|
Tournoi du 30-01-17
Lundi
1 61,61 10 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
2 61,45 13 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy
3 60,52 11 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph
4 53,23 3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
5 50,77 8 LIBERT Laurent -PIROTTE Claude
6 50,71 12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
7 47,98 7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
8 47,79 5 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
9 47,70 9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
10 44,58 6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
11 43,36 4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
12 41,11 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
13 39,21 1 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,39 19 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
2 59,79 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
3 58,12 15 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice
4 55,45 24 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
5 53,39 20 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
6 51,20 22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
7 49,79 25 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
8 47,95 16 MOSSERAY Etienne -LEBRUN Robert
9 47,94 23 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
10 47,85 17 PETERS Annik -LENAERTS Pol
11 43,08 26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
12 40,98 18 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
13 32,05 21 -
PAIRE Nr : 1 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,79 % 1 NS 3K S+1 130 5 22.73
2 NS 3C E = -140 8 36.36
3 NS 1P W+2 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
24 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,45 % 4 NS 3P E = -140 4 18.18
5 NS 1S S+3 180 9 40.91
6 NS 4C E-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 % 7 NS 3P S-2 -200 4 18.18
8 NS 3K E+1 -130 3 13.64
9 NS 3P S-2 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,20 %10 NS 4T N+2 170 2 9.09
11 NS 3S N = 400 12 54.55
12 NS 3K S+2 150 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
21 - : 32,05 %13 NS 3S S-2 -200 13 59.09
14 NS 4P W-1 50 15 68.18
15 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,08 %16 NS 3C W-1 100 14 63.64
17 NS 3S W-2 100 19 86.36
18 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
19 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,39 %19 NS 4P E-2 200 14 63.64
20 NS 4P E-3 300 16 72.73
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 40,98 %22 NS 4P W = -620 0 0.00
23 NS 3C S-2 -200 1 4.55
24 NS 4P W = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
17 PETERS Annik -LENAERTS Pol : 47,85 %25 NS 3S N-1 -50 11 50.00
26 NS 3K S+1 130 8.8 40.00
27 NS 3C W+1 -170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
16 MOSSERAY Etienne -LEBRUN Robert : 47,95 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
29 NS 4P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00
30 NS 2S W-3 150 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
Total : 258,8 / 660 = 39,21 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
15 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 58,12 % 4 NS 5KcN-1 -200 1 4.55
5 NS 1C S+3 170 5 22.73
6 NS 2C W+1 -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,79 % 7 NS 4P N-4 -400 0 0.00
8 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00
9 NS 3K S = 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
24 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,45 %10 NS 5T N+2 640 6 27.27
11 NS 3S N = 400 12 54.55
12 NS 3T N+1 130 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %13 NS 4C S-5 -500 0 0.00
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 9 40.91
15 NS 5K S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,20 %16 NS 3K N-2 -100 8 36.36
17 NS 4C W-1 50 13 59.09
18 NS 4P S = 620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
21 - : 32,05 %19 NS 3P W-3 300 18 81.82
20 NS 5PcW-5 1400 22 100.00
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
25 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,79 %22 NS 4P E-1 100 15 68.18
23 NS 1S E = -90 16 72.73
24 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
19 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,39 %25 NS 3P W = -140 0.1 0.45
26 NS 3S S = 600 19.7 89.55
27 NS 4C E = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 33,48 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 40,98 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 18.6 84.55
29 NS 4P S = 620 13.2 60.00
30 NS 1S W-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
17 PETERS Annik -LENAERTS Pol : 47,85 %31 NS 1S N+3 180 20 90.91
32 NS 5PcN-1 -100 3 13.64
33 NS 2C W+3 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 271,3 / 660 = 41,11 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane
18 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 40,98 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36
2 NS 4C E-2 100 20 90.91
3 NS 1P W+2 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
16 MOSSERAY Etienne -LEBRUN Robert : 47,95 % 7 NS 1S N = 90 14 63.64
8 NS 3PcE-1 100 20 90.91
9 NS 2S N-2 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
25 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,79 %10 NS 6T N = 1370 17 77.27
11 NS 3S N = 400 12 54.55
12 NS 2C W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,79 %13 NS 3P S-1 -100 20 90.91
14 NS 2P W+1 -140 9 40.91
15 NS 3S N+1 630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
24 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,45 %16 NS 3S N-4 -200 0 0.00
17 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 18.18
18 NS 4P N = 620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %19 NS 2P E-2 200 14 63.64
20 NS 3P E-2 200 14 63.64
21 NS 3S E = -400 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,20 %22 NS 2S E-3 300 21 95.45
23 NS 2P W = -110 8 36.36
24 NS 4C W = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,08 %25 NS 3S N-1 -50 11 50.00
26 NS 4K S+1 150 16.5 75.00
27 NS 1C W+2 -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
20 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 53,39 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
29 NS 4P S-2 -200 3.4 15.45
30 NS 2P N+2 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
19 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,39 %31 NS 1S N = 90 4 18.18
32 NS 5CcW-1 200 14 63.64
33 NS 4C W+1 -450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
Total : 351,3 / 660 = 53,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
20 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 53,39 % 1 NS 2K S+3 150 8 36.36
2 NS 4C E-1 50 15 68.18
3 NS 5K E-1 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
19 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,39 % 4 NS 3S E-3 300 20 90.91
5 NS 3C S+1 170 5 22.73
6 NS 4KcS-3 -500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
17 PETERS Annik -LENAERTS Pol : 47,85 %10 NS 3T N+4 190 4 18.18
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 13.64
12 NS 3C E-3 150 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,08 %13 NS 3P S-2 -200 13 59.09
14 NS 3P W+1 -170 4 18.18
15 NS 3S N+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
15 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 58,12 %16 NS 3C W-2 200 19 86.36
17 NS 2C W = -110 8 36.36
18 NS 3P N-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,79 %19 NS 2P E = -110 2 9.09
20 NS 4C S-2 -200 6 27.27
21 NS 3S W+1 -430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
24 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,45 %22 NS 3P E = -140 7 31.82
23 NS 3C S-2 -200 1 4.55
24 NS 4C W = -420 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %25 NS 2P W-1 100 17.5 79.55
26 NS 2K S+2 130 8.8 40.00
27 NS 4C E-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,20 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
29 NS 3TcW = -670 0.1 0.45
30 NS 1S W-1 50 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 16,97 %
25 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,79 %31 NS 1S N+1 120 13 59.09
32 NS 4PcN = 590 21 95.45
33 NS 2C W+4 -230 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
Total : 286,2 / 660 = 43,36 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,08 % 1 NS 3S S = 400 10 45.45
2 NS 2P E+1 -140 8 36.36
3 NS 3K W = -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
21 - : 32,05 % 4 NS 3T W = -110 6 27.27
5 NS 1S N+2 150 2 9.09
6 NS 3P N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
20 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 53,39 % 7 NS 2P N = 110 16 72.73
8 NS 2P W = -110 9 40.91
9 NS 4K S-2 -100 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 40,98 %13 NS 6K N-1 -100 20 90.91
14 NS 4P W-1 50 15 68.18
15 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
17 PETERS Annik -LENAERTS Pol : 47,85 %16 NS 3K N-2 -100 8 36.36
17 NS 1S W-1 50 13 59.09
18 NS 1P S+3 170 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
25 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,79 %19 NS 3P W-1 100 8 36.36
20 NS 2P W+1 -140 8 36.36
21 NS 3S E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
15 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 58,12 %22 NS 4P W-2 200 18 81.82
23 NS 2P W = -110 8 36.36
24 NS 4TcS-2 -300 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,79 %25 NS 2S N-2 -100 4.5 20.45
26 NS 2K S+1 110 1.2 5.45
27 NS 1C W+3 -170 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 20,30 %
24 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,45 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
29 NS 3S N-1 -100 8.8 40.00
30 NS 2P N+2 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %31 NS 1S N = 90 4 18.18
32 NS 4C W = -620 0 0.00
33 NS 1S E+1 -120 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 315,4 / 660 = 47,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
24 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,45 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 14 63.64
2 NS 3C E-1 50 15 68.18
3 NS 3S S-6 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 % 4 NS 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
5 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73
6 NS 4P N-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
25 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,79 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 3C S = 140 22 100.00
9 NS 4C E+1 -650 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
21 - : 32,05 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 9 40.91
11 NS 3S S-1 -50 3 13.64
12 NS 3S S+3 690 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
19 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,39 %16 NS 2C W = -110 4 18.18
17 NS 3C E-1 50 13 59.09
18 NS 3S S-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 40,98 %19 NS 2P E = -110 2 9.09
20 NS 4C S-3 -300 4 18.18
21 NS 3S E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,08 %22 NS 2P E+1 -140 7 31.82
23 NS 2P W-1 100 20 90.91
24 NS 5TcS-3 -500 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
16 MOSSERAY Etienne -LEBRUN Robert : 47,95 %25 NS 3S N-2 -100 4.5 20.45
26 NS 2K S+3 150 16.5 75.00
27 NS 1C W+2 -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 51,82 %
15 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 58,12 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
29 NS 2P S-1 -100 8.8 40.00
30 NS 2P N+2 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,79 %31 NS 2P N = 110 9 40.91
32 NS 5P S-1 -50 7 31.82
33 NS 4C W+1 -450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 294,2 / 660 = 44,58 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
15 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 58,12 % 1 NS 2S S-1 -50 1 4.55
2 NS 3C E+1 -170 4 18.18
3 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,79 % 4 NS 4TcW-1 200 18 81.82
5 NS 3S S+3 690 22 100.00
6 NS 3P N-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
24 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,45 % 7 NS 3S S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 3P W-1 50 18 81.82
9 NS 3C E+2 -200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,08 %10 NS 4C S-2 -200 0 0.00
11 NS 3S S+2 460 20 90.91
12 NS 5K S+1 620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,20 %13 NS 3P S-2 -200 13 59.09
14 NS 3P W+2 -200 0 0.00
15 NS 3S S+2 660 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
20 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 53,39 %19 NS 2P E = -110 2 9.09
20 NS 4C S = 620 18 81.82
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
19 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,39 %22 NS 5TcS-2 -300 2 9.09
23 NS 2P W = -110 8 36.36
24 NS 3S E+2 -460 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 40,98 %25 NS 2C S = 110 20.8 94.55
26 NS 2K S+2 130 8.8 40.00
27 NS 4C W-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 74,70 %
25 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,79 %28 NS 2S S+1 150 21.9 99.55
29 NS 3S S+1 630 15.4 70.00
30 NS 2C N-1 -50 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
16 MOSSERAY Etienne -LEBRUN Robert : 47,95 %31 NS 2P N+1 140 16 72.73
32 NS 5C W-1 100 11 50.00
33 NS 4C E+1 -450 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
Total : 316,7 / 660 = 47,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 LIBERT Laurent -PIROTTE Claude
17 PETERS Annik -LENAERTS Pol : 47,85 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 14 63.64
2 NS 3C E = -140 8 36.36
3 NS 4C N-3 -150 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
16 MOSSERAY Etienne -LEBRUN Robert : 47,95 % 4 NS 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
5 NS 3S N+1 630 16 72.73
6 NS 3C W = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
15 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 58,12 % 7 NS 1S S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 2P W = -110 9 40.91
9 NS 3C E+2 -200 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,79 %10 NS 6T N+1 1390 20 90.91
11 NS 3S S+2 460 20 90.91
12 NS 4K S+1 150 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
24 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,45 %13 NS 4P S-3 -300 6 27.27
14 NS 4P W-1 50 15 68.18
15 NS 3S N+1 630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
25 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,79 %16 NS 4C W-1 100 14 63.64
17 NS 3K N-3 -150 0 0.00
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
21 - : 32,05 %22 NS 2P E = -110 12 54.55
23 NS 2P E-1 100 20 90.91
24 NS 4C W-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
20 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 53,39 %25 NS 3S N-2 -100 4.5 20.45
26 NS 3K S = 110 1.2 5.45
27 NS 4C W = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
19 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,39 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
29 NS 3S N+2 660 20.8 94.55
30 NS 2P N+1 140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 53,18 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,08 %31 NS 1S N+3 180 20 90.91
32 NS 4PcN = 590 21 95.45
33 NS 2C E+1 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
Total : 335,1 / 660 = 50,77 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
19 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,39 % 1 NS 2K S+2 130 5 22.73
2 NS 4C E = -420 1 4.55
3 NS 3C N-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
25 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,79 % 4 NS 3P E+2 -200 1 4.55
5 NS 1S N+1 120 0 0.00
6 NS 4C W-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
17 PETERS Annik -LENAERTS Pol : 47,85 % 7 NS 3C W-2 200 20 90.91
8 NS Pass Passe 16 72.73
9 NS 3K S = 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 81,82 %
16 MOSSERAY Etienne -LEBRUN Robert : 47,95 %10 NS 3S N+4 720 13 59.09
11 NS 3S S = 400 12 54.55
12 NS 4T N = 130 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
15 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 58,12 %13 NS 4P S-3 -300 6 27.27
14 NS 3S E-2 100 21 95.45
15 NS 3K S+1 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,79 %16 NS 3C W+1 -170 2 9.09
17 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 18.18
18 NS 2P S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,08 %19 NS 3S E-4 400 21 95.45
20 NS 4CcS-2 -500 2 9.09
21 NS 3S W = -400 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,20 %25 NS 2C S = 110 20.8 94.55
26 NS 3K S+1 130 8.8 40.00
27 NS 4C W = -420 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
21 - : 32,05 %28 NS 2S N = 120 18.6 84.55
29 NS 3S N+2 660 20.8 94.55
30 NS 2P N+2 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 84,70 %
20 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 53,39 %31 NS 2P N = 110 9 40.91
32 NS 5PcN-1 -100 3 13.64
33 NS 3C E+2 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
Total : 314,8 / 660 = 47,70 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
21 - : 32,05 % 1 NS 3S S+2 460 22 100.00
2 NS 3C E-3 150 22 100.00
3 NS 1P W+1 -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
20 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 53,39 % 4 NS 5PcE-2 500 22 100.00
5 NS 2S N+2 180 9 40.91
6 NS 4C E-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,08 % 7 NS 3CcW-3 800 22 100.00
8 NS 3K E+1 -130 3 13.64
9 NS 3K N = 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 40,98 %10 NS 6T N = 1370 17 77.27
11 NS 3S S = 400 12 54.55
12 NS 5T N+1 620 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
17 PETERS Annik -LENAERTS Pol : 47,85 %13 NS 4P S-4 -400 2 9.09
14 NS 4P W-1 50 15 68.18
15 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 MOSSERAY Etienne -LEBRUN Robert : 47,95 %16 NS 2S W-2 200 19 86.36
17 NS 4C W-2 100 19 86.36
18 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
15 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 58,12 %19 NS 4P E-4 400 21 95.45
20 NS 7TcN-3 -800 0 0.00
21 NS 1S E+1 -120 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 59,79 %22 NS 1P E+2 -140 7 31.82
23 NS 2C S-1 -100 14 63.64
24 NS 5TcS-3 -500 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
29 NS 5P S-2 -200 3.4 15.45
30 NS 2P N+2 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,20 %31 NS 1S N+3 180 20 90.91
32 NS 5P S-1 -50 7 31.82
33 NS 4C W-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 406,6 / 660 = 61,61 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph
23 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 % 1 NS 3S S+1 430 19 86.36
2 NS 4C E-1 50 15 68.18
3 NS 1P W+1 -110 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,20 % 4 NS 4P E-1 100 10 45.45
5 NS 3S S+2 660 20 90.91
6 NS 3C E = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
21 - : 32,05 % 7 NS 3P S+1 170 18 81.82
8 NS 3C N-2 -100 14 63.64
9 NS 2P S = 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
20 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 53,39 %10 NS 3S N+4 720 13 59.09
11 NS 3S N-1 -50 3 13.64
12 NS 4K N+1 150 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
25 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,79 %13 NS 3P S-2 -200 13 59.09
14 NS 3S E-2 100 21 95.45
15 NS 3S S = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 40,98 %16 NS 4C W-4 400 22 100.00
17 NS 1S W-3 150 22 100.00
18 NS 2P S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
17 PETERS Annik -LENAERTS Pol : 47,85 %19 NS 2P E-2 200 14 63.64
20 NS 3P W-1 100 12 54.55
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
16 MOSSERAY Etienne -LEBRUN Robert : 47,95 %22 NS 3P E = -140 7 31.82
23 NS 2P W-1 100 20 90.91
24 NS 4P E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
15 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 58,12 %25 NS 1S N = 90 15.4 70.00
26 NS 3K S+1 130 8.8 40.00
27 NS 1C W+2 -140 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
24 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,45 %31 NS 1S N = 90 4 18.18
32 NS 5C W-1 100 11 50.00
33 NS 4C E = -420 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 399,4 / 660 = 60,52 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
25 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 49,79 % 1 NS 4C N = 420 14 63.64
2 NS 4C E = -420 1 4.55
3 NS 4P W-1 100 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 40,98 % 4 NS 3K S = 110 14 63.64
5 NS 3S S = 600 12 54.55
6 NS 4P N-2 -100 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,20 % 7 NS 2S S-3 -300 2 9.09
8 NS 2P W = -110 9 40.91
9 NS 2S N-1 -50 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
15 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 58,12 %10 NS 4P S+1 650 9 40.91
11 NS 4C N-1 -50 3 13.64
12 NS 3K S+2 150 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
19 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,39 %13 NS 4P S-3 -300 6 27.27
14 NS 3P W+1 -170 4 18.18
15 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %16 NS 2P S-2 -100 8 36.36
17 NS 1S W-1 50 13 59.09
18 NS 4P S = 620 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
16 MOSSERAY Etienne -LEBRUN Robert : 47,95 %19 NS 2S W-1 100 8 36.36
20 NS 5T N-1 -100 10 45.45
21 NS 1S E+2 -150 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
20 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 53,39 %22 NS 4P E-1 100 15 68.18
23 NS 2P W = -110 8 36.36
24 NS 4TcS-2 -300 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
17 PETERS Annik -LENAERTS Pol : 47,85 %28 NS 3S N-1 -100 7.7 35.00
29 NS 4P S+1 650 17.5 79.55
30 NS 2P N+2 170 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
21 - : 32,05 %31 NS 1S N+1 120 13 59.09
32 NS 4P N = 420 17 77.27
33 NS 2C E+2 -170 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 334,7 / 660 = 50,71 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy
22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard : 51,20 % 1 NS 5K S-1 -50 1 4.55
2 NS 4C E-1 50 15 68.18
3 NS 3C N-2 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 43,08 % 4 NS 3K N+2 150 16 72.73
5 NS 3S S+1 630 16 72.73
6 NS 3C W = -140 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
19 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre : 62,39 % 7 NS 2S S-1 -100 9 40.91
8 NS 2P W = -110 9 40.91
9 NS 3K S = 110 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
23 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 47,94 %10 NS 6S N = 1440 22 100.00
11 NS 3S S+2 460 20 90.91
12 NS 3S N+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 93,94 %
16 MOSSERAY Etienne -LEBRUN Robert : 47,95 %13 NS 4K N-1 -100 20 90.91
14 NS 2P W+2 -170 4 18.18
15 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
20 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie : 53,39 %16 NS 3C W-1 100 14 63.64
17 NS 2C W+1 -140 4 18.18
18 NS 2P S+1 140 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
24 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 55,45 %19 NS 2P E-1 100 8 36.36
20 NS 4PcW-3 800 20 90.91
21 NS 2K W = -90 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
17 PETERS Annik -LENAERTS Pol : 47,85 %22 NS 2S E-3 300 21 95.45
23 NS 2P W = -110 8 36.36
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
21 - : 32,05 %25 NS 3S N-1 -50 11 50.00
26 NS 1KxS+4 1830 21.9 99.55
27 NS 4C W-1 50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 79,70 %
18 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 40,98 %31 NS 1S N-2 -200 0 0.00
32 NS 4P N = 420 17 77.27
33 NS 2S E-1 50 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
Total : 405,6 / 660 = 61,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
1 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,21 % 1 EO 3K S+1 130 17 77.27
2 EO 3C E = -140 14 63.64
3 EO 1P W+2 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,98 % 4 EO 4TcW-1 200 4 18.18
5 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00
6 EO 3P N-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,11 % 7 EO 4P N-4 -400 22 100.00
8 EO 2P W+2 -170 22 100.00
9 EO 3K S = 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -PIROTTE Claude : 50,77 %10 EO 6T N+1 1390 2 9.09
11 EO 3S S+2 460 2 9.09
12 EO 4K S+1 150 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,23 %13 EO 3P S-1 -100 2 9.09
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 59.09
15 EO 3S N+1 630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,70 %16 EO 3C W+1 -170 20 90.91
17 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 81.82
18 EO 2P S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 43,36 %19 EO 2P E = -110 20 90.91
20 EO 4C S-2 -200 16 72.73
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
10 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,61 %22 EO 1P E+2 -140 15 68.18
23 EO 2C S-1 -100 8 36.36
24 EO 5TcS-3 -500 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
5 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,79 %25 EO 2S N-2 -100 17.5 79.55
26 EO 2K S+1 110 20.8 94.55
27 EO 1C W+3 -170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 79,70 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 44,58 %31 EO 2P N = 110 13 59.09
32 EO 5P S-1 -50 15 68.18
33 EO 4C W+1 -450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 394,6 / 660 = 59,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,98 % 1 EO 2S S-1 -50 21 95.45
2 EO 3C E+1 -170 18 81.82
3 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,11 % 4 EO 5KcN-1 -200 21 95.45
5 EO 1C S+3 170 17 77.27
6 EO 2C W+1 -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -PIROTTE Claude : 50,77 % 7 EO 1S S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 2P W = -110 13 59.09
9 EO 3C E+2 -200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,71 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 13 59.09
11 EO 4C N-1 -50 19 86.36
12 EO 3K S+2 150 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,70 %13 EO 4P S-3 -300 16 72.73
14 EO 3S E-2 100 1 4.55
15 EO 3K S+1 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 43,36 %16 EO 3C W-2 200 3 13.64
17 EO 2C W = -110 14 63.64
18 EO 3P N-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
10 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,61 %19 EO 4P E-4 400 1 4.55
20 EO 7TcN-3 -800 22 100.00
21 EO 1S E+1 -120 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
5 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,79 %22 EO 4P W-2 200 4 18.18
23 EO 2P W = -110 14 63.64
24 EO 4TcS-2 -300 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 60,52 %25 EO 1S N = 90 6.6 30.00
26 EO 3K S+1 130 13.2 60.00
27 EO 1C W+2 -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 44,58 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
29 EO 2P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00
30 EO 2P N+2 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
Total : 383,6 / 660 = 58,12 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 MOSSERAY Etienne -LEBRUN Robert
8 LIBERT Laurent -PIROTTE Claude : 50,77 % 4 EO 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
5 EO 3S N+1 630 6 27.27
6 EO 3C W = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,23 % 7 EO 1S N = 90 8 36.36
8 EO 3PcE-1 100 2 9.09
9 EO 2S N-2 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,70 %10 EO 3S N+4 720 9 40.91
11 EO 3S S = 400 10 45.45
12 EO 4T N = 130 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
13 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 61,45 %13 EO 4K N-1 -100 2 9.09
14 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 81.82
15 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
10 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,61 %16 EO 2S W-2 200 3 13.64
17 EO 4C W-2 100 3 13.64
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,71 %19 EO 2S W-1 100 14 63.64
20 EO 5T N-1 -100 12 54.55
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 60,52 %22 EO 3P E = -140 15 68.18
23 EO 2P W-1 100 2 9.09
24 EO 4P E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 44,58 %25 EO 3S N-2 -100 17.5 79.55
26 EO 2K S+3 150 5.5 25.00
27 EO 1C W+2 -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 48,18 %
1 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,21 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
29 EO 4P S-1 -100 13.2 60.00
30 EO 2S W-3 150 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,98 %31 EO 2P N+1 140 6 27.27
32 EO 5C W-1 100 11 50.00
33 EO 4C E+1 -450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
Total : 316,5 / 660 = 47,95 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 PETERS Annik -LENAERTS Pol
8 LIBERT Laurent -PIROTTE Claude : 50,77 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 8 36.36
2 EO 3C E = -140 14 63.64
3 EO 4C N-3 -150 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,70 % 7 EO 3C W-2 200 2 9.09
8 EO Pass Passe 6 27.27
9 EO 3K S = 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 18,18 %
4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 43,36 %10 EO 3T N+4 190 18 81.82
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 19 86.36
12 EO 3C E-3 150 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
10 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,61 %13 EO 4P S-4 -400 20 90.91
14 EO 4P W-1 50 7 31.82
15 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
5 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,79 %16 EO 3K N-2 -100 14 63.64
17 EO 1S W-1 50 9 40.91
18 EO 1P S+3 170 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 60,52 %19 EO 2P E-2 200 8 36.36
20 EO 3P W-1 100 10 45.45
21 EO 1S E+2 -150 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
13 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 61,45 %22 EO 2S E-3 300 1 4.55
23 EO 2P W = -110 14 63.64
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
1 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,21 %25 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 50.00
26 EO 3K S+1 130 13.2 60.00
27 EO 3C W+1 -170 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,71 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
29 EO 4P S+1 650 4.5 20.45
30 EO 2P N+2 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,11 %31 EO 1S N+3 180 2 9.09
32 EO 5PcN-1 -100 19 86.36
33 EO 2C W+3 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 315,8 / 660 = 47,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,23 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64
2 EO 4C E-2 100 2 9.09
3 EO 1P W+2 -140 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,71 % 4 EO 3K S = 110 8 36.36
5 EO 3S S = 600 10 45.45
6 EO 4P N-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
10 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,61 %10 EO 6T N = 1370 5 22.73
11 EO 3S S = 400 10 45.45
12 EO 5T N+1 620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
5 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,79 %13 EO 6K N-1 -100 2 9.09
14 EO 4P W-1 50 7 31.82
15 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 60,52 %16 EO 4C W-4 400 0 0.00
17 EO 1S W-3 150 0 0.00
18 EO 2P S = 110 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 44,58 %19 EO 2P E = -110 20 90.91
20 EO 4C S-3 -300 18 81.82
21 EO 3S E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
1 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,21 %22 EO 4P W = -620 22 100.00
23 EO 3C S-2 -200 21 95.45
24 EO 4P W = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,98 %25 EO 2C S = 110 1.2 5.45
26 EO 2K S+2 130 13.2 60.00
27 EO 4C W-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 25,30 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,11 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 3.4 15.45
29 EO 4P S = 620 8.8 40.00
30 EO 1S W-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
13 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 61,45 %31 EO 1S N-2 -200 22 100.00
32 EO 4P N = 420 5 22.73
33 EO 2S E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
Total : 270,5 / 660 = 40,98 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 TIRLOCQ Daniel -JANSSENS Pierre
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,70 % 1 EO 2K S+2 130 17 77.27
2 EO 4C E = -420 21 95.45
3 EO 3C N-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 43,36 % 4 EO 3S E-3 300 2 9.09
5 EO 3C S+1 170 17 77.27
6 EO 4KcS-3 -500 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
13 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 61,45 % 7 EO 2S S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 2P W = -110 13 59.09
9 EO 3K S = 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,71 %13 EO 4P S-3 -300 16 72.73
14 EO 3P W+1 -170 18 81.82
15 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 44,58 %16 EO 2C W = -110 18 81.82
17 EO 3C E-1 50 9 40.91
18 EO 3S S-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
1 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,21 %19 EO 4P E-2 200 8 36.36
20 EO 4P E-3 300 6 27.27
21 EO 3S W+1 -430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,98 %22 EO 5TcS-2 -300 20 90.91
23 EO 2P W = -110 14 63.64
24 EO 3S E+2 -460 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,11 %25 EO 3P W = -140 21.9 99.55
26 EO 3S S = 600 2.3 10.45
27 EO 4C E = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 66,52 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -PIROTTE Claude : 50,77 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
29 EO 3S N+2 660 1.2 5.45
30 EO 2P N+1 140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 46,82 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,23 %31 EO 1S N = 90 18 81.82
32 EO 5CcW-1 200 8 36.36
33 EO 4C W+1 -450 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
Total : 411,8 / 660 = 62,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 VANDAM Cécile -HUBERT Jean-Marie
4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 43,36 % 1 EO 2K S+3 150 14 63.64
2 EO 4C E-1 50 7 31.82
3 EO 5K E-1 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,61 % 4 EO 5PcE-2 500 0 0.00
5 EO 2S N+2 180 13 59.09
6 EO 4C E-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
5 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,79 % 7 EO 2P N = 110 6 27.27
8 EO 2P W = -110 13 59.09
9 EO 4K S-2 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 60,52 %10 EO 3S N+4 720 9 40.91
11 EO 3S N-1 -50 19 86.36
12 EO 4K N+1 150 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
13 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 61,45 %16 EO 3C W-1 100 8 36.36
17 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 81.82
18 EO 2P S+1 140 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,98 %19 EO 2P E = -110 20 90.91
20 EO 4C S = 620 4 18.18
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,71 %22 EO 4P E-1 100 7 31.82
23 EO 2P W = -110 14 63.64
24 EO 4TcS-2 -300 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -PIROTTE Claude : 50,77 %25 EO 3S N-2 -100 17.5 79.55
26 EO 3K S = 110 20.8 94.55
27 EO 4C W = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,23 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
29 EO 4P S-2 -200 18.6 84.55
30 EO 2P N+2 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,70 %31 EO 2P N = 110 13 59.09
32 EO 5PcN-1 -100 19 86.36
33 EO 3C E+2 -200 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
Total : 352,4 / 660 = 53,39 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 -
10 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,61 % 1 EO 3S S+2 460 0 0.00
2 EO 3C E-3 150 0 0.00
3 EO 1P W+1 -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
5 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,79 % 4 EO 3T W = -110 16 72.73
5 EO 1S N+2 150 20 90.91
6 EO 3P N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 60,52 % 7 EO 3P S+1 170 4 18.18
8 EO 3C N-2 -100 8 36.36
9 EO 2P S = 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 44,58 %10 EO 4P S+1 650 13 59.09
11 EO 3S S-1 -50 19 86.36
12 EO 3S S+3 690 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
1 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,21 %13 EO 3S S-2 -200 9 40.91
14 EO 4P W-1 50 7 31.82
15 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,11 %19 EO 3P W-3 300 4 18.18
20 EO 5PcW-5 1400 0 0.00
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -PIROTTE Claude : 50,77 %22 EO 2P E = -110 10 45.45
23 EO 2P E-1 100 2 9.09
24 EO 4C W-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
13 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 61,45 %25 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 50.00
26 EO 1KxS+4 1830 0.1 0.45
27 EO 4C W-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 20,30 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,70 %28 EO 2S N = 120 3.4 15.45
29 EO 3S N+2 660 1.2 5.45
30 EO 2P N+2 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 15,30 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,71 %31 EO 1S N+1 120 9 40.91
32 EO 4P N = 420 5 22.73
33 EO 2C E+2 -170 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
Total : 211,5 / 660 = 32,05 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 JASSOGNE Jacqueline -de NICOLAS Bernard
13 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 61,45 % 1 EO 5K S-1 -50 21 95.45
2 EO 4C E-1 50 7 31.82
3 EO 3C N-2 -100 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 60,52 % 4 EO 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
5 EO 3S S+2 660 2 9.09
6 EO 3C E = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,71 % 7 EO 2S S-3 -300 20 90.91
8 EO 2P W = -110 13 59.09
9 EO 2S N-1 -50 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
1 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,21 %10 EO 4T N+2 170 20 90.91
11 EO 3S N = 400 10 45.45
12 EO 3K S+2 150 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,98 %13 EO 3P S-2 -200 9 40.91
14 EO 3P W+2 -200 22 100.00
15 EO 3S S+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,11 %16 EO 3K N-2 -100 14 63.64
17 EO 4C W-1 50 9 40.91
18 EO 4P S = 620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,23 %22 EO 2S E-3 300 1 4.55
23 EO 2P W = -110 14 63.64
24 EO 4C W = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,70 %25 EO 2C S = 110 1.2 5.45
26 EO 3K S+1 130 13.2 60.00
27 EO 4C W = -420 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 43,36 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
29 EO 3TcW = -670 21.9 99.55
30 EO 1S W-1 50 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 83,03 %
10 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,61 %31 EO 1S N+3 180 2 9.09
32 EO 5P S-1 -50 15 68.18
33 EO 4C W-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 337,9 / 660 = 51,20 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
11 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 60,52 % 1 EO 3S S+1 430 3 13.64
2 EO 4C E-1 50 7 31.82
3 EO 1P W+1 -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 44,58 % 4 EO 4P E-1 100 12 54.55
5 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27
6 EO 4P N-2 -100 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
1 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,21 % 7 EO 3P S-2 -200 18 81.82
8 EO 3K E+1 -130 19 86.36
9 EO 3P S-2 -100 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
13 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 61,45 %10 EO 6S N = 1440 0 0.00
11 EO 3S S+2 460 2 9.09
12 EO 3S N+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 6,06 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,11 %13 EO 4C S-5 -500 22 100.00
14 EO 2P W+1 -140 13 59.09
15 EO 5K S-1 -100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,71 %16 EO 2P S-2 -100 14 63.64
17 EO 1S W-1 50 9 40.91
18 EO 4P S = 620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,23 %19 EO 2P E-2 200 8 36.36
20 EO 3P E-2 200 8 36.36
21 EO 3S E = -400 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 43,36 %25 EO 2P W-1 100 4.5 20.45
26 EO 2K S+2 130 13.2 60.00
27 EO 4C E-1 50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
10 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,61 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
29 EO 5P S-2 -200 18.6 84.55
30 EO 2P N+2 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
5 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,79 %31 EO 1S N = 90 18 81.82
32 EO 4C W = -620 22 100.00
33 EO 1S E+1 -120 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
Total : 316,4 / 660 = 47,94 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 44,58 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 8 36.36
2 EO 3C E-1 50 7 31.82
3 EO 3S S-6 -300 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
1 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,21 % 4 EO 3P E = -140 18 81.82
5 EO 1S S+3 180 13 59.09
6 EO 4C E-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,98 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 3P W-1 50 4 18.18
9 EO 3C E+2 -200 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,11 %10 EO 5T N+2 640 16 72.73
11 EO 3S N = 400 10 45.45
12 EO 3T N+1 130 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -PIROTTE Claude : 50,77 %13 EO 4P S-3 -300 16 72.73
14 EO 4P W-1 50 7 31.82
15 EO 3S N+1 630 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,23 %16 EO 3S N-4 -200 22 100.00
17 EO 2C W+1 -140 18 81.82
18 EO 4P N = 620 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
13 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 61,45 %19 EO 2P E-1 100 14 63.64
20 EO 4PcW-3 800 2 9.09
21 EO 2K W = -90 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 43,36 %22 EO 3P E = -140 15 68.18
23 EO 3C S-2 -200 21 95.45
24 EO 4C W = -420 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
5 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,79 %28 EO 3S N-1 -100 14.3 65.00
29 EO 3S N-1 -100 13.2 60.00
30 EO 2P N+2 170 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 60,52 %31 EO 1S N = 90 18 81.82
32 EO 5C W-1 100 11 50.00
33 EO 4C E = -420 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 366,0 / 660 = 55,45 %
PAIRE Nr : 25 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
12 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 50,71 % 1 EO 4C N = 420 8 36.36
2 EO 4C E = -420 21 95.45
3 EO 4P W-1 100 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,70 % 4 EO 3P E+2 -200 21 95.45
5 EO 1S N+1 120 22 100.00
6 EO 4C W-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 44,58 % 7 EO 3S S-1 -100 13 59.09
8 EO 3C S = 140 0 0.00
9 EO 4C E+1 -650 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,23 %10 EO 6T N = 1370 5 22.73
11 EO 3S N = 400 10 45.45
12 EO 2C W-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
11 VUYTS Michèle -PIETQUIN Joseph : 60,52 %13 EO 3P S-2 -200 9 40.91
14 EO 3S E-2 100 1 4.55
15 EO 3S S = 600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -PIROTTE Claude : 50,77 %16 EO 4C W-1 100 8 36.36
17 EO 3K N-3 -150 22 100.00
18 EO 4P S-1 -100 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
5 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,79 %19 EO 3P W-1 100 14 63.64
20 EO 2P W+1 -140 14 63.64
21 EO 3S E-1 50 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
2 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,11 %22 EO 4P E-1 100 7 31.82
23 EO 1S E = -90 6 27.27
24 EO 4C W+1 -450 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,98 %28 EO 2S S+1 150 0.1 0.45
29 EO 3S S+1 630 6.6 30.00
30 EO 2C N-1 -50 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 43,36 %31 EO 1S N+1 120 9 40.91
32 EO 4PcN = 590 1 4.55
33 EO 2C W+4 -230 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
Total : 328,6 / 660 = 49,79 %
PAIRE Nr : 26 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
5 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 47,79 % 1 EO 3S S = 400 12 54.55
2 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 63.64
3 EO 3K W = -110 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
13 GOBBE Amélie -LAMBEAUX Guy : 61,45 % 4 EO 3K N+2 150 6 27.27
5 EO 3S S+1 630 6 27.27
6 EO 3C W = -140 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
10 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,61 % 7 EO 3CcW-3 800 0 0.00
8 EO 3K E+1 -130 19 86.36
9 EO 3K N = 110 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
7 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 47,98 %10 EO 4C S-2 -200 22 100.00
11 EO 3S S+2 460 2 9.09
12 EO 5K S+1 620 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
4 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 43,36 %13 EO 3P S-2 -200 9 40.91
14 EO 3P W+1 -170 18 81.82
15 EO 3S N+2 660 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
1 VAGMAN David -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,21 %16 EO 3C W-1 100 8 36.36
17 EO 3S W-2 100 3 13.64
18 EO 4C S-2 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
9 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 47,70 %19 EO 3S E-4 400 1 4.55
20 EO 4CcS-2 -500 20 90.91
21 EO 3S W = -400 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
6 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 44,58 %22 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 68.18
23 EO 2P W-1 100 2 9.09
24 EO 5TcS-3 -500 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
3 TIELEMANS Jean-Marie -de WASSEIGE Ariane : 53,23 %25 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 50.00
26 EO 4K S+1 150 5.5 25.00
27 EO 1C W+2 -140 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
8 LIBERT Laurent -PIROTTE Claude : 50,77 %31 EO 1S N+3 180 2 9.09
32 EO 4PcN = 590 1 4.55
33 EO 2C E+1 -140 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
Total : 284,3 / 660 = 43,08 %
|
|