|
Tournoi du 30-11-15
1 61,92 A.9 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile
2 55,83 A11 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline
3 55,52 A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
4 54,83 A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
5 54,33 A13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
6 50,98 A12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
7 47,74 A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
8 47,24 A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
9 46,74 A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre
10 46,70 A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert
11 43,03 A.5 ARICKX Roger -VAGMAN David
12 42,74 A.7 PETERS Annik -MASSAUX Joel
13 42,41 A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
14 0,00 A14 -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 60,19 a11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
2 59,83 a.6 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice
3 59,12 a.5 BABIKOW Georges -DEBIE Sylvie
4 57,05 a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
5 55,32 a.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
6 54,95 a14 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele
7 52,17 a.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
8 51,30 a.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
9 47,12 a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
10 47,02 a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
11 42,64 a.9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
12 41,33 a.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
13 39,63 a.8 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
14 34,00 a13 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine
PAIRE Nr : A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,33 % 1 NS 4P W-2 100 20 90.91
2 NS 4P W-1 50 16 72.73
3 NS 4C N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,19 % 4 NS 3S W+1 -630 0 0.00
5 NS 2S N-1 -100 4 18.18
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,05 % 7 NS 4C W+2 -680 15 68.18
8 NS 6S W-1 50 15 68.18
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
a.9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,64 %10 NS 4K S+2 170 6 27.27
11 NS 3P E = -140 8 36.36
12 NS 3S E = -400 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a.8 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,63 %13 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
14 NS 3S W-4 200 22 100.00
15 NS 4C E-2 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a13 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 34,00 %16 NS 1S S+1 120 12 54.55
17 NS 4P N+2 480 17 77.27
18 NS 4T W-2 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 71,21 %
a.6 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 59,83 %19 NS 3K N = 110 9 40.91
20 NS 4K S = 130 13 59.09
21 NS 3S N+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,12 %22 NS 4C E+2 -680 5 22.73
23 NS 2P W+2 -170 8 36.36
24 NS 2K S = 90 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 40,91 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,02 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
26 NS 4P S = 620 11 50.00
27 NS 2K S-1 -50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,17 %28 NS 4C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
29 NS 5P E-1 100 19.7 89.55
30 NS 2C N+1 140 6.6 30.00 µ Tbl = 63,18 %
Total : 361,9 / 660 = 54,83 %
PAIRE Nr : A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert
a.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 % 4 NS 3S E = -600 5 22.73
5 NS 2S N-1 -100 4 18.18
6 NS 3P S-2 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,33 % 7 NS 6T E = -1370 8 36.36
8 NS 6C E-3 150 22 100.00
9 NS 4P W-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,19 %10 NS 3KcS+3 1270 20 90.91
11 NS 4P E = -420 1 4.55
12 NS 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,05 %13 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
14 NS 3T W-1 50 18 81.82
15 NS 4C E = -420 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a.9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,64 %16 NS 1S S = 90 8 36.36
17 NS 5K W-2 100 8 36.36
18 NS 3PcS-1 -200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a14 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,95 %19 NS 1P N+1 110 9 40.91
20 NS 4K S = 130 13 59.09
21 NS 3T N+2 150 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,12 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73
24 NS 1P S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
a.6 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 59,83 %25 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
26 NS 3S S+2 660 19.7 89.55
27 NS 4T E-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 58,18 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,12 %28 NS 3C E-1 50 15.4 70.00
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 1.2 5.45
30 NS 2C N+2 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 45,15 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,02 %31 NS 4P E-1 50 14 63.64
32 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 4.55
33 NS 2S W+2 -180 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
Total : 308,2 / 660 = 46,70 %
PAIRE Nr : A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,12 % 1 NS 2K E-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 4P W-1 50 16 72.73
3 NS 4CcN-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
a.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,17 % 7 NS 6C W = -1430 3 13.64
8 NS 3S E+4 -520 8 36.36
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,12 %10 NS 2K S+4 170 6 27.27
11 NS 3P E+1 -170 6 27.27
12 NS 3S E+1 -430 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,33 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36
14 NS 3T W = -110 8 36.36
15 NS 2C E+1 -140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,19 %16 NS 1S S+2 150 19 86.36
17 NS 5P N+1 480 17 77.27
18 NS 3S E-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,05 %19 NS 2P N+1 140 19 86.36
20 NS 4P E = -620 0 0.00
21 NS 3P S+2 200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a.9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,64 %22 NS 3ScE+2 -1150 0 0.00
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73
24 NS 1S W-3 150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
a13 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 34,00 %25 NS 4P W = -620 16.5 75.00
26 NS 4P S+1 650 17.5 79.55
27 NS 4T E-3 150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 79,70 %
a.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,32 %28 NS 1C W+2 -140 0.1 0.45
29 NS 4P E = -620 9.9 45.00
30 NS 2C S+2 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 35,15 %
a.6 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 59,83 %31 NS 1S W = -90 8 36.36
32 NS 3S E = -600 5 22.73
33 NS 3S W+1 -430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
Total : 311,8 / 660 = 47,24 %
PAIRE Nr : A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre
a.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,32 % 1 NS 2C W = -110 7 31.82
2 NS 3P W+1 -170 4 18.18
3 NS 3P E-1 100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
a.6 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 59,83 % 4 NS 2S W+1 -150 13 59.09
5 NS 2C N = 110 10 45.45
6 NS 2C S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,02 %10 NS 2KcS+3 780 16 72.73
11 NS 4PcW-2 300 22 100.00
12 NS 4C E = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
a13 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 34,00 %13 NS 5KcS-1 -200 0 0.00
14 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36
15 NS 5CcE-2 300 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
a.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %16 NS 1S S+2 150 19 86.36
17 NS 5C S-1 -50 3 13.64
18 NS 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,33 %19 NS 1P N+1 110 9 40.91
20 NS 4K S = 130 13 59.09
21 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,19 %22 NS 3S E+2 -660 9 40.91
23 NS 4P E+1 -650 0 0.00
24 NS 2C N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,05 %25 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
26 NS 4P S = 620 11 50.00
27 NS 1S E = -90 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a14 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,95 %28 NS 3C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
29 NS 4P E+1 -650 1.2 5.45
30 NS 4C N = 420 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,12 %31 NS 3S W-2 100 21 95.45
32 NS 3S E-1 100 11 50.00
33 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
Total : 308,5 / 660 = 46,74 %
PAIRE Nr : A.5 ARICKX Roger -VAGMAN David
a13 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 34,00 % 1 NS 2S W-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 4P W-1 50 16 72.73
3 NS 4C N-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
a.8 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,63 % 4 NS 2C W = -110 20 90.91
5 NS 2S N-1 -100 4 18.18
6 NS 2S E-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,32 % 7 NS 6C W = -1430 3 13.64
8 NS 6S E = -990 3 13.64
9 NS 4P W+1 -650 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,12 %13 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
14 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36
15 NS 4C E-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
a14 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,95 %16 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 18.18
17 NS 5K W-1 50 6 27.27
18 NS 2P S+1 140 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,12 %19 NS 2K N+1 110 9 40.91
20 NS 5KcS-1 -200 4 18.18
21 NS 4P S+1 650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
a.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %22 NS 3S E+3 -690 2 9.09
23 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 36.36
24 NS 1P S = 80 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,33 %25 NS 4C W = -620 16.5 75.00
26 NS 3S S+3 690 21.9 99.55
27 NS 3K S-2 -100 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,19 %28 NS 2C W = -110 4.5 20.45
29 NS 3S W-1 100 19.7 89.55
30 NS 3S S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,05 %31 NS 4P W = -420 0 0.00
32 NS 3S E-1 100 11 50.00
33 NS 3S E+1 -430 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
Total : 284,0 / 660 = 43,03 %
PAIRE Nr : A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
a11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,19 % 1 NS 2S E+2 -180 0 0.00
2 NS 4P W-1 50 16 72.73
3 NS 4C N-3 -150 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
a14 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,95 % 4 NS 2S W = -120 17 77.27
5 NS 2P S-1 -100 4 18.18
6 NS 2C E = -110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,12 % 7 NS 4C W+2 -680 15 68.18
8 NS 6S E-1 50 15 68.18
9 NS 3S W+1 -630 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
a.8 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,63 %10 NS 4KxS+2 1720 22 100.00
11 NS 5KcN-2 -300 4 18.18
12 NS 4C W+1 -450 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
a.6 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 59,83 %16 NS 2S S-1 -50 4 18.18
17 NS 5P N-2 -100 0 0.00
18 NS 3P S-2 -200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,12 %19 NS 1P N-1 -50 1 4.55
20 NS 4P E-1 100 8 36.36
21 NS 1P S+2 140 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
a13 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 34,00 %22 NS 3S E-3 300 22 100.00
23 NS 4P E = -620 2 9.09
24 NS 2P S = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
a.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,17 %25 NS 4P E+1 -650 7.7 35.00
26 NS 4P S = 620 11 50.00
27 NS 3K S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %28 NS 2C W = -110 4.5 20.45
29 NS 3P E+1 -170 13.2 60.00
30 NS 2C N+2 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 46,82 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,33 %31 NS 2P W+2 -170 4 18.18
32 NS 3S E-2 200 19 86.36
33 NS 3S W-2 100 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 279,9 / 660 = 42,41 %
PAIRE Nr : A.7 PETERS Annik -MASSAUX Joel
a.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 % 1 NS 2S E-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 4T E = -130 9 40.91
3 NS 4C N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,33 % 4 NS 2S W = -120 17 77.27
5 NS 2S N-1 -100 4 18.18
6 NS 4P N-3 -150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,19 % 7 NS 6C W = -1430 3 13.64
8 NS 6S E = -990 3 13.64
9 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
a13 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 34,00 %10 NS 4CcW-3 800 18 81.82
11 NS 3P W-3 150 18 81.82
12 NS 3C W+1 -170 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
a.9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,64 %13 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
14 NS 2K S-1 -50 14 63.64
15 NS 4CxE = -880 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
a.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,32 %19 NS 1P N+1 110 9 40.91
20 NS 3K S+1 130 13 59.09
21 NS 2C S-2 -200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
a.6 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 59,83 %22 NS 4C W+1 -650 15 68.18
23 NS 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73
24 NS 3S N-2 -100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a14 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,95 %25 NS 4P W+2 -680 0.1 0.45
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 1.2 5.45
27 NS 2K S = 90 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 15,30 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,12 %28 NS 3C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
29 NS 4P E = -620 9.9 45.00
30 NS 3C N+2 200 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
a.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,17 %31 NS 3S W-1 50 14 63.64
32 NS 3S E+1 -630 1 4.55
33 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
Total : 282,1 / 660 = 42,74 %
PAIRE Nr : A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,02 % 1 NS 2P W-2 100 20 90.91
2 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27
3 NS 3P E = -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,17 % 4 NS 2S W+2 -180 10 45.45
5 NS 2S N = 120 17 77.27
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
a.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 % 7 NS 3S E+3 -690 10 45.45
8 NS 6S E = -990 3 13.64
9 NS 3S E-2 200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,33 %10 NS 3K S+3 170 6 27.27
11 NS 4P E-1 50 13 59.09
12 NS 3C W-1 50 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
a14 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,95 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36
14 NS 3T W-1 50 18 81.82
15 NS 5C E-2 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,12 %16 NS 1S S-1 -50 4 18.18
17 NS 5PcN+1 750 22 100.00
18 NS 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
a.8 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,63 %22 NS 3S W+2 -660 9 40.91
23 NS 4P W-1 100 21 95.45
24 NS 3S S-4 -200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,32 %25 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
26 NS 4P S = 620 11 50.00
27 NS 2P N-1 -50 5.5 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
a.6 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 59,83 %28 NS 3C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 5.5 25.00
30 NS 4C S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 35,15 %
a13 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 34,00 %31 NS 4P W-2 100 21 95.45
32 NS 3S E-2 200 19 86.36
33 NS 3S W = -400 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
Total : 366,4 / 660 = 55,52 %
PAIRE Nr : A.9 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile
a14 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,95 % 1 NS 2P W = -110 7 31.82
2 NS 4P E = -420 1 4.55
3 NS 3P E+1 -170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 13,64 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,12 % 4 NS 3S W-1 100 22 100.00
5 NS 1S N+1 120 17 77.27
6 NS 3P N-2 -100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,02 % 7 NS 3S E+2 -660 21 95.45
8 NS 6S E-1 50 15 68.18
9 NS 3S W = -600 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
a.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,17 %10 NS 2K N+4 170 6 27.27
11 NS 4P W = -420 1 4.55
12 NS 4C W = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
a.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36
14 NS 2P E = -110 8 36.36
15 NS 6CcE-2 300 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,33 %16 NS 1S S+2 150 19 86.36
17 NS 5KcW-2 300 10 45.45
18 NS 2P N = 110 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
a13 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 34,00 %19 NS 2P N+2 170 22 100.00
20 NS 4K S+1 150 18 81.82
21 NS 4P S+1 650 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 83,33 %
a.9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,64 %25 NS 6S E-4 400 21.9 99.55
26 NS 3S S = 600 4.5 20.45
27 NS 3K S = 110 14.3 65.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
a.8 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,63 %28 NS 3C W-1 50 15.4 70.00
29 NS 3K W+1 -130 15.4 70.00
30 NS 2C N+2 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
a.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,32 %31 NS 4P W-1 50 14 63.64
32 NS 3S E-2 200 19 86.36
33 NS 4T E+1 -150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
Total : 408,7 / 660 = 61,92 %
PAIRE Nr : A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean
a.8 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,63 % 1 NS 3S W-2 100 20 90.91
2 NS 4P W = -420 1 4.55
3 NS 4C N-1 -50 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
a.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,32 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 5 22.73
5 NS 2S N = 120 17 77.27
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a13 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 34,00 % 7 NS 6C W = -1430 3 13.64
8 NS 6S E-1 50 15 68.18
9 NS 4P W = -620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,12 %10 NS 4K S+2 170 6 27.27
11 NS 4T W = -130 10 45.45
12 NS 4C W = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,02 %13 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
14 NS 2T W+2 -130 2 9.09
15 NS 5P N-1 -100 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
a.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,17 %16 NS 1S S+1 120 12 54.55
17 NS 5P N+1 480 17 77.27
18 NS 3PcS-3 -800 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %19 NS 1P N-1 -50 1 4.55
20 NS 5PcE-2 500 20 90.91
21 NS 2P S+3 200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a14 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,95 %22 NS 4C E+2 -680 5 22.73
23 NS 3P W+1 -170 8 36.36
24 NS 2K S+2 130 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,05 %28 NS 3S W-1 50 15.4 70.00
29 NS 3S W+1 -630 5.5 25.00
30 NS 2C S+2 170 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
a.9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,64 %31 NS 4P E-1 50 14 63.64
32 NS 3S E-2 200 19 86.36
33 NS 2C E+3 -200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
Total : 315,1 / 660 = 47,74 %
PAIRE Nr : A11 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,05 % 1 NS 3S W-1 50 13 59.09
2 NS 3S W-2 100 22 100.00
3 NS 3P E+1 -170 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,64 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 5 22.73
5 NS 2S N = 120 17 77.27
6 NS 2K E-2 200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
a.8 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,63 % 7 NS 4C W+2 -680 15 68.18
8 NS 3S W+3 -490 10 45.45
9 NS 3S W-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
a14 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,95 %10 NS 2K S+4 170 6 27.27
11 NS 4P W-3 150 18 81.82
12 NS 3C E+2 -200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,12 %13 NS 3S N+1 630 19 86.36
14 NS 3S E-1 50 18 81.82
15 NS 4C E-2 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,12 %16 NS 1S S+1 120 12 54.55
17 NS 5P N+1 480 17 77.27
18 NS 4PcS-3 -800 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,02 %19 NS 2P N+1 140 19 86.36
20 NS 5KcN-1 -200 4 18.18
21 NS 3S N+1 630 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,17 %22 NS 4C E = -620 20 90.91
23 NS 3P E+1 -170 8 36.36
24 NS 1S N-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %25 NS 4C W+1 -650 7.7 35.00
26 NS 4P S-1 -100 1.2 5.45
27 NS 3T E-3 150 18.6 84.55 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,19 %31 NS 3S E = -400 2 9.09
32 NS 3S E-1 100 11 50.00
33 NS 2C E+3 -200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
Total : 368,5 / 660 = 55,83 %
PAIRE Nr : A12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine
a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick : 47,12 % 1 NS 3C S-3 -150 2 9.09
2 NS 2T E+2 -130 9 40.91
3 NS 3P E = -140 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,12 % 4 NS 2S W+1 -150 13 59.09
5 NS 2S N = 120 17 77.27
6 NS 2C W = -110 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,64 % 7 NS 3S E+2 -660 21 95.45
8 NS 7S W-2 100 20 90.91
9 NS 4P W-1 100 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 89,39 %
a.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 51,30 %10 NS 3K S+3 170 6 27.27
11 NS 4K N+1 150 18 81.82
12 NS 3C E+2 -200 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
a.6 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 59,83 %13 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
14 NS 2K S-3 -150 0 0.00
15 NS 5C E-1 50 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,05 %16 NS 2S S-2 -100 0 0.00
17 NS 4P N+1 450 12 54.55
18 NS 3P S-2 -200 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,17 %19 NS 1K N+3 130 16 72.73
20 NS 5KcS = 750 22 100.00
21 NS 3S N+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 87,88 %
a.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,32 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
23 NS 2P E+2 -170 8 36.36
24 NS 2P S-1 -50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,02 %28 NS 1C W+1 -110 4.5 20.45
29 NS 6P E-1 100 19.7 89.55
30 NS 4C S-1 -50 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 40,15 %
a.8 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,63 %31 NS 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27
32 NS 3S E-1 100 11 50.00
33 NS 2S E+1 -150 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
Total : 336,5 / 660 = 50,98 %
PAIRE Nr : A13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
a.9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,64 % 1 NS 2S W = -120 4 18.18
2 NS 4T E-1 50 16 72.73
3 NS 3CcN = 530 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
a13 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine : 34,00 % 4 NS 3S W = -600 5 22.73
5 NS 2S N = 120 17 77.27
6 NS 2P S-1 -50 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
a.6 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 59,83 % 7 NS 4C W+2 -680 15 68.18
8 NS 6S W = -990 3 13.64
9 NS 3S E+2 -660 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,05 %10 NS 4C W-3 300 14 63.64
11 NS 4P E-1 50 13 59.09
12 NS 4C W = -420 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
a.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 52,17 %13 NS 3S N = 600 8 36.36
14 NS 2T E+1 -110 8 36.36
15 NS 5CcE-1 100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
a.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,32 %16 NS 1S S+2 150 19 86.36
17 NS 6P N-1 -50 3 13.64
18 NS 3S E-1 50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,19 %19 NS 2K N+1 110 9 40.91
20 NS 6K S-2 -200 4 18.18
21 NS 3S N+2 660 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,02 %22 NS 4C E+1 -650 15 68.18
23 NS 2K W-1 100 21 95.45
24 NS 3K S = 110 17 77.27 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
a.8 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,63 %25 NS 3P W+1 -170 19.7 89.55
26 NS 4P S = 620 11 50.00
27 NS 3PcE-3 500 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 79,70 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,12 %31 NS 4P E-1 50 14 63.64
32 NS 3S E = -600 5 22.73
33 NS 3S E+2 -460 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 358,6 / 660 = 54,33 %
PAIRE Nr : A14 -
a.6 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice : 59,83 % 1 NS BYE 0 0.00
2 NS BYE 0 0.00
3 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 57,05 % 4 NS BYE 0 0.00
5 NS BYE 0 0.00
6 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a14 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele : 54,95 % 7 NS BYE 0 0.00
8 NS BYE 0 0.00
9 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 55,32 %10 NS BYE 0 0.00
11 NS BYE 0 0.00
12 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 60,19 %13 NS BYE 0 0.00
14 NS BYE 0 0.00
15 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle : 47,02 %16 NS BYE 0 0.00
17 NS BYE 0 0.00
18 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.8 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 39,63 %19 NS BYE 0 0.00
20 NS BYE 0 0.00
21 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 41,33 %22 NS BYE 0 0.00
23 NS BYE 0 0.00
24 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.5 BABIKOW Georges -DEBIE Sylvie : 59,12 %25 NS BYE 0 0.00
26 NS BYE 0 0.00
27 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
a.9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 42,64 %28 NS BYE 0 0.00
29 NS BYE 0 0.00
30 NS BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
Total : 0,0 / 726 = 0,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a.1 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 54,83 % 1 EO 4P W-2 100 2 9.09
2 EO 4P W-1 50 6 27.27
3 EO 4C N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
A.7 PETERS Annik -MASSAUX Joel : 42,74 % 4 EO 2S W = -120 5 22.73
5 EO 2S N-1 -100 18 81.82
6 EO 4P N-3 -150 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,70 % 7 EO 6T E = -1370 14 63.64
8 EO 6C E-3 150 0 0.00
9 EO 4P W-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,52 %10 EO 3K S+3 170 16 72.73
11 EO 4P E-1 50 9 40.91
12 EO 3C W-1 50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,24 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64
14 EO 3T W = -110 14 63.64
15 EO 2C E+1 -140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
A.9 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 61,92 %16 EO 1S S+2 150 3 13.64
17 EO 5KcW-2 300 12 54.55
18 EO 2P N = 110 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 25,76 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 46,74 %19 EO 1P N+1 110 13 59.09
20 EO 4K S = 130 9 40.91
21 EO 4P S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
A14 - : 0,00 %22 EO BYE 0 0.00
23 EO BYE 0 0.00
24 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -VAGMAN David : 43,03 %25 EO 4C W = -620 5.5 25.00
26 EO 3S S+3 690 0.1 0.45
27 EO 3K S-2 -100 21.9 99.55 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %31 EO 2P W+2 -170 18 81.82
32 EO 3S E-2 200 3 13.64
33 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
Total : 245,5 / 594 = 41,33 %
PAIRE Nr : a.2 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
A.7 PETERS Annik -MASSAUX Joel : 42,74 % 1 EO 2S E-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 4T E = -130 13 59.09
3 EO 4C N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,70 % 4 EO 3S E = -600 17 77.27
5 EO 2S N-1 -100 18 81.82
6 EO 3P S-2 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,52 % 7 EO 3S E+3 -690 12 54.55
8 EO 6S E = -990 19 86.36
9 EO 3S E-2 200 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,98 %10 EO 3K S+3 170 16 72.73
11 EO 4K N+1 150 4 18.18
12 EO 3C E+2 -200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
A.9 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 61,92 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64
14 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64
15 EO 6CcE-2 300 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 27,27 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 46,74 %16 EO 1S S+2 150 3 13.64
17 EO 5C S-1 -50 19 86.36
18 EO 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,74 %19 EO 1P N-1 -50 21 95.45
20 EO 5PcE-2 500 2 9.09
21 EO 2P S+3 200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -VAGMAN David : 43,03 %22 EO 3S E+3 -690 20 90.91
23 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 63.64
24 EO 1P S = 80 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A11 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 55,83 %25 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 20.8 94.55
27 EO 3T E-3 150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %28 EO 2C W = -110 17.5 79.55
29 EO 3P E+1 -170 8.8 40.00
30 EO 2C N+2 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 53,18 %
Total : 338,6 / 660 = 51,30 %
PAIRE Nr : a.3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,52 % 4 EO 2S W+2 -180 12 54.55
5 EO 2S N = 120 5 22.73
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,24 % 7 EO 6C W = -1430 19 86.36
8 EO 3S E+4 -520 14 63.64
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
A.9 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 61,92 %10 EO 2K N+4 170 16 72.73
11 EO 4P W = -420 21 95.45
12 EO 4C W = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 77,27 %
A13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,33 %13 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
14 EO 2T E+1 -110 14 63.64
15 EO 5CcE-1 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,74 %16 EO 1S S+1 120 10 45.45
17 EO 5P N+1 480 5 22.73
18 EO 3PcS-3 -800 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,98 %19 EO 1K N+3 130 6 27.27
20 EO 5KcS = 750 0 0.00
21 EO 3S N+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 12,12 %
A11 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 55,83 %22 EO 4C E = -620 2 9.09
23 EO 3P E+1 -170 14 63.64
24 EO 1S N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %25 EO 4P E+1 -650 14.3 65.00
26 EO 4P S = 620 11 50.00
27 EO 3K S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 54,83 %28 EO 4C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
29 EO 5P E-1 100 2.3 10.45
30 EO 2C N+1 140 15.4 70.00 µ Tbl = 36,82 %
A.7 PETERS Annik -MASSAUX Joel : 42,74 %31 EO 3S W-1 50 8 36.36
32 EO 3S E+1 -630 21 95.45
33 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
Total : 344,3 / 660 = 52,17 %
PAIRE Nr : a.4 GERARD Francis -VUYTS Michèle
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,52 % 1 EO 2P W-2 100 2 9.09
2 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73
3 EO 3P E = -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.9 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 61,92 % 7 EO 3S E+2 -660 1 4.55
8 EO 6S E-1 50 7 31.82
9 EO 3S W = -600 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 46,74 %10 EO 2KcS+3 780 6 27.27
11 EO 4PcW-2 300 0 0.00
12 EO 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,74 %13 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
14 EO 2T W+2 -130 20 90.91
15 EO 5P N-1 -100 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
A14 - : 0,00 %16 EO BYE 0 0.00
17 EO BYE 0 0.00
18 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 55,83 %19 EO 2P N+1 140 3 13.64
20 EO 5KcN-1 -200 18 81.82
21 EO 3S N+1 630 10 45.45 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,33 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
23 EO 2K W-1 100 1 4.55
24 EO 3K S = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 19,70 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 54,83 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
26 EO 4P S = 620 11 50.00
27 EO 2K S-1 -50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,98 %28 EO 1C W+1 -110 17.5 79.55
29 EO 6P E-1 100 2.3 10.45
30 EO 4C S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,70 %31 EO 4P E-1 50 8 36.36
32 EO 3S E+1 -630 21 95.45
33 EO 2S W+2 -180 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
Total : 279,3 / 594 = 47,02 %
PAIRE Nr : a.5 BABIKOW Georges -DEBIE Sylvie
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,24 % 1 EO 2K E-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 4P W-1 50 6 27.27
3 EO 4CcN-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
A12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,98 % 4 EO 2S W+1 -150 9 40.91
5 EO 2S N = 120 5 22.73
6 EO 2C W = -110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,74 %10 EO 4K S+2 170 16 72.73
11 EO 4T W = -130 12 54.55
12 EO 4C W = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -VAGMAN David : 43,03 %13 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
14 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64
15 EO 4C E-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 62,12 %
A11 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 55,83 %16 EO 1S S+1 120 10 45.45
17 EO 5P N+1 480 5 22.73
18 EO 4PcS-3 -800 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %19 EO 1P N-1 -50 21 95.45
20 EO 4P E-1 100 14 63.64
21 EO 1P S+2 140 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 80,30 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 54,83 %22 EO 4C E+2 -680 17 77.27
23 EO 2P W+2 -170 14 63.64
24 EO 2K S = 90 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 59,09 %
A14 - : 0,00 %25 EO BYE 0 0.00
26 EO BYE 0 0.00
27 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,70 %28 EO 3C E-1 50 6.6 30.00
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 20.8 94.55
30 EO 2C N+2 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 54,85 %
A13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,33 %31 EO 4P E-1 50 8 36.36
32 EO 3S E = -600 17 77.27
33 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
Total : 351,2 / 594 = 59,12 %
PAIRE Nr : a.6 CASSART Guy -ERPICUM Patrice
A14 - : 0,00 % 1 EO BYE 0 0.00
2 EO BYE 0 0.00
3 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 46,74 % 4 EO 2S W+1 -150 9 40.91
5 EO 2C N = 110 12 54.55
6 EO 2C S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
A13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,33 % 7 EO 4C W+2 -680 7 31.82
8 EO 6S W = -990 19 86.36
9 EO 3S E+2 -660 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,98 %13 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
14 EO 2K S-3 -150 22 100.00
15 EO 5C E-1 50 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %16 EO 2S S-1 -50 18 81.82
17 EO 5P N-2 -100 22 100.00
18 EO 3P S-2 -200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 84,85 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 54,83 %19 EO 3K N = 110 13 59.09
20 EO 4K S = 130 9 40.91
21 EO 3S N+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A.7 PETERS Annik -MASSAUX Joel : 42,74 %22 EO 4C W+1 -650 7 31.82
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27
24 EO 3S N-2 -100 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,70 %25 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
26 EO 3S S+2 660 2.3 10.45
27 EO 4T E-2 100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 41,82 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,52 %28 EO 3C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.5 75.00
30 EO 4C S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 64,85 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,24 %31 EO 1S W = -90 14 63.64
32 EO 3S E = -600 17 77.27
33 EO 3S W+1 -430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
Total : 355,4 / 594 = 59,83 %
PAIRE Nr : a.7 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 46,74 % 1 EO 2C W = -110 15 68.18
2 EO 3P W+1 -170 18 81.82
3 EO 3P E-1 100 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 53,03 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,74 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 17 77.27
5 EO 2S N = 120 5 22.73
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -VAGMAN David : 43,03 % 7 EO 6C W = -1430 19 86.36
8 EO 6S E = -990 19 86.36
9 EO 4P W+1 -650 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A14 - : 0,00 %10 EO BYE 0 0.00
11 EO BYE 0 0.00
12 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,33 %16 EO 1S S+2 150 3 13.64
17 EO 6P N-1 -50 19 86.36
18 EO 3S E-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
A.7 PETERS Annik -MASSAUX Joel : 42,74 %19 EO 1P N+1 110 13 59.09
20 EO 3K S+1 130 9 40.91
21 EO 2C S-2 -200 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 65,15 %
A12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,98 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
23 EO 2P E+2 -170 14 63.64
24 EO 2P S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,52 %25 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
26 EO 4P S = 620 11 50.00
27 EO 2P N-1 -50 16.5 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,24 %28 EO 1C W+2 -140 21.9 99.55
29 EO 4P E = -620 12.1 55.00
30 EO 2C S+2 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 64,85 %
A.9 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 61,92 %31 EO 4P W-1 50 8 36.36
32 EO 3S E-2 200 3 13.64
33 EO 4T E+1 -150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
Total : 328,6 / 594 = 55,32 %
PAIRE Nr : a.8 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,74 % 1 EO 3S W-2 100 2 9.09
2 EO 4P W = -420 21 95.45
3 EO 4C N-1 -50 6 27.27 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -VAGMAN David : 43,03 % 4 EO 2C W = -110 2 9.09
5 EO 2S N-1 -100 18 81.82
6 EO 2S E-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A11 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 55,83 % 7 EO 4C W+2 -680 7 31.82
8 EO 3S W+3 -490 12 54.55
9 EO 3S W-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %10 EO 4KxS+2 1720 0 0.00
11 EO 5KcN-2 -300 18 81.82
12 EO 4C W+1 -450 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 54,83 %13 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
14 EO 3S W-4 200 0 0.00
15 EO 4C E-2 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A14 - : 0,00 %19 EO BYE 0 0.00
20 EO BYE 0 0.00
21 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,52 %22 EO 3S W+2 -660 13 59.09
23 EO 4P W-1 100 1 4.55
24 EO 3S S-4 -200 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 54,55 %
A13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,33 %25 EO 3P W+1 -170 2.3 10.45
26 EO 4P S = 620 11 50.00
27 EO 3PcE-3 500 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 20,30 %
A.9 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 61,92 %28 EO 3C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
29 EO 3K W+1 -130 6.6 30.00
30 EO 2C N+2 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
A12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,98 %31 EO 2P W+1 -140 16 72.73
32 EO 3S E-1 100 11 50.00
33 EO 2S E+1 -150 3 13.64 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
Total : 235,4 / 594 = 39,63 %
PAIRE Nr : a.9 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
A13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,33 % 1 EO 2S W = -120 18 81.82
2 EO 4T E-1 50 6 27.27
3 EO 3CcN = 530 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,36 %
A11 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 55,83 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 17 77.27
5 EO 2S N = 120 5 22.73
6 EO 2K E-2 200 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 34,85 %
A12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,98 % 7 EO 3S E+2 -660 1 4.55
8 EO 7S W-2 100 2 9.09
9 EO 4P W-1 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 10,61 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 54,83 %10 EO 4K S+2 170 16 72.73
11 EO 3P E = -140 14 63.64
12 EO 3S E = -400 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A.7 PETERS Annik -MASSAUX Joel : 42,74 %13 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
14 EO 2K S-1 -50 8 36.36
15 EO 4CxE = -880 22 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,70 %16 EO 1S S = 90 14 63.64
17 EO 5K W-2 100 14 63.64
18 EO 3PcS-1 -200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,24 %22 EO 3ScE+2 -1150 22 100.00
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27
24 EO 1S W-3 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
A.9 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 61,92 %25 EO 6S E-4 400 0.1 0.45
26 EO 3S S = 600 17.5 79.55
27 EO 3K S = 110 7.7 35.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
A14 - : 0,00 %28 EO BYE 0 0.00
29 EO BYE 0 0.00
30 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,74 %31 EO 4P E-1 50 8 36.36
32 EO 3S E-2 200 3 13.64
33 EO 2C E+3 -200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
Total : 253,3 / 594 = 42,64 %
PAIRE Nr : a10 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
A11 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 55,83 % 1 EO 3S W-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 3S W-2 100 0 0.00
3 EO 3P E+1 -170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A14 - : 0,00 % 4 EO BYE 0 0.00
5 EO BYE 0 0.00
6 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 54,83 % 7 EO 4C W+2 -680 7 31.82
8 EO 6S W-1 50 7 31.82
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
A13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,33 %10 EO 4C W-3 300 8 36.36
11 EO 4P E-1 50 9 40.91
12 EO 4C W = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 46,97 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,70 %13 EO 3S N = 600 14 63.64
14 EO 3T W-1 50 4 18.18
15 EO 4C E = -420 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,98 %16 EO 2S S-2 -100 22 100.00
17 EO 4P N+1 450 10 45.45
18 EO 3P S-2 -200 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,24 %19 EO 2P N+1 140 3 13.64
20 EO 4P E = -620 22 100.00
21 EO 3P S+2 200 13 59.09 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 46,74 %25 EO 4C W+1 -650 14.3 65.00
26 EO 4P S = 620 11 50.00
27 EO 1S E = -90 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 68,18 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,74 %28 EO 3S W-1 50 6.6 30.00
29 EO 3S W+1 -630 16.5 75.00
30 EO 2C S+2 170 8.8 40.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -VAGMAN David : 43,03 %31 EO 4P W = -420 22 100.00
32 EO 3S E-1 100 11 50.00
33 EO 3S E+1 -430 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
Total : 338,9 / 594 = 57,05 %
PAIRE Nr : a11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 % 1 EO 2S E+2 -180 22 100.00
2 EO 4P W-1 50 6 27.27
3 EO 4C N-3 -150 18 81.82 µ Tbl = 69,70 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 54,83 % 4 EO 3S W+1 -630 22 100.00
5 EO 2S N-1 -100 18 81.82
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.7 PETERS Annik -MASSAUX Joel : 42,74 % 7 EO 6C W = -1430 19 86.36
8 EO 6S E = -990 19 86.36
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 74,24 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,70 %10 EO 3KcS+3 1270 2 9.09
11 EO 4P E = -420 21 95.45
12 EO 4C E = -420 14 63.64 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
A14 - : 0,00 %13 EO BYE 0 0.00
14 EO BYE 0 0.00
15 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,24 %16 EO 1S S+2 150 3 13.64
17 EO 5P N+1 480 5 22.73
18 EO 3S E-1 50 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 22,73 %
A13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,33 %19 EO 2K N+1 110 13 59.09
20 EO 6K S-2 -200 18 81.82
21 EO 3S N+2 660 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 46,74 %22 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 59.09
23 EO 4P E+1 -650 22 100.00
24 EO 2C N-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 75,76 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -VAGMAN David : 43,03 %28 EO 2C W = -110 17.5 79.55
29 EO 3S W-1 100 2.3 10.45
30 EO 3S S-1 -50 19.7 89.55 µ Tbl = 59,85 %
A11 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 55,83 %31 EO 3S E = -400 20 90.91
32 EO 3S E-1 100 11 50.00
33 EO 2C E+3 -200 9 40.91 µ Tbl = 60,61 %
Total : 357,5 / 594 = 60,19 %
PAIRE Nr : a12 ADAMANTIADIS Frangoulis -COURTOIS Patrick
A12 MOSSERAY Bernadette -VAN AVERMAET Martine : 50,98 % 1 EO 3C S-3 -150 20 90.91
2 EO 2T E+2 -130 13 59.09
3 EO 3P E = -140 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 72,73 %
A.9 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 61,92 % 4 EO 3S W-1 100 0 0.00
5 EO 1S N+1 120 5 22.73
6 EO 3P N-2 -100 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 30,30 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 % 7 EO 4C W+2 -680 7 31.82
8 EO 6S E-1 50 7 31.82
9 EO 3S W+1 -630 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,24 %10 EO 2K S+4 170 16 72.73
11 EO 3P E+1 -170 16 72.73
12 EO 3S E+1 -430 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 78,79 %
A11 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 55,83 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64
14 EO 3S E-1 50 4 18.18
15 EO 4C E-2 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,52 %16 EO 1S S-1 -50 18 81.82
17 EO 5PcN+1 750 0 0.00
18 EO 2P S-1 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,94 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -VAGMAN David : 43,03 %19 EO 2K N+1 110 13 59.09
20 EO 5KcS-1 -200 18 81.82
21 EO 4P S+1 650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,70 %22 EO 4C E+1 -650 7 31.82
23 EO 2P W+1 -140 6 27.27
24 EO 1P S-1 -50 15 68.18 µ Tbl = 42,42 %
A.7 PETERS Annik -MASSAUX Joel : 42,74 %28 EO 3C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
29 EO 4P E = -620 12.1 55.00
30 EO 3C N+2 200 2.3 10.45 µ Tbl = 31,82 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 46,74 %31 EO 3S W-2 100 1 4.55
32 EO 3S E-1 100 11 50.00
33 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 90.91 µ Tbl = 48,48 %
Total : 311,0 / 660 = 47,12 %
PAIRE Nr : a13 DE KERCKOVE Pauline -DUMONT Catherine
A.5 ARICKX Roger -VAGMAN David : 43,03 % 1 EO 2S W-1 50 9 40.91
2 EO 4P W-1 50 6 27.27
3 EO 4C N-2 -100 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,39 %
A13 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,33 % 4 EO 3S W = -600 17 77.27
5 EO 2S N = 120 5 22.73
6 EO 2P S-1 -50 8 36.36 µ Tbl = 45,45 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,74 % 7 EO 6C W = -1430 19 86.36
8 EO 6S E-1 50 7 31.82
9 EO 4P W = -620 11 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
A.7 PETERS Annik -MASSAUX Joel : 42,74 %10 EO 4CcW-3 800 4 18.18
11 EO 3P W-3 150 4 18.18
12 EO 3C W+1 -170 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 15,15 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 46,74 %13 EO 5KcS-1 -200 22 100.00
14 EO 2P E = -110 14 63.64
15 EO 5CcE-2 300 1 4.55 µ Tbl = 56,06 %
A.1 WANDERPEPEN Janine -GROSFILS Colette : 54,83 %16 EO 1S S+1 120 10 45.45
17 EO 4P N+2 480 5 22.73
18 EO 4T W-2 100 4 18.18 µ Tbl = 28,79 %
A.9 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 61,92 %19 EO 2P N+2 170 0 0.00
20 EO 4K S+1 150 4 18.18
21 EO 4P S+1 650 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 16,67 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 %22 EO 3S E-3 300 0 0.00
23 EO 4P E = -620 20 90.91
24 EO 2P S = 110 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
A.3 VAN OPPENS Jean Luc -CLERIN François-Xavier : 47,24 %25 EO 4P W = -620 5.5 25.00
26 EO 4P S+1 650 4.5 20.45
27 EO 4T E-3 150 3.4 15.45 µ Tbl = 20,30 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,52 %31 EO 4P W-2 100 1 4.55
32 EO 3S E-2 200 3 13.64
33 EO 3S W = -400 12 54.55 µ Tbl = 24,24 %
Total : 224,4 / 660 = 34,00 %
PAIRE Nr : a14 THIRIFAY Marie-Paule -VAN DOOREN Michele
A.9 LIBERT Laurent -DELTOUR Emile : 61,92 % 1 EO 2P W = -110 15 68.18
2 EO 4P E = -420 21 95.45
3 EO 3P E+1 -170 21 95.45 µ Tbl = 86,36 %
A.6 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 42,41 % 4 EO 2S W = -120 5 22.73
5 EO 2P S-1 -100 18 81.82
6 EO 2C E = -110 19 86.36 µ Tbl = 63,64 %
A14 - : 0,00 % 7 EO BYE 0 0.00
8 EO BYE 0 0.00
9 EO BYE 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 0,00 %
A11 de NICOLAS Bernard -JASSOGNE Jacqueline : 55,83 %10 EO 2K S+4 170 16 72.73
11 EO 4P W-3 150 4 18.18
12 EO 3C E+2 -200 5 22.73 µ Tbl = 37,88 %
A.8 COLLET Edgard -RAVET Brigitte : 55,52 %13 EO 3S N+1 630 3 13.64
14 EO 3T W-1 50 4 18.18
15 EO 5C E-2 100 7 31.82 µ Tbl = 21,21 %
A.5 ARICKX Roger -VAGMAN David : 43,03 %16 EO 1S S-1 -50 18 81.82
17 EO 5K W-1 50 16 72.73
18 EO 2P S+1 140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 51,52 %
A.2 VANGYSEGHEM Robert -LEBRUN Robert : 46,70 %19 EO 1P N+1 110 13 59.09
20 EO 4K S = 130 9 40.91
21 EO 3T N+2 150 16 72.73 µ Tbl = 57,58 %
A10 WILLEMS Jacques -MASSART Jean : 47,74 %22 EO 4C E+2 -680 17 77.27
23 EO 3P W+1 -170 14 63.64
24 EO 2K S+2 130 2 9.09 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
A.7 PETERS Annik -MASSAUX Joel : 42,74 %25 EO 4P W+2 -680 21.9 99.55
26 EO 4P S-1 -100 20.8 94.55
27 EO 2K S = 90 13.2 60.00 µ Tbl = 84,70 %
A.4 DELHEZ Jacques -DANTINNE Pierre : 46,74 %28 EO 3C W-1 50 6.6 30.00
29 EO 4P E+1 -650 20.8 94.55
30 EO 4C N = 420 0.1 0.45 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
Total : 326,4 / 594 = 54,95 %
|
|