|
Tournoi du 31-10-16
Lundi
1 61,85 9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
2 61,82 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
3 56,23 11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
4 52,57 7 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard
5 50,57 4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
6 50,18 6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
7 48,92 12 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
8 47,38 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
9 47,08 5 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
10 46,42 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
11 42,97 10 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
12 33,68 1 ROEGIERS Marga -
Classement des Est-Ouest
1 62,73 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
2 58,30 21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
3 58,05 24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
4 54,53 22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
5 52,02 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
6 51,78 14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
7 51,35 18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
8 44,18 13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
9 43,80 19 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
10 43,30 15 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie
11 40,72 23 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
12 38,90 17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
PAIRE Nr : 1 ROEGIERS Marga -
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,18 % 1 NS 4P S-1 -50 9 45.00
2 NS 4C S = 620 8 40.00
3 NS 2C W = -110 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
23 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 40,72 % 4 NS 3S W+2 -660 11 55.00
5 NS 1T W = -70 12 60.00
6 NS 2C N+2 170 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,53 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 9 45.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 4 20.00
9 NS 4P S-2 -100 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,30 %10 NS 4C W+1 -650 15 75.00
11 NS 2P N-1 -50 0 0.00
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 62,73 %13 NS 3C N-2 -200 1 5.00
14 NS 2S W-3 150 17 85.00
15 NS 2C W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
19 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,80 %16 NS 40%40% Ajust 8 40.00
17 NS 5KcN-3 -500 0 0.00
18 NS 5CcN-3 -800 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 51,35 %19 NS 6C E-1 100 16 80.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 3 15.00
21 NS 5C W = -450 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,90 %22 NS 3K N-1 -50 6 30.00
23 NS 4C N+1 650 12 60.00
24 NS 3T E = -110 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,02 %25 NS 4P E = -620 6.7 33.50
26 NS 1S E = -90 2.3 11.50
27 NS 2S N-1 -50 0.1 0.50 µ Tbl = 15,17 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,30 %28 NS 3K N-1 -100 4 20.00
29 NS 5T N-1 -100 10 50.00
30 NS 3C N-1 -50 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
Total : 202,1 / 600 = 33,68 %
PAIRE Nr : 2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 51,78 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 17 85.00
5 NS 1S N-2 -200 0 0.00
6 NS 2C N+2 170 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,18 % 7 NS 4C W-2 200 20 100.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 4 20.00
9 NS 4P S = 420 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
23 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 40,72 %10 NS 4P E+2 -680 3 15.00
11 NS 4P N = 420 16 80.00
12 NS 4P S+1 650 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,53 %13 NS 5T E-1 100 15 75.00
14 NS 3CcS-1 -100 0 0.00
15 NS 2P S+1 140 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,30 %16 NS 3S N+4 520 2.3 11.50
17 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 30.00
18 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 18,83 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 62,73 %19 NS 4C E+2 -680 5 25.00
20 NS 3S S = 600 3 15.00
21 NS 5C W-1 50 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %22 NS 4P S-3 -150 0 0.00
23 NS 4C N+1 650 12 60.00
24 NS 2S W+1 -150 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 51,35 %25 NS 4P W = -620 6.7 33.50
26 NS 1S S+2 150 15.5 77.50
27 NS 2C N+3 200 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 53,67 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,90 %28 NS 1S N = 90 13 65.00
29 NS 4C N-1 -100 10 50.00
30 NS 5C N-1 -50 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,02 %31 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 30.00
32 NS 4P N-2 -100 8 40.00
33 NS 3K N = 110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
Total : 278,5 / 600 = 46,42 %
PAIRE Nr : 3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,90 % 1 NS 3S N-1 -50 9 45.00
2 NS 3C S+2 200 3 15.00
3 NS 3CcW-2 500 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,30 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 9 45.00
8 NS 3S E-1 50 15 75.00
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %10 NS 4P W+2 -680 3 15.00
11 NS 4P N = 420 16 80.00
12 NS 4P S-2 -200 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,18 %13 NS 2C N = 110 20 100.00
14 NS 1S W-1 50 3 15.00
15 NS 2C W-2 100 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
23 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 40,72 %16 NS 7S N = 1520 17.7 88.50
17 NS 1K N+2 110 20 100.00
18 NS 4P W = -420 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 82,83 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,53 %19 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00
20 NS 3S N+2 660 14 70.00
21 NS 3S E+1 -430 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,30 %22 NS 2K N+2 130 16 80.00
23 NS 4C N+1 650 12 60.00
24 NS 3S E-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 62,73 %25 NS 4P W = -620 6.7 33.50
26 NS 2T W-2 200 19.9 99.50
27 NS 2C N+3 200 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,00 %
19 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,80 %28 NS 2T E+1 -110 0 0.00
29 NS 4CcN-2 -500 0 0.00
30 NS 3C N = 140 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 51,35 %31 NS 4C W+2 -480 0 0.00
32 NS 5KcS-2 -300 0 0.00
33 NS 3PcE = -530 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 1,67 %
Total : 284,3 / 600 = 47,38 %
PAIRE Nr : 4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard
19 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,80 % 1 NS 4P S = 420 19 95.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 15 75.00
3 NS 1S S+1 120 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 85,00 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 51,35 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 17 85.00
5 NS 1T W+1 -90 8 40.00
6 NS 2C N+3 200 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,02 %10 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 75.00
11 NS 3P N = 140 7 35.00
12 NS 3P N+2 200 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,30 %13 NS 5T E-1 100 15 75.00
14 NS 1S W-2 100 8 40.00
15 NS 2K N+2 130 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 51,78 %16 NS 5T N+2 440 0.1 0.50
17 NS 4C W-1 50 18 90.00
18 NS 4P W = -420 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,17 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,18 %19 NS 3S W+2 -660 8 40.00
20 NS 3S S+1 630 9 45.00
21 NS 3S E = -400 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
23 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 40,72 %22 NS 2K S-1 -50 6 30.00
23 NS 4C N+1 650 12 60.00
24 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,53 %25 NS 4P W = -620 6.7 33.50
26 NS 1P N+2 140 13.3 66.50
27 NS 2C N+2 170 2.3 11.50 µ Tbl = 37,17 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,30 %28 NS 3K N-1 -100 4 20.00
29 NS 3T S = 110 16 80.00
30 NS 4CcN-2 -300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %31 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 30.00
32 NS 3S N-1 -50 15 75.00
33 NS 3PcE = -530 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
Total : 303,4 / 600 = 50,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 5 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,30 % 1 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 45.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 15 75.00
3 NS 2C E = -110 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 62,73 % 4 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 20.00
5 NS 1C W+1 -110 4 20.00
6 NS 3C N-1 -50 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
19 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,80 % 7 NS 4C W-1 100 18 90.00
8 NS 2C E-1 50 15 75.00
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,90 %13 NS 2P W-1 100 15 75.00
14 NS 3P E-3 150 17 85.00
15 NS 2P S+1 140 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 78,33 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,02 %16 NS 6T N+1 940 7.8 39.00
17 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 30.00
18 NS 4P W = -420 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 43,00 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %19 NS 4C E+1 -650 11 55.00
20 NS 3S S+1 630 9 45.00
21 NS 3S E+2 -460 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 51,78 %22 NS 2P S-1 -50 6 30.00
23 NS 4C N+1 650 12 60.00
24 NS 3S W+1 -430 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,18 %25 NS 4P W-1 100 19.9 99.50
26 NS 1S S-1 -100 0.1 0.50
27 NS 4C N = 420 17.7 88.50 µ Tbl = 62,83 %
23 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 40,72 %28 NS 1S N = 90 13 65.00
29 NS 4C N-2 -200 5 25.00
30 NS 3C N = 140 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,53 %31 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 30.00
32 NS 4P N-2 -100 8 40.00
33 NS 2P W+1 -140 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
Total : 282,5 / 600 = 47,08 %
PAIRE Nr : 6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain
23 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 40,72 % 1 NS 4P N-1 -50 9 45.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 15 75.00
3 NS 2C W+1 -140 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,53 % 4 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 20.00
5 NS 1T W = -70 12 60.00
6 NS 2C N+1 140 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 % 7 NS 4C E = -620 9 45.00
8 NS 1S E+2 -150 10 50.00
9 NS 3K W+2 -150 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 62,73 %10 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 75.00
11 NS 2P N+1 140 7 35.00
12 NS 6P S-2 -200 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 51,35 %16 NS 7S S = 1520 17.7 88.50
17 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 30.00
18 NS 4P W = -420 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 59,50 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,90 %19 NS 4C E+2 -680 5 25.00
20 NS 4S S+2 690 18 90.00
21 NS 6S E-2 100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,02 %22 NS 2S S+1 150 20 100.00
23 NS 3C N+2 200 2 10.00
24 NS 3KcS-2 -300 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,30 %25 NS 3P W+1 -170 15.5 77.50
26 NS 1S S+1 120 8.9 44.50
27 NS 2C N+3 200 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 51,78 %28 NS 1K N = 70 8 40.00
29 NS 4K W-1 100 14 70.00
30 NS 3C N-1 -50 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,18 %31 NS 1S S-2 -200 17 85.00
32 NS 3S S-1 -50 15 75.00
33 NS 3K S = 110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
Total : 301,1 / 600 = 50,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 7 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 51,78 % 1 NS 3S S-1 -50 9 45.00
2 NS 3C S+2 200 3 15.00
3 NS 3C W-1 100 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,18 % 4 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 20.00
5 NS 1T W = -70 12 60.00
6 NS 2C N+2 170 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
23 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 40,72 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 9 45.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 4 20.00
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,53 %10 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 75.00
11 NS 3T W-2 100 2 10.00
12 NS 4P S+1 650 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,30 %13 NS 2P W-1 100 15 75.00
14 NS 3S W-2 100 8 40.00
15 NS 2P S-1 -100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
19 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,80 %19 NS 6S E-1 100 16 80.00
20 NS 3S N+3 690 18 90.00
21 NS 4C W = -420 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 51,35 %22 NS 2P S = 110 13 65.00
23 NS 4C N+1 650 12 60.00
24 NS 3S W = -400 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,90 %25 NS 3P W+1 -170 15.5 77.50
26 NS 1S S+1 120 8.9 44.50
27 NS 2C N+3 200 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 57,33 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %28 NS 1S N-1 -100 4 20.00
29 NS 5KcW-1 200 20 100.00
30 NS 2C N = 110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,30 %31 NS 2C W+3 -200 17 85.00
32 NS 4P N-1 -50 15 75.00
33 NS 3K N = 110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
Total : 315,4 / 600 = 52,57 %
PAIRE Nr : 8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,02 % 1 NS 3S N-1 -50 9 45.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 15 75.00
3 NS 1S S+1 120 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,30 % 4 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 20.00
5 NS 2S W-1 50 18 90.00
6 NS 2PcE-2 500 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 51,78 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 9 45.00
8 NS 3S E-1 50 15 75.00
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,18 %10 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 75.00
11 NS 2P N+1 140 7 35.00
12 NS 4P S+1 650 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
23 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 40,72 %13 NS 2P W = -110 6 30.00
14 NS 2TcW-2 300 20 100.00
15 NS 2C W-2 100 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %16 NS 7S S = 1520 17.7 88.50
17 NS 3C W+1 -170 6 30.00
18 NS 4PcW-1 100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 72,83 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 62,73 %22 NS 2P S+1 140 18 90.00
23 NS 6C S-1 -100 0 0.00
24 NS 3T E = -110 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
19 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,80 %25 NS 4P W = -620 6.7 33.50
26 NS 1S S = 90 4.5 22.50
27 NS 1C N+4 200 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 35,33 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 51,35 %28 NS 1S N = 90 13 65.00
29 NS 3C N-1 -100 10 50.00
30 NS 1S N+2 150 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,90 %31 NS 4C W-1 50 20 100.00
32 NS 6K S-3 -150 3 15.00
33 NS 5PcE-2 300 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
Total : 370,9 / 600 = 61,82 %
PAIRE Nr : 9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 51,35 % 1 NS 4P S-1 -50 9 45.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 15 75.00
3 NS 1S S = 90 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 % 4 NS 3S E+2 -660 11 55.00
5 NS 3C E = -140 2 10.00
6 NS 4C N+1 450 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,02 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 9 45.00
8 NS 3S E-2 100 20 100.00
9 NS 3P S = 140 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 76,67 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,30 %10 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 35.00
11 NS 4P N = 420 16 80.00
12 NS 4P S+1 650 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 51,78 %13 NS 2C N-1 -100 9 45.00
14 NS 2C S = 110 13 65.00
15 NS 1S N+2 150 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,18 %16 NS 6S S+1 1020 12.2 61.00
17 NS 3C E+1 -170 6 30.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,33 %
23 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 40,72 %19 NS 6S E-2 200 20 100.00
20 NS 3S N+3 690 18 90.00
21 NS 5C W-1 50 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 90,00 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,30 %25 NS 4P W+1 -650 0.1 0.50
26 NS 1S S+1 120 8.9 44.50
27 NS 4C N+2 480 19.9 99.50 µ Tbl = 48,17 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 62,73 %28 NS 1S N = 90 13 65.00
29 NS 4C N-2 -200 5 25.00
30 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
19 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,80 %31 NS 4C W = -420 13 65.00
32 NS 4P N = 420 20 100.00
33 NS 3P E-1 50 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
Total : 371,1 / 600 = 61,85 %
PAIRE Nr : 10 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 62,73 % 1 NS 4P S-2 -100 0 0.00
2 NS 3C S+2 200 3 15.00
3 NS 2C W = -110 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 13,33 %
19 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,80 % 4 NS 4P E+1 -650 17 85.00
5 NS 2S W-1 50 18 90.00
6 NS 3C N = 140 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 51,35 % 7 NS 4C W+1 -650 0 0.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 4 20.00
9 NS 3P S = 140 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,90 %10 NS 6S E = -1440 0 0.00
11 NS 4P N = 420 16 80.00
12 NS 4P S+1 650 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,02 %13 NS 2P S-2 -200 1 5.00
14 NS 2C S = 110 13 65.00
15 NS 2C W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,30 %16 NS 6T N+1 940 7.8 39.00
17 NS 4K N-2 -100 15 75.00
18 NS 4P W+1 -450 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 43,00 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 51,78 %19 NS 3S W+3 -690 2 10.00
20 NS 3T N+1 130 0 0.00
21 NS 5C W-1 50 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques : 44,18 %22 NS 3K N-1 -50 6 30.00
23 NS 4C N+1 650 12 60.00
24 NS 3S W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,53 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 19 95.00
29 NS 4T S = 130 18 90.00
30 NS 4C N-1 -50 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 73,33 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,30 %31 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 30.00
32 NS 3S S-2 -100 8 40.00
33 NS 2P E+1 -140 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
Total : 257,8 / 600 = 42,97 %
PAIRE Nr : 11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,53 % 1 NS 4P N = 420 19 95.00
2 NS 4C S+1 650 15 75.00
3 NS 2C W = -110 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,30 % 4 NS 4P E+2 -680 4 20.00
5 NS 4P E-1 50 18 90.00
6 NS 3C N+1 170 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 62,73 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 9 45.00
8 NS 3S E-1 50 15 75.00
9 NS 4KcE = -710 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
19 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,80 %10 NS 4P E+1 -650 15 75.00
11 NS 4P N = 420 16 80.00
12 NS 4P S-1 -100 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 %13 NS 3T E+2 -150 4 20.00
14 NS 2P E-1 50 3 15.00
15 NS 4C W-2 100 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,90 %16 NS 6S S+1 1020 12.2 61.00
17 NS 3C W = -140 12 60.00
18 NS 4P E = -420 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 60,33 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,02 %19 NS 6S E-1 100 16 80.00
20 NS 3S N+1 630 9 45.00
21 NS 2C E+3 -200 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,30 %22 NS 2P S = 110 13 65.00
23 NS 4C N+1 650 12 60.00
24 NS 2P E+1 -140 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 51,78 %25 NS 3P W+1 -170 15.5 77.50
26 NS 1S N+3 180 17.7 88.50
27 NS 2C N+3 200 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 72,00 %
23 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette : 40,72 %31 NS 4C E = -420 13 65.00
32 NS 3S N-1 -50 15 75.00
33 NS 3K N = 110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
Total : 337,4 / 600 = 56,23 %
PAIRE Nr : 12 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita
24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel : 58,05 % 1 NS 3S N-1 -50 9 45.00
2 NS 3C S+2 200 3 15.00
3 NS 1S N = 90 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette : 38,90 % 4 NS 5P E = -650 17 85.00
5 NS 2T N-1 -100 6 30.00
6 NS 3C N+2 200 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo : 58,30 % 7 NS 4C W = -620 9 45.00
8 NS 3S E = -400 4 20.00
9 NS 4P S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol : 51,78 %10 NS 3S E+2 -660 7 35.00
11 NS 1P N+2 140 7 35.00
12 NS 4P S = 620 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal : 51,35 %13 NS 3C N-1 -100 9 45.00
14 NS 3C E-2 100 8 40.00
15 NS 2S N+1 150 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René : 54,53 %16 NS 6T N = 920 4.5 22.50
17 NS 4KcN-1 -100 15 75.00
18 NS 4P W = -420 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 52,50 %
15 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie : 43,30 %19 NS 4C E+1 -650 11 55.00
20 NS 3S N+1 630 9 45.00
21 NS 3S E = -400 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
19 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert : 43,80 %22 NS 4P N-1 -50 6 30.00
23 NS 4C N+1 650 12 60.00
24 NS 4P E-2 100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc : 52,02 %28 NS 1S N+1 120 19 95.00
29 NS 4C N-3 -300 2 10.00
30 NS 3C N-1 -50 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques : 62,73 %31 NS 4C W+1 -450 6 30.00
32 NS 4P N-3 -150 3 15.00
33 NS 3K N = 110 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
Total : 293,5 / 600 = 48,92 %
PAIRE Nr : 13 FRAITURE Louis -COLOT Jacques
1 ROEGIERS Marga - : 33,68 % 1 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 55.00
2 EO 4C S = 620 12 60.00
3 EO 2C W = -110 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
7 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,57 % 4 EO 4P E+2 -680 16 80.00
5 EO 1T W = -70 8 40.00
6 EO 2C N+2 170 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,42 % 7 EO 4C W-2 200 0 0.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 16 80.00
9 EO 4P S = 420 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,82 %10 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 25.00
11 EO 2P N+1 140 13 65.00
12 EO 4P S+1 650 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,38 %13 EO 2C N = 110 0 0.00
14 EO 1S W-1 50 17 85.00
15 EO 2C W-2 100 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,85 %16 EO 6S S+1 1020 7.8 39.00
17 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 70.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 49,67 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,57 %19 EO 3S W+2 -660 12 60.00
20 EO 3S S+1 630 11 55.00
21 EO 3S E = -400 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,97 %22 EO 3K N-1 -50 14 70.00
23 EO 4C N+1 650 8 40.00
24 EO 3S W-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 47,08 %25 EO 4P W-1 100 0.1 0.50
26 EO 1S S-1 -100 19.9 99.50
27 EO 4C N = 420 2.3 11.50 µ Tbl = 37,17 %
6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,18 %31 EO 1S S-2 -200 3 15.00
32 EO 3S S-1 -50 5 25.00
33 EO 3K S = 110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
Total : 265,1 / 600 = 44,18 %
PAIRE Nr : 14 PIROTTE Claude -LENAERTS Pol
7 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,57 % 1 EO 3S S-1 -50 11 55.00
2 EO 3C S+2 200 17 85.00
3 EO 3C W-1 100 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,42 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 3 15.00
5 EO 1S N-2 -200 20 100.00
6 EO 2C N+2 170 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,82 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 11 55.00
8 EO 3S E-1 50 5 25.00
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
12 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 48,92 %10 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 65.00
11 EO 1P N+2 140 13 65.00
12 EO 4P S = 620 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,85 %13 EO 2C N-1 -100 11 55.00
14 EO 2C S = 110 7 35.00
15 EO 1S N+2 150 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,57 %16 EO 5T N+2 440 19.9 99.50
17 EO 4C W-1 50 2 10.00
18 EO 4P W = -420 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 49,83 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,97 %19 EO 3S W+3 -690 18 90.00
20 EO 3T N+1 130 20 100.00
21 EO 5C W-1 50 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 47,08 %22 EO 2P S-1 -50 14 70.00
23 EO 4C N+1 650 8 40.00
24 EO 3S W+1 -430 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,23 %25 EO 3P W+1 -170 4.5 22.50
26 EO 1S N+3 180 2.3 11.50
27 EO 2C N+3 200 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,00 %
6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,18 %28 EO 1K N = 70 12 60.00
29 EO 4K W-1 100 6 30.00
30 EO 3C N-1 -50 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
Total : 310,7 / 600 = 51,78 %
PAIRE Nr : 15 LEBRUN Robert -BERGER Jean Marie
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,82 % 4 EO 4P E+2 -680 16 80.00
5 EO 2S W-1 50 2 10.00
6 EO 2PcE-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,38 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 11 55.00
8 EO 3S E-1 50 5 25.00
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,85 %10 EO 3S E+2 -660 13 65.00
11 EO 4P N = 420 4 20.00
12 EO 4P S+1 650 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,57 %13 EO 5T E-1 100 5 25.00
14 EO 1S W-2 100 12 60.00
15 EO 2K N+2 130 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,97 %16 EO 6T N+1 940 12.2 61.00
17 EO 4K N-2 -100 5 25.00
18 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 57,00 %
12 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 48,92 %19 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 45.00
20 EO 3S N+1 630 11 55.00
21 EO 3S E = -400 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,23 %22 EO 2P S = 110 7 35.00
23 EO 4C N+1 650 8 40.00
24 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,18 %25 EO 3P W+1 -170 4.5 22.50
26 EO 1S S+1 120 11.1 55.50
27 EO 2C N+3 200 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga - : 33,68 %28 EO 3K N-1 -100 16 80.00
29 EO 5T N-1 -100 10 50.00
30 EO 3C N-1 -50 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
7 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,57 %31 EO 2C W+3 -200 3 15.00
32 EO 4P N-1 -50 5 25.00
33 EO 3K N = 110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
Total : 259,8 / 600 = 43,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 16 CLERIN François-Xavier -VAN OPPENS Jean Luc
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,82 % 1 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 55.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 5 25.00
3 EO 1S S+1 120 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,85 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 11 55.00
8 EO 3S E-2 100 0 0.00
9 EO 3P S = 140 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 23,33 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,57 %10 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 25.00
11 EO 3P N = 140 13 65.00
12 EO 3P N+2 200 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,97 %13 EO 2P S-2 -200 19 95.00
14 EO 2C S = 110 7 35.00
15 EO 2C W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 47,08 %16 EO 6T N+1 940 12.2 61.00
17 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 70.00
18 EO 4P W = -420 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 57,00 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,23 %19 EO 6S E-1 100 4 20.00
20 EO 3S N+1 630 11 55.00
21 EO 2C E+3 -200 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 38,33 %
6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,18 %22 EO 2S S+1 150 0 0.00
23 EO 3C N+2 200 18 90.00
24 EO 3KcS-2 -300 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 56,67 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga - : 33,68 %25 EO 4P E = -620 13.3 66.50
26 EO 1S E = -90 17.7 88.50
27 EO 2S N-1 -50 19.9 99.50 µ Tbl = 84,83 %
12 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 48,92 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 1 5.00
29 EO 4C N-3 -300 18 90.00
30 EO 3C N-1 -50 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,42 %31 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 70.00
32 EO 4P N-2 -100 12 60.00
33 EO 3K N = 110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 53,33 %
Total : 312,1 / 600 = 52,02 %
PAIRE Nr : 17 GAUTHIER Anne-Marie -SAMBREE Arlette
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,38 % 1 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 55.00
2 EO 3C S+2 200 17 85.00
3 EO 3CcW-2 500 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
12 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 48,92 % 4 EO 5P E = -650 3 15.00
5 EO 2T N-1 -100 14 70.00
6 EO 3C N+2 200 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,97 %10 EO 6S E = -1440 20 100.00
11 EO 4P N = 420 4 20.00
12 EO 4P S+1 650 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 47,08 %13 EO 2P W-1 100 5 25.00
14 EO 3P E-3 150 3 15.00
15 EO 2P S+1 140 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 21,67 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,23 %16 EO 6S S+1 1020 7.8 39.00
17 EO 3C W = -140 8 40.00
18 EO 4P E = -420 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 39,67 %
6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,18 %19 EO 4C E+2 -680 15 75.00
20 EO 4S S+2 690 2 10.00
21 EO 6S E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga - : 33,68 %22 EO 3K N-1 -50 14 70.00
23 EO 4C N+1 650 8 40.00
24 EO 3T E = -110 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
7 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,57 %25 EO 3P W+1 -170 4.5 22.50
26 EO 1S S+1 120 11.1 55.50
27 EO 2C N+3 200 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 42,67 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,42 %28 EO 1S N = 90 7 35.00
29 EO 4C N-1 -100 10 50.00
30 EO 5C N-1 -50 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,82 %31 EO 4C W-1 50 0 0.00
32 EO 6K S-3 -150 17 85.00
33 EO 5PcE-2 300 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
Total : 233,4 / 600 = 38,90 %
PAIRE Nr : 18 LOUIS Serge -COURTOIS Chantal
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,85 % 1 EO 4P S-1 -50 11 55.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 5 25.00
3 EO 1S S = 90 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,57 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 3 15.00
5 EO 1T W+1 -90 12 60.00
6 EO 2C N+3 200 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,97 % 7 EO 4C W+1 -650 20 100.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 16 80.00
9 EO 3P S = 140 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
12 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 48,92 %13 EO 3C N-1 -100 11 55.00
14 EO 3C E-2 100 12 60.00
15 EO 2S N+1 150 1 5.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,18 %16 EO 7S S = 1520 2.3 11.50
17 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 70.00
18 EO 4P W = -420 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 40,50 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga - : 33,68 %19 EO 6C E-1 100 4 20.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 17 85.00
21 EO 5C W = -450 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
7 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,57 %22 EO 2P S = 110 7 35.00
23 EO 4C N+1 650 8 40.00
24 EO 3S W = -400 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,42 %25 EO 4P W = -620 13.3 66.50
26 EO 1S S+2 150 4.5 22.50
27 EO 2C N+3 200 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 46,33 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,82 %28 EO 1S N = 90 7 35.00
29 EO 3C N-1 -100 10 50.00
30 EO 1S N+2 150 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,38 %31 EO 4C W+2 -480 20 100.00
32 EO 5KcS-2 -300 20 100.00
33 EO 3PcE = -530 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 98,33 %
Total : 308,1 / 600 = 51,35 %
PAIRE Nr : 19 COLLET Claudine -POULAERT Gilbert
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,57 % 1 EO 4P S = 420 1 5.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 5 25.00
3 EO 1S S+1 120 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 15,00 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,97 % 4 EO 4P E+1 -650 3 15.00
5 EO 2S W-1 50 2 10.00
6 EO 3C N = 140 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 47,08 % 7 EO 4C W-1 100 2 10.00
8 EO 2C E-1 50 5 25.00
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 28,33 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,23 %10 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 25.00
11 EO 4P N = 420 4 20.00
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 40,00 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga - : 33,68 %16 EO 40%40% Ajust 8 40.00
17 EO 5KcN-3 -500 20 100.00
18 EO 5CcN-3 -800 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 80,00 %
7 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,57 %19 EO 6S E-1 100 4 20.00
20 EO 3S N+3 690 2 10.00
21 EO 4C W = -420 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 33,33 %
12 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 48,92 %22 EO 4P N-1 -50 14 70.00
23 EO 4C N+1 650 8 40.00
24 EO 4P E-2 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,82 %25 EO 4P W = -620 13.3 66.50
26 EO 1S S = 90 15.5 77.50
27 EO 1C N+4 200 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 64,67 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,38 %28 EO 2T E+1 -110 20 100.00
29 EO 4CcN-2 -500 20 100.00
30 EO 3C N = 140 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,85 %31 EO 4C W = -420 7 35.00
32 EO 4P N = 420 0 0.00
33 EO 3P E-1 50 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 31,67 %
Total : 262,8 / 600 = 43,80 %
PAIRE Nr : 20 MASSART Jean -WILLEMS Jacques
10 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,97 % 1 EO 4P S-2 -100 20 100.00
2 EO 3C S+2 200 17 85.00
3 EO 2C W = -110 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 47,08 % 4 EO 4P E+2 -680 16 80.00
5 EO 1C W+1 -110 16 80.00
6 EO 3C N-1 -50 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 86,67 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,23 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 11 55.00
8 EO 3S E-1 50 5 25.00
9 EO 4KcE = -710 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,18 %10 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 25.00
11 EO 2P N+1 140 13 65.00
12 EO 6P S-2 -200 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga - : 33,68 %13 EO 3C N-2 -200 19 95.00
14 EO 2S W-3 150 3 15.00
15 EO 2C W-1 50 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,42 %19 EO 4C E+2 -680 15 75.00
20 EO 3S S = 600 17 85.00
21 EO 5C W-1 50 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,82 %22 EO 2P S+1 140 2 10.00
23 EO 6C S-1 -100 20 100.00
24 EO 3T E = -110 7 35.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,38 %25 EO 4P W = -620 13.3 66.50
26 EO 2T W-2 200 0.1 0.50
27 EO 2C N+3 200 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 39,00 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,85 %28 EO 1S N = 90 7 35.00
29 EO 4C N-2 -200 15 75.00
30 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 58,33 %
12 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 48,92 %31 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 70.00
32 EO 4P N-3 -150 17 85.00
33 EO 3K N = 110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
Total : 376,4 / 600 = 62,73 %
PAIRE Nr : 21 de VIRON Baudouin -HUBLET Carlo
5 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 47,08 % 1 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 55.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 5 25.00
3 EO 2C E = -110 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 51,67 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,23 % 4 EO 4P E+2 -680 16 80.00
5 EO 4P E-1 50 2 10.00
6 EO 3C N+1 170 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
12 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 48,92 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 11 55.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 16 80.00
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga - : 33,68 %10 EO 4C W+1 -650 5 25.00
11 EO 2P N-1 -50 20 100.00
12 EO 4P S-1 -100 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
7 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,57 %13 EO 2P W-1 100 5 25.00
14 EO 3S W-2 100 12 60.00
15 EO 2P S-1 -100 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,42 %16 EO 3S N+4 520 17.7 88.50
17 EO 3C E+1 -170 14 70.00
18 EO 4P W+1 -450 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 81,17 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,38 %22 EO 2K N+2 130 4 20.00
23 EO 4C N+1 650 8 40.00
24 EO 3S E-1 50 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 25,00 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,85 %25 EO 4P W+1 -650 19.9 99.50
26 EO 1S S+1 120 11.1 55.50
27 EO 4C N+2 480 0.1 0.50 µ Tbl = 51,83 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,57 %28 EO 3K N-1 -100 16 80.00
29 EO 3T S = 110 4 20.00
30 EO 4CcN-2 -300 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,97 %31 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 70.00
32 EO 3S S-2 -100 12 60.00
33 EO 2P E+1 -140 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
Total : 349,8 / 600 = 58,30 %
PAIRE Nr : 22 CHANTRAINE René -LAENENS René
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,23 % 1 EO 4P N = 420 1 5.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 5 25.00
3 EO 2C W = -110 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 35,00 %
6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,18 % 4 EO 4P E+2 -680 16 80.00
5 EO 1T W = -70 8 40.00
6 EO 2C N+1 140 17 85.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga - : 33,68 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 11 55.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 16 80.00
9 EO 4P S-2 -100 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 71,67 %
7 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,57 %10 EO 4P E+1 -650 5 25.00
11 EO 3T W-2 100 18 90.00
12 EO 4P S+1 650 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 45,00 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,42 %13 EO 5T E-1 100 5 25.00
14 EO 3CcS-1 -100 20 100.00
15 EO 2P S+1 140 5 25.00 µ Tbl = 50,00 %
12 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 48,92 %16 EO 6T N = 920 15.5 77.50
17 EO 4KcN-1 -100 5 25.00
18 EO 4P W = -420 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 47,50 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,38 %19 EO 6S E = -1440 20 100.00
20 EO 3S N+2 660 6 30.00
21 EO 3S E+1 -430 16 80.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,57 %25 EO 4P W = -620 13.3 66.50
26 EO 1P N+2 140 6.7 33.50
27 EO 2C N+2 170 17.7 88.50 µ Tbl = 62,83 %
10 ARICKX Roger -VANGYSEGHEM Robert : 42,97 %28 EO 1S N+1 120 1 5.00
29 EO 4T S = 130 2 10.00
30 EO 4C N-1 -50 13 65.00 µ Tbl = 26,67 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 47,08 %31 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 70.00
32 EO 4P N-2 -100 12 60.00
33 EO 2P W+1 -140 15 75.00 µ Tbl = 68,33 %
Total : 327,2 / 600 = 54,53 %
PAIRE Nr : 23 VAN AVERMAET Martine -MOSSERAY Bernadette
6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,18 % 1 EO 4P N-1 -50 11 55.00
2 EO 4C S+1 650 5 25.00
3 EO 2C W+1 -140 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 60,00 %
1 ROEGIERS Marga - : 33,68 % 4 EO 3S W+2 -660 9 45.00
5 EO 1T W = -70 8 40.00
6 EO 2C N+2 170 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 46,67 %
7 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,57 % 7 EO 4C W = -620 11 55.00
8 EO 3S E = -400 16 80.00
9 EO 4P S-1 -50 10 50.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,42 %10 EO 4P E+2 -680 17 85.00
11 EO 4P N = 420 4 20.00
12 EO 4P S+1 650 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,82 %13 EO 2P W = -110 14 70.00
14 EO 2TcW-2 300 0 0.00
15 EO 2C W-2 100 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 43,33 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,38 %16 EO 7S N = 1520 2.3 11.50
17 EO 1K N+2 110 0 0.00
18 EO 4P W = -420 8 40.00 µ Tbl = 17,17 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,85 %19 EO 6S E-2 200 0 0.00
20 EO 3S N+3 690 2 10.00
21 EO 5C W-1 50 4 20.00 µ Tbl = 10,00 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,57 %22 EO 2K S-1 -50 14 70.00
23 EO 4C N+1 650 8 40.00
24 EO 2P E+1 -140 11 55.00 µ Tbl = 55,00 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 47,08 %28 EO 1S N = 90 7 35.00
29 EO 4C N-2 -200 15 75.00
30 EO 3C N = 140 3 15.00 µ Tbl = 41,67 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,23 %31 EO 4C E = -420 7 35.00
32 EO 3S N-1 -50 5 25.00
33 EO 3K N = 110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 30,00 %
Total : 244,3 / 600 = 40,72 %
PAIRE Nr : 24 JANSSENS Pierre -TIRLOCQ Daniel
12 NELIS Claude -SOENENS Anita : 48,92 % 1 EO 3S N-1 -50 11 55.00
2 EO 3C S+2 200 17 85.00
3 EO 1S N = 90 9 45.00 µ Tbl = 61,67 %
9 BRIOT Fernand -LIBERT Laurent : 61,85 % 4 EO 3S E+2 -660 9 45.00
5 EO 3C E = -140 18 90.00
6 EO 4C N+1 450 2 10.00 µ Tbl = 48,33 %
6 FOUBERT Marie-Rose -DEVIGNE Alain : 50,18 % 7 EO 4C E = -620 11 55.00
8 EO 1S E+2 -150 10 50.00
9 EO 3K W+2 -150 18 90.00 µ Tbl = 65,00 %
3 HUBERT Jean-Marie -VANDAM Cécile : 47,38 %10 EO 4P W+2 -680 17 85.00
11 EO 4P N = 420 4 20.00
12 EO 4P S-2 -200 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
11 MOLS Bruno -MOSSERAY Etienne : 56,23 %13 EO 3T E+2 -150 16 80.00
14 EO 2P E-1 50 17 85.00
15 EO 4C W-2 100 12 60.00 µ Tbl = 75,00 %
8 MATELART Marc -DEBIE Sylvie : 61,82 %16 EO 7S S = 1520 2.3 11.50
17 EO 3C W+1 -170 14 70.00
18 EO 4PcW-1 100 0 0.00 µ Tbl = 27,17 %
5 MASSAUX Joel -GROSFILS Colette : 47,08 %19 EO 4C E+1 -650 9 45.00
20 EO 3S S+1 630 11 55.00
21 EO 3S E+2 -460 20 100.00 µ Tbl = 66,67 %
2 VANDENHAUTE Jacqueline -CAMUS Colette : 46,42 %22 EO 4P S-3 -150 20 100.00
23 EO 4C N+1 650 8 40.00
24 EO 2S W+1 -150 14 70.00 µ Tbl = 70,00 %
7 VUYTS Michèle -de NICOLAS Bernard : 52,57 %28 EO 1S N-1 -100 16 80.00
29 EO 5KcW-1 200 0 0.00
30 EO 2C N = 110 6 30.00 µ Tbl = 36,67 %
4 COOLEN Joseph -PARMENTIER Richard : 50,57 %31 EO 4C W+1 -450 14 70.00
32 EO 3S N-1 -50 5 25.00
33 EO 3PcE = -530 19 95.00 µ Tbl = 63,33 %
Total : 348,3 / 600 = 58,05 %
|
|