|
Tournoi du 29-08-16
Lundi
1 60,37 A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
2 57,04 A10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
3 53,89 A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
4 50,93 A.6 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 49,26 A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
6 47,41 A.5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
7 47,22 A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
8 47,04 A.8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
9 43,89 A.3 LEBRUN Robert -COURTOIS Patrick
10 42,96 A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 57,96 a.3 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
2 55,93 a.4 PANIS Guy -CASSART Guy
3 53,70 a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
4 52,96 a10 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele
5 50,37 a.2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
6 49,26 a.1 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
7 48,89 a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
8 45,74 a.5 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
9 43,15 a.9 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
10 42,04 a.8 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
PAIRE Nr : A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
a.1 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,26 % 1 NS 3C N+1 170 18 100.00
2 NS 4P E-3 150 18 100.00
3 NS 1S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a.3 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,96 % 4 NS 3P E-2 200 16 88.89
5 NS 1S E-1 50 7 38.89
6 NS 3S N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,37 % 7 NS 4K N-1 -100 13 72.22
8 NS 3T W-2 100 13 72.22
9 NS 4P S+1 450 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,89 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 6 33.33
11 NS 4PcW = -590 1 5.56
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,70 %13 NS 5P E = -650 1 5.56
14 NS 2P N+1 140 12 66.67
15 NS 3S W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.8 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,04 %16 NS 4T N-2 -100 12 66.67
17 NS 2S W-3 150 18 100.00
18 NS 2C N-3 -300 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.9 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,15 %19 NS 4C E-4 400 18 100.00
20 NS 3S E-5 500 18 100.00
21 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a10 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 52,96 %22 NS 4C E-2 200 13 72.22
23 NS 3C N+1 170 6 33.33
24 NS 2P S+2 170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.4 PANIS Guy -CASSART Guy : 55,93 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11
27 NS 6P E = -980 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.5 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,74 %28 NS 4PcE-1 100 12 66.67
29 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 1S N+2 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
Total : 291,0 / 540 = 53,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
a.3 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,96 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 4P E-2 100 14 77.78
3 NS 2S W-1 100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,37 % 4 NS 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00
5 NS 1S W = -90 1 5.56
6 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,26 % 7 NS 2C E = -110 10 55.56
8 NS 2S N = 120 18 100.00
9 NS 3T N-3 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a10 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 52,96 %10 NS 4C N+1 650 16 88.89
11 NS 4PcW = -590 1 5.56
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.4 PANIS Guy -CASSART Guy : 55,93 %13 NS 5CcN-1 -200 8 44.44
14 NS 2P N+1 140 12 66.67
15 NS 3S W = -400 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,74 %16 NS 2T N = 90 17 94.44
17 NS 2S W+1 -150 5 27.78
18 NS 2K E = -90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,89 %19 NS 4TcN-1 -100 2 11.11
20 NS 2C E-1 100 2 11.11
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,70 %22 NS 4C W-1 100 5 27.78
23 NS 3C N+1 170 6 33.33
24 NS 2P S+3 200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.8 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,04 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11
27 NS 6P E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,15 %28 NS 4C N = 620 17 94.44
29 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 255,0 / 540 = 47,22 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 LEBRUN Robert -COURTOIS Patrick
a.2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,37 % 1 NS 4C N-2 -100 2 11.11
2 NS 4C W = -420 2 11.11
3 NS 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,26 % 4 NS 2P E = -110 5 27.78
5 NS 1S W-1 50 7 38.89
6 NS 2K N+2 130 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.3 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,96 % 7 NS 3C W = -140 7 38.89
8 NS 2P N-2 -100 0 0.00
9 NS 3S S-3 -150 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.8 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,04 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 6 33.33
11 NS 4P W = -420 5 27.78
12 NS 3T S+1 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.9 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,15 %13 NS 4P E = -620 4 22.22
14 NS 2P N = 110 6 33.33
15 NS 3S W-2 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a10 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 52,96 %16 NS 3T N-1 -50 14 77.78
17 NS 2S W-1 50 11 61.11
18 NS 1S W+1 -120 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.4 PANIS Guy -CASSART Guy : 55,93 %19 NS 3S E-1 100 12 66.67
20 NS 2CcW-1 200 7 38.89
21 NS 3S E = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.5 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,74 %22 NS 3K E-3 300 18 100.00
23 NS 2C N+2 170 6 33.33
24 NS 3P N = 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,89 %25 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89
26 NS 2C W-2 200 15 83.33
27 NS 7S W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,70 %28 NS 2PcE = -470 1 5.56
29 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 2S N-2 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 237,0 / 540 = 43,89 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,70 % 1 NS 2C N+1 140 15 83.33
2 NS 4P E-1 50 9 50.00
3 NS 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,89 % 4 NS 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00
5 NS 1S W-1 50 7 38.89
6 NS 2S S+1 150 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,74 % 7 NS 2C W+1 -140 7 38.89
8 NS 1K N+1 90 7 38.89
9 NS 1P N+1 110 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.4 PANIS Guy -CASSART Guy : 55,93 %10 NS 3C N+1 170 6 33.33
11 NS 5PcW-1 100 16 88.89
12 NS 2K W+1 -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a10 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 52,96 %13 NS 5P E = -650 1 5.56
14 NS 1S E = -90 0 0.00
15 NS 2S E = -120 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
a.9 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,15 %16 NS 2T N = 90 17 94.44
17 NS 1K W = -70 8 44.44
18 NS 2K E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.8 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,04 %19 NS 2P S-1 -50 5 27.78
20 NS 2C E-3 300 13 72.22
21 NS 3S W = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.3 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,96 %22 NS 4C W-2 200 13 72.22
23 NS 3C N = 140 1 5.56
24 NS 2P S+3 200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,37 %25 NS 3C N = 140 16 88.89
26 NS 2C E-2 200 15 83.33
27 NS 6S E = -990 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,26 %28 NS 2P E-1 50 9 50.00
29 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
a.8 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,04 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 4P E-2 100 14 77.78
3 NS 2C S-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,70 % 4 NS 3P E-2 200 16 88.89
5 NS 3K S+1 130 13 72.22
6 NS 3K N = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,89 % 7 NS 3C E-1 100 17 94.44
8 NS 3T W-2 100 13 72.22
9 NS 3K S-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,26 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 6 33.33
11 NS 5CcS-1 -100 8 44.44
12 NS 3S N+1 630 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.5 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,74 %13 NS 6PcE-1 200 16 88.89
14 NS 3K E-1 50 3 16.67
15 NS 3S W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.4 PANIS Guy -CASSART Guy : 55,93 %16 NS 5TcN-4 -800 0 0.00
17 NS 2S W+1 -150 5 27.78
18 NS 2P W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a10 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 52,96 %19 NS 1S N-5 -250 0 0.00
20 NS 2P S+3 200 7 38.89
21 NS 3S E = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.9 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,15 %22 NS 4C W-1 100 5 27.78
23 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
24 NS 2P S+3 200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.3 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,96 %25 NS 4C N-3 -150 0 0.00
26 NS 2C E-2 200 15 83.33
27 NS 6P E = -980 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,37 %28 NS 4T S-1 -100 5 27.78
29 NS 4P S-1 -100 1 5.56
30 NS 2C S = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 256,0 / 540 = 47,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard
a.9 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,15 % 1 NS 3C N-2 -100 2 11.11
2 NS 4C W = -420 2 11.11
3 NS 2C S = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.8 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,04 % 4 NS 2P W = -110 5 27.78
5 NS 3K S+2 150 16 88.89
6 NS 3S S = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,70 % 7 NS 3T S-1 -100 13 72.22
8 NS 2TcW-1 100 13 72.22
9 NS 4P S = 420 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,37 %10 NS 3T E-1 100 0 0.00
11 NS 4C N = 420 18 100.00
12 NS 3S S = 600 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,26 %13 NS 5CcS-1 -200 8 44.44
14 NS 3K E-1 50 3 16.67
15 NS 1S W+3 -180 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,89 %16 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 27.78
17 NS 3S W-2 100 15 83.33
18 NS 2K E-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.5 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,74 %19 NS 1S N-1 -50 5 27.78
20 NS 3C E-4 400 16 88.89
21 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.4 PANIS Guy -CASSART Guy : 55,93 %22 NS 3C W = -140 0 0.00
23 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
24 NS 3P S+2 200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a10 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 52,96 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 2C E-1 100 7 38.89
27 NS 6S W-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.3 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,96 %28 NS 4PcE-2 300 14 77.78
29 NS 5P S-1 -100 1 5.56
30 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 275,0 / 540 = 50,93 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
a10 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 52,96 % 1 NS 2C N = 110 12 66.67
2 NS 4P E-1 50 9 50.00
3 NS 1S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.9 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,15 % 4 NS 2P E-1 100 12 66.67
5 NS 1S W-1 50 7 38.89
6 NS 3S S+1 430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.8 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,04 % 7 NS 3C E-1 100 17 94.44
8 NS 1K N-1 -50 2 11.11
9 NS 2P S+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.3 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,96 %10 NS 4C N = 620 13 72.22
11 NS 5P W-1 50 13 72.22
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,37 %13 NS 5P E-1 100 12 66.67
14 NS 2P N+1 140 12 66.67
15 NS 1S W-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,26 %16 NS 4T N-3 -150 8 44.44
17 NS 3K E-2 100 15 83.33
18 NS 2T S = 90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,70 %19 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00
20 NS 3P N+2 200 7 38.89
21 NS 3S W+2 -460 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,89 %22 NS 4C W-2 200 13 72.22
23 NS 4C N = 620 14 77.78
24 NS 4P S+1 450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.5 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,74 %25 NS 2C N+1 140 16 88.89
26 NS 3K N = 110 10 55.56
27 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.4 PANIS Guy -CASSART Guy : 55,93 %28 NS 4P W-1 50 9 50.00
29 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 1S N+1 120 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
Total : 326,0 / 540 = 60,37 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
a.4 PANIS Guy -CASSART Guy : 55,93 % 1 NS 3C N = 140 15 83.33
2 NS 4P E-2 100 14 77.78
3 NS 1S N-1 -50 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a10 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 52,96 % 4 NS 2P E-2 200 16 88.89
5 NS 2K N+2 130 13 72.22
6 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
a.9 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,15 % 7 NS 4KcN-1 -200 3 16.67
8 NS 1K N+1 90 7 38.89
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.5 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,74 %10 NS 2C N+2 170 6 33.33
11 NS 5P W-1 50 13 72.22
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.3 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,96 %13 NS 5CcN-1 -200 8 44.44
14 NS 2P N+1 140 12 66.67
15 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,37 %16 NS 3C W+1 -170 5 27.78
17 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00
18 NS 2K E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,26 %19 NS 1S N+2 150 16 88.89
20 NS 3P S+2 200 7 38.89
21 NS 3S W = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.8 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,04 %22 NS 3T E-1 100 5 27.78
23 NS 4C N+1 650 18 100.00
24 NS 3P S+2 200 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,70 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 2C E = -110 2 11.11
27 NS 6P E = -980 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,89 %28 NS 2PcE = -470 1 5.56
29 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 1S N = 90 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
Total : 254,0 / 540 = 47,04 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
a.5 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,74 % 1 NS 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
2 NS 3P E = -140 6 33.33
3 NS 1S N = 90 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.4 PANIS Guy -CASSART Guy : 55,93 % 4 NS 3C N-2 -200 1 5.56
5 NS 1S W = -90 1 5.56
6 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a10 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 52,96 % 7 NS 5KcN-2 -500 0 0.00
8 NS 1K N = 70 4 22.22
9 NS 4P N-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,70 %10 NS 4C N = 620 13 72.22
11 NS 4P W = -420 5 27.78
12 NS 3T S+1 130 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,89 %13 NS 5PcE-1 200 16 88.89
14 NS 3P N = 140 12 66.67
15 NS 1S E+3 -180 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.3 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,96 %16 NS 3C E+2 -200 2 11.11
17 NS 2S W+2 -180 2 11.11
18 NS 2K E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,37 %19 NS 1S N = 90 9 50.00
20 NS 1S E+1 -120 0 0.00
21 NS 3S W = -400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,26 %22 NS 2K E-1 100 5 27.78
23 NS 3C N+2 200 10 55.56
24 NS 2P N+2 170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.9 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,15 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 2C E-2 200 15 83.33
27 NS 4P E+2 -480 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.8 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,04 %28 NS 4C N-1 -100 5 27.78
29 NS 4P S = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 1S N+2 150 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 232,0 / 540 = 42,96 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 48,89 % 1 NS 4C N-2 -100 2 11.11
2 NS 4C E = -420 2 11.11
3 NS 2P N+1 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 45,74 % 4 NS 3C N-2 -200 1 5.56
5 NS 2K N+4 170 18 100.00
6 NS 3S N+1 430 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.4 PANIS Guy -CASSART Guy : 55,93 % 7 NS 5K N-2 -200 3 16.67
8 NS 2TcE-1 100 13 72.22
9 NS 4P N-2 -100 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.9 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,15 %10 NS 4CcN = 790 18 100.00
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
12 NS 4P N-1 -100 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.8 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 42,04 %13 NS 6PcE-1 200 16 88.89
14 NS 2P N+2 170 18 100.00
15 NS 3S E-1 50 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 53,70 %16 NS 3C E = -140 10 55.56
17 NS 2S E-1 50 11 61.11
18 NS 2ScN-2 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.3 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 57,96 %19 NS 2T N+1 110 14 77.78
20 NS 2C E-3 300 13 72.22
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 50,37 %22 NS 4C E-2 200 13 72.22
23 NS 3C N = 140 1 5.56
24 NS 4P N+1 450 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a.1 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 49,26 %25 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 38.89
26 NS 2C E-1 100 7 38.89
27 NS 4P E+1 -450 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a10 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele : 52,96 %28 NS 4C N = 620 17 94.44
29 NS 4P N = 620 11 61.11
30 NS 2P N+1 140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 308,0 / 540 = 57,04 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,89 % 1 EO 3C N+1 170 0 0.00
2 EO 4P E-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 1S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,89 % 4 EO 2P E = -110 13 72.22
5 EO 1S W-1 50 11 61.11
6 EO 2K N+2 130 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,22 % 7 EO 2C E = -110 8 44.44
8 EO 2S N = 120 0 0.00
9 EO 3T N-3 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,41 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 12 66.67
11 EO 5CcS-1 -100 10 55.56
12 EO 3S N+1 630 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.6 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,93 %13 EO 5CcS-1 -200 10 55.56
14 EO 3K E-1 50 15 83.33
15 EO 1S W+3 -180 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,37 %16 EO 4T N-3 -150 10 55.56
17 EO 3K E-2 100 3 16.67
18 EO 2T S = 90 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %19 EO 1S N+2 150 2 11.11
20 EO 3P S+2 200 11 61.11
21 EO 3S W = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,96 %22 EO 2K E-1 100 13 72.22
23 EO 3C N+2 200 8 44.44
24 EO 2P N+2 170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,04 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 2C E-1 100 11 61.11
27 EO 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,26 %28 EO 2P E-1 50 9 50.00
29 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
Total : 266,0 / 540 = 49,26 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,89 % 1 EO 4C N-2 -100 16 88.89
2 EO 4C W = -420 16 88.89
3 EO 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,22 % 4 EO 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00
5 EO 1S W = -90 17 94.44
6 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,89 % 7 EO 4K N-1 -100 5 27.78
8 EO 3T W-2 100 5 27.78
9 EO 4P S+1 450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.6 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,93 %10 EO 3T E-1 100 18 100.00
11 EO 4C N = 420 0 0.00
12 EO 3S S = 600 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,37 %13 EO 5P E-1 100 6 33.33
14 EO 2P N+1 140 6 33.33
15 EO 1S W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %16 EO 3C W+1 -170 13 72.22
17 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00
18 EO 2K E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,96 %19 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00
20 EO 1S E+1 -120 18 100.00
21 EO 3S W = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,04 %22 EO 4C E-2 200 5 27.78
23 EO 3C N = 140 17 94.44
24 EO 4P N+1 450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,26 %25 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11
26 EO 2C E-2 200 3 16.67
27 EO 6S E = -990 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,41 %28 EO 4T S-1 -100 13 72.22
29 EO 4P S-1 -100 17 94.44
30 EO 2C S = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
Total : 272,0 / 540 = 50,37 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,22 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 4P E-2 100 4 22.22
3 EO 2S W-1 100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,89 % 4 EO 3P E-2 200 2 11.11
5 EO 1S E-1 50 11 61.11
6 EO 3S N-1 -50 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,89 % 7 EO 3C W = -140 11 61.11
8 EO 2P N-2 -100 18 100.00
9 EO 3S S-3 -150 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,37 %10 EO 4C N = 620 5 27.78
11 EO 5P W-1 50 5 27.78
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %13 EO 5CcN-1 -200 10 55.56
14 EO 2P N+1 140 6 33.33
15 EO 3S W+1 -430 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,96 %16 EO 3C E+2 -200 16 88.89
17 EO 2S W+2 -180 16 88.89
18 EO 2K E-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,04 %19 EO 2T N+1 110 4 22.22
20 EO 2C E-3 300 5 27.78
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,26 %22 EO 4C W-2 200 5 27.78
23 EO 3C N = 140 17 94.44
24 EO 2P S+3 200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,41 %25 EO 4C N-3 -150 18 100.00
26 EO 2C E-2 200 3 16.67
27 EO 6P E = -980 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.6 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,93 %28 EO 4PcE-2 300 4 22.22
29 EO 5P S-1 -100 17 94.44
30 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 313,0 / 540 = 57,96 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 PANIS Guy -CASSART Guy
A.8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 % 1 EO 3C N = 140 3 16.67
2 EO 4P E-2 100 4 22.22
3 EO 1S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,96 % 4 EO 3C N-2 -200 17 94.44
5 EO 1S W = -90 17 94.44
6 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,04 % 7 EO 5K N-2 -200 15 83.33
8 EO 2TcE-1 100 5 27.78
9 EO 4P N-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,26 %10 EO 3C N+1 170 12 66.67
11 EO 5PcW-1 100 2 11.11
12 EO 2K W+1 -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,22 %13 EO 5CcN-1 -200 10 55.56
14 EO 2P N+1 140 6 33.33
15 EO 3S W = -400 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,41 %16 EO 5TcN-4 -800 18 100.00
17 EO 2S W+1 -150 13 72.22
18 EO 2P W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,89 %19 EO 3S E-1 100 6 33.33
20 EO 2CcW-1 200 11 61.11
21 EO 3S E = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.6 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,93 %22 EO 3C W = -140 18 100.00
23 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
24 EO 3P S+2 200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,89 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89
27 EO 6P E = -980 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,37 %28 EO 4P W-1 50 9 50.00
29 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 1S N+1 120 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
Total : 302,0 / 540 = 55,93 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,96 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 3P E = -140 12 66.67
3 EO 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,04 % 4 EO 3C N-2 -200 17 94.44
5 EO 2K N+4 170 0 0.00
6 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,26 % 7 EO 2C W+1 -140 11 61.11
8 EO 1K N+1 90 11 61.11
9 EO 1P N+1 110 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 12 66.67
11 EO 5P W-1 50 5 27.78
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,41 %13 EO 6PcE-1 200 2 11.11
14 EO 3K E-1 50 15 83.33
15 EO 3S W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,22 %16 EO 2T N = 90 1 5.56
17 EO 2S W+1 -150 13 72.22
18 EO 2K E = -90 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.6 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,93 %19 EO 1S N-1 -50 13 72.22
20 EO 3C E-4 400 2 11.11
21 EO 3S W+2 -460 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,89 %22 EO 3K E-3 300 0 0.00
23 EO 2C N+2 170 12 66.67
24 EO 3P N = 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,37 %25 EO 2C N+1 140 2 11.11
26 EO 3K N = 110 8 44.44
27 EO 4P E+1 -450 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,89 %28 EO 4PcE-1 100 6 33.33
29 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 1S N+2 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
Total : 247,0 / 540 = 45,74 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,04 % 1 EO 4C N-2 -100 16 88.89
2 EO 4C E = -420 16 88.89
3 EO 2P N+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,26 % 4 EO 3C N-1 -100 9 50.00
5 EO 1S W-1 50 11 61.11
6 EO 2S S+1 150 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,41 % 7 EO 3C E-1 100 1 5.56
8 EO 3T W-2 100 5 27.78
9 EO 3K S-4 -200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,89 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 12 66.67
11 EO 4PcW = -590 17 94.44
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,96 %13 EO 5PcE-1 200 2 11.11
14 EO 3P N = 140 6 33.33
15 EO 1S E+3 -180 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.6 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,93 %16 EO 3C W+1 -170 13 72.22
17 EO 3S W-2 100 3 16.67
18 EO 2K E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,22 %19 EO 4TcN-1 -100 16 88.89
20 EO 2C E-1 100 16 88.89
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,37 %22 EO 4C W-2 200 5 27.78
23 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
24 EO 4P S+1 450 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,89 %25 EO 3C N = 140 2 11.11
26 EO 2C W-2 200 3 16.67
27 EO 7S W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %28 EO 2PcE = -470 17 94.44
29 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
Total : 264,0 / 540 = 48,89 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,26 % 1 EO 2C N+1 140 3 16.67
2 EO 4P E-1 50 9 50.00
3 EO 1S N = 90 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,41 % 4 EO 3P E-2 200 2 11.11
5 EO 3K S+1 130 5 27.78
6 EO 3K N = 110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.6 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,93 % 7 EO 3T S-1 -100 5 27.78
8 EO 2TcW-1 100 5 27.78
9 EO 4P S = 420 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,96 %10 EO 4C N = 620 5 27.78
11 EO 4P W = -420 13 72.22
12 EO 3T S+1 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,89 %13 EO 5P E = -650 17 94.44
14 EO 2P N+1 140 6 33.33
15 EO 3S W-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,04 %16 EO 3C E = -140 8 44.44
17 EO 2S E-1 50 7 38.89
18 EO 2ScN-2 -500 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,37 %19 EO 1S N = 90 9 50.00
20 EO 3P N+2 200 11 61.11
21 EO 3S W+2 -460 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,22 %22 EO 4C W-1 100 13 72.22
23 EO 3C N+1 170 12 66.67
24 EO 2P S+3 200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89
27 EO 6P E = -980 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,89 %28 EO 2PcE = -470 17 94.44
29 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 2S N-2 -100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 290,0 / 540 = 53,70 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
A.5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,41 % 1 EO 4C N-1 -50 10 55.56
2 EO 4P E-2 100 4 22.22
3 EO 2C S-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.6 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,93 % 4 EO 2P W = -110 13 72.22
5 EO 3K S+2 150 2 11.11
6 EO 3S S = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,37 % 7 EO 3C E-1 100 1 5.56
8 EO 1K N-1 -50 16 88.89
9 EO 2P S+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,89 %10 EO 2C N+2 170 12 66.67
11 EO 4P W = -420 13 72.22
12 EO 3T S+1 130 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,04 %13 EO 6PcE-1 200 2 11.11
14 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00
15 EO 3S E-1 50 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,89 %16 EO 4T N-2 -100 6 33.33
17 EO 2S W-3 150 0 0.00
18 EO 2C N-3 -300 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,26 %19 EO 2P S-1 -50 13 72.22
20 EO 2C E-3 300 5 27.78
21 EO 3S W = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 %22 EO 3T E-1 100 13 72.22
23 EO 4C N+1 650 0 0.00
24 EO 3P S+2 200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,22 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 2C E = -110 16 88.89
27 EO 6P E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,96 %28 EO 4C N-1 -100 13 72.22
29 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 1S N+2 150 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 227,0 / 540 = 42,04 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
A.6 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,93 % 1 EO 3C N-2 -100 16 88.89
2 EO 4C W = -420 16 88.89
3 EO 2C S = 110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,37 % 4 EO 2P E-1 100 6 33.33
5 EO 1S W-1 50 11 61.11
6 EO 3S S+1 430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 % 7 EO 4KcN-1 -200 15 83.33
8 EO 1K N+1 90 11 61.11
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,04 %10 EO 4CcN = 790 0 0.00
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 8 44.44
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,89 %13 EO 4P E = -620 14 77.78
14 EO 2P N = 110 12 66.67
15 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,26 %16 EO 2T N = 90 1 5.56
17 EO 1K W = -70 10 55.56
18 EO 2K E-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,89 %19 EO 4C E-4 400 0 0.00
20 EO 3S E-5 500 0 0.00
21 EO 3S W+2 -460 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,41 %22 EO 4C W-1 100 13 72.22
23 EO 4C N = 620 4 22.22
24 EO 2P S+3 200 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,96 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 2C E-2 200 3 16.67
27 EO 4P E+2 -480 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,22 %28 EO 4C N = 620 1 5.56
29 EO 4P S = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 1S N = 90 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 233,0 / 540 = 43,15 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 SALFI Huguette -VAN DOOREN Michele
A.7 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 60,37 % 1 EO 2C N = 110 6 33.33
2 EO 4P E-1 50 9 50.00
3 EO 1S N-1 -50 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.8 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 47,04 % 4 EO 2P E-2 200 2 11.11
5 EO 2K N+2 130 5 27.78
6 EO 3S N+1 430 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
A.9 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,96 % 7 EO 5KcN-2 -500 18 100.00
8 EO 1K N = 70 14 77.78
9 EO 4P N-2 -100 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 47,22 %10 EO 4C N+1 650 2 11.11
11 EO 4PcW = -590 17 94.44
12 EO 4P N-1 -100 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.4 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 49,26 %13 EO 5P E = -650 17 94.44
14 EO 1S E = -90 18 100.00
15 EO 2S E = -120 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,89 %16 EO 3T N-1 -50 4 22.22
17 EO 2S W-1 50 7 38.89
18 EO 1S W+1 -120 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.5 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 47,41 %19 EO 1S N-5 -250 18 100.00
20 EO 2P S+3 200 11 61.11
21 EO 3S E = -400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.1 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 53,89 %22 EO 4C E-2 200 5 27.78
23 EO 3C N+1 170 12 66.67
24 EO 2P S+2 170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.6 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 50,93 %25 EO 4C N-1 -50 11 61.11
26 EO 2C E-1 100 11 61.11
27 EO 6S W-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,04 %28 EO 4C N = 620 1 5.56
29 EO 4P N = 620 7 38.89
30 EO 2P N+1 140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 286,0 / 540 = 52,96 %
|
|