|
Tournoi du 30-10-17
Lundi
1 64,39 A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
2 60,85 A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre
3 57,33 A.5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
4 54,24 A.4 PIROTTE Claude -GROSFILS Colette
5 50,59 A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
6 50,56 A.3 LEBRUN Robert -MOSSERAY Etienne
7 46,43 A10 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
8 44,20 A.2 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele
9 42,72 A.1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
10 39,46 A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie
11 39,26 A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie
12 0,00 A12 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 65,08 a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
2 58,02 a.5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine
3 57,88 a.7 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
4 55,21 a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
5 54,24 a.1 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice
6 48,64 a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
7 48,23 a.8 HUBLET Carlo -DELTOUR Emile
8 45,23 a.3 DELFORGE Philippe -PAQUET Anne
9 44,26 a.6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
10 42,28 a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
11 41,56 a.4 COOLEN Joseph -ROMAIN Roberte
12 39,71 a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
PAIRE Nr : A.1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
a.1 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 54,24 % 1 NS 3C W-3 150 18 100.00
2 NS 1S E+2 -150 4 22.22
3 NS 2S W+2 -180 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,28 % 4 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22
5 NS 4C E-2 100 18 100.00
6 NS 3S E = -600 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 51,30 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,64 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 5.56
9 NS 3S N+3 490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 65,08 %10 NS 2K E = -90 2 11.11
11 NS 4CcS-1 -100 0 0.00
12 NS 2P E-1 50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.8 HUBLET Carlo -DELTOUR Emile : 48,23 %13 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
14 NS 3P W-1 50 1 5.56
15 NS 2P E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.7 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,88 %16 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
17 NS 2P S+3 200 8 44.44
18 NS 4P W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,26 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 13 72.22
20 NS 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 NS 3PcW = -530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 58,02 %22 NS 4C W = -620 8 44.44
23 NS 1S N+1 120 11 61.11
24 NS 4P S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.4 COOLEN Joseph -ROMAIN Roberte : 41,56 %25 NS 1S S-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 2P W = -110 0 0.00
27 NS 3S N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.3 DELFORGE Philippe -PAQUET Anne : 45,23 %28 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 66.67
29 NS 3K W+1 -130 6 33.33
30 NS 2C N-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 230,7 / 540 = 42,72 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,21 % 4 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22
5 NS 4P E = -420 0 0.00
6 NS 3S W = -600 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 17,96 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 54,24 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 NS 4P N = 420 12 66.67
9 NS 3S N+1 430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,28 %10 NS 2K E = -90 2 11.11
11 NS 4C S+1 450 16 88.89
12 NS 2S N-3 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,64 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 5.56
14 NS 3CcN+1 630 16 88.89
15 NS 2C W = -110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 65,08 %16 NS 2P N+4 230 0 0.00
17 NS 3P S+2 200 8 44.44
18 NS 4PcW-2 300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.8 HUBLET Carlo -DELTOUR Emile : 48,23 %19 NS 3S S+3 490 18 100.00
20 NS 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 NS 3P W = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 39,71 %22 NS 4PcN-4 -800 0 0.00
23 NS 1S N+1 120 11 61.11
24 NS 2P S+1 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,26 %25 NS 2T S = 90 16 88.89
26 NS 4P E-2 200 13 72.22
27 NS 3S N-2 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 58,02 %28 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 27.78
29 NS 2P N = 110 15 83.33
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.4 COOLEN Joseph -ROMAIN Roberte : 41,56 %31 NS 2C W-4 200 18 100.00
32 NS 3P N+1 170 9 50.00
33 NS 4C W+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 238,7 / 540 = 44,20 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 LEBRUN Robert -MOSSERAY Etienne
a.5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 58,02 % 1 NS 3K N-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
3 NS 3S W = -600 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.3 DELFORGE Philippe -PAQUET Anne : 45,23 % 7 NS 2P W+1 -140 0 0.00
8 NS 4P N+1 450 18 100.00
9 NS 3S S+3 490 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 39,71 %10 NS 2P N+1 140 16 88.89
11 NS 2C S+2 170 13 72.22
12 NS 3C N+1 170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 54,24 %13 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
14 NS 3C N+1 170 10 55.56
15 NS Pass Passe 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,28 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 16 88.89
17 NS 2P S+3 200 8 44.44
18 NS 4PcW-1 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,64 %19 NS 3S S+2 460 13 72.22
20 NS 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 NS 4PcW-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 65,08 %22 NS 4C W = -620 8 44.44
23 NS Pass Passe 2 11.11
24 NS 3S S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.8 HUBLET Carlo -DELTOUR Emile : 48,23 %25 NS 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56
26 NS 4P E-2 200 13 72.22
27 NS 4TcN-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.7 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,88 %28 NS 1S W+3 -180 1 5.56
29 NS 2P N-2 -200 0 0.00
30 NS 1S E-1 50 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,26 %31 NS 3S S-1 -100 2 11.11
32 NS 2P N+1 140 3 16.67
33 NS 4P S = 420 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
Total : 273,0 / 540 = 50,56 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 PIROTTE Claude -GROSFILS Colette
a.7 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,88 % 1 NS 3K N-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
3 NS 3S W+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,26 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 15 83.33
5 NS 4P W-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 3S W-2 200 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
a.4 COOLEN Joseph -ROMAIN Roberte : 41,56 %10 NS 2P S = 110 12 66.67
11 NS 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
12 NS 3S N-2 -200 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.3 DELFORGE Philippe -PAQUET Anne : 45,23 %13 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
14 NS 2S W-3 150 5 27.78
15 NS 2C W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,21 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 16 88.89
17 NS 2P S+2 170 3 16.67
18 NS 4P W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 54,24 %19 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78
20 NS 1S W+1 -120 0 0.00
21 NS 5TcE-1 100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,28 %22 NS 4C W = -620 8 44.44
23 NS 1S N+1 120 11 61.11
24 NS 5T N+1 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,64 %25 NS 2T S-2 -100 7 38.89
26 NS 4P E-2 200 13 72.22
27 NS 4C S-1 -50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 65,08 %28 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 66.67
29 NS 3P N-1 -100 12 66.67
30 NS 2C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 39,71 %31 NS 1S S+2 150 16 88.89
32 NS 4P N = 420 16 88.89
33 NS 4C W+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
Total : 292,9 / 540 = 54,24 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 65,08 % 1 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33
2 NS 1S E = -90 18 100.00
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.8 HUBLET Carlo -DELTOUR Emile : 48,23 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 15 83.33
5 NS 3P E-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 3S W-1 100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 78,89 %
a.7 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,88 % 7 NS 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
8 NS 4P N = 420 12 66.67
9 NS 3S N+1 430 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
a.5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 58,02 %13 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 5.56
14 NS 3C N+1 170 10 55.56
15 NS 2C W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a.4 COOLEN Joseph -ROMAIN Roberte : 41,56 %16 NS 4P N+1 450 16 88.89
17 NS 4P S+1 450 14 77.78
18 NS 2P W = -110 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 39,71 %19 NS 4P S-1 -50 1 5.56
20 NS 1S W-2 200 16 88.89
21 NS 3C N = 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,21 %22 NS 4PcN-2 -300 16 88.89
23 NS 1S N+1 120 11 61.11
24 NS 5T N+1 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 54,24 %25 NS 3C N-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 4P E-2 200 13 72.22
27 NS 2P W-2 100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,28 %28 NS 1S W+2 -150 5 27.78
29 NS 4K E+1 -150 2 11.11
30 NS 2C S-2 -100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,64 %31 NS 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
32 NS 3P N+1 170 9 50.00
33 NS 5CcW+1 -750 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
Total : 309,6 / 540 = 57,33 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,28 % 1 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
3 NS 2S W+1 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 72,22 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,64 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 61.11
5 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
6 NS 4P E-1 100 14.6 81.11 µ Tbl = 58,52 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 39,71 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 NS 3P N+2 200 6 33.33
9 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.8 HUBLET Carlo -DELTOUR Emile : 48,23 %10 NS 1S W-2 200 18 100.00
11 NS 2C S+1 140 7 38.89
12 NS 3KcW-1 100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a.6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,26 %16 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
17 NS 4P S+1 450 14 77.78
18 NS 4P W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a.5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 58,02 %19 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 5.56
20 NS 1S W = -90 2 11.11
21 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
a.4 COOLEN Joseph -ROMAIN Roberte : 41,56 %22 NS 3P N = 140 18 100.00
23 NS 3T S = 110 4 22.22
24 NS 5T N+1 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
a.3 DELFORGE Philippe -PAQUET Anne : 45,23 %25 NS 2C N+1 140 18 100.00
26 NS 4P E-2 200 13 72.22
27 NS 3T S = 110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 90,74 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,21 %28 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 66.67
29 NS 2P N = 110 15 83.33
30 NS 2C S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 54,24 %31 NS 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
32 NS 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
33 NS 4PcS-1 -100 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 328,6 / 540 = 60,85 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,21 % 1 NS 4P N-4 -200 0 0.00
2 NS 2C W+1 -140 6 33.33
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 54,24 % 4 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22
5 NS 1S N-1 -100 8 44.44
6 NS 3S E+2 -660 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 22,41 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,28 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 NS 4P N = 420 12 66.67
9 NS 3S N+2 460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,64 %10 NS 2P S = 110 12 66.67
11 NS 4T W-2 100 2 11.11
12 NS 2P E+1 -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 65,08 %13 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
14 NS 3P W-1 50 1 5.56
15 NS 2P S = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
a.7 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,88 %19 NS 3S S = 400 5 27.78
20 NS 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 NS 3P W = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,26 %22 NS 4C W = -620 8 44.44
23 NS 1S S+1 120 11 61.11
24 NS 3P S-2 -100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
a.5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 58,02 %25 NS 2P E = -110 4 22.22
26 NS 4P E-2 200 13 72.22
27 NS 2P W = -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 39,71 %28 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 66.67
29 NS 4K E = -130 6 33.33
30 NS 2C E-4 200 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.3 DELFORGE Philippe -PAQUET Anne : 45,23 %31 NS 2C W-2 100 4 22.22
32 NS 1P S+3 170 9 50.00
33 NS 4C W+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 213,1 / 540 = 39,46 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
a.4 COOLEN Joseph -ROMAIN Roberte : 41,56 % 1 NS 2P S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 2C S-3 -300 0 0.00
3 NS 2C W = -110 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.3 DELFORGE Philippe -PAQUET Anne : 45,23 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 11 61.11
5 NS 3C W+1 -170 3 16.67
6 NS 2CcN-2 -300 11.2 62.22 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,21 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 NS 4P N-1 -50 1 5.56
9 NS 3S S = 400 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 54,24 %10 NS 3K E-1 100 7 38.89
11 NS 3CcS = 530 18 100.00
12 NS 2C N+2 170 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,28 %13 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
14 NS 3C N+1 170 10 55.56
15 NS 2P N = 110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 39,71 %16 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
17 NS 4P S+1 450 14 77.78
18 NS 3P W = -140 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.8 HUBLET Carlo -DELTOUR Emile : 48,23 %22 NS 4C W = -620 8 44.44
23 NS 1S N+1 120 11 61.11
24 NS 5T N = 400 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.7 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,88 %25 NS 2T S-2 -100 7 38.89
26 NS 4P E-1 100 4 22.22
27 NS 3KcE+1 -570 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 20,37 %
a.6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,26 %28 NS 1S W-1 50 18 100.00
29 NS 2P N+1 140 18 100.00
30 NS 2C N-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
a.5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 58,02 %31 NS 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
32 NS 2P N+1 140 3 16.67
33 NS 4C W+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 273,2 / 540 = 50,59 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie
a.6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,26 % 1 NS 2P S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 2T S-2 -200 2 11.11
3 NS 2S W+1 -150 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 39,71 % 4 NS 6P E-2 200 18 100.00
5 NS 4C E-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 50%50% Ajust 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
a.4 COOLEN Joseph -ROMAIN Roberte : 41,56 % 7 NS 4P W-3 300 18 100.00
8 NS 3T E-1 50 4 22.22
9 NS Pass Passe 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.3 DELFORGE Philippe -PAQUET Anne : 45,23 %10 NS 1S W-1 100 7 38.89
11 NS 3C S = 140 7 38.89
12 NS 3C S = 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,21 %13 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
14 NS 3P W-3 150 5 27.78
15 NS 2C W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 54,24 %16 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
17 NS 4P S-1 -50 0 0.00
18 NS 2P W+2 -170 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,28 %19 NS 4P N = 420 8 44.44
20 NS 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 NS 2P W = -110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 65,08 %25 NS 2P E+1 -140 1 5.56
26 NS 4P E-1 100 4 22.22
27 NS 1P W+1 -110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 14,81 %
a.8 HUBLET Carlo -DELTOUR Emile : 48,23 %28 NS 1S W+3 -180 1 5.56
29 NS 3K E = -110 10 55.56
30 NS 1S E+1 -120 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
a.7 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,88 %31 NS 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
32 NS 4P N = 420 16 88.89
33 NS 4C W+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
Total : 212,0 / 540 = 39,26 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
a.8 HUBLET Carlo -DELTOUR Emile : 48,23 % 1 NS 2P S-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 1S E+1 -120 11 61.11
3 NS 3S W+1 -630 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
a.7 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,88 % 4 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22
5 NS 4C E-1 50 13 72.22
6 NS 3S W = -600 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 42,04 %
a.6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,26 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 NS 4P N = 420 12 66.67
9 NS 2K N+4 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
a.5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 58,02 %10 NS 2P S = 110 12 66.67
11 NS 3C S = 140 7 38.89
12 NS 3T N = 110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.4 COOLEN Joseph -ROMAIN Roberte : 41,56 %13 NS 3S E-1 100 16 88.89
14 NS 4P W-4 200 14 77.78
15 NS 2P S+1 140 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 88,89 %
a.3 DELFORGE Philippe -PAQUET Anne : 45,23 %16 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
17 NS 2P S+2 170 3 16.67
18 NS 4P W-2 100 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,21 %19 NS 4P N+2 480 16 88.89
20 NS 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 NS 3P W = -140 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.1 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 54,24 %22 NS 4C W = -620 8 44.44
23 NS 2S S-2 -200 0 0.00
24 NS 5KcW-2 300 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,64 %28 NS 1S W+1 -120 12 66.67
29 NS 3K E+1 -130 6 33.33
30 NS 2T S-1 -50 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 65,08 %31 NS 2S S-3 -300 0 0.00
32 NS 4P N-1 -50 0 0.00
33 NS 4C W+2 -480 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
Total : 250,7 / 540 = 46,43 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,64 % 1 NS 1S N-1 -50 7 38.89
2 NS 2P N-1 -100 16 88.89
3 NS 4S W-1 100 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 65,08 % 4 NS 3S W+2 -660 4 22.22
5 NS 2P E+2 -170 3 16.67
6 NS 3S W = -600 5.7 31.67 µ Tbl = 23,52 %
a.8 HUBLET Carlo -DELTOUR Emile : 48,23 % 7 NS 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 NS 4P N = 420 12 66.67
9 NS 3S S+2 460 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.7 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,88 %10 NS 2K E = -90 2 11.11
11 NS 3C S+1 170 13 72.22
12 NS 3S N = 600 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 39,71 %13 NS 3S E = -600 8 44.44
14 NS 5CcE-7 1700 18 100.00
15 NS 3C W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
a.5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 58,02 %16 NS 4P N = 420 7 38.89
17 NS 2CcW-4 800 18 100.00
18 NS 3P W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
a.4 COOLEN Joseph -ROMAIN Roberte : 41,56 %19 NS 4P N+1 450 10 55.56
20 NS 2K W-4 400 18 100.00
21 NS 3C N = 140 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.3 DELFORGE Philippe -PAQUET Anne : 45,23 %22 NS 4C W = -620 8 44.44
23 NS 1S N+2 150 18 100.00
24 NS 5T N+1 420 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,21 %25 NS 1S S-1 -50 12 66.67
26 NS 4P E-1 100 4 22.22
27 NS 2P W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 42,28 %31 NS 1S S+1 120 10 55.56
32 NS 4P N = 420 16 88.89
33 NS 2P S+2 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
Total : 347,7 / 540 = 64,39 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 -
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 39,71 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine : 58,02 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 65,08 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 55,21 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette : 44,26 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 48,64 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.3 DELFORGE Philippe -PAQUET Anne : 45,23 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle : 57,88 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 COOLEN Joseph -ROMAIN Roberte : 41,56 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 HUBLET Carlo -DELTOUR Emile : 48,23 %31 NS BYE 0 0.00
32 NS BYE 0 0.00
33 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 594 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice
A.1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,72 % 1 EO 3C W-3 150 0 0.00
2 EO 1S E+2 -150 14 77.78
3 EO 2S W+2 -180 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,46 % 4 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78
5 EO 1S N-1 -100 10 55.56
6 EO 3S E+2 -660 17.9 99.44 µ Tbl = 77,59 %
A.2 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 44,20 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 EO 4P N = 420 6 33.33
9 EO 3S N+1 430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,59 %10 EO 3K E-1 100 11 61.11
11 EO 3CcS = 530 0 0.00
12 EO 2C N+2 170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,56 %13 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
14 EO 3C N+1 170 8 44.44
15 EO Pass Passe 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 39,26 %16 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
17 EO 4P S-1 -50 18 100.00
18 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
A.4 PIROTTE Claude -GROSFILS Colette : 54,24 %19 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22
20 EO 1S W+1 -120 18 100.00
21 EO 5TcE-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A10 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 46,43 %22 EO 4C W = -620 10 55.56
23 EO 2S S-2 -200 18 100.00
24 EO 5KcW-2 300 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 70,37 %
A.5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,33 %25 EO 3C N-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 4P E-2 200 5 27.78
27 EO 2P W-2 100 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,85 %31 EO 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
32 EO 2P N+2 170 9 50.00
33 EO 4PcS-1 -100 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 292,9 / 540 = 54,24 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,46 % 1 EO 4P N-4 -200 18 100.00
2 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 81,48 %
A.2 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 44,20 % 4 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78
5 EO 4P E = -420 18 100.00
6 EO 3S W = -600 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 82,04 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,59 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 EO 4P N-1 -50 17 94.44
9 EO 3S S = 400 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 74,07 %
A12 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 39,26 %13 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
14 EO 3P W-3 150 13 72.22
15 EO 2C W-1 50 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.4 PIROTTE Claude -GROSFILS Colette : 54,24 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 2 11.11
17 EO 2P S+2 170 15 83.33
18 EO 4P W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A10 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 46,43 %19 EO 4P N+2 480 2 11.11
20 EO 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 EO 3P W = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,33 %22 EO 4PcN-2 -300 2 11.11
23 EO 1S N+1 120 7 38.89
24 EO 5T N+1 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,39 %25 EO 1S S-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 4P E-1 100 14 77.78
27 EO 2P W-1 50 4 22.22 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,85 %28 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 33.33
29 EO 2P N = 110 3 16.67
30 EO 2C S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 29,63 %
Total : 268,3 / 486 = 55,21 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 DELFORGE Philippe -PAQUET Anne
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,59 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 38.89
5 EO 3C W+1 -170 15 83.33
6 EO 2CcN-2 -300 6.8 37.78 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,56 % 7 EO 2P W+1 -140 18 100.00
8 EO 4P N+1 450 0 0.00
9 EO 3S S+3 490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 39,26 %10 EO 1S W-1 100 11 61.11
11 EO 3C S = 140 11 61.11
12 EO 3C S = 140 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.4 PIROTTE Claude -GROSFILS Colette : 54,24 %13 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
14 EO 2S W-3 150 13 72.22
15 EO 2C W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A10 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 46,43 %16 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
17 EO 2P S+2 170 15 83.33
18 EO 4P W-2 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A12 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,39 %22 EO 4C W = -620 10 55.56
23 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00
24 EO 5T N+1 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,85 %25 EO 2C N+1 140 0 0.00
26 EO 4P E-2 200 5 27.78
27 EO 3T S = 110 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 9,26 %
A.1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,72 %28 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 33.33
29 EO 3K W+1 -130 12 66.67
30 EO 2C N-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,46 %31 EO 2C W-2 100 14 77.78
32 EO 1P S+3 170 9 50.00
33 EO 4C W+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 219,8 / 486 = 45,23 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 COOLEN Joseph -ROMAIN Roberte
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,59 % 1 EO 2P S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 2C S-3 -300 18 100.00
3 EO 2C W = -110 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 39,26 % 7 EO 4P W-3 300 0 0.00
8 EO 3T E-1 50 14 77.78
9 EO Pass Passe 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 PIROTTE Claude -GROSFILS Colette : 54,24 %10 EO 2P S = 110 6 33.33
11 EO 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
12 EO 3S N-2 -200 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A10 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 46,43 %13 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
14 EO 4P W-4 200 4 22.22
15 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 11,11 %
A.5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,33 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 2 11.11
17 EO 4P S+1 450 4 22.22
18 EO 2P W = -110 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,39 %19 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44
20 EO 2K W-4 400 0 0.00
21 EO 3C N = 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,85 %22 EO 3P N = 140 0 0.00
23 EO 3T S = 110 14 77.78
24 EO 5T N+1 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,72 %25 EO 1S S-1 -50 6 33.33
26 EO 2P W = -110 18 100.00
27 EO 3S N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A12 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 44,20 %31 EO 2C W-4 200 0 0.00
32 EO 3P N+1 170 9 50.00
33 EO 4C W+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
Total : 202,0 / 486 = 41,56 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 VANDAM Cécile -WANDERPEPEN Janine
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,56 % 1 EO 3K N-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
3 EO 3S W = -600 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A12 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 46,43 %10 EO 2P S = 110 6 33.33
11 EO 3C S = 140 11 61.11
12 EO 3T N = 110 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,33 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 17 94.44
14 EO 3C N+1 170 8 44.44
15 EO 2C W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,39 %16 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
17 EO 2CcW-4 800 0 0.00
18 EO 3P W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,85 %19 EO 4P N-1 -50 17 94.44
20 EO 1S W = -90 16 88.89
21 EO 3C N-1 -100 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 75,93 %
A.1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,72 %22 EO 4C W = -620 10 55.56
23 EO 1S N+1 120 7 38.89
24 EO 4P S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,46 %25 EO 2P E = -110 14 77.78
26 EO 4P E-2 200 5 27.78
27 EO 2P W = -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
A.2 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 44,20 %28 EO 1S W+2 -150 13 72.22
29 EO 2P N = 110 3 16.67
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,59 %31 EO 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
32 EO 2P N+1 140 15 83.33
33 EO 4C W+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 62,96 %
Total : 282,0 / 486 = 58,02 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 DAPHNE Chantal -DEBUISSON Colette
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 39,26 % 1 EO 2P S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 2T S-2 -200 16 88.89
3 EO 2S W+1 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.4 PIROTTE Claude -GROSFILS Colette : 54,24 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 3 16.67
5 EO 4P W-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 3S W-2 200 0.1 0.56 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
A10 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 46,43 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 EO 4P N = 420 6 33.33
9 EO 2K N+4 170 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A12 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,85 %16 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
17 EO 4P S+1 450 4 22.22
18 EO 4P W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 44,44 %
A.1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,72 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 5 27.78
20 EO 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 EO 3PcW = -530 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,46 %22 EO 4C W = -620 10 55.56
23 EO 1S S+1 120 7 38.89
24 EO 3P S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 61,11 %
A.2 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 44,20 %25 EO 2T S = 90 2 11.11
26 EO 4P E-2 200 5 27.78
27 EO 3S N-2 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,59 %28 EO 1S W-1 50 0 0.00
29 EO 2P N+1 140 0 0.00
30 EO 2C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 12,96 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,56 %31 EO 3S S-1 -100 16 88.89
32 EO 2P N+1 140 15 83.33
33 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
Total : 215,1 / 486 = 44,26 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 de NICOLAS Bernard -VUYTS Michèle
A.4 PIROTTE Claude -GROSFILS Colette : 54,24 % 1 EO 3K N-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
3 EO 3S W+2 -660 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A10 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 46,43 % 4 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78
5 EO 4C E-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 3S W = -600 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 57,96 %
A.5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,33 % 7 EO 3S W-1 100 9 50.00
8 EO 4P N = 420 6 33.33
9 EO 3S N+1 430 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 48,15 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,39 %10 EO 2K E = -90 16 88.89
11 EO 3C S+1 170 5 27.78
12 EO 3S N = 600 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,72 %16 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
17 EO 2P S+3 200 10 55.56
18 EO 4P W-1 50 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,46 %19 EO 3S S = 400 13 72.22
20 EO 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 EO 3P W = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A12 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,59 %25 EO 2T S-2 -100 11 61.11
26 EO 4P E-1 100 14 77.78
27 EO 3KcE+1 -570 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 79,63 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,56 %28 EO 1S W+3 -180 17 94.44
29 EO 2P N-2 -200 18 100.00
30 EO 1S E-1 50 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 39,26 %31 EO 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
32 EO 4P N = 420 2 11.11
33 EO 4C W+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
Total : 281,3 / 486 = 57,88 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 HUBLET Carlo -DELTOUR Emile
A10 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 46,43 % 1 EO 2P S-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,33 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 3 16.67
5 EO 3P E-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 3S W-1 100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 21,11 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,39 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 EO 4P N = 420 6 33.33
9 EO 3S S+2 460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,85 %10 EO 1S W-2 200 0 0.00
11 EO 2C S+1 140 11 61.11
12 EO 3KcW-1 100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 38,89 %
A.1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,72 %13 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
14 EO 3P W-1 50 17 94.44
15 EO 2P E-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.2 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 44,20 %19 EO 3S S+3 490 0 0.00
20 EO 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 EO 3P W = -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 42,59 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,59 %22 EO 4C W = -620 10 55.56
23 EO 1S N+1 120 7 38.89
24 EO 5T N = 400 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,56 %25 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44
26 EO 4P E-2 200 5 27.78
27 EO 4TcN-1 -100 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 59,26 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 39,26 %28 EO 1S W+3 -180 17 94.44
29 EO 3K E = -110 8 44.44
30 EO 1S E+1 -120 17 94.44 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A12 - : 0,00 %31 EO BYE 0 0.00
32 EO BYE 0 0.00
33 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 234,4 / 486 = 48,23 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
A.5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,33 % 1 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67
2 EO 1S E = -90 0 0.00
3 EO 3S W+1 -630 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 31,48 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,39 % 4 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78
5 EO 2P E+2 -170 15 83.33
6 EO 3S W = -600 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 76,48 %
A12 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,72 %10 EO 2K E = -90 16 88.89
11 EO 4CcS-1 -100 18 100.00
12 EO 2P E-1 50 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,46 %13 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
14 EO 3P W-1 50 17 94.44
15 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 55,56 %
A.2 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 44,20 %16 EO 2P N+4 230 18 100.00
17 EO 3P S+2 200 10 55.56
18 EO 4PcW-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,85 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,56 %22 EO 4C W = -620 10 55.56
23 EO Pass Passe 16 88.89
24 EO 3S S-2 -100 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 39,26 %25 EO 2P E+1 -140 17 94.44
26 EO 4P E-1 100 14 77.78
27 EO 1P W+1 -110 15 83.33 µ Tbl = 85,19 %
A.4 PIROTTE Claude -GROSFILS Colette : 54,24 %28 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 33.33
29 EO 3P N-1 -100 6 33.33
30 EO 2C N-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A10 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 46,43 %31 EO 2S S-3 -300 18 100.00
32 EO 4P N-1 -50 18 100.00
33 EO 4C W+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 87,04 %
Total : 316,3 / 486 = 65,08 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,39 % 1 EO 1S N-1 -50 11 61.11
2 EO 2P N-1 -100 2 11.11
3 EO 4S W-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,85 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 7 38.89
5 EO 2C W+1 -140 12 66.67
6 EO 4P E-1 100 3.4 18.89 µ Tbl = 41,48 %
A.1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,72 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 EO 4P N-1 -50 17 94.44
9 EO 3S N+3 490 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,46 %10 EO 2P S = 110 6 33.33
11 EO 4T W-2 100 16 88.89
12 EO 2P E+1 -140 14 77.78 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 44,20 %13 EO 3S E+1 -630 17 94.44
14 EO 3CcN+1 630 2 11.11
15 EO 2C W = -110 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A12 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,56 %19 EO 3S S+2 460 5 27.78
20 EO 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 EO 4PcW-1 100 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.4 PIROTTE Claude -GROSFILS Colette : 54,24 %25 EO 2T S-2 -100 11 61.11
26 EO 4P E-2 200 5 27.78
27 EO 4C S-1 -50 6 33.33 µ Tbl = 40,74 %
A10 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 46,43 %28 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 33.33
29 EO 3K E+1 -130 12 66.67
30 EO 2T S-1 -50 7 38.89 µ Tbl = 46,30 %
A.5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,33 %31 EO 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
32 EO 3P N+1 170 9 50.00
33 EO 5CcW+1 -750 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 64,81 %
Total : 236,4 / 486 = 48,64 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,85 % 1 EO 2P S = 110 3 16.67
2 EO 1S E+1 -120 7 38.89
3 EO 2S W+1 -150 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.1 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 42,72 % 4 EO 3S W+2 -660 14 77.78
5 EO 4C E-2 100 0 0.00
6 EO 3S E = -600 12.3 68.33 µ Tbl = 48,70 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,46 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 EO 4P N = 420 6 33.33
9 EO 3S N+2 460 5 27.78 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.2 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 44,20 %10 EO 2K E = -90 16 88.89
11 EO 4C S+1 450 2 11.11
12 EO 2S N-3 -300 18 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,59 %13 EO 3S E-1 100 2 11.11
14 EO 3C N+1 170 8 44.44
15 EO 2P N = 110 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 24,07 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,56 %16 EO 4P N+1 450 2 11.11
17 EO 2P S+3 200 10 55.56
18 EO 4PcW-1 100 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 39,26 %19 EO 4P N = 420 10 55.56
20 EO 1S W-1 100 9 50.00
21 EO 2P W = -110 10 55.56 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.4 PIROTTE Claude -GROSFILS Colette : 54,24 %22 EO 4C W = -620 10 55.56
23 EO 1S N+1 120 7 38.89
24 EO 5T N+1 420 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,33 %28 EO 1S W+2 -150 13 72.22
29 EO 4K E+1 -150 16 88.89
30 EO 2C S-2 -100 13 72.22 µ Tbl = 77,78 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,39 %31 EO 1S S+1 120 8 44.44
32 EO 4P N = 420 2 11.11
33 EO 2P S+2 170 2 11.11 µ Tbl = 22,22 %
Total : 228,3 / 540 = 42,28 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A12 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.9 de TERWANGNE Philippe -PIRMEZ Amélie : 39,26 % 4 EO 6P E-2 200 0 0.00
5 EO 4C E-1 50 5 27.78
6 EO 50%50% Ajust 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,93 %
A.6 MATELART Marc -JANSSENS Pierre : 60,85 % 7 EO 4P W-1 100 9 50.00
8 EO 3P N+2 200 12 66.67
9 EO 4P N+1 450 8 44.44 µ Tbl = 53,70 %
A.3 LEBRUN Robert -MOSSERAY Etienne : 50,56 %10 EO 2P N+1 140 2 11.11
11 EO 2C S+2 170 5 27.78
12 EO 3C N+1 170 3 16.67 µ Tbl = 18,52 %
A11 COURTOIS Chantal -LOUIS Serge : 64,39 %13 EO 3S E = -600 10 55.56
14 EO 5CcE-7 1700 0 0.00
15 EO 3C W-2 100 9 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,19 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 50,59 %16 EO 4P N = 420 11 61.11
17 EO 4P S+1 450 4 22.22
18 EO 3P W = -140 16 88.89 µ Tbl = 57,41 %
A.5 BRIOT Fernand -BRUYR Pascal : 57,33 %19 EO 4P S-1 -50 17 94.44
20 EO 1S W-2 200 2 11.11
21 EO 3C N = 140 1 5.56 µ Tbl = 37,04 %
A.2 NELIS Claude -VAN DOOREN Michele : 44,20 %22 EO 4PcN-4 -800 18 100.00
23 EO 1S N+1 120 7 38.89
24 EO 2P S+1 140 12 66.67 µ Tbl = 68,52 %
A.7 DELHEZ Jacques -BERGER Jean Marie : 39,46 %28 EO 1S W+1 -120 6 33.33
29 EO 4K E = -130 12 66.67
30 EO 2C E-4 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A.4 PIROTTE Claude -GROSFILS Colette : 54,24 %31 EO 1S S+2 150 2 11.11
32 EO 4P N = 420 2 11.11
33 EO 4C W+2 -480 11 61.11 µ Tbl = 27,78 %
Total : 193,0 / 486 = 39,71 %
|
|