 180 0 0.00
26 EO 2C W-1 100 8 44.44
27 EO 3S N+1 430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.4 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 47,59 %28 EO 3S E-1 50 3 16.67
29 EO 1C W+4 -200 12 66.67
30 EO 2C N-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PETITJEAN Christian : 51,30 %31 EO 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
32 EO 4PcE = -790 18 100.00
33 EO 2K N+1 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 212,0 / 486 = 43,62 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 LAMBEAUX Guy -GOBBE Amélie
A11 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 43,52 % 1 EO 3T W = -110 12 66.67
2 EO 2K N+2 130 17 94.44
3 EO 5T N-1 -50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,81 % 4 EO 6T W+1 -1390 18 100.00
5 EO 5T E = -400 10 55.56
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 39,07 % 7 EO 1S N-1 -100 18 100.00
8 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 83.33
9 EO 6S E = -1440 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 94,44 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 54,44 %10 EO 2C S+1 140 3 16.67
11 EO 3S N+3 490 3 16.67
12 EO 3S N+1 630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.2 MOLS Bruno -CLUYTENS : 52,22 %13 EO 3S W+2 -660 15 83.33
14 EO 2T E = -90 12 66.67
15 EO 3S S-2 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,48 %19 EO 4PcW-2 500 7 38.89
20 EO 2P S+1 140 3 16.67
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.4 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 47,59 %25 EO 2P W = -110 17 94.44
26 EO 2S S-1 -100 14 77.78
27 EO 2S N = 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A10 COOLEN Joseph -PETITJEAN Christian : 51,30 %28 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
29 EO 3S E = -600 16 88.89
30 EO 3T S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,15 %31 EO 4P S = 620 1 5.56
32 EO 4C W-1 100 1 5.56
33 EO 2P N = 110 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 292,0 / 486 = 60,08 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,81 % 1 EO 3T W-1 50 2 11.11
2 EO 2C N+2 170 8 44.44
3 EO 3S S+1 430 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 39,07 % 4 EO 3P E+1 -170 10 55.56
5 EO 5T E+1 -420 14 77.78
6 EO 3S E+3 -690 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 54,44 % 7 EO 3K E-3 300 0 0.00
8 EO 3C N = 140 0 0.00
9 EO 5K E+2 -640 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 7,41 %
A.2 MOLS Bruno -CLUYTENS : 52,22 %10 EO 2S N-2 -200 18 100.00
11 EO 3S N+3 490 3 16.67
12 EO 3S S+2 660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,93 %13 EO 6K E-1 100 0 0.00
14 EO 2T E-1 50 3 16.67
15 EO 3S S-2 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,48 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 7 38.89
17 EO 2P S+1 140 9 50.00
18 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 41,48 %19 EO 5K N+2 440 17 94.44
20 EO 2T E-1 100 10 55.56
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
A.4 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 47,59 %22 EO 3C E = -140 13 72.22
23 EO 2C W+2 -170 8 44.44
24 EO 3P E-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,15 %28 EO 3S E = -400 9 50.00
29 EO 3C W+1 -170 10 55.56
30 EO 3K W = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 43,52 %31 EO 3P S+1 170 9 50.00
32 EO 4P W = -620 9 50.00
33 EO 4K N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 243,0 / 540 = 45,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 BERGER Jean Marie -PIERRET Jean-François
A12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 41,48 % 4 EO 6S W-1 100 8 44.44
5 EO 3T E+3 -170 6 33.33
6 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.6 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,81 % 7 EO 1S N+3 180 2 11.11
8 EO 2P E = -110 8 44.44
9 EO 3S W+2 -660 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 56,48 %10 EO 3C S = 140 3 16.67
11 EO 3S N+3 490 3 16.67
12 EO 3S S+3 690 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A11 CAMUS Colette -BEYNE Anne : 43,52 %13 EO 3S E+2 -660 15 83.33
14 EO 2S E = -120 18 100.00
15 EO 4P N-2 -200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.8 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,93 %16 EO 4P S+1 450 7 38.89
17 EO 1P S+2 140 9 50.00
18 EO 1S N+1 120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.5 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 48,15 %19 EO 5K N+2 440 17 94.44
20 EO 3P S-1 -100 16 88.89
21 EO 4C W+1 -450 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.2 MOLS Bruno -CLUYTENS : 52,22 %22 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00
23 EO 3C W+1 -170 8 44.44
24 EO 4K N-5 -250 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.7 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 54,44 %28 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00
29 EO 1C W+2 -140 6 33.33
30 EO 2T S+1 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
A.4 BRIOT Fernand -HUBLET Carlo : 47,59 %31 EO 2P S+2 170 9 50.00
32 EO 4P E = -620 9 50.00
33 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 214,0 / 486 = 44,03 %
|
|